Printer Friendly

A Mycobacterium bovis BCG-naked DNA prime-boost vaccination strategy induced [CD4.sup.+] and [CD8.sup.+] T-cell response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis immunogens.

1. Introduction

Today tuberculosis (TB) still remains a major infectious cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, one-third of the world's population is latently infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the only available vaccine against tuberculosis presently, and the protective efficacy of it is variable from 0 to 80% in many field trials and is unclear in pulmonary TB in adults [1], but it prevents miliary tuberculosis in newborns and toddlers [2, 3]. The cause of these large differences in vaccine-induced protection is poorly understood, and some of its limitations may involve short-lived BCG-induced immune reactivity. This raises an issue that a novel TB vaccine which can protect adults against tuberculosis is urgently needed [3, 4], while BCG vaccination of newborns should be continued as it is effective. Previous TB vaccines are classified into 4 main groups: (1) DNA vaccines, (2) recombinant BCG vaccines, (3) subunit vaccines, and (4) attenuated vaccines, and currently most efforts to improve the protective immunity of BCG are focused on strategies that incorporate priming with BCG, recombinant BCG, or other attenuated mycobacteria followed by a heterologous booster immunization that aims to improve the duration and efficacy of the responses [57]. Considering all kinds of reasons, we decide to choose the heterologous prime-boost vaccination strategy comprised of priming with BCG and boosting with a novel vaccine candidate [8, 9].

Cellular immune responses are critical for the control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, which depends on polyfunctional [CD4.sup.+] and [CD8.sup.+] T-cell responses [10, 11]. T helper type 1 (Th1) [CD4.sup.+] T cell can primarily secrete interferon-[gamma] (IFN-[gamma]), which is important in M. tuberculosis infection and disease prevention [12]. [CD8.sup.+] cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are essential for clearance ofintracellular M. tuberculosis infection [13] by secreting perforin, granulysin, and extracellular enzymes into the immunological synapse [14]. Heterologous prime-boost strategy has been used in many models of pathogenic infections [15], and some studies demonstrate that prime-boost strategies using BCG as prime and heterologous constructs such as recombinant DNA, recombinant adenovirus, and recombinant poxviruses as boosting immunogens can enhance [CD4.sup.+] and [CD8.sup.+] T-cell responses against TB [6,7,16-18].

To search for a novel effective vaccine candidate to improve the protection of BCG, many strategies have been attempted and a number of antigens have been studied. In our research, we choose two BCG substrains (BCG-Pasteur1173 and BCG-China) which are different in two deletions called RD14 and N-RD18 [19,20], which are present in BCG-China, but absent in BCG-Pasteur1173. We notice two genes (Rv1769 and Rv1772) in RD14 deletion, which have been studied superficially, and some research has indicated that Rv1769 and Rv1772 should be considered for potential subunit vaccines [21,22].

In previous work, researchers paid much attention to ESAT-6, CFP-10, and Ag85 [7,16, 23-25], and little attention has been paid to the RD14 deletion. Maybe the genes located in this deletion are responsible for different immunogenicity between the BCG-Pasteur and BCG-China. Based on all of the reasons above, we have constructed several vaccination strategies primed with BCG-C or BCG-P and boosted with recombination plasmid pcDNA3.1-Rv1769 or pcDNA3.1Rv1772 to immunize BALB/c mice and evaluated its immunogenicity. This study shows that this strategy can elicit potent humoral and cellular immune responses comprising both [CD4.sup.+] and [CD8.sup.+] T cells against TB in mice, but its protective efficacy was not to be demonstrated in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains, Media, and Plasmids. M. bovis BCGPasteur and BCG-China were kindly provided by the Chengdu Biological Products Institute. BCGs were maintained in Sauton's medium (MgS[O.sub.4] 0.5 g, [K.sub.2]HP[O.sub.4] 0.5 g, citric acid 2 g, sodium glutamate 8 g, glycerol 60 mL, ZnS[O.sub.4] 0.01 g, and ferrum-ammonium citrate 0.05 g in 1000 mL, pH1.4-7.5). The plasmid was originally conserved in our laboratory.

2.2. Plasmid Construction. The Rv1769 and Rv1772 genes were amplified from the BCG-China genome and cloned into pcDNA3.1(+) plasmid to generate recombinant pcDNA3.1Rv1769 and pcDNA3.1-Rv1772. The sequences were confirmed by sequencing by Invitrogen (Shanghai, China). Endotoxin-free plasmids were prepared using an EndoFree plasmid purification kit (OMEGA, USA). Plasmids were adjusted to a final concentration of 1mg/mL in PBS and stored at -20[degrees]C.

2.3. Animals and Immunization Protocol. 4-5-week-old pathogen-free BALB/c male mice were purchased from the Laboratory of Animals Institute in Sichuan University (Chengdu, China). The vaccination schedules of mice are shown in Table 1. Groups of BALB/c (n = 18) were primed with PBST, BCG-China, or BCG-Pasteur1173 at week 0 and boosted with plasmid DNA or control plasmid at week 3 and week 6. Mice were immunized subcutaneously with 5 * [10.sup.6] CFU of BCG in a volume of 0.1 mL per mouse and intramuscularly with 50 [micro]g DNA in a volume of 0.1 mL each time per mouse. Mice were put to death at 10,14,18, and 22 weeks (four mice for each group at each time point). Blood was collected from retroorbital sinus and the sera were stored at -20[degrees]C after separation until used.

2.4. ELISA for Antibody Response. Specific antibodies against TB were determined by an indirect ELISA method. The method was described as previous [22, 26]. Each sera sample was tested in three replicates, and the results are expressed as mean [+ or -] standard errors.

2.5. Proliferation of Splenocytes. The animals were sacrificed as previously described and the spleens were removed aseptically. The proliferation of lymphocyte were tested by MTT assay [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazoliumbromide]. The method was described as previous [22, 27 ]. The results are expressed as the value of stimulation index (SI). SI = OD of stimulated well/OD of unstimulated well.

2.6. Flow Cytometry. The splenocytes were prepared and cultured as previously described [27,28], and the splenocytes were plated in 6-well flat-bottom plates (5 * [10.sup.6] cells in 2 mL of cRPMI per well) with 100 [micro]L TB-PPD (1 [micro]g/mL; XiangRui Biotech, Ltd., Beijing, China) in each well and incubated for 72 h (37[degrees]C, 5% C[O.sub.2]). The cells were collected and washed three times with 0.1 M PBS (PH = 7.2), and then rabbit antiMouse [CD4.sup.+]-PE and anti-Mouse [CD8.sup.+]-FITC (eBioscience, USA) were added into EP tube for a 30 min incubation in an ice-bath keep out of the sun. Finally, the cells were washed twice again and the proportions of [CD4.sup.+] and [CD8.sup.+] T cells were determined by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD).

2.7. Cytokine Release Assay. The splenocytes were dealt with in the same way as flow cytometry assay previously described, and concentrations of IFN-[gamma] and IL-4 in the medium were measured by an ELISA kit (eBioscience, USA) according to the manufacture's protocol.

2.8. Statistical Analysis. Measurements of these data are expressed as the mean [+ or -] standard errors (S.E.). We used one-way ANOVA to analyze the differences among the groups and post hoc test to analyze the differences between two groups. When P value < 0.05, the differences were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Antibodies in the Serum. The antibody titers were detected by ELISA assay to reflect the humoral immune response against TB. The levels of antibody response in the sera of the immunized mice at different time points are shown in Figure 1. The results show that firstly the titers of IgG and IgG2a antibodies in the group immunized with BCG-C+3.169 and BCG-C+3.1-72 were higher than those in the other 7 groups at the 8th week (P < 0.01); secondly the IgG titers in group BCG-C+3.1-69 were higher than those in the BCGP+3.1-72, PBST, plasmid controls, and positive controls at the 4th and 12th weeks (P < 0.05) and were higher than those in the other 8 groups at the 16th week (P < 0.05); thirdly the titers of IgG2a antibodies in the group immunized with BCG-C+3.1-69 and BCG-C+3.1-72 were higher than those in the BCG-P+3.1-72, PBST, plasmid controls, and positive controls at the 12th week (P < 0.05). Besides, the titers of IgG1 antibodies in the group immunized with BCG-C+3.1-69 were higher than those in the other 8 groups at the 4th, 8th, and 16th weeks (P < 0.05). Figure 1(d) shows that groups BCGC+3.1-69, BCG-C+3.1-72, BCG-P+3.1-69, and BCG-P+3.1-72 all indicated a shift towards a Th1 immune response at the 12th week.

3.2. Lymphoproliferation Assay. To detect the cell-mediated immune response, the splenic lymphocyte proliferation was assessed by MTT assay. The results show that the proliferation of splenocytes in the BCG-C+3.1-69, BCG-C+3.1-72, BCGP+3.1-69, and BCG-P+3.1-72 groups were higher than those in the PBST, plasmid controls, and positive controls at the 12th week (P < 0.01), but there were no significative statistical differences between the above four groups (BCG-C+3.1-69, BCG-C+3.1-72, BCG-P+3.1-69, and BCG-P+3.1-72), while the group BCG-C+3.1-69 showed greater proliferation of splenocytes than the other 8 groups at the 4th week (P < 0.05) and than the BCG-C+3.1-72, PBST, plasmid controls, and positive controls groups at the 8th week (P < 0.05). The SI value in the BCG-C+3.1-69 and BCG-C+3.1-72 groups peaked at the 12th week, and the proliferation level decreased after this time. Importantly, the proliferation reaction of group BCG-C+3.1-72 still maintains at a high level at the 16th week (Figure 2).

3.3. Percentages of Splenocyte Subsets. The proportions of splenocyte subsets were measured by flow cytometry. As Figure 3 shows, the BCG-C+3.1-72 group induced a significantly greater ratio of [CD4.sup.+] T cells at the 8th week compared with BCG-P+3.1-69, BCG-P+3.1-72, PBST, plasmid controls, and positive controls groups (P < 0.05). In addition, the BCG-C+3.1-69, BCG-C+3.1-72, BCG-P+3.1-69, and BCGP+3.1-72 groups induced a significantly greater ratio of [CD4.sup.+] T cells at the 12th week compared with PBST, plasmid controls, and positive controls groups (P < 0.01), and the status of BCG-C+3.1-69, BCG-C+3.1-72, and BCG-P+3.1-69 groups lasted to the 16th week except the group BCG-P+3.172. Finally, the proportions of [CD8.sup.+] T cells in the BCG-C+3.169 group was higher than that in the other 8 groups at the 12th week (P < 0.05) Figure 3).

3.4. Cytokine Production. To determine Th1- and Th2-type immune response, the IFN-[gamma] and IL-4 were detected from restimulated spleen cells by ELISA. According to Figure 4, the results clearly showed that the concentrations of IFN-[gamma] in the group BCG-C+3.1-69 and BCG-C+3.1-72 were higher than those in the other 7 groups at the 12th week (P < 0.05), and the IFN-[gamma] concentrations of the BCG-C+3.1-72 were higher than those of the groups BCG-C+3.1-69, BCG-P+3.169, PBST, plasmid controls, and positive controls at the 8th week (P < 0.05) (Figure 4). IL-4 maintained at a low level, and there were no significantly changes among any groups including PBST group (P > 0.05) (data not shown).

4. Discussion

Heterologous prime/boost vaccination strategies employing recombinant bacteria, viruses, proteins, and naked DNA have been shown to elicit stronger and more diverse cellular immune responses than BCG vaccine alone [5-7, 22]. In humans, DNA vaccines alone have not provided satisfactory results, whereas DNA vaccines produced better outcomes when immunized as a prime-boost strategy [29, 30]. According to these former observations, we built this work to evaluate the immunogenicity of two genes (Rv1769 and Rv1772) by a heterologous prime/boost strategy. The data of this paper supports the theory that heterologous prime-boost vaccination significantly induces more robust cellular immune responses than BCG vaccine alone.

Previously, numerous prime-boost vaccination protocols have demonstrated varying success when carried out in various infectious disease models. In tuberculosis experiments, prime-boost vaccination protocols include BCG/protein prime-boost [8, 22], DNA/protein prime-boost [31], DNA/ adenovirus 5 prime-boost [32], DNA/BCG prime-boost [33], and BCG/MVA prime-boost [5] vaccination schedules, and these prime-boost protocols used Ag85A [5, 8], MTJ721 [31], ESAT-6 [33], Rv1769, and Rv1772 [22] as antigens. Considering a BCG immunization is done in early childhood, our study has begun with a BCG prime.

Antigens Rv1769 and Rv1772 are interesting because the coding genes are present in the genome of BCG-China, only deleted from the BCG-Pasteur. We suppose that overexpression of the genes enhances the immune response of the existing BCG. More importantly, we succeeded in improving the vaccine immunogenicity of the BCG by using a prime-boost vaccination.

The pathogenic bacterium of TB is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which is intracellular bacteria and cell immune is very important in clearance of it. In the early infection, the [CD4.sup.+] T cell can release IFN-[gamma], IL-2, and TNF-[alpha], which can activate macrophages to fight against M. tuberculosis [34]. In this paper, IFN-[gamma], as the representative, was detected by ELISA, and the results show that groups BCG-C+3.1-69 and BCG-C+3.1-72 were of the highest levels of IFN-[gamma] concentrations. In addition, flow cytometry results show that groups BCG-C+3.1-69 and BCG-C+3.1-72 can induce the greatest ratio of [CD4.sup.+] T cells. According to the data of flow cytometry, we have observed that [CD4.sup.+] T cells and IFN-[gamma] levels of BCG-C+3.1-72 rise from 8th week and down after the 12th week; however, great ratio of [CD4.sup.+] T cells of BCG-C+3.1-69 lasted to even the 16th week. So, we suppose that the group BCG-C+3.1-69 may enhance a stronger and longer-lasting T-cell immune response against M. tuberculosis early infection. Recently, numerous studies indicate that [CD8.sup.+] T cells are critical for the induction of protective TB immunity in humans [35], NHPs [36], rodents [37], and cattle [38]. The [CD8.sup.+] T cells can secrete perforin, granulysin, and extracellular enzyme to promote bacterial schizolysis [13, 34]. In our research, flow cytometry results show that the proportions of [CD8.sup.+] T cells in the BcG-C+3.169 group was the highest at the 12th week with P < 0.05. Considering these, we have thought about the group BCGC+3.1-69 not only induced polyfunctional [CD4.sup.+] T cells, but also a robust [CD8.sup.+] T-cell response in mice.

To measure the TH1-type immune response better, we also determined the antibody responses induced by these vaccine candidates. The results reveal that groups BCGC+3.1-69 and BCG-C+3.1-72 can elicit high levels of IgG and IgG2a antibodies and also last a long time. Besides, the ratio of IgG2a/IgG1 shows a shift towards a Th1-type immune response.

Lastly, the proliferation rate of splenocytes increased consistently with the other experimental results; the splenocytes proliferation rate in group BCG-C + 3.1-69 rises in the 4th week and reaches the peak value in the 12th week. Due to the arguments above, we believe that the group BCG-C + 3.169 can induce stronger and longer-lasting TH1-type immune response than native BCG or other prime-boost groups in mice having [CD4.sup.+] and [CD8.sup.+] T cells.

Some research has demonstrated that BCG and recombinant BCG can induce central memory [CD8.sup.+] T-cell differentiation in vivo [6, 39]. Because [CD4.sup.+] T helper cells are important for driving memory [CD8.sup.+] T-cell differentiation [40, 41], the ability of BCG to generate memory [CD8.sup.+] T cells could make it have the propensity to stimulate [CD4.sup.+] T helper cells growth. It has been suggested that the functional heterogeneity ofT-cell responses may be associated with successful containment of microbial infections. The extent of T-cell polyfunctionality has been correlated with the protection against leishmaniasis in mice, HIV-1 in humans [42, 43], and SIV in nonhuman primates [44]. In this study, a prime BCGboost DNA strategy can induce [CD8.sup.+] T-cell differentiation as well as [CD4.sup.+] T cell; we suppose that this vaccination strategy may obtain success against TB in humans and gene Rv1769 may be an excellent vaccine candidate.

The prime BCG-boost plasmid Rv1769 strategy improved the vaccine immunogenicity of BCG, and the subunit vaccination can be used to improve preexisting immunogenicity evoked by BCG and even be used in future clinical trials. More recent protocols show that naked DNA performs better in macaques and humans as part of a prime-boost regime [30]. Therefore, BCG prime and naked DNA boost vaccination should be used for several reasons: firstly BCG needs to be included in future vaccine trials against tuberculosis; secondly naked DNA vaccination has been shown to be effective as a submit vaccine in prime-boost vaccination protocols; lastly this vaccination regime can improve BCG-induced immunogenicity.

In summary, our results provide evidence that a BCG-naked DNA prime-boost vaccination protocol represents a valuable candidate (gene Rv1769) for future vaccine trials targeted at one of the major health problems worldwide.

In the future, we would consider building an in vivo challenge model to extend our findings to an infection/disease protection system.

Abbreviations

PBST:                PBS-Tween 80

BCG:                 Bacille Calmette-Guerin

BCC-C:               The group immunized with
                     vaccine BCG-China substrain

BCG-P:               The group immunized with
                     vaccine BCG-Pasteur1173
                     substrain

BCG-C + pcDNA3.1:    The group immunized
                     BCG-China prime plasmid
                     pcDNA3.1 boost

BCG-P+pcDNA3.1:      The group immunized
                     BCG-Pasteur1173 prime

                     plasmid pcDNA3.1 boost

BCG-C+3.1-69:        The group immunized
                     BCG-China prime plasmid
                     pcDNA3.1-Rv1769 boost

BCG-P+3.1-69:        The group immunized
                     BCG-Pasteur1173 prime
                     plasmid pcDNA3.1-Rv1769
                     boost

BCG-C+3.1-72:        The group immunized
                     BCG-China prime plasmid
                     pcDNA3.1-Rv1772 boost

BCG-P+3.1-72:        The group immunized
                     BCG-Pasteur1173 prime
                     plasmid pcDNA3.1-Rv1772
                     boost.


http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/395626

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grants from the Chinese National Key Project of Infectious Disease (2012ZX10003008 004) and The Fund of Doctoral Scientific Research of MOE (20110181110046).

References

[1] WHO, "BCG, (Tuberculosis)," 2011, http://www.who.int/biologicals/areas/vaccines/bcg/Tuberculosis/en/.

[2] P. E. M. Fine, "Bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccines: a rough guide" Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 11-14, 1995.

[3] S. H. E. Kaufmann, "Is the development of a new tuberculosis vaccine possible?" Nature Medicine, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 955-960, 2000.

[4] I. M. Orme, "Beyond BCG: the potential for a more effective TB vaccine," Molecular Medicine Today, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 487-492, 1999.

[5] E. Z. Tehilian, C. Desel, E. K. Forbeset al., "Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of prime-boost regimens with recombinant AureC hly+ Mycobacterium bovis BCG and modified vaccinia virus ankara expressing M. tuberculosis antigen 85A against Murine tuberculosis" Infection and Immunity, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 622-631, 2009.

[6] M. J. Cayabyab, B. Korioth-Schmitz, Y. Sun et al., "Recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG prime-recombinant adenovirus boost vaccination in rhesus monkeys elicits robust polyfunctional simian immunodeficiency virus-specific T-cell responses," Journal of Virology, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 5505-5513, 2009.

[7] C. Cai, J. Lu, C. Wang et al., "Immunogenicity and protective efficacy against Murine tuberculosis of a prime-boost regimen with BCG and a DNA vaccine expressing ESAT-6 and Ag85A fusion protein," Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 2011, Article ID 617892, 10 pages, 2011.

[8] J. V. Brooks, A. A. Frank, M. A. Keen, J. T. Bellisle, and I. M. Orme, "Boosting vaccine for tuberculosis," Infection and Immunity, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 2714-2717, 2001.

[9] N. P Goonetiileke, H. McShane, C. M. Hannan, R. J. Anderson, R. H. Brookes, and A. V. S. Hill, "Enhanced immunogenicity and protective efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis of bacille Calmette-Gueerin vaccine using mucosal administration and boosting with a recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara," The Journal of Immunology, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 1602-1609, 2003.

[10] J. L. Flynn and J. Chan, "Immunology of tuberculosis," Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 19, pp. 93-129, 2001.

[11] P Wong and E. G. Pamer, "CD8 T cell responses to infectious pathogens," Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 21, pp. 29-70, 2003.

[12] N. Caccamo, G. Guggino, S. A. Joosten et al., "Multifunctional [CD4.sup.+] T cells correlate with active Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection," European Journal of Immunology, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2211-2220, 2010.

[13] D. Sud, C. Bigbee, J. L. Flynn, and D. E. Kirschner, "Contribution of [CD8.sup.+] T cells to control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection," The Journal ofImmunology, vol. 176, no. 7, pp. 4296-4314, 2006.

[14] J. S. Woodworth, Y. Wu, and S. M. Behar, "Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific [CD8.sup.+] T cells require perforin to kill target cells and provide protection in vivo," The Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 12, pp. 8595-8603, 2008.

[15] S. H. E. Kaufmann and A. J. McMichael, "Annulling a dangerous liaison: vaccination strategies against AIDS and tuberculosis," Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. S33-S44, 2005.

[16] M. Romano, S. D'Souza, P.-Y. Adnet et al., "Priming but not boosting with plasmid DNA encoding mycolyl-transferase Ag85A from Mycobacterium tuberculosis increases the survival time of Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccinated mice against low dose intravenous challenge with M. tuberculosis H37Rv," Vaccine, vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 3353-3364, 2006.

[17] M. Santosuosso, S. McCormick, X. Zhang, A. Zganiacz, and Z. Xing, "Intranasal boosting with an adenovirus-vectored vaccine markedly enhances protection by parenteral Mycobacterium bovis BCG immunization against pulmonary tuberculosis," Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 4634-4643, 2006.

[18] J. M. Vuola, S. Keating, D. P Webster et al., "Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers," The Journal ofImmunology, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 449-455, 2005.

[19] J. Liu, V. Tran, A. S. Leung, D. C. Alexander, and B. Zhu, "BCG vaccines: their mechanisms ofattenuation and impact on safety and protective efficacy," Human Vaccines, vol. 5, no. 2,pp. 70-78, 2009.

[20] A. S. Leung, V Tran, Z. Wu et al., "Novel genome polymorphisms in BCG vaccine strains and impact on efficacy," BMC Genomics, vol. 9, article 413, 2008.

[21] P J. Cockle, S. V. Gordon, A. Lalvani, B. M. Buddle, R. G. Hewinson, and H. M. Vordermeier, "Identification of novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens with potential as diagnostic reagents or subunit vaccine candidates by comparative genomics," Infection and Immunity, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 6996-7003, 2002.

[22] M. Lu, Z. Y. Xia, and L. Bao, "Enhancement of antimycobacterial Th1-cell responses by a Mycobacterium bovis BCG prime-protein boost vaccination strategy," Cellular Immunology, vol. 285, no. 1-2, pp. 111-117, 2013.

[23] J. Yang, K. Xu, J. Zheng, L. Wei, and J. Fan L, "Limited T cell receptor beta variable repertoire responses to ESAT-6 and CFP-10 in subjects infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis" Tuberculosis, vol. 93, pp. 529-537, 2013.

[24] L. Zhang, H. Zhang, Y. Zhao et al., "Effects of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESAT-6/CFP-10 fusion protein on the autophagy function of mouse macrophages," DNA and Cell Biology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 171-179, 2012.

[25] M. Legesse, G. Ameni, G. Medhin et al., "IgA response to ESAT-6/CFP-10 and Rv2031 antigens varies in patients with culture-confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, healthy Mycobacterium tuberculosis--infected and non-infected individuals in a tuberculosis endemic setting, Ethiopia," Scandinavian Journal ofImmunology, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 266-274, 2013.

[26] Y. H. Deng, Z. Sun, X. L. Yang, and L. Bao, "Improved immunogenicity of recombinant Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Gueerin strains expressing fusion protein Ag85AESAT-6 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis" Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 332-338, 2010.

[27] Y. Deng, L. Bao, and X. Yang, "Evaluation of immunogenicity and protective efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection elicited by recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG expressing human Interleukin-12p70 and Early Secretory Antigen Target-6 fusion protein," Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 798-808, 2011.

[28] X. Yang, L. Bao, and Y. Deng, "A novel recombinant Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin strain expressing human granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor and Mycobacterium tuberculosis early secretory antigenic target 6 complex augments Th1 immunity," Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 511-518, 2011.

[29] R. R. MacGregor, R. Ginsberg, K. E. Ugen et al., "T-cell responses induced in normal volunteers immunized with a DNA-based vaccine containing HIV-1 env and rev," AIDS, vol. 16, no. 16, pp. 2137-2143, 2002.

[30] S. J. McConkey, W.H.H. Reece, V. S. Moorthy et al., "Enhanced T-cell immunogenicity of plasmid DNA vaccines boosted by recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara in humans," Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 729-735, 2003.

[31] M. J. Cayabyab, S. S. Kashino, and A. Campos-Neto, "Robust immune response elicited by a novel and unique Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein using an optimized DNA/protein heterologous prime/boost protocol," Immunology, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 216-225, 2012.

[32] B. C. G. de Alencar, P. M. Persechini, F. A. Haolla et al., "Perforin and gamma interferon expression are required for [CD4.sup.+] and [CD8.sup.+] T-cell-dependent protective immunity against a human parasite, Trypanosoma cruzi, elicited by heterologous plasmid DNA prime-recombinant adenovirus 5 boost vaccination," Infection and Immunity, vol. 77, no. 10, pp. 4383-4395, 2009.

[33] M. A. Skinner, B. M. Buddle, D. N. Wedlock et al., "A DNA prime-Mycobacterium bovis BCG boost vaccination strategy for cattle induces protection against bovine tuberculosis?" Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 4901-4907, 2003.

[34] M. E. Munk and M. Emoto, "Functions of T-cell subsets and cytokines in mycobacterial infections," European Respiratory Journal, vol. 8, no. 20, pp. 668s-675s, 1995.

[35] S. M. Smith, A. S. Malin, P T. Lukey et al., "Characterization of human Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette-Gueerin- reactive [CD8.sup.+] T cells," Infection and Immunity, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 52235230, 1999.

[36] C. Y. Chen, D. Huang, R. C. Wang et al., "A critical role for [CD8.sup.+] T cells in a nonhuman primate model of tuberculosis," PLoS Pathogens, vol. 5, no. 4, Article ID e1000392, 2009.

[37] Y. Wu, J. S. Woodworth, D. S. Shin, S. Morris, and S. M. Behar, "Vaccine-elicited 10-kilodalton culture filtrate protein-specific [CD8.sup.+] T cells are sufficient to mediate protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection," Infection and Immunity, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 2249-2255, 2008.

[38] A. E. Hogg, A. Worth, P Beverley, C. J. Howard, and B. Villarreal-Ramos, "The antigen-specific memory [CD8.sup.+] T-cell response induced by BCG in cattle resides in the [CD8.sup.+]y/dTCRCD45RO+ T-cell population," Vaccine, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 270279, 2009.

[39] H. van Faassen, M. Saldanha, D. Gilbertson, R. Dudani, L. Krishnan, and S. Sad, "Reducing the stimulation of [CD8.sup.+] T cells during infection with intracellular bacteria promotes differentiation primarily into a central (CD62LhighCD44high) Subset," The Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 9, pp. 5341-5350, 2005.

[40] D. J. Shedlock and H. Shen, "Requirement for [CD4.sup.+] T cell help in generating functional [CD8.sup.+] T cell memory," Science, vol. 300, no. 5617, pp. 337-339, 2003.

[41] J. C. Sun and M. J. Bevan, "Defective [CD8.sup.+] T cell memory following acute infection without [CD4.sup.+] T cell help," Science, vol. 300, no. 5617, pp. 339-342, 2003.

[42] J. R. Almeida, D. A. Price, L. Papagno et al., "Superior control of HIV-1 replication by [CD8.sup.+] T cells is reflected by their avidity, polyfunctionality, and clonal turnover," Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 204, no. 10, pp. 2473-2485, 2007

[43] P A. Darrah, D. T. Patel, P M. de Luca et al., "Multifunctional TH1 cells define a correlate of vaccine-mediated protection against Leishmania major," Nature Medicine, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 843-850, 2007.

[44] M. Genesca, T. Rourke, J. Li et al., "Live attenuated lentivirus infection elicits polyfunctional simian immunodeficiency virus Gag-specific [CD8.sup.+] T cells with reduced apoptotic susceptibility in rhesus macaques that control virus replication after challenge with pathogenic SIVmac239," The Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 7, pp. 4732-4740, 2007.

Miao Lu, Zhi Yang Xia, and Lang Bao

Laboratory of Infection and Immunity, School of Basic Medical Science, West China Center of Medical Sciences, Sichuan University, No. 17, Third Section, Ren Min Nan Road, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Lang Bao; baolang@scu.edu.cn

Received 11 November 2013; Revised 2 January 2014; Accepted 6 February 2014; Published 11 March 2014

Academic Editor: Beatrice Saviola

Table 1: Heterologous prime-boost immunization schedule.

Group                     Prime               Boost1

PBST                       PBST                PBST
BCG-C                   BCG-China              PBST
BCG-P                BCG-Pasteur1173           PBST
BCG-C+pcDNA3.1          BCG-China        Plasmid pcDNA3.1
BCG-P+pcDNA3.1       BCG-Pasteur1173     Plasmid pcDNA3.1
BCG-C+3.1-69            BCG-China       Plasmid pc-Rv1769
BCG-P+3.1-69         BCG-Pasteur1173    Plasmid pc-Rv1769
BCG-C+3.1-72            BCG-China       Plasmid pc-Rv1772
BCG-P+3.1-72         BCG-Pasteur1173    Plasmid pc-Rv1772
Timeline in weeks           0                   3
                       [down arrow]        [down arrow]

Group                      Boost2

PBST                        PBST
BCG-C                       PBST
BCG-P                       PBST
BCG-C+pcDNA3.1        Plasmid pcDNA3.1
BCG-P+pcDNA3.1        Plasmid pcDNA3.1
BCG-C+3.1-69         Plasmid Pc-Rv1769
BCG-P+3.1-69         Plasmid Pc-Rv1769
BCG-C+3.1-72         Plasmid Pc-Rv1772
BCG-P+3.1-72         Plasmid Pc-Rv1772
Timeline in weeks            6
                        [down arrow]
COPYRIGHT 2014 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article; Bacille Calmette-Guerin
Author:Lu, Miao; Xia, Zhi Yang; Bao, Lang
Publication:Journal of Immunology Research
Article Type:Report
Date:Jan 1, 2014
Words:4819
Previous Article:Construction of a chimeric secretory IgA and its neutralization activity against avian influenza virus H5N1.
Next Article:Anti-nuclear antibodies in daily clinical practice: prevalence in primary, secondary, and tertiary care.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters