A comparison study of removal of methylene blue dye by adsorption on Neem Leaf Powder (NLP) and activated NLP.
Synthetic dyes have a wide application in the food, pharmaceutical, textile, leather, cosmetics and paper industries due to their ease of production, fastness, and variety in color compared to natural dyes (Adedayo et al. 2004). Dyes usually have a synthetic origin and complex aromatic molecular structures which make them more stable and more difficult to biodegrade. Degradation of dyes is typically a slow process (Carlos et al. 2009). The removal of color is needed to be considered in the disposal of textile wastewater due to aesthetic deterioration as well as the obstruction of penetration of dissolved oxygen and sunlight into water bodies, which seriously affects aquatic life. Besides, the dye precursors and degradation products are proven carcinogenic and mutagenic in nature (Somasiri et al. 2006). Consumption of dye-polluted water can cause allergy reactions, dermatitis, skin irritation, cancer and mutation both in babies and matures. (Kalyuzhnyi, Sklyar 2000).
Many techniques have been used to remove harmful dyes from colored wastewater, including chemical coagulation/ flocculation, precipitation, ozonation, adsorption, oxidation, ion exchange and photo degradation. Some of these techniques have shown to be effective, although they have limitations. Among these are: excess amount of chemical usage, or accumulation of concentrated sludge with disposal problems; expensive plant requirements and operational costs; lack of effective color reduction; and sensitivity to a variable wastewater input (Jaikumar, Ramamurthi 2008). One of the powerful and convenient treatment processes is adsorption. Some natural adsorbents such as fly ash (Lin et al. 2008), zeolite (Alpat et al. 2008; Mazeikiene et al. 2010), gulmohar (Delonix regia) plant leaf powder (Ponnusami et al. 2009), orange peel (Khaled et al. 2009), walnut shell (Nazari-Moghaddam et al. 2010) etc. are exploited for removal of various types of dyes. Raising Neem Juss seedling (Singh et al. 2009) and Neem leaf powder (Bhattacharyya, Sharma 2005) was also utilized for treatment of textile industrial effluent. Some acids were also utilized for activation of adsorbents (Rozic et al. 2008, Bhattacharyya, Gupta 2008).
This investigation is indented to prepare NLP and activated NLP using sulphuric acid and compare for the adsorption of MBD. The process parameters like adsorption dose, pH, temperature and contact duration were explored. The data were analyzed using adsorption isotherms (Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm) and kinetic models (pseudo first-, second-order and Elovic equation) models.
1. Material and methods
The neem (scientific name: Azadirachta indica) belongs to the meliaceae family and is native to Indian subcontinent. Its seeds and leaves have been in use since ancient times to treat a number of human ailments and also as a household pesticide. The structure and ingredient presented in Azadirachta indica was mentioned by Sethu (Sethu, Andersen 2009). The mature leaf of plant was washed thrice with de-ionized water to remove dust and water soluble impurities and was dried until the leaves become crisp. The dried leaves were crushed and powdered and further washed with de-ionized water till the washings were free of color and turbidity. Then this powder was dried in an oven at 60 [+ or -] 2[degrees]C and placed in desiccator for the adsorption studies, thus NLP prepared. For activated NLP, it was stirred with 0.1 N sulphuric acid for 30 min. Then after, it washed thrice with 1 liter de-ionized water to remove untreated acid and dried in an oven at 60 [+ or -] 2[degrees]C. The surface characteristics of NLP and activated NLP, such as particle size distribution was investigated using Laser Particle Size Analyzer, Sympatec, Germany (Model No.: Helos-BF). The porosity, pore diameter and pore volume of adsorbents were determined by Mercury Porosimeter, Thermo Quest (Model No.: PASCAL-140). The surface area was calculated using the multipoint Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) model.
Methylene blue (CI No. 52015) is a heterocyclic aromatic chemical compound with molecular weight 319.851. The dye was purchased from Sigma Aldrich, India and structure of same was mentioned in Fig. 1. It has many uses in a range of different fields, such as biology, chemistry, medicine, etc. The concentration of MB in each aqueous solution was measured on an UV-visible spectrophotometer (ELICO SL 164 Double Beam UV-VIS Spectrophotometer) at [[lambda].sub.max] = 665 nm (Wang et al. 2005).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
1.3. Experimental details:
The experiments were carried out as shown in Table 1 and maintaining process parameters of dye initial concentration of 200 mg/L and agitation speed of 200 rpm. The pH of system was maintained by 1.0 N HCl or 1.0 N NaOH during experiment. All other chemicals used were of analytical reagent grade.
The percentage of removal and quantity of dye adsorbed, [q.sub.e] (mg/g) was calculated using the following formula:
% Removal = ([C.sub.o] - [C.sub.e]) X 100/[C.sub.o] (1)
[q.sub.e] = ([C.sub.o] - [C.sub.e]) X V/W, (2)
were, [C.sub.o] and [C.sub.e] are initial and equilibrium concentration of dye respectively. V the volume of the solution and W the weight of the adsorbent used.
1.4. Equilibrium isotherm
The Freundlich isotherm is an empirical equation employed to describe heterogeneous systems and is expressed by the following equation.
[q.sub.e] = [K.sub.F] [C.sub.e.sup.1/n] OR log [q.sub.e] = log [K.sub.F] + 1/n log [C.sub.e], (3)
where [K.sub.F] (L/g) and n are the Freundlich constants reflecting the adsorption capacity and intensity respectively which are calculated from the intercept and slope of the plots of log [C.sub.e] vs. log [q.sub.e].
The Langmuir equation is widely used for adsorption equilibria because of its thermodynamic basis. The Langmuir isotherm model assumes monolayer coverage of adsorbate over a homogeneous adsorbent surface, and at equilibrium, a saturation point is reached where no further adsorption can occur. The Langmuir isotherm model is expressed as
1/[q.sub.e]=1/[q.sub.max] + (1/[q.sub.max][K.sub.L])(1/[C.sub.e]), (4)
where [C.sub.e] is the equilibrium concentration (mg/L); [q.sub.e] is the quantity of dye adsorbed onto adsorbents (mg/g); [q.sub.max] is qe for a complete monolayer (mg/g), a constant related to sorption capacity; and KL is the Langmuir constant related to the affinity of the binding sites and energy of adsorption (L/mg) (Venkateswarlu et al. 2007).
1.5. Kinetic isotherm
There are different variables that depend upon rate of sorption such as surface area, porosity, particle size, etc. of adsorbent and properties of adsorbate. In order to investigate the mechanism of adsorption and potential rate controlling steps such as chemical reaction, diffusion control and mass transport processes, kinetic models have been used to test experimental data. These kinetic models included the pseudo first-order equation, the pseudo second-order equation and the Elovich equation.
The pseudo first-order equation of Lagergren is generally expressed as follows
ln ([q.sub.e] - [q.sub.t]) = ln [q.sub.e] - [k.sub.1]t, (5)
where [q.sub.t] and [q.sub.e] are the amounts of MBD adsorbed at time t and equilibrium (mg/g), respectively, and [k.sub.1] is the pseudo first-order rate constant for the adsorption process (1/min). The linear graph of ln ([q.sub.e] - [q.sub.t]) vs. t shows the applicability of first order kinetic. Also, the pseudo second-order chemisorption kinetic rate equation is expressed
t/[q.sub.t] = 1/[k.sub.2][q.sub.e.sup.2] + (1/[q.sub.e])t, (6)
where [k.sub.2] is the equilibrium rate constant of pseudo second order equation (g/mg min). The linearity of t/[q.sub.t] vs t suggests the best fit with pseudo second order kinetic (Paliulis 2006).
The Elovic equation was firstly used in the kinetics of chemisorption of gases on solids, it has been successfully applied for the adsorption of solutes from a liquid solution. The Elovic equation is given as follows:
[q.sub.t] = 1/[beta] ln ([alpha][beta]) + 1/[beta] ln t, (7)
where [alpha] is the initial sorption rate (mg/g min) and the parameter [beta] is related to the extent of surface coverage and activation energy for chemisorption (g/mg). The linear graph of [q.sub.t] vs. ln t shows the applicability of Elovic kinetic (Bulut, Tez 2007).
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Surface analysis of adsorbents
Table 2 compares the surface analysis of NLP and activated NLP using [H.sub.2]S[O.sub.4], in which particle size, porosity, pore diameter, pore volume and surface area of activated NLP were moderately increased than those of NLP. While in comparison to NLP, pore diameter of activated NLP was slightly increased. This shows that [H.sub.2]S[O.sub.4] was effective in creating well-developed pores on the surface of NLP with large surface area and porous structure.
2.2. Effect of adsorbent dose
Fig. 2 depicted effect of adsorption doses of activated NLP and NLP (0.5 to 3.0 gm/L) for adsorption MBD at temperature of 300 K and contact duration of 60 min at neutral pH, in which constant increment in removal of MBD was found. The value of percentage removals were found to be 41.1 to 82.9% using activated NLP and also, 37.1 to 72.2% of removal using NLP at adsorbent dosage of 0.5 to 3.0 g/L respectively. This may be due to the increase in availability of surface active sites resulting from the increased dose and conglomeration of the adsorbents (D'Ilario et al. 2008). Also, the removal of MBD by activated NLP was found higher than NLP. The pore sizes after acid treatment of NLP are bigger and also, possibility that the small increase in the pore sizes of activated NLP as compared to normal NLP was due to formation of small new pores during acid activation at the higher acid concentration (Brezovska et al. 2005).
2.3. Effect of pH
The pH exploits an important part on the quantity of the dye fixed. The choice of the pH values was carried out in order to examine the evolution of the adsorption of the dye associated with the various chemical forms present. The influence of pH for percentage adsorption of MBD onto activated NLP and NLP was represented in Fig. 3, in which maximum MBD removal was found to be 72.3 and 79.9% using NLP and activated NLP respectively. The adsorption of MBD on activated NLP and NLP shows that the best adsorption may be obtained at basic pH which shows there is protons release from the surface of the carbon due to cation exchange between the sorbent and the dye solution. This reveals that the increase of pH deprotonate the acidic groups on the surface of the carbon and provides more negative sites for the sorption of cationic form of the dye molecules (Malarvizhi, Sulochana 2008). It is observed that percentage removal of activated NLP is higher than that of NLP.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
2.4. Effect of temperature
To study the effect of temperature on the color removal, experiment was performed at temperature of 310, 320, 330, 340, 350 and 360 K (Fig. 4). The nature of curves of graph is considerable increase as increasing temperature and highest removal was found to be 44.8 and 49.8% using NLP and activated NLP respectively at temperature of 360 K. The adsorbed amounts of dyes decrease with the rise in temperature, which indicate that the adsorption process is of exothermic nature. This may be due to a tendency for the dye molecules to escape from the solid phase to be bulk phase with the increasing temperature of the solution (Ozacar, Sengil 2004). It is verified that removal of MBD by activated NLP was higher than the NLP.
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
2.5. Effect of contact duration
The influence of contact duration on adsorption of MBD was presented in Fig. 5, in which amount of adsorption of dye are continuously increasing with increasing contact durations and The value of percentage removals were found to be 37.2 to 63.7% using activated NLP and also, 32.1 to 56.2% of removal using NLP at contact duration of 30 to 105 min respectively. That is probably due to the larger surface area of natural materials at the beginning for the adsorption of color. As the surface adsorption sites become exhausted, the uptake rate is controlled by the rate at which the adsorbate is transported from the exterior to the interior sites of the adsorbent particles (Bulut, Tez 2007). Also, it is confirm that adsorption of MBD on activated NLP is higher than NLP.
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
2.6. Adsorption isotherm:
The isotherms parameters and correlation coefficient values were mentioned in Table 3, in which maximum adsorption capacity ([Q.sub.max]) of activated NLP (401.6 mg/g) was found higher than NLP (352.6 mg/g). So, the activated NLP is more suitable adsorbent than NLP. Many studies are conducted for adsorption of Methylene Blue removal using adsorbent, rice husk, cotton waste, hair, coal, GLP and MLP and their [Q.sub.max] values are 312, 277, 158, 250, 315.6 and 304.6 mg/g respectively (McKay et al. 1999; Patel, Vashi 2009). The coefficient values ([r.sub.2]) of Freundlich and Langmuir models represented that the data were fitted to both isotherm. Also, we observed that [r.sub.2] values of Freundlich isotherm were found higher than Langmuir isotherm for both adsorbents, so, adsorption process is well fitted to Freundlich isotherm, confirming multilayer coverage of adsorbate having heterogenic adsorbent surface. The same pattern was observed for absorption of various types of dye onto adsorbents (Malarvizhi, Sulochana 2008; Inbaraj, Sulochana 2002; Prahas et al. 2008).
2.7. Kinetic studies
Values of kinetic parameters (derived from slope and intercept) and the coefficients for these equations determined by non-linear regression for all kinetic models, Pseudo first-, Pseudo-second order and Elovich equation for adsorption of MBD onto activated NLP and NLP are listed in Table 3. High [r.sub.2] (> 0.99) implies that the correlations fit well with the experimental data. It can be observed that correlation coefficient values, 0.9960 and 0.9909 of Pseudo-second order equation, for activated NLP and NLP respectively, were higher than other kinetic isotherms. So, Pseudo-second order equation is most fitted than other kinetic isotherm. Similar views have been expressed by earlier scientists (Lin et al. 2008; Alpat et al. 2008; Nagda, Ghole 2008).
1. According to the surface analysis of activated NLP and NLP, the surface of activated NLP is more porous than NLP.
2. The comparison study of adsorption of MBD by activated NLP and NLP was conducted, in which effect of adsorption dose, pH, temperature and contact duration was exploited, and concluded that percentage removal of MBD by activated NLP was found higher than NLP. Also, parameter of adsorption dose is found to be more effective for removal of MBD onto activated NLP and NLP. The highest removal of MBD (82.9%) was achieved using 3.0 gm/L of activated charcoal at pH 7 and contact duration of 60 min.
3. The Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms were utilized, in which maximum adsorption capacity ([Q.sub.max]) of activated NLP and NLP was found to be 401.6 and 352.6 mg/g respectively, indicating activated NLP is more efficient than NLP. Also, Freundlich isotherm was more application than Langmuir isotherm for MBD adsorption.
4. The data were analyzed using kinetic models, pseudo first-and second-order and Elovich equation, in which pseudo second-order model is more applicable among others investigated models, derived from correlation coefficient.
Adedayo, O.; Javadpour, S.; Taylor, C.; Anderson, W. A.; Moo-Young, M. 2004. Decolourization and detoxification of Methyl Red by aerobic bacteria from a wastewater treatment plant, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 20: 545-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:WIBI.0000043150.37318.5f
Alpat, S. K.; Ozbayrak, O.; Alpat, S.; Akcay, H. 2008. The adsorption kinetics and removal of cationic dye, Toluidine Blue O, from aqueous solution with Turkish Zeolite, Journal of Hazardous Materials 151: 213-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.071
Bhattacharyya, K. G.; Sharma, A. 2005. Kinetics and thermodynamics of Methylene Blue adsorption on Neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf powder, Dyes and Pigment 65(1): 51-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.06.016
Bhattacharyya, K. G.; Gupta, S. S. 2008. Influence of acid activation on adsorption of Ni(II) and Cu(II) on kaolinite and montmorillonite: kinetic and thermodynamic study, Chemical Engineering Journal 136(1): 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jxej.2007.03.005
Brezovska, S.; Marina, B.; Napanova, B.; Burevski, D.; Bosevska, V.; Stoianovska, L. 2005. Adsorption properties and porous structure of sulfuric acid treated bentonites determined by the adsorption isotherms of benzene vapor, Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society 70: 33-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/JSC0501033B
Bulut, Y.; Tez, Z. 2007. Adsorption studies on ground shells of Hazelnut and almond, Journal of Hazardous Materials 149: 35-U. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.03.044
Carlos, B.; Ivonne, L.; Gabriela, R.; Bryan, B.; Patricia, B. 2009. Removal of biorefractory compounds in industrial wastewater by chemical and electrochemical pretreatments, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 48: 1253-1258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie800560n
D'Ilario, L.; Francolini, I.; Martinelli, A.; Piozzi, A. 2008. Insight into the Heparin-Toluidine Blue (C.I. Basic Blue 17) interaction, Dyes and Pigments 80(3): 343-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2008.07.015
Inbaraj, B. S.; Sulochana, N. 2002. Basic dye adsorption on a low cost carbonaceous sorbent--kinetic and equilibrium studies, Indian Journal of Chemical Technology 9: 201208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2008.07.015
Jaikumar, V.; Ramamurthi, V. 2008. Optimization of batch process parameters by response surface methodology for colour removal using spent brewery grains, in International Conference on Environmental Research and Technology (ICERT 2008), 28-30 May, 2008, Penang, Malaysia, 840-489.
Kalyuzhnyi, S.; Sklyar, V. 2000. Biomineralisation of azo dyes and their breakdown products in anaerobic-aerobic hybrid reactor, Water Science and Technology 41(12): 23-30.
Khaled, A.; El Nemr, A.; El-Sikaily, A.; Abdelwahab, O. 2009. Removal of Direct N Blue-106 from artificial textile dye effluent using activated carbon from orange peel: Adsorption isotherm and kinetic studies, Journal of Hazardous Materials 165: 100-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.122
Lin, J. X.; Zhan, S. L.; Fang, M. H.; Qian, X. Q.; Yang, H. 2008. Adsorption of basic dye from aqueous solution onto fly ash, Journal of Environmental Management 87: 193200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.001
Malarvizhi, R.; Sulochana, N. 2008. Sorption isotherm and kinetic studies of methylene blue uptake onto activated carbon prepared from wood apple shell, Journal of Environmental Protection Science 2: 40-46.
Mazeikiene, D.; Valentukeviciene, M.; Cyril, J. 2010. Laboratory study of ammonium ion removal by using zeolite (clinoptilolite) to treat drinking water, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management 18(1): 54-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jeelm.2010.07
McKay, G.; Porter, J. F.; Prasad, G. R. 1999. The removal of dye colours from aqueous solutions by adsorption on low-cost materials, Water Air and Soil Pollution 114(3-4): 423-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005197308228
Nagda, G. K.; Ghole, V. S. 2008. Utilization of lignocellulosic waste from bidi industry for removal of dye from aqueous solution International Journal of Environmental Research 2(4): 385-390.
Nazari-Moghaddam, A. A.; Najafpor, G. D.; Ghoeyshi, A. A. 2010. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous phase by pretreated walnut shell in a packed column, Iranica Journal of Energy and Environment 1(2): 137-143.
Ozacar, M.; Sengil, I. A. 2004. Equilibrium data and process design for adsorption of disperse dyes onto Alunite, Environmental Geology 45: 762-768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0936-5
Paliulis, D. 2006. Numerical modeling of kinetics of heavy metal sorption from pollutes water, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management 14(1): 10-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16486897.2006.9636873
Patel, H. J.; Vashi, R. T. 2009. Comparative study of methylene blue dye removal from its aqueous solution using guava and mango leaf powder as low cost adsorbent, Interna tional Journal of Human Geography and Environmental Studies 1(1): 58-62.
Ponnusami, V.; Gunasekar, V.; Srivastava, S. N. 2009. Kinetics of methylene blue removal from aqueous solution using gulmohar (Delonix regia) plant leaf powder: multivariate regression analysis, Journal of Hazardous Materials 169: 119-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.066
Prahas, D.; Kartika, Y.; Indraswati, N.; Ismadji, S. 2008. The use of activated carbon prepared from jackfruit (artocarpus heterophyllus) peel waste for methylene blue removal, Journal of Environmental Protection Science 2: 1-10.
Rozic, L.; Novakovic, T.; Petrovic, S.; Vukovic, Z.; Cupic, Z. 2008. Fractal analysis of physical adsorption on surfaces of acid activated bentonites from Serbia, Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly 14(4): 227-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ0804227R
Sethu, V. S.; Andersen, J. M.; Cloke, M. 2009. Biosorption of Cu(II) from wastewater using Azadirachta indica (Neem leaves), Journal of Environmental Research and Development 3(3): 614-620.
Singh, G.; Bala, N.; Rathod, T. R. 2009. Utilization of textile industrial effluent from raising Azadirachta Indica A. juss seedling in indian desert, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management 17(3): 171-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648-6897.2009.17.171-180
Somasiri, W.; Ruan, W.; Xiufen, L.; Jian, C. 2006. Decolourization of textile wastewater containing acid dyes in UASB reactor system under mixed anaerobic granular sludge, Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry 5(1): 1224-1234.
Venkateswarlu, P.; Venkata, R. M.; Rao, D. S.; Rao, M. V. 2007. Removal of chromium from an aqueous solution using Azadirachta indica (neem) leaf powder as an adsorbent, International Journal of Physical Sciences 2(8): 188-195.
Wang, S.; Boyjoo, Y.; Choueib, A. 2005. A comparative study of dye removal using fly ash treated by different methods, Chemosphere 60: 1401-1407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.01.091
Himanshu Patel (1), R. T. Vashi (2)
Department of Chemistry, Navyug Science College, Rander Road, Surat 395009, Gujarat, India
E-mails: (1) firstname.lastname@example.org (corresponding author); (2) email@example.com
Submitted 24 Jan. 2011; accepted 27 Feb. 2012
Himanshu PATEL. Dr Himanshu Patel, a corresponding author of this research article, is a Research fellow of Navyug Science College, Gujarat, INDIA. My research area are characterization of textile wastewater and its treatment using various adsorbents and coagulants prepared from natural plant materials like leaf, root, seed, etc. Also, adsorption of various types of dye from its aqueous solution onto natural plant materials. I am a member of Scientific Committee and Editorial Review Board on Medical and Biological Sciences in "World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology" and volunteer editor in the "E-International Scientific research Journal of Consortium (E-ISRJC)'
R. T. VASHI. Dr R. T. Vashi is lecturer and research guide at Navyug Science College, Gujarat, INDIA. His research area is environmental and applied chemistry. He is a member of Editorial Advisory Board of Journal of Environmental Research And Development (JEDAR).
Table 1. Experimental details for comparison of NLP and activated NLP for adsorption of MBD Effect of Adsorption pH System Dose (g/L) Effect of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 7 Adsorption 2.0, 2.5 and dose 3.0 Effect of pH 1.0 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 Effect of 1.0 7 Temperature Effect of 1.0 7 Contact duration Effect of Temperature (K) Contact System Duration (min) Effect of 300 60 Adsorption dose Effect of pH 300 60 Effect of 310, 320, 330, 60 Temperature 340, 350 and 360 Effect of 300 30, 45, 60, Contact 75, 90 and 105 duration Table 2. Surface analysis of Adsorbents Analysis NLP Activated NLP Particle Size (mesh) 122 184 Porosity (%) 24 37 Pore Volume ([cm.sub.3]/g) 0.052 0.087 Pore Diameter (nm) 8.7-9.5 9.0-9.7 BET surface Area ([m.sub.2]/g) 412 524 Table 3. Isothermal and kinetic parameters for adsorption of MBD using activated NLP and NLP Adsorbent Model Parameters Activated NLP NLP Freundlich [K.sub.F](L/g) 4.99 4.84 n 1.43 1.46 [r.sup.2] 0.994 0.997 Langmuir [K.sub.L] (L/g) 0.032 0.039 [Q.sub.max] (mg/g) 402 353 [r.sup.2] 0.998 0.993 Pseudo [K.sub.1] X [10.sup.-2] (1/min) 1.97 1.73 first-order [r.sup.2] 0.985 0.954 Pseudo [K.sub.2] X [10.sup.-2] (g/mg 1.42 1.13 second-order min) [r.sup.2] 0.996 0.991 Elovich [alpha] (mg/g min) 30.1 25.5 equation [beta] (g/mg) 0.12 0.11 [r.sup.2] 0.995 0.967
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Patel, Himanshu; Vashi, R.T.|
|Publication:||Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management|
|Date:||Mar 1, 2013|
|Previous Article:||Factors affecting seasonal and spatial patterns of water quality in Lithuanian rivers.|
|Next Article:||Environment-friendly biodiesel production by transesterification of rapeseed oil: Effect of reaction parameters.|