Printer Friendly

ACA submits data, comments to PHMSA on incident reporting system.

On December 28. 2012, ACA submitted data and comments to the U.S. Department of Transportation's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) on its Incident Reporting system. PHMSA sought comments from industry as the agency conducts an assessment to improve the collection, analysis, reporting, and use of data related to accidents and incidents involving the transportation of hazardous materials. It is important to note that this is not the opening of a new rulemaking docket.

ACA comments focused on the mechanism which provides incident data, the 5800 Form, and its instructions, making recommendations on the very long list of codes and definitions, and urged PHMSA to focus its resources in order to collect data that is meaningful, useful, reliable, and consistent; that is, the collection of essential data that can help eliminate or reduce the risk of causing harm to people, property, and the environment when transporting dangerous goods. Toward that end, ACA urged PHMSA to focus on higher risk incidents. Shipments of small quantities of Class 9 and Class 3 (PG II and PG III) paints, printing inks, and adhesives present little or nominal risk of injury or harm and should be exempt from this program, ACA argued.

Under the "Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)," PHMSA is required to conduct an assessment to improve the incident reporting system.

The incident reporting system and its requirements are important to the paint and coatings industry. PHMSA not only collects incident data but they also publish it. For many years, paint (UN 1263) has been the commodity with one of the highest number of incidents. PHMSA uses this data for a variety of reasons, including evaluating regulatory effectiveness, identifying risk areas, charting trends, and evaluating packagings, to target enforcement and fitness evaluations for special permits.

Other organizations use this data as well. Several years ago, the National Motor Freight Traffic Association used the incident report summaries to argue that the freight classification of paint should be revamped, and while ACA was able to delay this action for almost four years, this higher freight classification was ultimately adopted. Currently, regulated paint now ships at a much higher classification than it had previously.

Specifically, ACA maintained that small containers of low risk dangerous goods like PG II or PG Ill Class 3 flammable liquids and those materials now classified as Class 9 due to the UN Globally Harmonized System (GHS) criteria for environmentally hazardous substances, such as paint, pose minimal risk in transportation when shipped by highway or sea. In addition, the financial implications of these low risk incidents are typically minimal.

In 2010, two petitions for rulemaking were submitted to PHMSA requesting broader exceptions for small quantity, low risk shipments. One of the petitions, submitted by ACA, sought an exemption from the incident reporting requirements for small quantity shipments of PG ll paint--an exemption that had previously existed in the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) until a 2004 amendment. The second petition, submitted by the American Trucking Association, seeks to broaden the exception for Class 3 Flammable Liquids. ACA incorporated its petition as part of its comment under MAP-21, and encouraged PHMSA to move forward aggressively to open a new rulemaking docket to exempt small quantities of paint and paint-related materials from the DOT Form 5800.

Contact ACA's Heidi McAuliffe ( for more information.
COPYRIGHT 2013 American Coatings Association, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:ACA Issues In-Depth
Publication:JCT CoatingsTech
Date:Feb 1, 2013
Previous Article:ECHA adds 54 substances of 'Very High Concern' under REACH.
Next Article:ACA responds to GAO survey of CFATS Program.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |