A better way to mange smog.
California already ranks--and regulates--VOCs this way as part of two vehicle-emissions programs. And while the federal government should too, says analysis coauthor Armistead Russell of Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, it should not stop there. Russell would reward all polluters for reducing the overall reactivity of the VOCs they emit--from industrial plants and consumer products such as paints to any companies that signed onto the smog-emissions trading program proposed by EPA last week. The latter would allow a VOC emitter to buy a "credit" to pollute from a company that had already reduced its emitted VOCs more than regulations required.
Some critics have argued against such a policy, on the grounds that an individual VOC's reactivity can vary with climate, typical cloud cover, even prevailing, coincident pollutants. But Russell says his team's new analysis found that these factors don't matter much: Whatever alters the reactivity of one VOC does much the same thing to most of the rest. So volatility differences between VOCs change little.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Armistead Russell and other researchers report that a more effective means of reducing air pollution would be to reward polluters for reducing the most potent volatile organic chemicals|
|Article Type:||Brief Article|
|Date:||Aug 5, 1995|
|Previous Article:||Breast effects of hormonal pollutants.|
|Next Article:||What risk hormones? Conflicting studies reveal problems in pinning down breast cancer risks.|