Printer Friendly

'Metabolism first' theory on origin of life rejected.

Byline: ANI

Washington, January 9 (ANI): A new research has rejected the 'metabolism first' hypothesis about the origin of life, a theory that says life originated from a system of self-catalytic molecules capable of experiencing Darwinian evolution without the need of RNA or DNA and their replication.

The research was carried out with the participation of Mauro Santos, researcher of the Department of Genetics and Microbiology at Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB).

It has demonstrated that, through the analysis of what some researchers name "compound genomes", these chemical networks cannot be considered evolutionary units because they lose properties that are essential for evolution when they reach a critical size and greater level of complexity.

In the first half of the 20th century, Alexander Oparin established the "Metabolism First" hypothesis to explain the origin of life, thus strengthening the primary role of cells as small drops of coacervates, which are evolutionary precursors of the first prokaryote cells.

Dr Oparin did not refer to RNA or DNA molecules since at that time it was not clear just how important the role of these molecules was in living organisms.

However, he did form a solid base for the idea of self-replication as a collective property of molecular compounds.

Science more recently demonstrated that sets of chemical components store information about their composition that can be duplicated and transmitted to their descendents.

This has led to their being named "compound genomes" or composomes.

In other words, heredity does not require information in order to be stored in RNA or DNA molecules.

These "compound genomes" apparently fulfill the conditions required to be considered evolutionary units, which suggests a pathway from pre-Darwinian dynamics to a minimum protocell.

Researchers in this study nevertheless reveal that these systems are incapable of undergoing a Darwinian evolution.

For the first time, a rigorous analysis was carried out to study the supposed evolution of these molecular networks using a combination of numerical and analytical simulations and network analysis approximations.

Their research demonstrated that the dynamics of molecular compound populations, which divide after having reached a critical size, do not evolve, since during this process the compounds lose properties that are essential for Darwinian evolution.

Researchers concluded that this fundamental limitation of "compound genomes" should lead to caution towards theories that set metabolism first as the origin as life, even though former metabolic systems could have offered a stable habitat in which primitive polymers such as RNA could have evolved. (ANI)

Copyright 2009 Asian News International (ANI) - All Rights Reserved.

Provided by an company
COPYRIGHT 2010 Al Bawaba (Middle East) Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Asian News International
Date:Jan 10, 2010
Previous Article:Two US Consulate employees arrested in Pakistan amid heightened diplomatic row.
Next Article:Quantum fluctuations are key in superconductors, reveal experiments.

Related Articles
Revolution in evolution? The evolution vs. creationism controversy continues to influence public school curriculum.
Internet evolution of Darwin's theories.
Charles Darwin, one of greatest of all Britons; What was it that was so extraordinary that Charles Darwin did? And why should we hold him in such...
New beat takes to the stage at Drum Theatre.
Teach creationism in school, say parents.
Darwin drama raises questions for both sides.
'Muslim academics don't believe in Darwin's theory of evolution'.
Darwin's pianist wife may have influenced evolution theories.
LAU discussions explore Darwin's theory of evolution.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters