A review of underground coal mine emergency communications and tracking system installations: an early 2014 NIOSH review found 306 active U.S. underground coal mines using 13 different leaky feeder or node-based post-accident communications systems and 12 different electronic tracking systems.
In response, post-accident communications and electronic tracking (emergency CT) technologies designed to meet MINER Act requirements have been developed by various manufacturers and approved for permissibility by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), meaning they may be used safely in coal mines that may have gassy or dust-laden atmospheres. As a result, more than a dozen different emergency CT systems have become available for U.S. underground coal mining.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recently conducted a review of the latest MSHA-approved Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) for each active underground coal mine on file as of February 2014 to identify and characterize the types of emergency CT systems installed. This review pertains only to CT systems installed underground for emergency purposes, and does not include any CT systems installed or used for non-emergency situations, such as communications for everyday operations.
Note that identifying emergency CT systems and their system components can become complicated because some manufacturers use components manufactured by other companies.
In addition, the systems and their various components will often have different MSHA approval numbers associated with them. Accordingly, for simplicity, the overall emergency CT system name listed in each ERP has been utilized for this review.
The key requirement for MINER Act-compliant communications systems is the capability to provide two-way, post-accident communication with the surface for all underground personnel via a wireless medium. This usually involves providing untethered portable communication devices, sometimes referred to as handsets, carried by or available to mine workers as part of the system. Other requirements include battery backup for line-powered equipment, and permissibility for use in conditions where mine ventilation has been compromised.
The MINER Act also requires electronic tracking systems that determine the location of all personnel underground within defined accuracies stated in Program Policy Letter (PPL) No. PI 1V-13; for example, to within 200 ft on working sections. Such requirements may necessitate a wireless device for each miner. Requirements for backup power and permissibility are similar to those for communications systems.
As of February 2014, there were 306 active underground coal mines in the U.S., all using either leaky feeder or node-based post-accident communications systems.
Leaky feeder systems have been around for many years, and have been adapted since the MINER Act was passed to serve as post-accident communications systems. They account for 44% of the installed systems (Figure 1). Leaky feeder systems employ a special type of coaxial cable to enable communications by acting as both a transmission line and an antenna for communication with handsets and other portable devices.
Node-based systems are communications networks installed in a mine; each node is a processor-based device that can link to untethered portable devices such as handsets, as well as to other nodes. Node-based systems may be wired or wireless. As the names imply, wired systems primarily use physical connections between nodes for transmission of communication signals, while wireless systems primarily employ radio links between nodes. Although not common before the MINER Act, node-based systems currently account for 56% of the systems installed in U.S mines. Furthermore, a little more than 60% of these node-based communications systems are wireless. These systems usually do not rely on any physical wired connection for communication from underground to the surface. Also, among node-based systems in service are examples that use both wired and wireless links between nodes, as well as some systems capable of operating as a wired network under normal operating conditions and automatically transitioning to wireless operation if the wired connections are compromised.
Most electronic tracking systems determine location by using either communications system nodes or dedicated "readers" installed at known locations underground. These nodes, or readers, detect and recognize uniquely identified electronic devices worn by miners. These electronic identification devices are generally one of two types--"tags" or "integrated handsets." Tags provide a continuously repetitive signal, or "beacon," which is detected by a node or reader.
Many handsets used for post-accident communication systems have tag capability integrated into the device itself, thus eliminating the need for a dedicated tag. If a tag or handset is detected by more than one node or reader simultaneously, software algorithms use the detected signal strength or differential signal time of arrival between the nodes or readers to approximate the location of the tag or handset. Tracking information from the readers is typically transmitted to the surface over some part of a communications system.
About half of U.S. underground coal mines use the same manufacturer for electronic tracking as they do for post-accident communications (Figure 2). In many of the instances where the mine is using the same manufacturer for both CT requirements, the tracking technology is often integrated directly with post-accident communications through the use of a handset with tracking built right in.
This review showed there are 13 manufacturers of post-accident communications systems currently used in U.S. underground coal mines; five produce leaky feeder systems, four make wired node-based systems, and four supply wireless node-based systems.
A total of 12 manufacturers supply electronic personnel tracking systems used in U.S. underground coal mines. Five manufacturers use tracking tags in conjunction with a leaky feeder communication infrastructure, and three use either tracking-capable handsets or tags as part of a wired node-based system. The remaining four systems provide tracking through an integrated wireless node-based communications system using either tags or handsets with tracking capability.
The accompanying table (Table 1) lists the manufacturers of currently used emergency CT systems, and includes the names under which their systems are marketed. The chart provided (Figure 3) shows the number of systems in service for each manufacturer.
Eight years after passage of the MINER Act, post-accident CT in U.S underground coal mines has evolved to a point where a number of systems based on a variety of CT approaches and technologies are available to mine operators. These advances are expected to greatly enhance miner safety, and it is reasonable to expect that emergency CT systems will continue to change and improve as the underlying technology improves, and as manufacturers adapt their systems to better serve the needs of the mining industry.
The findings and conclusions in this review are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of NIOSH. The mention of any company or product does not constitute an endorsement by NIOSH.
Nicholas Damiano, Gerald Horace and Ronald Jacksha are researchers with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Office of Mine Safety and Health Research.
Table 1--All Underground Emergency CT Systems Manufacturer ERP Full Name Abbrev. System name(s) Leaky Feeder Systems Becker Varis Varis Smart Com 150/450 Kutta Radios Kutta DRUM 100S * Mine Radio Systems MRS Flexcom * MineCom MineCom MCA 1000/2000 Tunnel Radio of America TRA Ultracomm/MineAx Wired Node-Based Systems American Mine Research AMR Mine Net Matrix Design Group Matrix METS 1.0/2.1 Mine Site Technologies MST IMPACT Northern Light Tech. NIT InfoMine PBE Group PBE Tracking Boss Wireless Node-Based Systems Active Control Technology ACT Active Mine Innovative Wireless Tech. IWT Sentinel/Accolade Strata Products Worldwide Strata CommTrac Venture Design Group Venture MineTracer MineCom and Mine Radio Systems are now a part of PBE Group Figure 1: Leaky feeder versus node-based post-accident communications systems. 306 Underground Coal Mine Post-Accident Communications Systems February 2014 Leaky feeder Wireless nodes Wired nodes Wired nodes 54(21%) Wireless nodes 107 (35%) Leaky feeder 134 (44%) Note: Table made from pie chart. Figure 2: Communications and tracking systems by the same or different manufacturers. 306 Underground Coal Mines February 2014 Use a Communications Use a Communications & Tracking System and Tracking System Made by the Same Made by Different Manufacturer Manufacturers Different Manufacturers 155 (51%) Same Manufacturer (151 (49%) Note: Table made from pie chart. Figure 3: All emergency communications and electronic tracking systems by number of installations. Manufacturers of Installed Emergency CT Systems in Underground U.S. Coal Mines (February 2014) No. of Post-Accident No. of Electronic Communication Systems Tracking Systems Northern Light Tech. 1 1 *Mine Radio Systems 1 1 Active Control Technology 6 6 Venture Design Group 8 8 Kutta Radios 8 8 Mine Site Technologies 16 16 Tunnel Radio of America 18 18 American Mine Research 17 25 PBE Group 49 Becker Varis 53 *MineCom 54 Strata Products Worldwide 39 39 Innovative Wireless Tech. 54 54 Matrix Design Group 31 81 *part of PBE Group Note: Table made from bar graph.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||COMMS & TRACKING; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health|
|Author:||Damiano, Nicholas; Homce, Gerald; Jacksha, Ronald|
|Publication:||Coal Age (1996)|
|Date:||Nov 1, 2014|
|Previous Article:||Common carriers: mines depend on conveyors for a multitude of materials handling tasks--and the newest systems are being asked to perform at higher...|
|Next Article:||A safer tomorrow: the latest in technology and research to keep miners safe both before and after an emergency.|