'Intelligent design' challenged in Pa. public school.
In October, Pennsylvania's Dover Area School Board ruled that biology teachers must present "intelligent design" (ID) as an alternative to the scientific theory of evolution. The lawsuit filed in federal court on Dec. 14 on behalf of 11 parents is the first one to challenge the use of ID in public school science classes. ID, the latest variant of creationism, is an assertion that an intelligent supernatural entity has intervened in the history of life.
"Public schools are not Sunday schools, and we must resist any efforts to make them so," said Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United, in a press statement about the lawsuit. "There is an evolving attack under way on sound education, and the school board's action in Dover is part of that misguided crusade. 'Intelligent design' has about as much to do with science as reality television has to do with reality."
The two groups' lawsuit, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, argues that teaching religious concepts in public school science courses entangles government with religion, violating the First Amendment.
In 1987, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Edwards v. Aguillard that the belief that a supernatural creator is responsible for the origins of humankind is a religious one and cannot be taught in public school science classes. (For more about this topic, see next month's issue of Church & State.)
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Around The States|
|Publication:||Church & State|
|Article Type:||Brief Article|
|Date:||Jan 1, 2005|
|Previous Article:||Charter schools don't meet standards, says DOE study.|
|Next Article:||Power play: resurgent religious right ready to push theocratic agenda in upcoming congress.|