Printer Friendly

A question of ethics: columnist invents colleague.

THE SITUATION: A high-school history teacher working as a freelance columnist at a small newspaper invents an imaginary colleague to debate in a column.

The editor, and presumably many of the readers, does not realize the colleague was a fiction used as a literary device such as Mike Royko's Slats Grobnik. When the professor writes a second column using the character, the editor asks who the person is, and the columnist explains.

The editor feels this is a betrayal of his and the readers' trust. He wonders how to explain the situation to his readers and whether to suspend or fire the columnist.

RESOLUTION: Royko, of course, was a master. Some readers may nat have realized that Slats was a creation, but most understood that Royko used the character as a tool to conduct what one Ethics Committee member referred to as a "lowbrow Socratic dialogue:' William Raspberry makes successful use occasionally of a similar tool, using a mythical Washington cabby as a foil.

In the case at hand, though, the author's intent was not so clear, and the editor's misgivings were legitimate. Reader trust is important--more than ever in a post-Jayson Blair age. As the editor noted, newspaper readers should be able to assume that they are reading nonfiction.

The editor's first instinct, to explain the situation to readers through an editor's note, was correct. Most of the Ethics Committee, however, felt that suspending or firing the columnist would be an overreaction, especially since the columnist is not a trained journalist. Instead, the editor should explain to him basic tenets of journalism, as well as the importance of maintaining credibility with readers by never intentionally deceiving them.

The editor did this, not only with the columnist in question, but with his other freelance columnists.

NOTE: If the newspaper had maintained a policy requiring that the editor know the identity of any unnamed source, this situation never would have occurred.
COPYRIGHT 2003 National Conference of Editorial Writers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:The Masthead
Date:Sep 22, 2003
Words:320
Previous Article:New members of NCEW: January-June 2003.
Next Article:Pederson writes a gift of faith.
Topics:


Related Articles
Accreditation Process Adds Ethics Component.
2000-2001 Board Nominees Announced.
Reputable Conduct: Ethical Issues in Policing and Corrections. (Book Review).
The educational technology Canon: want to do a better job of integrating technology and curriculum? Reading these books will move you to the head of...
Bob in paradise: how Novak created his own ethics-free zone.
Previous relationship with candidate causes credibility issue in the ethics advisor.
Know your writers' agendas and disclose them.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters