Printer Friendly

2005 Ninth Circuit Environmental Review.

SHERRY L. BOSSE

Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. County of Los Angeles, 433 F.3d 1260 (9th Cir. 2006)

Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 420 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 2005)

Ecology Center, Inc. v. Austin, 430 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2005)

Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe v. Ryan, 415 F.3d 986 (9th Cir. 2005)

National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service, 422 F.3d 782 (9th Cir. 2005)

Olympic type Line Co. v. City of Seattle, 437 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2006)

Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, 426 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2005)

RENEE HASLETT

Alaska Trojan Partnership v. Gutierrez, 425 F.3d 620 (9th Cir. 2005)

City of Arcadia v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 411 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2005)

The Ecology Center v. Castaneda, 426 F.3d 1144 (9th Cir. 2005)

United States v. Wyatt, 408 F.3d 1257 (9th Cir. 2005)

Washington Toxics Coalition v. Environmental Protection Agency, 413 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2005)

Yakutat, Inc. v. Gutierrez, 407 F.3d 1054 (9th Cir. 2005)

LLOYD POLLARD

Ashley Creek Phosphate Co. v. Norton, 420 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2005)

Defenders of Wildlife v. Flowers, 414 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2005)

Native Ecosystems Council v. United States Forest Service, 418 F.3d 953 (9th Cir. 2005)

Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Forest Service, 421 F.3d 797 (9th Cir. 2005)

Skranak v. Castaneda, 425 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir. 2005)

ANNA STASCH

ARC Ecology v. United States Department of Air Force, 411 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2004)

Association of Irritated Residents v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 423 F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 2005)

Baccarat Fremont Developers, LLC v. United States Army Corps of Engineer, 425 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 2005)

Great Basin Mine Watch v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 401 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2005)

Hale v. Norton, 437 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 2006)

San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United States, 417 F.3d (9th Cir. 2005)

United States v. W.R. Grace & Co., 429 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2005)
2005 NINTH CIRCUIT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

REVIEW EDITOR'S NOTE

CASE SUMMARIES

 I. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

 A. Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation
 and Liability Act
 B. Clean Air Act
 C. Clean Water Act
 D. Federal insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
 E. National Environmental Policy Act

 II. NATURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION
 A. Endangered Species Act
 B. Alaska National interest Land Conservation Act
 C. Forests
 D. Native American Issues
 E. Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation Act
 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMINAL LIABILITY
 IV. LITIGATION ISSUES
 A. Standing and Ripeness
 B. Statute of Limitations Analysis
FS C. Subject Matter Jurisdiction under the APA
 D. Attorney Sanctions
 V. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES
 A. Federalism
 B. Sovereign Immunity
 C. Separation of Powers

CHAPTERS

 Defenders of Wildlife v. EPA: Testing the Boundaries of Federal
 Agency Power Under the ESA
 Sherry Bosse

 ARC Ecology v. United States Department of the Air Force:
 Extending the Extraterritorial Reach of Domestic
 Environmental Law
 A. Danyel Stasch

2005 NINTH CIRCUIT INDEX OF CASES AND STATUTES
COPYRIGHT 2006 Lewis & Clark Northwestern School of Law
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Tucker, Jon
Publication:Environmental Law
Date:Jun 22, 2006
Words:515
Previous Article:The Nez Perce water rights settlement and the revolution in Indian country.
Next Article:Review editor's note.
Topics:


Related Articles
1994 Ninth Circuit Environmental Review.
1995 Ninth Circuit environmental review.
When plain language may not be plain: whether CERCLA's preclusion of pre-enforcement judicial review is limited to actions under CERCLA.
The return of reasonableness to NEPA review?
Current trends in judicial review of environmental agency action.
Case summaries.
Case summaries.
Idaho nibbles at Montana: carving out a third exception for tribal jurisdiction over environmental and natural resource management.
Case summaries.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters