A bad accounting rule.
As the saying goes, everything changes and everything stays the same. An earlier version of this standard had a 3% rule that was exploited to create Enron's Special Purpose Entities. The current FAS 140 has the Section 9(c) loophole, or 10% rule, that was aggressively exploited by Citi and other key players in the subprime crisis to move mortgage-backed securities off balance sheets after selling just 10% to outsiders. Citi did this right under the nose of their regulator, the Federal Reserve, and thereby avoided banking reserve requirements on this debt.
I suggest this is not ethics, but bad accounting policy. FYI, this lousy policy was the result of heavy lobbying by the financial industry, which said that a higher (say 51% is common sense) rule would inhibit capital formation. Guess we know the truth now. This was not bad ethics but a bad accounting standard.
--Gordie Brenne, CMA
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Article Type:||Letter to the editor|
|Date:||Apr 1, 2009|
|Previous Article:||CDS bill moves forward.|
|Next Article:||No more cheap shots.|