Printer Friendly

AIDS: waiting for cure or treatment.

Laboratories across the United States and Europe are searching for and finding drugs that combat the AIDS virus. But meanwhile the virus is demonstrating features that can complicate drug treatment and that will have to be overcome if the U.S. Public Health Service is to meet its goal of controlling and preventing AIDS by the year 2000.

At last week's Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) in Minneapolis, researchers from Burroughs Wellcome Co. in Research Triangle Park, N.C., revealed details about azidothymidine (AZT), which was synthesized by chemists there last year. After the drug halted replication of the AIDS virus in cells growing in test tubes, researchers at the National Cancer Institute (NCE) in Bethesda, Md., and Duke University in Durham, N.C., began testing it in humans.

AZT has thus far been given to 10 men with AIDS or AIDS-related complex (ARC), says Sandra Nusioff-Lehrman of Burroughs Wellcome and Duke. It is too early to tell if the drug is beneficial. As far as safety, she says, "It appears as though we're not having any unplesant surprises." If no toxicity problems are seen, more extensive trials to establish efficacy will begin in early 1986. "We have every hope that it will be an important drug in the treatment of AIDS," says Nusinoff-Lehrman.

The drug appears to block the action of reverse transcriptase, an enzyme specifically needed by troviruses such as the AIDS virus to permit incorporation into a host cell's DNA. Nusinoff-Lehrman would like to be able to administer the compound befroe the immune system has been extensively damaged by the virus.

The question of when to treat is a crucial one, since many more people have been infected with the virus than have the disease. For example, 31 men who are part of a long-term study in San Francisco have been infected with the AIDS virus for five years or more; 21 of them remain healthy, according to a report in the Sept. 27 MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT. At the ICAAC meeting, Martin S. Hirsch, who is involved in several AIDS trials at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, remarked, "The earlier in the course of the infection that you treat, the more likely the benefit. But with potentially toxic drugs, it's hard to use them without a known benefit."

There are other barriers to treatment. Following up on earlier reports of the AIDS virus in central nervous system tissue, David D. Ho and his colleagues at Mass. General found the virus in the central nervous system tissue of 24 of 45 patients with AIDS or ARC.

The virus may be getting in through the same cell portal. Candace Pert of the National Institute of Mental Health in Bethesda, Md., and William Farrar and Frank Ruscetti of NCI have found the same protein receptors on the surface of brain cells as the AIDS virus uses to latch onto immune system cells, Pert told SCIENCE NEWS this week.

The presence of the virus in the nervous system means that AIDS drugs will have to cross the blodd-brain barrier to wipe out virus reservoirs, says Ho. Hirsch, who worked with Ho on the project and is currently testing interferon against AIDS, notes that interferons don't cross the barrier very well. Nusinoff-Lehrman says spinal fluid studies show that AZT may penetrate the barrier.

Of the drugs now being tested against AIDS, says Hirsch, "None has shown a benefit against AIDS in patients. Some have shown they might inhibit the virus [in patients] as they do in the lab. All are in need of large-scale clinical trials."

And then there's the matter of a vaccine, which requires stimulating the production of antibodies capable of fighting the virus. Gerald V. Quinnn and his colleagues at the Food and Drug Administration in Bethesda, Md., looked at the presence of neutralizing antibodies in patients with AIDS and ARC, and found no apparent effect on the disease.

Does this mean that neutralizing antibodies don't protect?" It means once you have an established infection, low levels of neutralizing antibodies don't determine the outcome," says Quinnan. "It's still possible that neutralizing antibodies could prevent somebody from becoming infected. It's an open question."

While "there has been plenty of money" available for AIDS research, says Hirsch, more is needed to test new drugs. Last week the Senate appropriations committee upped the $120 million for AIDS research in President Reagan's fiscal year 1986 budget to $241 million; the appropriations bill that includes this sum now goes to the full Senate vote.
COPYRIGHT 1985 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1985, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Silberner, Joanne
Publication:Science News
Date:Oct 12, 1985
Previous Article:Wildfires: apocalypse then and now.
Next Article:Radial keratotomy: an unkind cut?

Related Articles
On the AIDS trail: work continues on test, cure, vaccine.
AIDS drug approval recommended.
AIDS drug approved, vaccine tested.
Two AIDS drugs may be better than one.
Early AZT use slows progression to AIDS.
Experts agree: an AIDS vaccine is doable.
New treatments, old behaviors.
Mixed blessings.
CFA: The Center for AIDS Information & Advocacy.
The other disaster: overcoming the mythology of AIDS.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters