Printer Friendly

A lost art.

For anyone who knows me, or has subscribed to this magazine for very long, it shouldn't come as a surprise to learn I occasionally go off on an ATC-related rant. Usually, such a rant involves nonsensical--to me, anyway--instructions, a lost clearance or worse. This column isn't a rant on ATC. It is, however, one on the pilots who make ATC's job more difficult than it has to be.

I write this on the weekend after AOPA's 2009 Aviation Summit concluded, just up the road in Tampa, Fla. I had the opportunity to attend and came away pleasantly surprised by the attendance level and, more importantly, the seriousness with which many I met approach their flying.


Early on the I Sunday morning after the show ended, a close friend needed to get from my house to Tampa International to catch his human mailing tube home. Instead of a 1.5hour expedition from my residential airpark by car, we turned it into a 15-minute hop in my Debonair.

The flight was punctuated by a very busy approach control frequency, especially for 0715 on a Sunday morning. Apparently, lots of AOPA attendees decided to get on the road early. This was even more apparent on the flight back home, through an ATC sector clearly saturated by, umm, FLIBs. Only two or three of them seemed to know what they were doing. Everyone else, I'm ashamed to say, were (pick one or all) missing ATC calls, flubbing readbacks, failing to understand their clearances, ignoring the Notam associated with the event and generally making the controller's life a living hell. To the guy's credit, he lost it only once, despite substantial provocation from unthinking pilots, while others in the facility worked behind the scenes to split the down-the-tubes sector into two. By the time I switched frequencies, things were headed back to normal.

Two things struck me, though. The first is ATC has good reason not to give those of us flying personal aircraft their trust and respect. We still have a long way to go before achieving anything like the consistency and professionalism to which we aspire.

Second, it should have been clear to anyone on the frequency there were too many aircraft making too many demands on one controller. In those circumstances, it's counterproductive to request direct to your distant destination; it ain't gonna happen. Likewise, failing to immediately respond to a call simply doubles the controller's workload and wastes everyone's time. I could go on.

The bottom line is many of us just need to shut up and listen. Listen to the situation unfolding in your headset. Listen to the other aircraft and what they're doing or being asked to do; you could be next. Most important, don't treat a saturated sector like your very own personal ATC system.

Listening seems to be a lost art among pilots. We need to fix that.

COPYRIGHT 2009 Belvoir Media Group, LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:EDITOR'S LOG; listening to air traffic control
Author:Burnside, Jeb
Publication:Aviation Safety
Article Type:Column
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 1, 2009
Previous Article:Who's in charge?
Next Article:On FLIBS and bravos.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters