Printer Friendly

A prospective study of nasal symptoms in pregnancy.

INTRODUCTION:

* A significant number of changes occur throughout the female body during pregnancy. Although most of these physiological and hormonal processes produce no harm to the expentent mother and foetus, some can become pathological and cause considerable discomfort and anxiety.

* According to some study, nasal symptoms consists of 20-30% of pregnant female. Nasal congetion most common symptom. E Karlson (1) has suggested so. Some of differential diagnosis of nasal symptoms are:

1. Allergic rhinitis.

2. Non allergic rhinitis includes idiopathic rhinitis/vasomotor rhinitis or NANIPER (Nonallergic non-infectious perennial rhinitis), non-allergic occupational rhinitis, hormonal rhinitis, drug induced rhinitis, other forms (NARES), rhinitis due to physical and chemical factors, food induced rhinitis, emotional rhinitis, atrophic rhinitis.

Conditions that mimics rhinitis like DNS.

3. Epistaxis.

4. Nasal polyps.

Hormonal rhinitis is often associated with pregnancy in particular, although is also known to induce symptoms. Incidence ranges from 10-20%. Ellegard, m toren (2) has suggested this incidence is around 15%. Even though the underlying cause of pregnancy has not been fully elucidated, numerous theories have been suggested.

Some of the proposed theories are enlisted below:

1. Elevated estrogens and progesterone level.

2. Increased mucosal acetylcholine receptors.

3. Increased blood volume with extravascular engorgement and Congestion.

4. Rising level of prolactin growth hormone.

5. Elevated inflammatory response.

* Drug induced rhinitis are aspirin, NSAIDS, beta blockers, ace inhibitors, methyldopa, oral contraceptives, psychotropic agents and nasal topical agents (Oxymetazoline, naphazoline, xylometazoline) may induce symptoms of rhinitis when they are administered topically or systematically.

* NARES originally introduced by Mullarkey and colleagues, which is characterized by the condition on the basis of the presence of greater than 20% eosinophil in nasal smear of symptomatic patients.

* Epistaxis during pregnancy incidence is approximately 20%.dugan kim (3) has suggested that epistaxis is due to hormonal changes. It is likely caused by endocrine alteration in nasal mucosa and increased vascular congestion. Hemangiomas sometimes appear in early months of pregnancy which involutes post-partum.

AIM OF THE STUDY:

1. To know the incidence of various nasal symptoms during pregnancy.

2. To follow a definite management protocol to reduce the hospital study.

3. To review of literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out over a period of one year from April 2013 to March 2014 in the OPD of department of obstetrics and gynecology. All he antenatal patients with nasal symptoms were reported. A total cases of 2210 cases were reported Out of these 242 were referred to ENT department for treatment.

History of the patient: chief concern, chronicity, seasonality and any triggering factor. Effect in the quality of life: Fatigability, sleep disturbances and attention problem. Physical examination: nasal and oropharyngeal examination.

RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS:

* A total cases of 2210 nasal symptoms during pregnancy were reported. Out of which 242 cases were referred to ENT OPD. Cases were presented in different trimester of pregnancy.

* 1st trimester (1-12weeks) 46%.

* 2nd trimester (13-28weeks) 37%.

* 3rd trimester (29-40weeks) 17%.

* Case 1: 22year old female with 8 months of amenorrhoea presented with epistaxsis.

* Case 2: In our one year study a 24year old female with 6 months of amenorrhoea presented with nasal polyposis with 20 day history of presentation.

Most of the cases were treated conservatively and assurance was given. Surgical intervention was carried for nasal polyposis under LA. Polypectomy was done.

Hormonal rhinitis subsided by itself after delivery. Among epistaxsis, 6 patients were given merocel. Others were managed conservatively with botroclot solute.

DISCUSSION:

* Nasal symptoms are common during pregnancy. According to Bende m, GredmarkT, (4) nasal stuffiness in pregnancy incidence in 20 weeks of gestation-27%, 20 weeks of gestation-37%, 30 weeks of gestation-40% 36weeks of gestation-42%. According to DanaWallace and Mark S. Dykewicz, The diagnosis and management of rhinitis mentioned pregnancy rhinitis is common during 2nd trimester of pregnancy.

* ENT complaints in pregnancy by TE Havas suggested that rhinitis can start during any trimester of pregnancy. In our study it is more common during 1st trimester of pregnancy.

* Epistaxis in pregnancy and associated with postpartum haemorrhage by Dugan-Kim M shows incidence of epistaxis during pregnancy is 20%. In our study epistaxis we got 12% of all nasal symptoms.

* In pregnancy the nasal mucosa appears swollen and often hyperaemic. One should be careful while selecting drugs.

CONCLUSION: In pregnancy rhinitis, conservative treatment is the norm. The mainstay of treatment is nasal irrigation with hypertonic saline. Assurance should be given as most of the symptoms disappear after delivery and avoidance of unnecessary treatment can reduce risk to both mother and fetus.

In severe cases sodium cromolyn is the safe treatment for all allergic rhinitis. The most critical time for concern about potential congenital malformation because of medication used in first trimester, when organogenesis occurs. Topical decongestant when used for short time basis may have a better safety profile than oral agents for 1st trimester. Oral decongestants can cause gastroschisis and small intestine atresia.

Epistaxis is due to increased vascularity of nasal mucosa due to hormonal change. Treatment includes 30 minutes of direct local pressure. Once the bleeding stops, saline nasal sprays must be given. Severe cases must be treated accordingly

DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/711

REFERENCES:

(1.) Ellegarde, karlson G. Nasal congestion during pregnancy. Clin otolaryngol allied sci. 1999; 307311.

(2.) Ellegard E, Hellgren M, Toren K, Karlson G. The incidence of pregnancy rhinitis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2000; 49: 98-101.

(3.) Dugan-Kim M, Connell S, Stika C, Wong CA, Gossett DR. Epistaxis in pregnancy and association with post-partum haemorrhage.

(4.) Bende M, Gredmark T. Nasal stuffiness diring pregnancy. Laryngoscope. 1999july; 109: 1108-10.

Soubhagini Acharya [1], Bulu Nahak [2]

AUTHORS:

[1.] Soubhagini Acharya

[2.] Bulu Nahak

PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:

[1.] Associate Professor, Department of ENT, V. S. S. Medical College & Hospital, Burla.

[2.] Post Graduate, Department of ENT, V. S. S. Medical College & Hospital, Burla.

FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: None

NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:

Dr. Bulu Nahak, H. S. Hostel, Room No. 232, V. S. S. Medical College, Burla, Sambarpur, Odisha-768017.

E-mail: drbulu2004@gmail.com

Date of Submission: 06/02/2015. Date of Peer Review: 07/02/2015. Date of Acceptance: 08/03/2015. Date of Publishing: 06/04/2015.
COPYRIGHT 2015 Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:CASE REPORT
Author:Acharya, Soubhagini; Nahak, Bulu
Publication:Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
Article Type:Report
Date:Apr 6, 2015
Words:1018
Previous Article:A comparative clinical evaluation of intubating conditions and Haemodynamic effects after administration of Succinylcholine & Rocuronium bromide.
Next Article:Benign lymphocytic infiltration of skin: a case report.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters