Printer Friendly

... A facts-and-circumstances determination.

The Tax Clinic item, "Recent Case Recognizes Built-In Capital Gains Tax for Valuation Purposes" TTA, December 1998, p. 818 reads, in part, as follows:

In 1989, the IRS reaffirmed its position in Letter Ruling (TAM) 9150001, stating that a corporation's inherent built-in capital gains tax liability could not be considered in valuing the corporation's stock--despite the repeal of the General Utilities doctrine--in the absence of evidence that a liquidation was actually contemplated....

Contrary to a recent decision in which the built-in capital gains tax was not recognized for valuation purposes (Irene Eisenberg, TC Memo 1997-483), the Tax Court, in Est. of Davis, 110 TC 530 (1998), found it necessary to apply a discount or adjustment for the built-in capital gains tax, because it is what a hypothetical willing buyer and seller would have done at the valuation date.

On Aug. 18, 1998, the Second Circuit, in Eisenberg, 155 F3d 50, reversed the Tax Court, holding:

... We believe that an adjustment for potential capital gains tax liabilities should be taken into account in valuing the stock at issue in the closely held C corporation even though no liquidation or sale of the Corporation or its assets was planned at the time of the gift of the stock. We therefore remand this matter to the Tax Court to ascertain the gift tax to be paid by the taxpayer consistent with this opinion [footnote 16].

Footnote 16 reads as follows:

Where there is a relatively sizable number of potential buyers who can avoid or defer the tax, the fair market value of the shares might well approach the pre-tax market value of the real estate. Potential buyers who could avoid or defer the tax would compete to purchase the shares, albeit in a market that would include similar real estate that was not owned by a corporation. However, where the number of potential buyers who can avoid or defer the tax is small, the fair market value of the shares might be only slightly above the value of the real estate net of taxes. In any event, all of these circumstances should be determined as a question of valuation for tax purposes.

The IRS has acquiesced in the Second Circuit's decision (AOD 1999-001).

FROM STUART R. JOSEPHS, CPA, TAX ASSISTANCE PRACTICE (TAP), SAN DIEGO, CA
COPYRIGHT 1999 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1999, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:update of article regarding built-in capital gains tax in The Tax Adviser, Dec. 1998, p. 818
Author:Josephs, Stuart R.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 1999
Words:382
Previous Article:Discounts for built-in gains.
Next Article:The new capital gains rules maze.
Topics:


Related Articles
New York State gains tax: what's new?
Avoiding ordinary income treatment on the sale or exchange of depreciable property between related parties.
Capital gains after the TRA '97 - tax relief or mental strain?
Ensuring capital gain treatment for boot received in a reorganization.
Valuing closely held stock for estate and gift tax purposes.
Securities trader reporting requirements.
The new capital gain tax rate.
Will a tax opinion still prevent penalties?
How the AMT affects long-term capital gain rates: tax advisers and their clients should be aware of the interaction between the capital gain tax...
Current developments (Part II: this two-part article discusses recent legislation, cases, rulings, regulations and other developments in the S...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |