Printer Friendly

A model third order phase transition in fe--pnictide superconductors.

1 Introduction

Since the discovery of superconductivity in Fe - based pnictides oxides [1], there has been enormous research activities to understand the origin of their superconductivity. This immense interest in the physics and chemistry communities is reminiscent of the excitement that accompanied the discovery of high - Tc cuprate superconductors in the early 1980s. Normally, in Fe - based superconductors, antiferromagnetic (AFM) order is suppressed by charge (hole) doping but spin interactions still exist [2]. It should be noted that superconductivity can still be induced in the pnictides without charge doping through either isoelectric doping, non-stoichiometry, or by use of non-thermal control parameters such as application of non-hydrostatic pressure. Also it should be noted that the parent compounds of the iron pnictides are metallic, albeit highly dissipative, bad metals [3]. Most striking is the spectroscopy evidence that Fe based superconductors are weakly correlated electronic system [4, 5]. Thus, the origin of the observed superconductivity may not be due to Mott physics. Put differently, for the fact that spin is relevant in Fe pnictide superconductors, they are basically itinerant magnetism suggesting that the Mott - Hubbard physics may be irrelevant in physics of Fe pnictide superconductors. We can thus speculate that the superconductivity observed in Fe pnictides are locally and dynamically spin polarized due to strong Fe spin fluctuations with the itinerant nature of Fe providing the "glue". Hence, spin-fluctuation mediated through the spin channel may be relevant in understanding the origin and nature of the observed superconductivity in Fe pnictide.

Fe pnictide superconductors have layered structure. The Fe atom layers of these pnictide systems are normally sandwiched by pnictogen, for example, Arsenic (As). Hence, the magnetic moment of Fe depends strongly on the inter-layer distances of Fe-As [6]. The magnetic moment of transition metals also depends on volume [7]. This leads to the so-called lattice anharmonicity.

In quasi 2D layered materials, a state with some rather unexpected properties (new mean field solution) is observed at non-zero [8]. This new mean field property observed in these layered systems cannot be described by the ordinary phenomenological Ginzburg - Landau theory. Also, the thermodynamic relation [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] which holds for 2nd order phase transition is violated in some materials with Bose - Einstein condensate (BEC)-like phase transition (see for example as in spin glasses [9], ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic spin models with temperature driven transitions [10]). We speculate that the normal Landau theory developed for 2nd order phase transition may not adequately account for the physics of the phase transitions and associated phenomena, for example, magneto-volume effect due to lattice anharmonicity in Fe pnictide superconductors. This motivated us to develop a new Landau-like mean field theory for studying Fe-pnictide superconductors. The theory is based on the Ehrenfest classification of orders of phase transitions [11]. Specifically, we will study the dependence of the local magnetic moment, M on the Fe-As layer separation, z.

2 Theoretical Framework

According to Hilfer [12], rewriting the singular part of the local free energy within a restricted path through the critical point in terms of the finite difference quotient, and analytically continuing in the orders, allows one to classify continuous phase transitions precisely according to their orders. We speculate that there exist phase transition of orders greater than two as there is no known physical reason why such transitions should not exist in nature since they certainly exist in a number of theoretical models like quantum chromodynamics (QCD), lattice field theory and statistical physics [13]. At least, higher order phase transitions ([greater than or equal to] 2) are tenuous at best and their non-detection might have been due to the hasty generalization that all that departs from phase transition of order two can always be explained in terms of field fluctuation [13,14].

The dependence of the magnetic moment, M on the Fe-As layer separation is completely determined by the functional (the magnetic free energy functional), F[z, <M>] where <M> is the local magnetic moment. However, F must be invariant under the symmetry group (e.g. Abelian Higg's model) [15] of the disordered phase in order to minimize the total energy [13]. In general, F is a very complex functional of <M>. To make <M> to be spatially continuous in equilibrium, in the ordered phase, we essentially for all cases, redefine it. This suggests that F be expressed in terms of a local free energy density, f [z, <M>] (the local magnetic free energy) which is a function of the field at the point "z". After coarse graining, in its simplest form [13,14], F is give (for orders of phase transition > 2) by,

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (1)

where p is the order of the phase transition, [a.sub.p] = [a.sub.o](1-H/[H.sub.c]), [b.sub.p] [much greater than] 1, z is the Fe-As layer distance (inter-atomic separation), [z.sub.c] is the critical point, and [alpha] < 0 (a typical material dependent parameter).

Equation 1 is the model equation we are proposing for studying the dependence of M on the Fe-As inter-atomic separation. For 3rd order phase transition, p = 3, Eq. 1 reduces to,

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (2)

If we neglect the gradient term, and minimize the local magnetic free energy with respect to M, Eq. 2 reduces to

[M.sup.2] = 2/3[b.sub.3] + [[a.sub.3] + [absolute value of [([alpha])](z - [z.sub.c]).sup.2]] (3)

which basically leads (i.e., substituting Eq. 3 into 2) to the local free energy

2 2 2 5 2 1

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (4)

In the presence of the gradient term to the local magnetic free energy, using variational principle, after scaling, we obtain the Euler - Lagrange equation for M as,

[[phi].sup.5] - [[phi].sup.3][1 - [alpha][(z - [z.sub.c]).sup.2]] - [phi][absolute value of ([[nabla].sub.2][phi])] = 0. (5)

3 Model Application

Using the data of Egami et al. [16], we calculated the magnetic moment, M using our model Eq. 3. The plot of experimentally determined critical temperature against our calculated M ([[mu].sub.B]) are as shown in Fig. 1. Observe that there is strong correlation between Tc and M. Most significantly, our model predicted correctly the range of values of magnetic moment of Fe, in Fe pnictide superconductors. As it is evidence from the plot, the magnetic moment range from 0.59 to 0.73 [[mu].sub.B]. The experimentally measured value for the magnetic moment of Fe in LaOFeAs for instance, range from 0.30 to 0.64 [[mu].sub.B] [17,18].

We speculate that the observed strong correlation between [T.sub.c] and M stems from the fact that the superconducting critical temperature [T.sub.c] depends very sensitively on the iron pnictogen (i.e., Fe-As-Fe) bond angle which in turn, depends on the Fe-As layer separation [19]. This present observation is in tandem with the understanding that the bonding of the arsenic atoms changed dramatically as a function of magnetic moment [20] and the core-level spectroscopy measurements on CeFeAs[O.sub.0.89][F.sub.0.11] [21] which showed very rapid spin fluctuation dependent magnetic moment. Since from our model Eq. 3, M is proportional to z (for [a.sub.3] [much less than] 1), the observed strong correlation is to be expected. This observation confirms our earlier assertion that spin mediated fluctuations may be the major dominant mediator in the superconductivity of Fe pnictide superconductors. However, electron-phonon coupling through the spin-channel is also to be expected.

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the Government of Ebonyi State, Federal Republic, Nigeria.

Submitted on March 24, 2012 / Accepted on April 2, 2012

References

[1.] Kamihara Y., Watanabe T., Hirano, M. and Hosono, H. Iron-based layered superconductor La[O(1-x)F(x)]FeAs (x = 0.05-0.12) with T(c) = 26 K. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2008, v. 130(11), 3296-3297.

[2.] Haule K., Shim J. H., and Kotliar, G. Correlated Electronic Structure of La[O.sub.1-x][F.sub.x]FeAs. Physical Review Letters, 2008, v. 100, 226402.

[3.] Si Q. and Abrahams A. Strong Correlations and Magnetic Frustration in the High [T.sub.c] Iron Pnictides. Physical Review Letters, 2008, v. 101, 076401.

[4.] Ren Z.-A., Lu W., Yang J., Yi W., Shen X.-L., Li Z.-C., Che G.C., Dong X.-L., Sun L.-L., Zhou F. and Zhao Z.-X. Superconductivity at 55 K in Iron-Based F-Doped Layered Quaternary Compound Sm[[O.sub.1-x][F.sub.x]]FeAs. Chinese Physics Letters, 2008, v. 25, 2215.

[5.] Yang W.-L., Sorini W. A., Chen C.-C., Moritz B., Lee W.-E., Vernay F., Olalde-Velasco P., Denlinger J. -D., Delley B, Chu F. G., Analytis J. -G., Fisher I. -R., Ren Z. -A., Yang J., Lu W., Zhao Z. -X., van den Brink J., Hussain Z., Shen Z. -X. and Devereaux T. -P. Evidence for weak electronic correlations in iron pnictides. Physical Review B., 2009, v. 80, 014508.

[6.] Yin Z. -P., Lebegue S., Han M. -J., Neal B. P., Savrasov S. -Y. and Pickett W. -E. Electron-Hole Symmetry and Magnetic Coupling in Antiferromagnetic LaFeAsO. Physical Review Letters, 2008, v. 101, 047001.

[7.] Chikazumi S. Physics of Magnetism. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1964.

[8.] Cronstrom C. and Noga M. Third-order phase transition and superconductivity in thin films. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 2001, v. 51 (2), 175-184.

[9.] Stanley H. E. Introduction to Phase Transition and Critical Phenomena. Clarendon Press, London, 1971.

[10.] Campostrini M., Rossi P. and and Vicar E. Large-N phase transition in lattice two-dimensional principal chiral models. Physical Review D, 1995, v. 52, 395.

[11.] Kumar P., Hall D. and Goodrich R. G. Thermodynamics of the Superconducting Phase Transition in Ba0.6K0.4BiO3. Physical Review Letters, 1991, v. 82, 4532.

[12.] Hilfer R. Multiscaling and the classification of continuous phase transitions. Physical Review Letters, 1992, v. 68, 190.

[13.] Ekuma E. C., Asomba G. C. and Okoye C.M. I. Thermodynamics of third order phase transition: A solution to the Euler-Lagrange equations. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 2010, v. 405, 2290-2293.

[14.] Ekuma E. C., Asomba G. C. and Okoye C. M. I. Ginzburg-Landau theory for higher order phase transition. Physica C: Superconductivity, 2012, v.472, 1-4.

[15.] Callaway D. J. E. and Carson L. J. Abelian Higgs model: A Monte Carlo study. Physical Review D, 1982, v. 25, 531-537.

[16.] Egami T., Fine B.V., Parshall D., Subedi A. and Singh D. J. SpinLattice Coupling and Superconductivity in Fe Pnictides. Advances in Condensed Matter Physics, 2010, v. 2010, 164916.

[17.] Ishida K., Nakai Y. and Hosono H. To What Extent Iron-Pnictide New Superconductors Have Been Clarified: A Progress Report. Journal Physical Society of Japan, 2009, v. 78 , 062001.

[18.] de la Cruz C., Huang Q., Lynn J. W., Li J., Ratcliff IIW., Zarestky J. L., Mook H. A., Chen G. F., Luo J. L., Wang N. L. and Dai P. Magnetic order close to superconductivity in the iron-based layered La[O.sub.1-x][F.sub.x]FeAs systems. Nature, 2008, v. 453 (7197), 899-902.

[19.] Lee C.-H., Iyo A., Eisaki H., Kito H., Fernandez-Dia M. T., Ito T., Kihou K., Matsuhata H., Braden M. and Yamada K. Effect of Structural Parameters on Superconductivity in Fluorine-Free LnFeAs[O.sub.1-y] (Ln = La, Nd). Journal Physical Society of Japan, 2008, v. 77, 083704.

[20.] Yildirim T. Strong Coupling of the Fe-Spin State and the As-As Hybridization in Iron-Pnictide Superconductors from First-Principle Calculations. Physical Review Letters, 2009, v. 102,037003.

[21.] Kreyssig A., Green M.A., Lee Y., Samolyuk G. D., Zajdel P., Lynn J.W., Bud'ko S.L., Torikachvili M.S., Ni N., Nandi S., Leao J. B., Poulton S.J., Argyriou D. N., Harmon B.N., McQueeney R. J., Canfield P. C. and Goldman A. I. Pressure-induced volume-collapsed tetragonal phase of Ca[Fe.sub.2][As.sub.2] as seen via neutron scattering Physical Review B, 2008, v. 78, 184517

Chinedu E. Ekuma and Ephraim O. Chukwuocha

Department of Physics, University of Port Harcourt, PMB 053 Choba, Port Harcourt, Rivers, Nigeria

E-mail: panaceamee@yahoo.com
COPYRIGHT 2012 Progress in Physics
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Ekuma, Chinedu E.; Chukwuocha, Ephraim O.
Publication:Progress in Physics
Date:Apr 1, 2012
Words:2023
Previous Article:On a fractional quantum potential.
Next Article:On the exact solution explaining the accelerate expanding universe according to general relativity.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters