Printer Friendly

[beta]-trace protein, cystatin C, [[beta].sub.2]-microglobulin, and creatinine compared for detecting impaired glomerular filtration rates in children.

Although it is a crude marker, serum creatinine is the most widely used to predict glomerular filtration rate (GFR). [9] Creatinine concentrations are insensitive to mild to moderate reductions in GFR. In childhood, the age and muscle mass dependency of serum creatinine complicates GFR assessment even when body length/creatinine ratios are used (1, 2). Low-molecular weight proteins have been suggested to replace serum creatinine. [[beta].sub.2]-microglobulin ([[beta].sub.2]-MG) has been advocated as a better predictor of GFR (3), but its serum concentration can increase as an acutephase reactant in disorders, such as lupus nephritis, that clearly require adequate assessment of GFR. Serum or plasma Cystatin C (Cys-C) may be better markers for GFR than serum creatinine [reviewed in Ref. (4)]. Cys-C offers an advantage over creatinine because of its age and gender independence (5, 6), but its diagnostic sensitivity for impaired GFR in pediatric patients, particularly in patients with only mildly impaired renal function, has not been better than that of the height/Creatinine ratio (Schwartz formula) (7).

([beta]-Trace protein (BTP) is a low-molecular weight glycoprotein with 168 amino acids and a molecular weight of 23 000-29 000, depending on the degree of glycosylation. BTP belongs to the lipocalin protein family; its biologic significance as prostaglandin D synthase is under investigation (8), and it is isolated primarily from cerebrospinal fluid (9). Serum BTP is increased in patients with renal diseases (8). It has been reported to be a better indicator of reduced GFR (estimated by inulin clearance) than serum Creatinine in the Creatinine-blind range (10), but not better than Cys-C (11). Further studies on this interesting new marker of GFR remain scarce (12), and to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports about the pediatric age range.

We used data from two university children centers to address the following goals: (a) to establish provisional reference limits of the new marker BTP in children; (b) to evaluate the relationship between BTP and other low-molecular weight proteins such as Cys-C and [[beta].sub.2]-MG to the GFR, using chromium-EDTA ([sup.51]Cr-EDTA) or technetium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid ([sup.99m]Tc-DTPA) clearance as the gold-standard comparison method; (c) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of BTP in comparison with the other low-molecular weight proteins to detect reduced GFR; and (d) to evaluate the usefulness of low-molecular weight proteins in serum in comparison with the conventional indicators, serum Creatinine and the Schwartz GFR estimate.

This study compared serum analytes with the results of nuclear isotope clearances because only these clearance data guarantee an exact comparative basis. However, because it is not ethically possible to measure nuclear isotope clearances in healthy children, this study included only children with various renal pathologies and different degrees of GFR.

Materials and Methods


We obtained venous blood from 225 children with various renal pathologies referred for determination of nuclear medicine GFR clearance. Patients were recruited consecutively unless parents or patients refused participation in the study. The patients were attending the Pediatric Nephrology outpatient clinic either in Berlin (n = 127) or in Ottawa (n = 98). Their ages ranged from 0.2 to 18.0 years with a mean of 11.2 [+ or -] 4.5 years. Mean height was 137 [+ or -] 28 cm (range, 62-189 cm), mean weight was 40.2 [+ or -] 20.0 kg (range, 6.5-104.0 kg), and mean body surface area was 1.22 [+ or -] 0.42 [m.sup.-2] (range, 0.33-2.20 [m.sup.-2]). Ninety-one patients were females, and 134 were males. The indications for the GFR measurements were as follows: condition after renal transplantation (n = 12), reflux nephropathy (n = 30), obstructive uropathy (n = 44), forms of glomerulonephritis (n = 40), and others (n = 99; including posthemolytic uremic syndrome, steroid-sensitive syndrome, cystinosis, and orthostatic proteinuria).

Archival sera collected between February 1998 and January 2001 as surplus serum available for additional measurements were used for this retrospective study. The study was approved by the local ethics boards and was in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (revised in 1983), and written consent from parents and 18-year-old patients was obtained in each case.


In the Ottawa patients, GFR was determined by a [sup.99m]TcDTPA single-injection technique with a three-point sampling approach at 2, 3, and 4 h postinjection according to Russell (13) with the minor modification that no 10-min sample was obtained. In Berlin, clearances were performed with a modification (7) of a [sup.51]Cr-EDTA method (14); [sup.51]Cr-EDTA is not available in North America. There is good agreement between the two methods (15,16). For both methods, clearance values <90 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2] were defined as reduced GFR. Both methods were performed and GFRs determined without knowledge of results for Cys-C, BTP, and [[beta].sub.2]-MG.

The techniques for measuring Creatinine, Cys-C, and BTP were identical in both centers. [[beta].sub.2]-MG was measured in only the German patients. Samples were analyzed without knowledge of GFR tests, which were performed first. Serum Creatinine was measured with an enzymatic assay (Creatinine-PAP; Roche Diagnostics), and the factors 38 for children >1 year and 48 for adolescent males [Schwartz GFR estimate (17), with a 20% correction for enzymatic measurement of Creatinine] were used to calculate the Schwartz GFR estimate (7). The formula reads as follows:

GFR estimate = height (cm) x constant/serum creatinine ([micro]mol/L)

Determination of Cys-C was performed with the N Latex Cystatin C reagent set (Dade Behring) on a Behring BN ProSpec analyzer. [[beta].sub.2]-MG was measured with the Tinaquant reagent set (Roche Diagnostics) on the Hitachi 717 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics). Interassay imprecisions (CVs) were 2.3% and 1.4% at 114 and 499 [micro]mol/L, respectively, for Creatinine (n = 31); 3.2% at 1.49 mg/L for Cys-C (n = 10); and 3.1% and 2.7% at 2.55 and 5.25 mg/L, respectively, for [[beta].sub.2]-MG (n = 10). BTP was measured with a newly developed nephelometric research assay (N Latex [beta]TP) on a BN ProSpec analyzer (Dade Behring). The assay is based on the principle of latex particle-enhanced immunonephelometry using rabbit polyclonal antibodies against BTP. Calibration is performed with a seven-point reference curve prepared automatically from a single calibrator. Standardization of the assay is based on highly purified BTP from cerebrospinal fluid (Dade Behring). The identity and the grade of purification were monitored by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for grade of purification and N-terminal amino acid sequencing for grade of purification and identity, compared with theoretical sequence. The BTP content was determined by quantitative amino acid analysis. For the default sample dilution of 1:100 (1 part BTP sample plus 99 parts buffer), the basic measuring range is ~0.25-15.8 mg/L. The total analytical imprecision (intraassay plus interassay; n = 40) of the assay, calculated from two control materials and three serum samples with concentrations of 1.51-7.89 mg/L, was 2.3-6.5%.


Statistical analysis was performed with the GraphPad Prism for Windows (Ver. 3.02; GraphPad Software) or SP55 for Windows (Ver. 10; SP55 Inc). The reference cohort with GFR values >90 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2] was subdivided into female and male age groups. Differences between the groups were tested with the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test. To compare the differences of the relative changes of the analytes from their upper reference limits in the various GFR ranges, the t-test of paired data was used. Associations between variables (e.g., age, creatinine, GFR) were assessed with the correlation coefficient according to Pearson (r). The central 95% reference intervals for Cys-C and BTP were calculated according to the IFCC recommendations (18). P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The diagnostic validity of Cys-C, BTP, [[beta].sub.2]-MG, creatinine, and the height/creatinine ratio (Schwartz formula) (7, 17) to detect reduced GFR in comparison to the [sup.51]Cr-EDTA or [sup.99m]Tc-DTPA clearance was evaluated by ROC analysis (19). MedCalc for Windows (Ver. 6.11.001; MedCalc) was used for calculations of the area under the curve and the sensitivity/specificity data at certain cutoffs.



We deliberately combined the data of the two centers because we believed that the evaluation should have included a large number of patients. We indeed applied two different, well-established, and comparable isotope methods for GFR determination (15,16). Because there was no statistically significant difference between the Berlin and Ottawa patient cohorts with regard to age (Student t-test, P = 0.30), gender distribution ([chi square] test, P = 0.13), or GFR (Student t-test, P = 0.15), the two cohorts could be combined for a common evaluation of data. To confirm the agreement of both GFR methods used in this study, we compared the concentrations of creatinine, BTP, and Cys-C in GFR subgroups with nondifferent GFR values in both centers (50-70, 70-90, 90-110, and 110-130 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2]). The concentrations of the analytes in the particular subgroups were not different between the two study sites (P >0.05). Most importantly, the same assays with comparable interassay imprecisions were used for the other GFR markers in both centers. The scatter plots of the three analytes BTP, Cys-C, and creatinine (Fig. 1) show an overlap of their concentrations measured in the two centers. The y-intercepts of the regression lines calculated for each analyte did not significantly differ (P >0.05) between the two centers.

Because it is impossible to measure nuclear isotope clearances in children without suspicious pathology, we defined children with nonpathologic GFR values (>90 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2]) as the control group. Seventy-five patients had GFR values <90 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2], defined as reduced GFR, and 150 patients had GFR values >90 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2] (Table 1). In the control group, all analytes had gaussian distributions (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P > 0.05). The concentrations of BTP, Cys-C, [[beta].sub.2]-MG, and creatinine were independent of gender for the entire control group and for the subgroups of 1-6, 6-12, and 12-18 years (P values between 0.059 and 0.975). Unlike serum creatinine (Fig. 1C), BTP (Fig. 1A) and the other two proteins, Cys-C (Fig. 1B) and [[beta].sub.2]-MG (data not shown), were not age dependent and showed slopes of the regression lines to the age for both genders that were not significantly different from zero (P values between 0.09 and 0.99). As shown for Cys-C and [[beta].sub.2]-MG, there was no statistically significant correlation between the BTP concentrations and age [r = -0.126 for males (P = 0.250); r = -0.216 for females (P = 0.087)]. The mean Cys-C concentrations for the different age ranges were as follows: 0.80 [+ or -] 0.19 mg/L (1-6 years); 0.84 [+ or -] 0.14 mg/L (6-12 years); and 0.82 [+ or -] 0.16 mg/L (12-18 years). The mean BTP concentrations for the different age ranges were as follows: 0.71 [+ or -] 0.19 mg/L (1-6 years); 0.68 [+ or -] 0.13 mg/L (6-12 years); and 0.65 [+ or -] 0.15 mg/L (12-18 years). These differences did not reach statistical significance (P >0.05). Thus, as we had shown previously for Cys-C (5), age- and gender-independent reference values for BTP can be considered. We calculated the upper reference limits as mean +1.96 SD. The 97.5 percentiles and their 90% confidence intervals for BTP and Cys-C are given in Table 1. The corresponding values for creatinine, [[beta].sub.2]-MG, and the Schwartz GFR estimates have been included for comparison.



Mean nuclear medicine GFR in the whole group was 105 [+ or -] 37 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2] (range, 7-235 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2]). BTP behaved similarly to serum creatinine and Cys-C when plotted against nuclear medicine clearance. It was possible to draw nonlinear regression lines (exponential decays) between the concentrations of the three analytes and GFR or linear regression lines between their reciprocals and GFR (Fig. 1). The correlations between the nuclear medicine GFR clearance and the reciprocals were significantly higher (P <0.05) for BTP (r = 0.653; Fig. 2A) and Cys-C (r = 0.765; Fig. 2B) [although not for [[beta].sub.2]-MG (r = 0.557; not shown in Fig. 2)] than for serum creatinine (r = 0.500; Fig. 2C). The correlation coefficient of the Schwartz GFR estimate (r = 0.706) was similar to the correlation coefficients of Cys-C and BTP.


To evaluate the ability of BTP to detect reduced GFR, ROC analysis was performed on data from 150 children with a GFR >90 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2] and 75 children with a GFR <90 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 m-Z. The mean (SD) GFRs in the groups with GFRs above and below >90 mL [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2] were 105 (25) and 65 (20) mL x [min.sup.-1] 1.73 [m.sup.-2], respectively.

ROC plot results are summarized in Table 2. The areas under the ROC curves for BTP (0.912), Cys-C (0.943), ([[beta].sub.2]-MG (0.899), and Schwartz GFR estimate (0.917) were not significantly different (P >0.05), although there was a tendency toward the best area for Cys-C. The area under the curve for creatinine (0.840) was significantly smaller than that for Cys-C (difference between areas, 0.103; SE, 0.031; P <0.001), BTP (difference between areas, 0.072; SE, 0.034; P = 0.036), and the Schwartz GFR estimate (difference between areas, 0.080; SE, 0.021; P = 0.001).

The clinical sensitivities and specificities were calculated at selected decision points of the ROC curves (Table 2). At the upper reference limits (97.5 percentiles), both BTP and Cys-C revealed higher sensitivities than creatinine, [[beta].sub.2]-MG, and the GFR estimate (61% vs 29%, 38%, and 31%, respectively) for reduced GFR. At the cutoff with a diagnostic specificity of 95%, BTP (68%) and Cys-C (80%) had higher sensitivities than did serum creatinine (35%) and ([[beta].sub.2]-MG (32%), but not higher than that of Schwartz GFR estimate (68%; Table 2). At the cutoff with a diagnostic sensitivity of 95%, BTP, Cys-C, and the Schwartz GFR estimate did not differ regarding specificities as the overlapping confidence intervals show (Table 2). Cys-C (63%) and the GFR estimate (65%), but not BTP (52%) showed a higher specificity than creatinine (47%). Between BTP and Cys-C, no statistical differences (P >0.05) in the specificity and sensitivity were found at the selected 95% sensitivity or specificity, respectively, and at the 97.5 percentiles. In addition, with expressions of the BTP, Cys-C, and creatinine concentrations as proportions of their upper reference limits, BTP and Cys-C showed a significantly (P <0.05) greater proportional increase than creatinine at the different degrees of renal failure (Fig. 3). These results clearly demonstrate that BTP is a more sensitive marker than creatinine and shows diagnostic accuracy similar to that of Cys-C, but the Schwartz GFR estimate was equivalent to that of BTP and Cys-C.



The identification of patients with mildly impaired GFR in the so-called "creatinine-blind" area remains a challenge for pediatric nephrologists. Although inulin clearance is the gold standard (20), GFR determination in children is barely practicable because timed urinary sampling is unreliable in children. Therefore, most pediatric centers use a single-shot, nuclear medicine clearance, either [sup.99m]Tc-DTPA (13) or [sup.51]Cr-EDTA (14).

Serum creatinine is a crude marker of GFR, especially in children. In our experience with renal transplants, a change in serum creatinine from 24 to 40 [micro]mol/L within the reference interval reflects ~50% decline in GFR. Serum creatinine typically varies slightly from day to day (21), but age- and gender-associated differences in creatinine production are proportional to muscle mass, and creatinine generation can vary significantly in a given individual over time when muscle mass changes (22, 23). Tubular secretion of creatinine varies not only within an individual but also between individuals, and the proportion of total renal creatinine excretion attributable to tubular secretion increases with decreasing renal function. The latter further amplifies the overestimation of GFR, which creatinine clearance represents (24). The significant age dependency of serum creatinine, although often forgotten, has been addressed by the use of height/creatinine ratios (1, 25); however, even these results may be misleading in children with a very low muscle mass. Serum creatinine, however, is rarely reported with the height/creatinine ratio even in dedicated pediatric hospitals. In our study, with the use of enzymatically determined serum creatinine and the factors 38 for children >1 year and 48 for adolescent males [Schwartz estimate (17) with a 20% correction for enzymatic measurement of creatinine], there was a reasonably good correlation between the nuclear medicine clearance and the estimated GFR (r = 0.706, P <0.0001). However, a marker independent of age and gender would be preferable.


Both [[beta].sub.2]-MG (26) and Cys-C [reviewed in Ref. (4)] have the advantages of age and muscle mass independence (3, 27). BTP was introduced recently as a novel marker for measurement of kidney function in the creatinine-blind range (8,10). In comparison with serum creatinine, all three low-molecular weight proteins, Cys-C, [[beta].sub.2]-MG, and BTP, have been reported to have a better diagnostic sensitivity for detection of impaired GFR (10, 27, 28). [[beta].sub.2]-MG has the disadvantage of being increased in patients with several malignancies and infectious diseases, particularly lymphoproliferative disorders (29). Apart from these interferences, serum concentrations of low-molecular weight proteins will be primarily determined by GFR, and an ideal marker has to have a constant production rate and should not vary in its concentration in situations with an acute-phase reaction. BTP seems to share these properties. That Cys-C is independent of age and gender is well established (5, 6, 30). Here, we demonstrate that BTP, like Cys-C, is independent of age and gender. Therefore, age- and gender-independent upper limits in our control group with GFR values >90 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2] could be calculated. The upper reference limits (parametric 97.5 percentiles) of serum BTP and Cys-C were 1.01 and 1.20 mg/L, respectively. For BTP, a mean value of 0.46 [+ or -] 0.13 mg/L was found in adults, using the same assay (10). The cutoff for Cys-C roughly corresponds to reference intervals shown in other pediatric studies (6, 27, 31-35). Slight differences may reflect assay differences (turbidimetric or nephelometric assay) and/or the use of different calibrators (34, 36).

Similar to the findings in adults (4,10), we found that the ROC plot area of serum creatinine was worse than that of both Cys-C and BTP (Table 2), but the areas for the two proteins were not significantly different (P >0.05). The upper reference limits of both BTP and Cys-C predicted reduced GFR more sensitively than did those of creatinine or [[beta].sub.2]-MG (Table 2). These Cys-C data correspond to the promising results reported in other recent pediatric studies (37, 38), although earlier studies, including our own (5, 34), did not demonstrate such a distinct improvement of sensitivity. Because BTP is equivalent to Cys-C determination as a sensitive predictor of reduced GFR, this new low-molecular weight protein could be considered to replace creatinine or to be used in combination with creatinine as discussed in the case of Cys-C (34, 39, 40). Further studies have to show whether extrarenal causes, such as malignancies or treatment with glucocorticoids, increase serum BTP without evidence of impaired GFR, as was found for Cys-C (41, 42).

We found a significant difference in the diagnostic efficiency of the height/creatinine ratio when compared with creatinine using age-dependent reference values (7). Although it is well established that the Schwartz formula overestimates the GFR in patients with a GFR <15 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2], the overestimation in patients with a GFR >90 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2] is negligible and was 10.3% [+ or -] 3% when the GFR was >50 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2] (43). This study confirms that a height/creatinine ratio provides a better way of estimating GFR in healthy and mildly impaired renal function when compared with age-dependent creatinine reference values. In addition, one can conclude from the diagnostic validity data summarized in Table 2 that BTP and Cys-C were not significantly different from the height/creatinine ratio clearance estimate for the detection of impaired GFR, and therefore, the higher costs are not justified. However, there is a well-known problem with increased muscle mass in male adolescents. Schwartz et al. (17) recognized this fact and adjusted the constant accordingly in that age group. Although it would be preferable to have a marker that is independent of such influences, because puberty can occur prematurely or be delayed in some males, our results also show that the Schwartz formula is sufficiently able to compensate for the age and muscle mass effects.

In summary, this study showed that the low-molecular weight serum proteins BTP and Cys-C had higher diagnostic accuracy than serum creatinine for identification of moderately impaired GFR in children, but they did not yield better diagnostic accuracy than the Schwartz GFR estimate.

We thank Dade Behring for providing us with Cys-C and BTP test methods free of charge. This work was partly supported by grants from the Humboldt University, Berlin.


(1.) Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB, Edelmann CM Jr, Spitzer A. A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics 1976;58:259-63.

(2.) Kwong MB, Tong TK, Mickell JJ, Chan JC. Lack of evidence that formula-derived creatinine clearance approximates glomerular filtration rate in pediatric intensive care population. Clin Nephrol 1985;24:285-8.

(3.) Nolte S, Mueller B, Pringsheim W. Serum [[alpha].sub.1]-microglobulin and [[beta].sub.2]-microglobulin for the estimation of fetal glomerular renal function. Pediatr Nephrol 1991;5:573-7.

(4.) Grubb AO. Cystatin C-properties and use as diagnostic marker. Adv Clin Chem 2000;35:63-99.

(5.) Filler G, Witt I, Priem F, Ehrich JHH, Jung K. Are Cystatin C and [[beta].sub.2]-microglobulin better markers than serum creatinine for prediction of a normal glomerular filtration rate in pediatric subjects? Clin Chem 1997;43:1077-8.

(6.) Bokenkamp A, Domanetzki M, Zinck R, Schumann G, Byrd D, Brodehl J. Cystatin C-a new marker of glomerular filtration rate in children independent of age and height. Pediatrics 1998;101: 875-81.

(7.) Filler G, Priem F, Vollmer I, Gellermann J, Jung K. Diagnostic sensitivity of serum Cystatin for impaired glomerular filtration rate. Pediatr Nephrol 1999;13:501-5.

(8.) Hoffmann A, Nimtz M, Conradt HS. Molecular characterization of [beta]-trace protein in human serum and urine: a potential diagnostic marker for renal diseases. Glycobiology 1997;7:499-506.

(9.) Clausen J. Proteins in normal cerebrospinal fluid not found in serum. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1961;107:170-2.

(10.) Priem F, Althaus H, Birnbaum M, Sinha P, Conradt HS, Jung K. [beta]-trace protein in serum: a new marker of glomerular filtration rate in the creatinine-blind range. Clin Chem 1999;45:567-8.

(11.) Priem F, Althaus H, Jung K, Sinha P. [beta]-Trace protein is not better than Cystatin C as an indicator of reduced glomerular filtration rate. Clin Chem 2001;47:2181.

(12.) Melegos DN, Grass L, Pierratos A, Diamandis EP. Highly increased levels of prostaglandin D synthase in the serum of patients with renal failure. Urology 1999;53:32-7.

(13.) Russell CD. Optimum sample times for single-injection, multisample renal clearance methods. J Nucl Med 1993;34:1761-5.

(14.) Chantler C, Barratt TM. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from plasma clearance of 51-chromium edetic acid. Arch Dis Child 1972;47:613-7.

(15.) Biggi A, Viglietti A, Farinelli MC, Bonada C, Camuzzini G. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate using chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid. Eur J Nucl Med 1995;22:532-6.

(16.) Petersen U, Petersen JR, Talleruphuus U, Moller ML, Ladefoged SD, Mehlsen J, et al. Glomerular filtration rate estimated from the uptake phase of [sup.99m]Tc-DTPA renography in chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:1673-8.

(17.) Schwartz GJ, Brion LP, Spitzer A. The use of plasma creatinine concentration for estimating glomerular filtration rate in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am 1987;34:57-190.

(18.) Solberg HE. Approved recommendations (1987) on the theory of reference values. Part 5. Statistical treatment of collected reference values. Determinations of reference limits. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1987;25:645-56.

(19.) Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 1993;39:561-77.

(20.) Smith HW. The kidney: structure and function in health and disease. New York: Oxford University Press, 1951:63-6.

(21.) Heymsfield SB, Arteaga C, McManus C, Smith J, Moffitt S. Measurement of muscle mass in humans: validity of the 24-hour urinary creatinine method. Am J Clin Nutr 1983;37:478-94.

(22.) Fitch CD, Sinton, DW. A study of creatine metabolism in diseases causing muscle wasting. J Clin Invest 1964;43:444-52.

(23.) James GD, Sealey JE, Alderman M, Ljungman S, Mueller FB, Pecker MS, et al. A longitudinal study of urinary creatinine and creatinine clearance in normal subjects. Race, sex, and age differences. Am J Hypertens 1988;1:124-31.

(24.) Levey AS, Berg RL, Gassman JJ, Hall PM, Walker WG. Creatinine filtration, secretion and excretion during progressive renal disease. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study Group. Kidney Int Suppl 1989;27:S73-80.

(25.) Morris MC, Allanby CW, Toseland P, Haycock GB, Chantler C. Evaluation of a height/plasma creatinine formula in the measurement of glomerular filtration rate. Arch Dis Child 1982;57:611-5.

(26.) Grubb A, Simonsen 0, Sturfelt G, Truedsson L, Thysell H. Serum concentration of Cystatin C, factor D and [beta]-2-microglobulin as a measure of glomerular filtration rate. Acta Med Scand 1985;218: 499-503.

(27.) Kyhse-Andersen J, Schmidt C, Nordin G, Anderson B, Nilsson EP, Lindstrom V, et al. Serum Cystatin C, determined by a rapid, automated particle-enhanced turbidimetric method, is a better marker than serum creatinine for glomerular filtration rate. Clin Chem 1994;40:1921-6.

(28.) Bethea M, Forman DT. [beta]2-Microglobulin: its significance and clinical usefulness. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1990;20:163-8.

(29.) Bataille R, Durie BG, Grenier J. Serum [[beta].sub.2]-microglobulin and survival duration in multiple myeloma: a simple reliable marker for staging. Br J Haematol 1983;55:439-47.

(30.) Randers E, Erlandsen EJ. Serum Cystatin C as an endogenous marker of the renal function-a review. Clin Chem Lab Med 1999;37:389-95.

(31.) Finney H, Newman DJ, Thakkar H, Fell JM, Price CP. Reference ranges for plasma Cystatin C and creatinine measurements in premature infants, neonates, and older children. Arch Dis Child 2000;82:71-5.

(32.) B~kenkamp A, Domanetzki M, Zinck R, Schumann G, Brodehl J. Reference values for Cystatin C serum concentrations in children. Pediatr Nephrol 1998;12:125-9.

(33.) Helin I, Axenram M, Grubb A. Serum Cystatin C as a determinant of glomerular filtration rate in children. Clin Nephrol 1998;49: 221-5.

(34.) Stickle D, Cole B, Hock K, Hruska KA, Scott MG. Correlation of plasma concentrations of Cystatin C and creatinine to inulin clearance in a pediatric population. Clin Chem 1998;44:1334-8.

(35.) Harmoinen A, Ylinen E, Ala-Houhala M, Janas M, Kaila M, Kouri T. Reference intervals for cystatin C in pre- and full-term infants and children. Pediatr Nephrol 2000;15:105-8.

(36.) Price CP, Finney H. Developments in the assessment of glomerular filtration rate. Clin Chim Acta 2000;297:55-66.

(37.) Ylinen EA, Ala-Houhala M, Harmoinen AP, Knip M. Cystatin C as a marker for glomerular filtration rate in pediatric patients. Pediatr Nephrol 1999;13:506-9.

(38.) B~kenkamp A, Ozden N, Dieterich C, Schumann G, Ehrich JH, Brodehl J. Cystatin C and creatinine after successful kidney transplantation in children. Clin Nephrol 1999;52:371-6.

(39.) Mussap M, Ruzzante N, Varagnolo M, Plebani M. Quantitative automated particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay for the routinary measurement of human cystatin C. Clin Chem Lab Med 1998;36:859-65.

(40.) Page MK, Bukki J, Luppa P, Neumeier D. Clinical value of cystatin C determination. Clin Chim Acta 2000;297:67-72.

(41.) Le Bricon T, Thervet E, Benlakehal M, Bousquet B, Legendre C, Erlich D. Changes in plasma cystatin C after renal transplantation and acute rejection in adults. Clin Chem 1999;45:2243-9.

(42.) Kos J, Stabuc B, Cimerman N, Brunner N. Serum cystatin C, a new marker of glomerular filtration rate, is increased during malignant progression [Letter]. Clin Chem 1998;44:2556-7.

(43.) Seikaly MG, Browne R, Bajaj G, Arant BS Jr. Limitations to body length/serum creatinine ratio as an estimate of glomerular filtration in children. Pediatr Nephrol 1996;10:709-11.


Departments of [1] Pediatrics, [3] Biochemistry, and [6] Radiology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H SL1 Canada.

[5] Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5 Canada.

Departments of [2] Laboratory Medicine, [4] Pediatric Nephrology, and [8] Urology, University Hospital Charite, Humboldt University, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.

[7] Dade Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany.

[9] Nonstandard abbreviations: GFR, glomerular iIItration rate; [[beta].sub.2]-MG, [[beta].sub.2]-microglobulin; Cys-C, Cystatin C; BTP, [beta]-trace protein; [sup.51]Cr-EDTA, chromium-EDTA; and [sup.99m]Tc-DTPA, technefium-diethylenetriamine pentaacefic acid.

* Address correspondence to this author at: Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiochemistry, University Hospital Charite, Humboldt University Berlin, Schumannstrasse 20/21, D-10117 Berlin, Germany. Fax 4930-450569912; e-mail

Received September 5, 2001; accepted January 24, 2002.
Table 1. BTP, Cys-C, [[beta].sub.2]-MG, creatinine, and the Schwartz
GFR estimate in children with GFR values of >90-150 and <90 mL x
[min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2]. (a)

 GFR >90 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2]

 Number of Mean [+ or -] SD
 children (ranges)

BTP, mg/L 150 0.68 [+ or -] 0.17 (0.24-1.15)
Cys-C, mg/L 150 0.83 [+ or -] 0.19 (0.36-1.41)
[[beta].sub.2]-MG, 80 1.78 [+ or -] 0.67 (0.43-4.64)
Creatinine, 150 51.1 [+ or -] 17.7 (16.8-101)
Schwartz GFR 150 105 [+ or -] 24.9 (49.8-201)
 estimate, mL x
 [min.sup.-1] x 1.73

 GFR <90 mL x [min.sup.-1]
 x 1.73 [m.sup.-2]

 Cutoff limits
 of the 95% Number of
 reference children
 interval (b)

BTP, mg/L 1.01 (0.97-1.05) 75
Cys-C, mg/L 1.20 (1.16-1.24) 75
[[beta].sub.2]-MG, 3.09 (2.88-3.30) 47
Creatinine, 85.9 (81.8-89.9) 75
Schwartz GFR 56 (50.3-61.7) 75
 estimate, mL x
 [min.sup.-1] x 1.73

 GFR <90 mL x [min.sup.-1]
 x 1.73 [m.sup.-2]

 Median (range)

BTP, mg/L 1.10 (0.60-4.87) (c)
Cys-C, mg/L 1.35 (0.65-7.44) (c)
[[beta].sub.2]-MG, 2.80 (1.59-7.62) (c)
Creatinine, 76.0 (14.1-530) (c)
Schwartz GFR 65.0 (11.6-234) (c)
 estimate, mL x
 [min.sup.-1] x 1.73

(a) Data from children with nonpathologic GFR were gaussian and are
presented as mean [+ or -] SD and the range of values (in
parentheses). Children with impaired GFR had log-normally distributed
data. Hence data are expressed as medians and range of values in

(b) The central 95% reference intervals with the 2.5% reference limit
for the Schwartz GFR estimate and 97.5% reference limits for the other
analytes were calculated by the parametric IFCC procedure with 90%
confidence intervals in parentheses (18).

(c) Significantly different (P <0.0001; Mann-Whitney U-test) from the
group with GFR >90 mL x [min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2].

Table 2. Diagnostic accuracy (areas under the ROC curves, sensitivity,
and specificity) of BTP, Cys-C, [[beta].sub.2]-MG, creatinine, and the
Schwartz GFR estimate to detect reduced GFR (<90 mL x [min.sup.-1] x
1.73 [m.sup.-2]) in children. (a)

 Area under the
 ROC curve,
 mean [+ or -] SE

BTP, mg/L 0.912 [+ or -] 0.024
 1.01 (b)
 0.68 (c)
 0.94 (d)
Cys-C, mg/L 0.943 [+ or -] 0.019
 1.20 (b)
 0.87 (c)
 1.11 (d)
 mg/L 0.899 [+ or -] 0.025
 3.09 (b)
 1.66 (c)
 3.30 (d)
Creatinine, 0.840 [+ or -] 0.031
 85.9 (b)
 47.7 (c)
 83.0 (d)
Schwartz 0.917 [+ or -] 0.018
 formula, mL/min
 56.0 (b)
 93.6 (c)
 70.8 (d)

 Sensitivity, Specificity,
 % %

BTP, mg/L
 1.01 (b) 61 (51-71) 97 (94-99)
 0.68 (c) 95 (88-98) 52 (45-59)
 0.94 (d) 68 (58-77) 95 (91-97)
Cys-C, mg/L
 1.20 (b) 61 (50-72) 98 (94-100)
 0.87 (c) 95 (87-99) 63 (55-71)
 1.11 (d) 80 (69-88) 95 (91-98)
 3.09 (b) 38 (25-54) 94 (86-98)
 1.66 (c) 95 (85-99) 54 (44-63)
 3.30 (d) 32 (21-45) 95 (89-98)
 85.9 (b) 29 (21-39) 97 (93-99)
 47.7 (c) 95 (88-98) 47 (40-54)
 83.0 (d) 35 (26-45) 95 (91-98)
 formula, mL/min
 56.0 (b) 31 (21-39) 99 (96-100)
 93.6 (c) 95 (88-98) 65 (58-71)
 70.8 (d) 68 (56-78) 95 (91-98)

(a) Data (with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses) result from
ROC curve analysis performed with 150 children with a GFR >90 mL x
[min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2] and 75 children with GFR <90 mL x
[min.sup.-1] x 1.73 [m.sup.-2].

(b) Upper cutoff limit (97.5% percentile); lower cutoff limit (2.5%
percentile) in the case of the Schwartz GFR (see Table 1 ).

(c) Threshold with diagnostic sensitivity of 95%.

(d) Threshold with diagnostic specificity of 95%.
COPYRIGHT 2002 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Enzymes and Protein Markers
Author:Filler, Guido; Priem, Friedrich; Lepage, Nathalie; Sinha, Pranav; Vollmer, Ilka; Clark, Heather; Kee
Publication:Clinical Chemistry
Date:May 1, 2002
Previous Article:Use of constant denaturant capillary electrophoresis of pooled blood samples to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the genes (Scnn1a and...
Next Article:Highly sensitive cholesterol assay with enzymatic cycling applied to measurement of remnant lipoprotein-cholesterol in serum.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters