Printer Friendly

A call for multiproduct testing.

Within the past five years we have been bombarded with a variety of whitening products. We now have whitening floss, whitening gum, whitening rinses and whitening toothpastes. This list does not even cover the whitening treatments offered in the dental offices. I, like any other assistant, want the very best for my patients. My concerns, however, are arising from the very strong chemical compositions of these products, and I question whether or not there are any side effects in using a multitude of these products on a long-term basis. Each product has a minimal amount of a harsh chemical ingredient, but if a patient is using a combination of whitening ingredients, then he or she is compounding the minimal dose of each product.

In every practice, including mine, we have whitening Nazis. These are people who can't get white enough, who insist on constantly using the strips, the gum, the rinse, and the toothpastes on an ongoing basis. Some of these people are doing the in-office bleaching or the office dispensed at home bleaching in addition to using all of these products. We have to ask the product manufacturers for more long-term studies of patients using a multitude of products over a long period of time.

Now I don't mean to sound like a worrier, but I know I would feel more comfortable recommending these products after I have read these studies. In my practice, I am seeing more extra- and interoral allergic reactions that seem to be greatly improved if not eliminated by changing dental care products. I want my patients to choose the products that are right for them. We in the dental community must ask for these studies. The product manufacturers have always been more than willing to help us with every aspect of our patient care. I am sure this request will not be any different.

As dental patient caregivers, we are in a position to recommend quality products to our patients and feel good about doing so. We ask nothing in return and periodically, we hit the jackpot by having a patient come back to us and say, "Thank you, I can't tell you how happy I am with my smile. It never would have happened if it weren't for you."

By Diane Chandler, CDA

Diane Chandler has been practicing for 22 years in private practice in Washington, Michigan.
COPYRIGHT 2006 American Dental Assistants Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Point of View
Author:Chandler, Diane
Publication:The Dental Assistant
Date:Jul 1, 2006
Words:394
Previous Article:Minnie and Maxine.
Next Article:Roll out the recognition.
Topics:


Related Articles
Estimating a non-minimum cost function for hospitals: reply.
A note on empirical tests of separability and the "approximation" view of functional forms.
Scale elasticity versus scale efficiency in banking.
Testing for subadditivity of vertically integrated electric utilities.
Expense preference behavior and contract-management: evidence from U.S. hospitals.
TMC[TM] Labs Review.
Aspect launches multiproduct solution.
Beyond quality.
The basics of boundary scan: this technique permits reuse of test data and cuts costs by eliminating ICT and functional test.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters