A study of community-acquired Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Yantai, China/Estudio de Mycoplasma pneumoniae adquirido en la comunidad en Yantai, China.
In recent years, researchers worldwide have identified Mycoplasma pneumoniae as one of the most common pathogens causing adult community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In North America, Europe, Latin America, and Asia, M. pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) accounts for 22%, 28%, 21%, and 20% of all pneumonia cases, respectively (1). In China, M. pneumoniae is responsible for 6.8%-38.9% of CAP etiology (2-4). Although MPP symptoms are mild in most adult patients, recent research shows that the incidence of severe MPP is increasing (5-8). Resistance of MPP to macrolide treatment is becoming a serious issue worldwide (9-12). Therefore, it is necessary to investigate drug resistance and drug resistance mechanisms of MPP, to determine the best treatment for CAP in the local community.
Materials and Methods
Our study recruited CAP patients from the outpatient clinic and hospital admissions at Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital and its Laishan branch between January 2015 and January 2016. The inclusion criteria for this study were: 1) age >18 years; 2) meeting the diagnostic criteria for CAP issued by the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America in 2007 (13); and 3) diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection by positive pharyngeal swab polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, according to the British Thoracic Society CAP guidelines (14). Patients were excluded if they: 1) presented with lung disease, such as lung abscess, aspiration pneumonia, or obstructive pneumonia; 2) were immunosuppressed, including AIDS patients, organ transplantation patients, patients taking two or more types of immunosuppressive drugs such as azathioprine, cyclosporine, and cyclophosphamide, or patients with malignant tumors who were actively receiving chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgical treatment; 3) were readmitted within 14 days from hospital discharge; 4) were pregnant or within 6 weeks after childbirth; 5) were previously enrolled in a similar study, were unable to provide medical history, or were unwilling to participate in this study.
One hundred and thirty CAP patients were enrolled in this study. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Among the 128 cases finally enrolled, 27 were positive for M. pneumoniae (21.1%), including 11 males and 16 females aged between 18 and 72 years (average age 36 [+ or -]5.7).
Mycoplasma pneumoniae isolation and identification Patients' clinical information was recorded. Pharyngeal swabs were obtained from each patient for M. pneumoniae identification and isolation. Pharyngeal swabs were either inoculated within 24 h after collection into 1 mL of CM403 medium (Oxoid, UK) with Mycoplasma Supplement G (Oxoid, UK) and incubated at 37[degrees] C, or preserved at -20[degrees] C. After 6 weeks, if the liquid medium changed from red to yellow, suggesting utilization of glucose, 0.2 mL of the culture was spread onto agar medium and incubated at 37[degrees] C with 5% C[O.sub.2] for 7-14 days. A single colony was then isolated and subcultivated three times until "fried-egg" colonies, typical of M. pneumoniae, were observed. Identification of M. pneumoniae strains was performed using a molecular method. Genomic DNA was extracted from 2.0 mL of culture with single "fried-egg" colonies using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The M. pneumoniae-specific 16s rRNA gene fragment was amplified from the extracted DNA by PCR with the primer sequences used by Morozumi et al (15). The appearance of the target band on an electrophoresis gel indicated a positive M. pneumoniae infection.
Antimicrobial susceptibility of M. pneumoniae In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using erythromycin, azithromycin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline. The procedures and interpretation of results were conducted according to the "Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Human Mycoplasma; Approved Guideline" (16). M. pneumoniae reference strain FH (ATCC15531) was used as drug-sensitive control. Standard drugs were purchased from China Pharmaceutical Biological Products Analysis Institute.
Detection of macrolide resistance-related genes
Domain V of the M. pneumoniae 23s rRNA gene was amplified by nested PCR (nPCR) of extracted DNA from clinical isolates, using previously described protocols and primer sequences (15). The nPCR products, including the reference strain, were sequenced (Sangon Biotech Co, Ltd., Shanghai, China). DNA sequences were compared to the M. pneumoniae strain FH sequence (GenBank accession no. CP002077.1) using BLAST.
Data were analyzed by a t-test using SPSS 19.0 software. p: <0.05 suggested a statistically significant difference.
This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. This study was conducted with approval from the Ethics Committee of Qingdao University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Eight of the 27 patients testing positive for M. pneumoniae used antimicrobial drugs 72 h prior to enrollment into the study. This included two patients using cephalosporin (7.4%), two patients using clindamycin (7.4%), three patients using macrolides (11.1%), and one patient using quinolones. All 27 strains (100%) of M. pneumoniae isolated from patients in this study were found to be resistant to macrolides. No quinolone- or tetracycline-resistant strains were identified (Table 1).
The MICs of erythromycin and clarithromycin (64-256 mg/L) were higher than that of azithromycin (16-128 mg/L). All 27 clinical isolates were susceptible to tetracyclines (tetracycline and minocycline) and fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin).
23S rRNA mutation in macrolide-resistant strains
We identified an A2063G point mutation in the sequence directly binding to macrolides in the 23S rRNA V domain of all 27 macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strains.
Comparison between the clinical efficacy of azithromycin and fluoroquinolones
Among the 27 macrolide-resistant clinical strains, 9 cases were treated with azithromycin and 18 cases were treated with fluoroquinolones (10 cases with levofloxacin and 8 cases with moxifloxacin). The mean pyretolytic time for the fluoroquinolone group was 4.7 [+ or -]2.9 d, which is significantly shorter than 8.2[+ or ]4.1 d for the azithromycin group (p <0.05). There was no statistical difference in the time for cough relief between the azithromycin group (13.5 [+ or -] 7.4 d) and the fluoroquinolone group (8.6 [+ or -] 5.1 dTable 2).
M. pneumoniae is the main cause of CAP in humans and is usually transmitted by close contact with infected patients. Studies have found that M. pneumoniae has replaced Streptococcus pneumoniae as the major CAP pathogen, accounting for 10%-30% of cases (4,17). Due to the lack of a cell wall in M. pneumoniae and fewer contraindications, macrolides have been the first choice for the clinical treatment of MPP (18,19).
Recently, more than 60% of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strains in pediatric patients were shown to have high resistance to 14- and 15-membered ring macrolides. In contrast to pediatric patients, the prevalence of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae infection in adult patients in the United States and the UK is low at 0-23% (20) and 9.3% (21), respectively. However, several Chinese studies have reported a significantly higher percentage of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strains, up to 90% (22).
In this study, we found that the prevalence of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae was 100% in Yantai, which is significantly higher than previous studies. This may be due to a lack of previous research into antimicrobial resistance status and the abuse of macrolides in local regions. As macrolides do not require a skin test and have few side effects, they have become commonly used antibiotics at home. Our study found that 37.5% (3/8) of patients had used macrolides before seeing a doctor. We also found that macrolide prescriptions were common in outpatient services of the Pediatric Department and the Respiratory Department in our hospital.
The mechanism of macrolide-resistance has been widely explored. Macrolide resistance in M. pneumoniae was found to be highly related to mutations in domain V of the 23S rRNA gene. The A2063G and A2064G mutations were identified as the most prevalent mutations related to macrolide resistance 23. The A2063G mutation, which often leads to high levels of macrolide resistance, can occur in Chinese populations at a frequency of more than 95% (22). In our study, 27 macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strains harbored the A2063G mutation in the 23S rRNA gene. This may be one of the reasons for 100% macrolide resistance in Yantai, China.
This study has several disadvantages. Firstly, the sample size was small. Secondly, due to concerns about macrolide resistance, MPP patients were mostly treated with fluoroquinolone and therefore, we were unable to analyze the effect of macrolide-resistance on prognosis. Thirdly, in this study we defined the diagnosis of MPP as isolation of M. pneumoniae in the pharyngeal swab. However, less than a quarter of patients had their diagnosis confirmed by paired serum antibody tests.
In summary, this study found that macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae in adult CAP in Yantai is a major problem, with a resistance rate of 100%. Rigorous supervision of the administration of macrolides is urgently needed. Further studies on the genome of M. pneumoniae could provide us with information regarding drug resistance trends. At present, fluoroquinolone and tetracycline have good antimicrobial activity against M. pneumoniae in vitro. However, in Yantai, the abusive use of fluoroquinolones in fish and poultry industries could lead to the development of resistant M. pneumoniae strains. Management of antimicrobial drugs should be further strengthened, and drug resistance should be regularly monitored to avoid or delay the development of drug resistance.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest
(1.) Arnold FW, Summersgill JT, Lajoie AS, Peyrani P, Marrie TJ, Rossi P, et al. A worldwide perspective of atypical pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007; 175:1086-93.
(2.) von Baum H, Welte T, Marre R, Suttorp N, Luck C, Ewig S. Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia revisited within the German Competence Network for Community-acquired pneumonia (CAPNETZ). BMC Infect Dis. 2009; 9:62.
(3.) Tao LL, Hu BJ, He LX, Wei L, Xie HM, Wang BQ, et al. Etiology and antimicrobial resistance of community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012; 125:2967-72.
(4.) Cao B, Zhao CJ, Yin YD, Zhao F, Song SF, Bai L, et al. High prevalence of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae isolates from adult and adolescent patients with respiratory tract infection in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 51:189-94.
(5.) Izumikawa K, Izumikawa K, Takazono T, Kosai K, Morinaga Y, Nakamura S, et al. Clinical features, risk factors and treatment of fulminant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: a review of the japanese literature. J Infect Chemother. 2014; 20:181-5.
(6.) Apfalter P, Stoiser B, Barousch W, Nehr M, Kramer L, Burgmann H. Community-acquired bacteria frequently detected by means of quantitative polymerase chain reaction in nosocomial early-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33:1492-8.
(7.) Muir MT, Cohn SM, Louden C, Kannan TR, Baseman JB. Novel toxin assays implicate Mycoplasma pneumoniae in prolonged ventilator course and hypoxemia. Chest. 2011; 139:305-10.
(8.) Miyashita N, Kawai Y, Inamura N, Tanaka T, Akaike H, Teranishi H, et al. Setting a standard for the initiation of steroid therapy in refractory or severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in adolescents and adults. J Infect Chemother. 2015; 21:153-60.
(9.) Averbuch D, Hidalgo-Grass C, Moses AE, Engelhard D, Nir-Paz R. Macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Israel, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011; 17:1079-82.
(10.) Zhou Z, Li X, Chen X, Luo F, Pan C, Zheng X, et al. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in adults in Zhejiang, China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015; 59:1048-51.
(11.) Zheng X, Lee S, Selvarangan R, Qin X, Tang YW, Stiles J, et al. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015; 21:1470-2.
(12.) Ishiguro N, Koseki N, Kaiho M, Kikuta H, Togashi T, Oba K, et al. Regional differences in prevalence of macrolide resistance among pediatric Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in Hokkaido, Japan. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2016; 69:186-90.
(13.) Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of Amercia/Amercian Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infec Dis. 2007; 44 Suppl 2:S27-72.
(14.) Lim WS, Baudouin SV, George RC, Hill AT, Jamieson C, Le Jeune I, et al. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: update 2009. Thorax. 2009; 64 Suppl 3:iii1-55.
(15.) Morozumi M, Hasegawa K, Kobayashi R, Inoue N, Iwata S, Kuroki H, et al. Emergence of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae with a 23SrRNA gene mutation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005; 49:2302-6.
(16.) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLS). Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing for human Mycoplasma; approved guildeline. CLSI document M43-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2011.
(17.) Daxboeck F, Krause R, Wenisch C. Laboratory diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003; 9:263-73.
(18.) Principi N, Esposito S. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae: its role in respiratory infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013; 68:506-11.
(19.) Qu J, Gu L, Wu J, Dong J, Pu Z, Gao Y, et al. Accuracy of IgM antibody testing, FQ-PCR and culture in laboratory diagnosis of acute infection by Mycoplasma pneumoniae in adults and adolescents with community-acquired pneumonia. BMC Infect Dis. 2013; 13:172.
(20.) Diaz MH, Benitez AJ, Winchell JM. Investigations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in the United States: trends in molecular typing and macrolide resistance from 2006 to 2013. J Clin Microbiol. 2015; 53:124-30.
(21.) Brown RJ, Macfarlane-Smith L, Phillips S, Chalker VJ. Detection of macrolide resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in England, September 2014 to September 2015. Euro Surveill. 2015; 20:30078.
(22.) Zhao F, Liu G, Wu J, Cao B, Tao X, He L, et al. Surveillance of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Beijing, China, from 2008 to 2012. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57:1521-3.
(23.) Morozumi M, Iwata S, Hasegawa K, Chiba N, Takayanagi R, Matsubara K, et al. Increased macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in pediatric patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008; 52:348-50.
Hong-Xia Yu [1,2], Mao-Mao Zhao , Zeng-Hui Pu , Yuan-Rong Ju  and Yan Liu 
 Pneumology Department, Shandong Provincial Hospital. Shandong University, Jinan, China
 Department of Infectious Diseases, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital. Qingdao University, Yantai, China
Received: 12 March 2018
Revised: 05 May 2018
Accepted: 09 May 2018
Autor de correspondencia: Yuan-Rong Ju. Pneumology Department, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University. Jinan 250021, China. Tel: +86 0531 87938911. Fax: +86 0531 84832677. E-mail:firstname.lastname@example.org
Table 1. In vitro drug sensitivity of the 27 isolated M. pneumoniae strains. Strain No. Erythromycin 1 128 2 64 3 128 4 [greater than or equal to] 256 5 64 6 64 7 128 8 128 9 128 10 64 11 [greater than or equal to] 256 12 128 13 >256 14 128 15 [greater than or equal to] 256 16 128 17 [greater than or equal to] 256 18 [greater than or equal to] 256 19 128 20 [greater than or equal to] 256 21 [greater than or equal to] 256 22 128 23 128 24 128 25 256 26 128 27 128 Control [less than or equal to] Control 64e Strain No. Clarithromycin Azithromycin 1 128 64 2 64 16 3 128 64 4 [greater than or equal to] 256 128 5 128 32 6 64 32 7 128 32 8 128 64 9 128 64 10 64 32 11 [greater than or equal to] 256 128 12 128 32 13 [greater than or equal to] 256 128 14 128 64 15 [greater than or equal to] 256 64 16 128 64 17 [greater than or equal to] 256 128 18 [greater than or equal to] 256 64 19 128 64 20 [greater than or equal to] 256 64 21 [greater than or equal to] 256 64 22 128 64 23 128 64 24 256 16 25 256 64 26 128 64 27 128 64 Control [less than or equal to] [less than or equal to] Control 64e Control 64e Strain No. Tetracycline Minocycline Moxifloxacin Gatifloxacin 1 0.50 0.250 0.064 0.064 2 0.25 0.125 0.032 0.064 3 0.50 0.500 0.125 0.125 4 0.25 0.125 0.064 0.064 5 0.50 0.250 0.064 0.064 6 0.50 0.250 0.064 0.064 7 0.50 0.250 0.064 0.064 8 0.50 0.500 0.064 0.064 9 0.50 0.250 0.064 0.064 10 0.25 0.250 0.032 0.064 11 0.25 0.125 0.064 0.064 12 0.50 0.250 0.064 0.064 13 0.25 0.125 0.064 0.064 14 0.50 0.250 0.064 0.064 15 0.25 0.125 0.064 0.064 16 0.25 0.125 0.064 0.064 17 0.25 0.125 0.064 0.064 18 0.25 0.125 0.064 0.064 19 0.50 0.250 0.064 0.064 20 0.25 0.125 0.064 0.064 21 0.25 0.125 0.064 0.064 22 0.25 0.125 0.064 0.064 23 0.50 0.250 0.064 0.064 24 0.50 0.250 0.064 0.064 25 0.50 0.125 0.064 0.064 26 0.50 0.250 0.064 0.064 27 0.50 0.250 0.064 0.064 Control 0.25 0.125 0.032 0.064 Strain No. Levofloxacin Ciprofloxacin 1 0.50 1.0 2 0.25 0.5 3 0.50 1.0 4 0.50 0.5 5 0.50 0.5 6 0.50 0.5 7 0.50 1.0 8 0.50 0.5 9 0.50 0.5 10 0.25 0.5 11 0.50 0.5 12 0.50 0.5 13 0.50 0.5 14 0.50 0.5 15 0.50 0.5 16 0.50 0.5 17 0.50 0.5 18 0.50 0.5 19 0.50 0.5 20 0.50 0.5 21 0.50 0.5 22 0.50 0.5 23 0.50 1.0 24 0.50 0.5 25 0.50 1.0 26 0.50 1.0 27 0.50 0.5 Control 0.25 0.5 Table 2. The effect comparison of the fluoroquinolones and macrolides groups. Groups Macrolides Fluoroquinolones (N= 9) (N= 18) Total duration of fever 8.22 [+ or -] 4.15 4.72 [+ or -] 2.89 (x [+ or -] a) Total duration of cough 13.56 [+ or -] 7.37 8.67 [+ or -] 5.05 (x [+ or -] a) Groups p value Total duration of fever <0.05 (0.017) (x [+ or -] a) Total duration of cough >0.05 (0.053) (x [+ or -] a)
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Original Article; texto en ingles|
|Author:||Yu, Hong-Xia; Zhao, Mao-Mao; Pu, Zeng-Hui; Ju, Yuan-Rong; Liu, Yan|
|Date:||Apr 1, 2018|
|Previous Article:||Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women/Desarrollo y validacion de ecuaciones...|
|Next Article:||Netrin 1 and Alpha-Methyl Acylcoenzim-A Racemase in diagnosis of prostate cancer/Netrina 1 y Alfa Metil-Acil coenzima-A Racemasa para el diagnostico...|