A rock that lies about its age.
Now, the younger age has drawn criticism. At a meeting of the Geological Society of America in Toronto last month, Nicholas J. Butterfield of the University of Cambridge in England announced that he had taken a look at the supposed shells and dismissed them as artifacts created when the rock was dissolved in acid during the laboratory analysis.
The new turn of events suggests that the rocks may indeed be ancient, but it doesn't resolve whether animals made the traces. "I've got a problem with these traces because there's a missing 500 million years" during which there is no other evidence for animal life, says Butterfield.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||finding worm burrows in a 1.1-billion-year-old sandstone|
|Date:||Nov 21, 1998|
|Previous Article:||Where has all the carbon gone?|
|Next Article:||Alien seaweed is aquarium escapee.|