Printer Friendly

A look back: December 2002.

Students walking hunched over in school hallways was a common sight in 2002. Surely the weight of academic pressures played a role, but the more concrete reason was one that plagued adolescents for generations: A backpack overstuffed with heavy textbooks. And bulky textbooks sometimes lack the educational quality that justifies the burden of lugging them, Managing Editor Angela Pascopella wrote in the December 2002 issue of DA.

Errors are difficult to correct in print textbooks, particularly science. Flat graphics and an overabundance of text was no longer enough to engage turn-of-the-century digital natives. The emerging alternative, e-textbooks, gave students the chance to click links to more information, watch videos and practice writing online. At the time, book publishers were just moving into the e-textbook market, and district leaders were hesitant to abandon the tradition of print texts--truly a far cry from the blended environments of today.

See DA's original story at http://DAmag.me/etext

COPYRIGHT 2015 Professional Media Group LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:First Take; e-textbooks
Publication:District Administration
Article Type:Brief article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 1, 2015
Words:155
Previous Article:DA FirstTake survey: do the arts play an important role in your STEM/STEAM program?
Next Article:Orchestrating mathematical discourse to enhance student learning: creating deeper learning by engaging students in math discussion.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters