A case of needle-free delivery system incompatibility.
We report a further equipment incompatibility between the V3-GISS triple lumen peripheral set from Go Medical Industries (Subiaco, WA) and the Smart Site needle-free valve port 200E from Alaris (Dublin, Ohio, USA) (Figure 1). This incompatibility was encountered during the recent case of a 70-year-old male, ASA II, undergoing cystocopy and transurethral resection of the prostate. An 18-gauge BD Insyte catheter with a Smart Site needle-free valve port 200E was inserted into a superficial vein on the dorsum of the right hand. A V3-GISS triplelumen peripheral set was connected to this port with a 1 litre bag of compound sodium lactate connected via an administration set to the primary arm of the peripheral set. The patient underwent a single-shot spinal with 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and, following repositioning, was commenced on a propofol target-controlled infusion at 1.2 [micro]g/minute for sedation. The propofol was connected to the fluid giving set port. Approximately five minutes after commencement of the target-controlled infusion, the patient's systolic blood pressure was recorded at 89 mmHg from a starting pressure of 140 mmHg. It was decided to give a 0.5 mg bolus of metaraminol via one of the two spare lumens on the V3-GISS triple-lumen peripheral set. However, neither of these ports was usable. As a result, the propofol had to be temporarily ceased to enable the administration of metaraminol.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
On connection on the V3-GISS triple lumen set directly to the BD Insyte cannula, following removal of the Smart Site needle-free valve port 200E, all three lumens were useable. We note with interest that the triple-lumen peripheral sets manufactured by Alaris are compatible with the needle-free valve port 200E. We suggest that this incompatibility needs to be more widely recognised.
(1) Russo PL, Harrington GA, Spelman DW. Needleless intravenous 1. systems: a review. Am J Infect Control 1999; 27:431-434.
(2) McCallum SR, Graham GR, Sigston PE. Blocked syringe with 2. use of needle-free connector. Anaesthesia 2007; 62:94-95.
J. D. Doyle
R. H. Riley
Perth, Western Australia
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Doyle, J.D.; Riley, R.H.|
|Publication:||Anaesthesia and Intensive Care|
|Date:||Jul 1, 2009|
|Previous Article:||Jackson spinal table failure: a possible design flaw.|
|Next Article:||Effect of pre-emptive alveolar recruitment strategy before pneumoperitoneum on arterial oxygenation during laparoscopic hysterectomy.|