Printer Friendly

A study of usefulness of psychometric tests in diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis of liver.

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a potentially reversible, metabolically caused disturbance of central nervous system function that occurs in patients with acute or chronic liver disease. It encompasses a board spectrum of neurological symptoms of varying severity and is classified according to clinical symptoms. Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE), previously known as subclinical or latent hepatic encephalopathy, is at the beginning of this spectrum. MHE has a high prevalence among patients with liver cirrhosis (22% to 74%). [1] It is defined as HE without symptoms on clinical/neurological examination, but with deficits in some cognitive areas that can only be measured by neuropsychometric testing and critical flicker frequency test.

The areas with impairments are attention, visuospatial perception, speed of information processing, especially in the psychomotor area, fine motor skills, and short-term memory leading to impaired quality of life and ability to work associated with driving errors, accidents and further deterioration into overt encephalopathy and thereby with increased mortality. In our study, we study the effectiveness of psychometric tests and critical flicker frequency test in detecting minimal hepatic encephalopathy earlier in patients with cirrhosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Place of Study

This study has been carried out at the General Medicine OP and wards, Department of MGE OP and wards at Govt. Stanley Hospital, Chennai.

Study Period

Six months (From June 2013 to November 2013). Study Design

This is a Prospective Observational Study. Ethical Committee Approval

The ethical committee approval was obtained for this study.

PATIENT SELECTION Inclusion Criteria

1. Age more than 18 years and below 70 years.

2. All patients who have been diagnosed as cirrhosis of the liver and detected by clinical, serological, biochemical, assessments and USG.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients aged below 18 years and above 70 years.

2. Patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy had variceal bleed within 6 weeks.

3. Patients diagnosed with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

4. Patients who had undergone TIPS or shunt surgery.

5. Patients who had taken alcohol in last 6 weeks.

6. Known Patients with cognitive impairment disorders as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinsonism.

7. Patients who are already taking sedatives, antidepressants.

8. Patients with impairment of vision.

METHODOLOGY

100 patients who have been diagnosed with cirrhosis based on clinical, biochemical, serological and ultrasonogram visiting in Medicine OP, MGE OP and admitted in Medical wards and MGE wards and 50 normal people as control group from June 2013 to November 2013 are included in the study. Patients were subjected to symptom analysis, clinical examination, laboratory investigations, psychometric tests and critical flicker frequency test to establish the current degree of encephalopathy. The final analysis was made at the end of the study to achieve the aforementioned goal.

DISCUSSION

This study includes 150 patients with 100 people as proven cases of cirrhosis and 50 people as controls for the psychometric tests. All the patients under the study were found to have no neurological disorder or psychiatric illness.
Sex      Cases    Percentage   Controls   Percentage

Male     76       76%          32         64%
Female   24       24%          18         36%
Total    100                   50


[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
               Group     N     Mean    Std. Deviation

Age in years   Control   50    40.38   11.820
               Study     100   41.03   12.333


There were 76 males and 24 females in the study group. There were 32 males and 18 females in the control group. In both the groups, the predominance of males is seen.

Mean age of presentation is 40 years with the youngest being 19 years and oldest 69 years. The mean age of study group is 41 years and of controls is 40 years.

PSYCHOMETRIC TESTS
           Group     N     Mean       Std. Deviation

NCT-A      Control   50    57.38      9.243
           Study     100   85.81      31.746
NCT-B      Control   50    152.34     19.448
           Study     100   224.07     55.332
DST        Control   50    194.46     34.929
           Study     100   270.38     49.218
LTT        Control   50    575.60     38.255
           Study     100   662.62     62.555
SDT        Control   50    207.40     96.533
           Study     100   271.28     76.997
CFF (Hz)   Control   50    47.882     4.6541
           Study     100   36.866     3.7761
CFF(SD)    Control   50    1.5770     .74642
           Study     100   1.2390     .70188


There exists significant difference in the performance of all the Psychometric tests as indicated by the values of median and standard deviation when compared between the study and the control groups (p=0.000).

NCT-A * Group
                       Group              Total
                       Control   Study

              Count    0         17       17
              %
              within   0%        100.0%   100.0%
        +Ve   NCT-A
              %
NCT-A         within   0%        17.0%    11.3%
              Group
        -Ve   Count    50        83       133
              %
              within   37.6%     62.4%    100.0%
              NCT-A
              %
              within   100.0%    83.0%    88.7%
              Group
              Count    50        100      150
              %
              within   33.3%     66.7%    100.0%
Total         NCT-A
              %
              within   100.0%    100.0%   100.0%
              Group


Number Connection Test--A was positive in only study group with no positivity at all in the control group.

[GRAPHIC OMITTED]

NCT-A Test turned out to be positive in only study group.
                              Group              Total
                              Control   Study

             Count            0         60       60
       +Ve   % within NCT-B   .0%       100.0%   100.0%
NCT-         % within Group   .0%       60.0%    40.0%
B            Count            50        40       90
       -Ve   % within NCT-B   55.6%     44.4%    100.0%
             % within Group   100.0%    40.0%    60.0%
             Count            50        100      150
Total        % within NCT-B   33.3%     66.7%    100.0%
             % within Group   100.0%    100.0%   100.0%


Number Connection Test -B is positive in 60 patients in the study group only.

[GRAPHIC OMITTED]

NCT-B was positivity in the study group only.

DIGIT SYMBOL TEST
                             Group              Total
                             Control   Study

            Count            3         67       70
      +Ve   % within DST     4.3%      95.7%    100.0%
DST         % within Group   6.0%      67.0%    46.7%
            Count            47        33       80
      -Ve   % within DST     58.8%     41.3%    100.0%
            % within Group   94.0%     33.0%    53.3%
            Count            50        100      150
Total       % within DST     33.3%     66.7%    100.0%
            % within Group   100.0%    100.0%   100.0%


There were totally 70 patients who showed positivity for Digit Symbol Test among which 67 people (95.7%) were from the study group with the remaining 3 people (4.3%) from the control group.

[GRAPHIC OMITTED]

Predominantly, there were more positive people from the study group.

LINE TRACING TEST (LTT)

                             Group              Total
                             Control   Study

            Count            1         74       75
      +Ve   % within LTT     1.3%      98.7%    100.0%
LTT         % within Group   2.0%      74.0%    50.0%
            Count            49        26       75
      -Ve   % within LTT     65.3%     34.7%    100.0%
            % within Group   98.0%     26.0%    50.0%
            Count            50        100      150
Total       % within LTT     33.3%     66.7%    100.0%
            % within Group   100.0%    100.0%   100.0%


Totally, 75 patients were positive for LTT out of which 74 (98.7%) people were from the study group.

[GRAPHIC OMITTED]

Almost, Line tracing test was positive in the study group leaving a fraction of positivity to the control group.

SERIAL DOTTING TEST (SDT)
                             Group              Total
                             Control   Study

            Count            3         70       73
      +Ve   % within LTT     4.1%      95.9%    100.0%
SDT         % within Group   6.0%      64.0%    48.7%
            Count            47        30       77
      -Ve   % within LTT     61.1%     38.9%    100.0%
            % within Group   94.0%     30%      51.3%
            Count            50        100      150
Total       % within LTT     33.3%     66.7%    100.0%
            % within Group   100.0%    100.0%   100.0%


There were totally 73 people who showed positivity for Serial Dotting Test out of which 70 people (95.9%) were from the study group while the remaining 3 people (4.1%) were from the control group.

CRITICAL FLICKER FREQUENCY (CFF)
                                    Group              Total
                                    Control   Study

                  Count             4         73       77
                  %
       Positive   within CFF (Hz)   5.2%      94.8%    100.0%
       (<39 Hz)   %
                  within            8.0%      73.0%    51.3%
CFF               Group
(Hz)              Count             46        27       73
                  %
       Negative   within CFF (Hz)   63.0%     37.0%    100.0%
       (>39 Hz)
                  %
                  within            92.0%     27.0%    48.7%
                  Group
                  Count             50        100      150
                  %
Total             within CFF (Hz)   33.3%     66.7%    100.0%
                  %
                  within            100.0%    100.0%   100.0%
                  Group


There were 73 patients (94.8%) who turned out to be positive among the study group, and 4 patients (5.2%) from the control group were positive in the study.

[GRAPHIC OMITTED]

Flicker Frequency Test (p value =0).

Critical Flicker Frequency Test was more positive in the study group than the control group. Only a few positives were noted among the control group.

SUMMARY

In our study, 100 patients who have been diagnosed and proven as a case of cirrhosis were included under the study group and 50 other people were included as control group without any evidence of liver disease. Before the study was commenced, all the people in both groups were clinically examined and were ruled out of any neuropsychological abnormalities. We utilised the psychometric tests in the study group and compared with the age, sex and education wise matched. In addition, critical flicker frequency test was carried out in both the study groups and the results were compared for further analysis. [2]

In our study, there was a preponderance of males in both the study groups with 76 males in the study group comprising 76% and 32 males in the control group as 64% of the members in their groups.

Mean age of presentation is 40 years with the youngest being 19 years and oldest as 69 years. The mean age of the study group is 41 years while that of the controls is 40 years.

Performances of the psychometric tests among the study group and the control group yielded significant results among the study group (p=0.000).

Critical Flicker Frequency Test was more positive in the study group than the control group and was found to be statistically significant values obtained as 0.000 indicating the higher significance when compared with the controls. Both the psychometric and critical flicker frequency tests were useful in detecting cases of minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Critical flicker frequency test was found to be more positive among the study group with 73% than the control group and hence the ability to detect the cases of minimal hepatic encephalopathy than the psychometric test. [3]

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated the occurrence of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy (MHE) in patients with Cirrhosis irrespective of the aetiology even in the presence of stable clinical condition. Both Critical Flicker Frequency (CFF) and Psychometric tests have been found out to be effective in detecting MHE. Psychometric tests have subjective variations due to their age factor, differences in education while CFF Test has no such limitations and more of objective in nature not requiring any educational qualification for undergoing and interpretation of the light stimulus and is reproducible .The detection of MHE in more numbers in our study may be due to higher number of patients with higher classes of Child-Pugh classification. The presence of majority of the patients with Hepatitis B infection is due to our place of study being a tertiary care and a prestigious institute of Gastroenterology. [4] Hence, we would like to recommend the utilisation of Critical Flicker Frequency (CFF) Test as an Outpatient Department based screening procedure and also for the monitoring of patients with cirrhosis yet with a stable clinical condition so as to detect MHE earlier and promptly institute the therapy to avoid the complications. [5]

REFERENCES

[1.] Weissenborn K. Diagnosis of encephalopathy. Digestion 1998;59 (Suppl 2):22-4.

[2.] Montagnese S, Middleton B, Skene DJ, et al. Night-time sleep disturbance does not correlate with neuropsychiatric impairment in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int 2009;29(9):1372-82.

[3.] Challenger F, Walshe JM. Methyl mercaptan in relation to foetor hepaticus. Biochem J 1955;59(3):372-5.

[4.] Victor M, Adams RD, Cole M. The acquired (non-Wilsonian) type of chronic hepatocerebral degeneration. Medicine (Baltimore) 1965;44(5):345-96.

[5.] Krieger S, Jauss M, Jansen O, et al. Neuropsychiatric profile and hyperintense globus pallidus on T1-weighted magnetic resonance images in liver cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1996;111(1):147-55.

Sundaramurthy Ganesan (1), Ashok Kumar Subramaniam (2), Natarajan Kandasamy (3), Vijayanand Radhakrishnan (4)

(1) Professor, Department of Medicine, Government Stanley Medical College.

(2) Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Government Stanley Medical College.

(3) Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Government Stanley Medical College.

(4) Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Government Stanley Medical College.

Financial or Other, Competing Interest: None. Submission 19-08-2016, Peer Review 20-09-2016, Acceptance 26-09-2016, Published 01-09-2016.

Corresponding Author: Dr. Ashok Kumar Subramaniam, No.41, GST Road, Meenambakkam, Chennai-600027.

E-mail: drashokstanley2459@gmail.com

DPI: 10.14260/jemds/2016/1329
COPYRIGHT 2016 Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Research Article
Author:Ganesan, Sundaramurthy; Subramaniam, Ashok Kumar; Kandasamy, Natarajan; Radhakrishnan, Vijayanand
Publication:Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
Article Type:Report
Date:Oct 3, 2016
Words:2061
Previous Article:An epidemiological study of tobacco use among males above 15 years of age in an urban area of Meerut District.
Next Article:Incidence of retinopathy of prematurity in babies of chronic anaemic mother and after oxygen therapy.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters