A retrospective study of blunt trauma abdomen.
A retrospective study of patients managed for BTA between Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2014 involving different abdominal organs was conducted in Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur.
This institute is located on National Highway no.-8 and caters most of the patients involved in RTA. The vehicles mostly are motorcycles, fast moving traffic with burdening transport, road conditions, ignoring safety measure and increasing alcohol abuse. Apart from RTA, fall from height, assaults and industrial accidents in this marble rich industrial zone contribute of significantly. (1)
BTA is the third most common form of injury in RTA after orthopedic injuries and head injuries and the victims mostly are young, productive adults and hence has got enormous socioeconomic impact. (2) Blunt injuries are thought to result from a combination of crushing, deforming, stretching and shearing forces. The magnitude of these forces directly related to the rate of their acceleration and deceleration also their relative direction of impact. (3)
Abdominal injuries can be particularly dangerous, because it is often difficult to assess intra- abdominal pathology in poly trauma victims. Delay in management of BTA increases morbidity and mortality due to bleeding from solid organ or vascular injury. (4)
MATERIAL & METHODS: Patient attending department of emergency with suspicion of BTA was always attended by senior consultant surgeon as we have round the clock senior surgeon on duty.
A thorough history and clinical examination of abdomen was done. On positive finding or suspicion of abdominal injury patient was thoroughly investigated viz. blood examination like CBC, haematocrit, blood sugar, urea, creatinine., complete urine examination, x-ray chest , flat plate abdomen in supine and standing position whenever possible and U.S.G. of whole abdomen were routinely done. NCCT and CECT were done as and when required along with serial examination if needed.
Case history, mode of injury, type of vehicle involved, time of trauma to arrival at hospital, resuscitation, investigation & type of management studied in 273 cases admitted in this hospital from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2014. The typical patients often showed with initial shock with abdominal pain, tenderness and with signs of concealed hemorrhage or peritonitis.
Abdominal pain the most common symptoms is enough to warrant close observation and frequent re-examination. Patients with deep abrasions, bruises on the abdominal in specific regions viz. right upper quadrant, left upper quadrant, loin etc. warranted proper evaluation.
OBSERVATIONS: The size of this study of 273 cases of BTA between Jan, 2010 to Dec, 2014 admitted and managed in the department of surgery, GMCH Udaipur. Udaipur region is unique in its population distribution, 30-40% rural population is tribal. Most of the cases (73%) in this series were of rural background as seen in other studies also. (5) Among the solid organs liver (26.37%) was most commonly involved organ followed by spleen (13.91%). In motor vehicle accident, seatbelt restraint usually leads to a sudden elevation in intra-abdominal pressure producing hollow visceral injury. Hollow visceral injuries occurred mainly at junction of mobile & fixed portion e.g. first part of jejunum, distal portion of ileum (18.68%), beginning of sigmoid & ascending colon (5.86%) and mesentery (4.02%). In our study diaphragmatic injury was significant (2.93%).
Sex & Age wise distribution Age Group Male Female Total 0-10 4 1 5 11-30 80 16 96 30-50 97 27 124 >50 40 8 48 Total 22 52 273
Male: Female 4.2:1
Rural/Urban distribution Rural 73% 197 Urban 27% 76 Cause of Blunt Abdominal Trauma Vehicle Accidents 185 68 Fall from Height 44 16 Strike by Heavy Object (Industrial) 33 12 Assault 11 4 Total 273 100 Organs Involvement in B.T.A Organ Number of Cases % Liver 72 26.37 Small Intestine 51 18.68 Spleen 38 13.91 Large Intestine 16 5.86 Mesentery 11 4.02 Kidney 33 12.06 Retroperitoneal Hematoma 35 12.82 Diaphragm 8 2.93 Urinary Bladder 6 2.19 Pancreas 3 1.09 Total 273 99.93 Treatment Offered Organ Total No. Surgery Conservative of Cases Liver 72 7 65 Spleen 38 21 17 Kidney 33 -- 33 Pancreas 3 -- 03 Retro Peritoneal 35 -- 35 Hollow Viscera 78 78 -- Diaphragm 08 08 -- Urinary Bladder 06 06 -- Cause of Death Shock 6 Septicemia 10 Renal Failure 5 Cardio Respiratory Failure 14 Total 35
DISCUSSION: With increase in urbanization and industrialization injuries of various types are increasing day by day including BTA, which required not only urgent treatment, but also different types of approach, dedication, planning and timely team work to have an effective outcome of a golden hour. (6) The initial hours of BTA are extremely crucial for the patient. Early institution of proper management results in decreased morbidity and mortality.
Whereas delay leads to poor outcome. (7) Introduction of ambulance services No. 108 has given very positive result by early transportation of injured patient.
A rough estimate indicates that 15% of all hospitals and clinical beds are occupied by the patients of trauma as one of the single leading cause of hospital admission. (8)
The predominant symptoms and signs depends on the organ involved and also the age , general condition of the patient ,and time interval between time of injury and arrival in hospital. Most of the patient had abrasions on right or left flank and abdominal wall. Patient had marked tenderness over the region involved, abdominal distension with guarding and rigidity as well. The chief cause of BTA in this study was RTA similar to Tripathi. (9) and Jolley 1993. (10) next common was fall from height.
Socioeconomic impact of BTA is disproportionately largely due to its epidemiological characteristics. Most of study showed young previously healthy and economically productive population is usually victim of BTA. (11) In our study 73.2% cases were in age group of 11 to 50 years. Similar incidence recorded by Tripathi et al 77.1%. (9) & Davis JJ et al 75%. (12) In this study male than female 4.2:1, probably due to an active outdoor life, fast driving vehicle, aggressive behavior & may be under influence of alcohol. It is also similar to other studies by Davis et al. (12) Sule et al. (13) It may be because of easy availability of vehicles, daily migration to urban area for livelihood, unaccustomed to traffic, traffic sense and ignorance of safety measure. (14)
Liver and spleen are the two most common organs that are injured followed by small intestine, kidney, stomach, gall bladder, urinary bladder & pancreas in this order. In this series it was noticed that solid organs liver (26.37%) is most common organ involved followed by spleen (10.68%). Other solid organs involved were less in numbers. The advent of newer imaging techniques with high resolution CT scanners has enabled the clinician to exactly diagnose extends of intra-abdominal organ injuries. Lacerations are the most common form of hepatic injury identified on CT, while contusions and subcapsular hematomas are the least common. (15)
Hepatic injury occurs in 5% of patients sustaining blunt abdominal trauma. (16) The large size of the liver, its friable parenchyma, its thin capsule and its relatively fixed position in relation to the spine make the liver particularly prone to blunt injury. As a result of its larger size and proximity to the ribs, the right lobe is injured more commonly than the left. However, surgical literature confirms that as many as 86% of liver injuries have stopped bleeding by the time surgical exploration is performed. (17) Those patients with stable blood pressure, adequate urine output, maintained abdominal girth and insignificant changes in laboratory finding were managed conservatively (NOM).
With the publication of many reports of success during the last 20 years, NOM has become an established and accepted management protocol for solid organ injuries in haemodynamically stable patient. (18) High rate of operative complications caused paradigm shift from operative to non- operative management (NOM) in haemodynamically stable patient. (4) Liver due to its firm texture is more confidently treated by NOM. Haemodynamically unstable patients with frank sign of exsanguinations underwent urgent laparotomy. (19)
NOM has a significant decrease in length of hospital stay and morbidity compared to the patient who undergoes surgery. Admission to ICU & its related problems, delay in diagnosis and management of missed bowel and vascular injuries are few of the risk involved in NOM. (20)
In the non-operative managed group renal injury was the commonest injury, followed by hepatic and splenic injuries (Table-5). Velmahos G C et al. (21) manage approx.85% patients nonoperatively with 8-38 %failure rate in spleen injury, but in our study conversion was 0 % out of 17 [44.74%]. According to the CT grading of splenic injuries grade IV and V injuries are treated by laparotomy, while lower grade injuries are managed conservatively. Splenic salvage rate improved from 67.9% to 72.4 % with this protocol and failure of NOM following the introduction of this protocol is minimal. (22)
Urological injury was found of kidney (12.06%) and urinary bladder 2.19%. Retroperitoneal hematoma was found in large number 35(12.82%). In our study all the patients  of renal injuries were haemodynamically stable after resuscitation were considered candidate for conservative management. It consisted of bed rest, analgesia hydration and broad spectrum antibiotics.
Injury of hollow viscera e.g. stomach, small intestine are uncommon because of their mobility. In BTA, bowel is usually injured at junction of mobile and fixed portion e.g. first part of jejunum, distal portion of ileum beginning of sigmoid and ascending colon.
Most of the perforation following BTA occurs at anti-mesenteric border of the GUT as its lacks any support. All the cases of hollow visceral injury were managed by exploratory laparotomy, repair, resection & anastomosis, and ileostome/colostomy was done as per requirements Among hollow viscera, small intestine is affected more 18.68% at its fixed point and large intestine was involved in 5.86%. Mesentery tear alone was found in 11 cases (4.02%).
In our study diaphragmatic injury (Rupture) was significant 8 cases (2.93%) in number. The incidence of diaphragmatic had been reported ranging from 1 to 7% of patients with BTA. In our study all patients had injury on left side. Numerous studies have shown a greater incidence of left sided diaphragmatic injuries. It is due to location of the lumbocoastal trigone on left side and protective effect of liver on right side. Management of such injuries was done by abdominal approach by repair with non-absorbable sutures. (24)
Patient may collapse or die without any visible injury following BTA due to vasovagal inhibition through plexuses present in posterior wall of upper abdomen. The overall mortality was 12.82% in present series which is slightly higher than other studies from India between 6 to 9%.
SUMMARY: The conclusion drawn from this study is peak incidence of BTA occur in young & productive age population with male predominance. RTA was the commonest mode of injury. Liver was the commonest organ involved followed by spleen & hollow viscera. It concluded that patient with BTA should have early and accurate diagnosis and proper regular, prompt & thoughtful management to improve overall prognosis.
It may be added that better roads, proper traffic sense and adherence to traffic rules may reduce the chance of RTA & therefore BTA. For a traumatic victim, it is not the life but the quality of function that matters. (16)
(1.) Bouras A, truant S, Pruvot F et al: Management of blunt hepatic trauma. J Visc Surg 2010, 147(6):e351-e358.
(2.) Zheng YX, Chena L, Tao SF, Song P, Xu Sm. Diagnosis and Management of Colonic injuries following blunt trauma. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2007; 13:633- 636.
(3.) Ahmed N, Vernick JJ; Management of liver trauma in adults. J Emrg Trauma Shock, 2011; 4(1): 114-119.
(4.) Munns J, Richardson M, Hewett P. A review of intestinal trauma. Aust NZJ Surg. 1995; 65:857860.
(5.) Gupta S, Talar S, Sharma Rk, Gupta P, Goyal A, Prasad P. Blunt Trauma Abdomen: A study of 63 cases. Indian J Med Sci 1996; 50: 272-6.
(6.) Hill Ac scheter Wp, Trinkey DD: Abdominal trauma and indication for laparotomy. Trauma Norwalk CT, Appleton and lange P. 401, 1988.
(7.) S. Goyal, HK Sancheti, et al: poly T rauma in rural India - Changing T rends. Indian J Orthopaedics 2006; 40(4):259-261.
(8.) Dave PK. Organisation of an accident Service, Delhi; Jaypee Brothers, 1995: 62-65.
(9.) Tripathi M.D., Srivastava R.D.: Blunt abdominal trauma with special reference to early detection of visceral injuries. (I.J.S) 53 (5):179-84; 1991.
(10.) Jolley S., Upadhyay M. and Jain R.L.: Blunt abdominal trauma. A clinical study of 100 cases. Ind. J. Sur. 209 -3, June, 1993.
(11.) Shackford SR (1995) the evolution of modern trauma care. SCNA 75: 147-156.
(12.) Devis J. J., cohn I., Nance F.C.: Diagnosis and management of blunt abdominal trauma. Am. Surg. 199: 467; 1976.
(13.) Sule AZ, Kidmas AT, Awani K, Uba F, Misauno M. Gastrointestinal perforation following blunt abdominal trauma. East Afr Med J. 2007; 84: 429-433.
(14.) Mohan D. Injuries in India, a Survey. ICSSR research abstract. IIT Bulletin, IIT Delhi. 1992 Vol. XXI No.3 pages 8-10.
(15.) Ghosh, Halder Kumar, Paira Kumar S, et al: An Epidemiological analysis of patients with abdominal trauma in an eastern Indian metropolitan city. J Indian Med Assoc. 2011; 109: 19-231.
(16.) Pachter Hl, Guth AA, Hofstetter SR, Spencer FC; Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma: the impact of nonoperatvie management of abdominal solid organ injury Ann Surg., 1995; 222(3): 311-322.
(17.) Velmahos GC, Toutouzas KG, Radian R, Chan L, Demetriades D: Non operatice treatment of blunt injury to solid abdominal organs: A prospective study. Arch Surg 2003, 138(8):844-851.
(18.) Van der Viles CH, Olthof DC, Gaakeer M, Ponsen KJ, Van Delden OM, Goslings JC: Changing patterns in diagnostic strategies and the treatment of blunt injury to solid abdominal organs. Int j Emerg Med 2011 Jul 27, 4:74. Do: 10.1186/1865-1380-4-47.
(19.) Heyn J, Ladurner R, Ozimek A, et al: diagnosis and preoperative management of multiple injured patients with explorative laparatomy because of blunt abdominal trauma. Eur J Med Res 2008, 13:517-524.
(20.) Mohsin Raza, Yasser Abbas, Vanitha Devi, et al: Non operative management of abdominal trauma - a 10 years review. World J emergency surgery 2013; 8:14; 1-6.
(21.) Velmahos GC, Zacharias N, Emhoff TA; Management of the most severely injured spleen: a multicenter study of the research consortium of New England Centers for trauma (ReCONNECTt). Arch Surg., 2010; 145(5): 456-460.
(22.) Madhumita mukhopadhyay: Intestinal injury from Blunt abdominal trauma: a study of 47 cases. Oman Medical Journal 2009; 24(4): 256-259.
(23.) Sheikh Imran Gul, Arshad Rahid, Imtiaz Wani: "countre-coupe injury of the gut"; isolated traumatic mesenteric border jejunal perforation. Journal of case reports in practice (JCRP) 2014; 2(1): 23-25.
(24.) Pradeep Singh Nain, Kuldip Singh, Harish Matta, et al: Review of 9 cases of diaphragmatic injury following blunt trauma chest; 3 years experience. Indian J surgery 2014; 76(4):261-264.
J. L. Kumawat , P. N. Mathur , Kusum Mathur , F. S. Mehta 
[1.] J. L. Kumawat
[2.] P. N. Mathur
[3.] Kusum Mathur
[4.] F. S. Mehta
PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:
[1.] Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur.
[2.] Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur.
[3.] Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur.
[4.] Professor, Department of General Surgery, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur.
FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: None
NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. J. L. Kumawat, 25-New Colony, Savina, Udaipur-313002, Rajasthan.
Date of Submission: 30/06/2015.
Date of Peer Review: 02/07/2015.
Date of Acceptance: 16/07/2015.
Date of Publishing: 21/07/2015.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||ORIGINAL ARTICLE|
|Author:||Kumawat, J.L.; Mathur, P.N.; Mathur, Kusum; Mehta, F.S.|
|Publication:||Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences|
|Date:||Jul 23, 2015|
|Previous Article:||Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the treatment of single renal stone 2-3cm.|
|Next Article:||A descriptive study of fractures distribution in faciomaxillary trauma in Kumaon region.|