Printer Friendly

'Geminate' consonants in Owere dialect of Igbo.

1. Introduction

Consonant gemination is the phenomenon in language where a consonant in a morpheme is doubled in the course of speech. This results in two adjacent consonants within a morpheme being identical. Consonant cluster on the other hand, is when two unidentical consonants occur adjacent to each other in tautosyllabic structure. Such identical consonants or geminates are attested to be phonemic in some languages like Italian, e.g. notte /notte/ 'night' (cf. Crystal, 2003). In some other languages, gemination may not be attested at all, or where it occurs it is a phonetic event. Eme and Nwankwere (2012) show that in Standard Igbo, the length of certain vowels or syllabic nasals could be made to become longer as a phonetic, rather than a phonological event; geminates were not found.

It was in the course of our collecting the relevant linguistic data for our study of phonetic lengthening of sounds in the Standard Igbo dialect that we coincidentally ran into some Owere data that seem to reflect phonemic gemination in this Igbo dialect. In that work, (Eme and Nwankwere, 2012) they said,
   In the course of our data collection for this paper, some of our
   informants gave some examples using their dialect. Before we
   discarded the dialectal forms as not being relevant to our present
   research, we discovered that sound lengthening in the Owere dialect
   of Igbo could result from gemination caused by the deletion of an
   intervening vowel. A vowel occurring between two consonants is
   deleted in fast or spontaneous speech in certain words of the
   language.


This chance discovery spurred us into carrying out a further investigation of the dialect, as we recommended; hence this paper sets out to investigate gemination in the Owere dialect of Igbo.

It is important to note that the vowel elision that leads to what looks like consonant gemination occurs in fast rapid speech, but interstingly it occurs in the normal speech of most OD speakers interviewed This implies that there may be a gradual language change which could lead to gemination becoming a phonological phenomenon since it could lead to contrast in the dialect. This paper tries to show those contrasts by setting up minimal pairs and near minimal pairs.

2. Literature review

According to Bussmann (1996:272) a geminate consonant is a "consonant that is distinguished from another exclusively by its longer period of articulation". For him, gemination differs from lengthening, as lengthening is often associated with vowels. He therefore sees lengthening of a sound as "the increase in the quantity of a segment, usually a vowel." Crystal (1987: 421) defines a geminate as, "A sequence of identical adjacent [consonant] sounds in one morpheme." In Crystal (2003:196) germination is defined thus:
   [Gemination] is a term used in phonetics and phonology for a
   sequence of identical adjacent segments of a sound in a single
   morpheme, e.g. Italian notte /notte/ ('night'). Because of the
   syllable division, a geminate sequence cannot be regarded as simply
   a 'long' consonant, and transcriptional differences usually
   indicate this, e.g. [-ff-] is geminate, [-f:] is long.


Further examples in the Italian language showing where geminates contrast with their non geminate counterparts are given by Clark, Yallop & Fletcher (2007: 52). They involve the alveolar plosive [t] and the alveolar nasal [n].
(1)    a. notte   'night'   note   'notes'
       b. canne   'canes'   cane   'dog'


Geminate plosives and fricatives occur in Luganda, as shown by Mutaka & Tamanji (2000). According to them, the geminates can contrast with their non geminate counterparts in certain words of Luganda to realize minimal pairs. Their examples include the following (cf. page 49):
(2)    a. okubba    'to steal'                    okuba    'to be'
       b. okkuta    'to kill'                     okuta    'to let go'
       c. okuggwa   'to get finished'             okugwa   'to fall'
       d. amazzi    'to make someone come back'   amazi    'dung'


In her study of four Igbo dialects- Akpo, Adazi-Nnukwu, Amaezu and Ezza, Eme (2008) shows that certain sound segments could be lengthened in these dialects to achieve such effects as time-gaining device to enable the speaker to change his line of thought or to remember the right word. It could also be used to lay emphasis or to show the long

duration of an action or event. Some individuals even use the lengthening strategy as a form of speech mannerism. In all these cases, sound lengthening is not contrastive. The extension of this investigation to the standard Igbo dialect by Eme & Nwankwere (2012) yielded the same result, indicating phonetic lengthening of such sounds.

According to Paradis (1992), in the Fula language, apart from continuants, all consonants can become geminates. Bakovic (1995) however points out that there is a phonotactic constraint restraining the Fula geminates from closing a syllable headed by a long vowel. He explains that this restriction is not placed on consonant clusters. Examples of words where geminate consonants appear in Fula, as given in Paradis (1992: 171), are shown below. We can see that the examples in (3) contain bilabial geminates [p b m] while the ones in (4) involve alveolar geminates [t d n].
(3)    a. hippoode   'lid'
       b. abbaade    'to rejoin'
       c. ummaade    'to rise'

(4)    a. wuttude    'to blow'
       b. fadduru    'fish'
       c. yennude    'to malign someone


Pycha (2007) shows that gemination is phonemic in Hungarian. The kind of gemination in Hungarian, according to him, results from morpho-phonological conditioning in which a suffix triggers gemination as well as lengthens the final consonant of the root to which it attaches.

It is important to note that the geminates we are considering in this paper differ significantly from the geminates attested to in different languages reviewed above. This is because the so called geminate consonants in OD result from the elision of a high vowel in between two identical consonants.

3. Methodology

The researchers used native speaker intuitive knowledge as well as interviews to gather the data. They randomly selected and interviewed forty people from OD. These consultants were of different age brackets with the least being fifteen years of age. They have lived in and within their communities for the greater part of their lives. With the help of the lead researcher, who is also an indigene and a native speaker of OD, it was easy to randomly select our consultants. They were individually asked to discuss any topic of their interest using their dialect. Such topics discussed included traditional festivities and ceremonies, family and community politics as well as occupation, traditional religious events etc. Their speeches were recorded with their consent. They spoke freely without fear as they are familiar with the lead researcher and this yielded the required reliable data for our investigation. Sometimes, side comments, greetings and instructions not targeted at the researchers yielded some of the items of our data. The area of study consists of the many communities in Nwaozuzu's (2008) Uratta Dialects (UD) within the East Central Group of Dialects (ECGD). We prefer to call them OD as it is the usual term used by the speakers to refer to their speech variety. The term was very much popularised by the colonial administrators since Owere (which they called Owerri) was the administrative headquarters.

All the three phonemic tones of Igbo are marked using the acute accent /'/ for high tone, grave accent /'/ for low tone and macron /-/ for down step tone. The items of our data are tone-marked, and glossed in English. For transcription, we adopt the symbols of the IPA; and [-CC-] for the geminate consonants in accordance with Crystal (2003: 196) who proposes the use of [:] for length or long consonant as in [p:] and [-CC-] as in [-pp-] for double consonants or geminates. Since there are certain sounds in Owere dialect that have no orthographic representation using the Igbo Standard Orthography, we use the phonetic symbols in presenting all our data. For example breathy voicing which is phonemic in the dialect is written as /b/ , /v/ etc. The voiceless alveolar implosive which is found in the Owere dialect of Igbo is written as /cf/ (cf. Nwankwere, 2012).

4. Data presentation and analysis

4.1 Preliminaries

The consonants of OD tend to have the propensity to become geminate as a result of the elision of an intervening high vowel. This phenomenon characterizes fast or spontaneous speech. However it does occur in the normal speech of a good number of speakers especially among the younger speakers.

A good number of these geminate consonants could be said to have their nongeminate counterparts that are already well-established as phonemes in the dialect. The geminates and their non-geminate counterparts could be used to form minimal pairs out of the words of the dialect. But some others have what we may term 'near-minimal pairs' due to tonal differences or different consonants. There are also others grouped under special cases because of partial elision resulting in the elided vowel transferring its tone to the nasal consonant immediately preceding it thereby making it syllabic. We also isolated a final group of data that have the same geminate consonants in non geminate forming environments due to certain constraints, like reduplication involving nasals or the vowel coming between two nasals with different places of articulation. This group helps to confirm that gemination is attained in this dialect in the defined environment.

4.2 Rule for gemination

In OD, segments could become geminate when they occur in some specified phonotactic environment. The common phonotactic rule for gemination in OD is stated below:

(5) [CV.sup.t1] + [CV.sup.t1/2] [right arrow] [CCV.sup.t1/2] ([CCV.sup.t1]/[CCV.sup.t2])

where, CV means a syllable sequence that consists of a consonant + a vowel. It must be stated that for a three-syllable word with VCVCV structure, the initial V syllable is not part of this rule, as our interest is on the syllable with CV structure. [CV.sup.t1] + [CV.sup.t2] means a two-syllable root/stem/word; t is the tone of the syllable; t1 + t1 denotes similar tone; t1 + t2 denotes a two-syllable root/stem/word with different tones. So, the ones with same tone will be [CV.sup.t1] + [CV.sup.t1] [right arrow] [CCV.sup.1]; while those with different tones will be [CV.sup.t1] + [CV.sup.t2] - [CCV.sup.t2]. Not that the C segments cannot be nasals with different places of articulation; or else germination is blocked.

In all cases, the geminate occurs in two syllable structure where the first syllable ends with an unreleased consonat and the second syllable starts with a released counterpart as shown below:

ab.ba 'feather'

Since Igbo language does not permit closed syllables, we assume in this paper that the identical consonants are one and the same. Hence the use of qoutation marker in the word 'geminate' in the title since they seem not to behave like geminate consonants identified in different languages in the literature.

4.3 The data

The data are presented in tabular form with the first column representing the words from which the geminate consonants are derived. The second column is the geminate while the last column is the non-geminate

4.3.1 Minimal pairs

Words in this group have identical segments and the same tone pattern but differ only in the geminate versus non-geminate consonants
       Source             Geminate

(6)    a. abuba           [right arrow] abba         'feather'
       b. afufu           [right arrow] affu         'phylaria rashes'
       c. amuma           [right arrow] amma         'lightening'
       d. avuvu           [right arrow] avvu         'palm chaff'
       e. awuwc           [right arrow] awwc         'trick'
       f. ikuku           [right arrow] ikku         'air'
       g. ofufe           [right arrow] offe         'worship'
       h. ct[??]If[??]a   [right arrow] ctt[??]a     'cockroach'
       i. ckpukpu         [right arrow] ckpkpu       'bone'
       j. onine           [right arrow] onne         'gift'
       k. oriri           [right arrow] orri         'feast'
       l. o[??]i[??]i     [right arrow] o[??][??]i   'tree'
       m. ududu           [right arrow] uddu         'morning'

       Source             Non Geminate

(6)    a. abuba           aba       'entering'
       b. afufu           afu       'half a penny'
       c. amuma           ama       'information'
       d. avuvu           avu       'song'
       e. awuwc           awc       'toad'
       f. ikuku           iku       'eyelid'
       g. ofufe           ofe       'across'
       h. ct[??]if[??]a   ct[??]a   'fair complexion'
       i. ckpukpu         ckpu      'precious'
       j. onine           one       'who?'
       k. oriri           ori       'shear butter'
       l. o[??]i[??]i     o[??]i    'theft'
       m. ududu           udu       'local bush apple'


4.3.2 Near-minimal pairs

In this group are pairs that differ in more than one segment. The difference may involve a difference in tone pattern.
       Source             Geminate

(7)    a. abuba           [right arrow] abba           'fat'
       b. adudu           [right arrow] addu           'tale bearing'
       c. afufa           [right arrow] affa           'garden egg'
       d. akwukwc         [right arrow] akwkwo         'book'
       e. akukc           [right arrow] akko           'story'
       f. akpukpc         [right arrow] akpkpo         'skin'
       g. avuvu           [right arrow] avvu'          'place name'
       h. etuto           [right arrow] etto           'boil'
       i. ct[??]It[??]I   [right arrow] ct[??]t[??]I   'rulership'
       j. ogwugwu         [right arrow] ogwgwu         'a deity'
       k. okwukwe         [right arrow] okwkwe         'faith'
       l. ck[w.sup.h]uk   [right arrow] ck[w.sup.h]k   'funeral'
       [w.sup.h]u         [w.sup.h]u
       m. cmImI           [right arrow] cmmI           'fruiting'
       n. omume           [right arrow] omme           'behaviour'
       o. osise           [right arrow] osse           'drawing'
       p. otito           [right arrow] otto           'glory'
       q. ozuzu           [right arrow] ozzu           'stealing'
       r. czuzu           [right arrow] czuzu          'training'
       s. ufufe           [right arrow] uffe           'breeze'

       Source             Non-Geminate

(7)    a. abuba           aba            'palm fruit/oil season
       b. adudu           adu            'a type of yam'
       c. afufa           afa            'divination'
       d. akwukwc         akwc           'grinds'
       e. akukc           akc            'wisdom'
       f. akpukpc         akpc           'refuse heap/call/dry'
       g. avuvu           avu            'place name'
       h. etuto           eto            'grows'
       i. ct[??]it[??]i   ct[??]I        'constipation'
       j. ogwugwu         ogwu           'one who digs'
       k. okwukwe         okwe           'a game (seeds)'
       l. ck[w.sup.h]uk   ck[w.sup.h]u   'concubinage'
       [w.sup.h]u
       m. cmimi           cmI            'pond'
       n. omume           ome            'tendril'
       o. osise           ose            'pepper'
       p. otito           oto            'enough'
       q. ozuzu           ozu            'corpse'
       r. czuzu           czu            'ant hill'
       s. ufufe           ufe            'flying'


4.3.3 Special geminate environments

The members of this group are special because they involve elision of vowels in the environment of nasals without eliding their different tones; where there is no nasal preceding the elided vowel, the intervening consonant is replaced with a homorganic nasal. The elided vowel transfers its tone to the nasal immediately preceding it thereby making it syllabic. We exemplify below:
       Source       Geminate

(8)    a. mmimi     [right arrow] mmmi      'spicy fruit'
       b. mkpukpc   [right arrow] mmkpc     'cricket'
       c. mkpukpu   [right arrow] mmkpu     'mushroom bud'

       Source       Non Geminate

(8)    a. mmimi     mmi     'sandfly'
       b. mkpukpc   mkpc    'container'
       c. mkpukpu   mkpu    'saturation'


4.3.4 Geminates in words with no words containing the non-geminate counterpart

There are words that contain derived geminate consonants but there are no words with non geminate that contrast with them. Such words are shown in (9).
       Source             Geminate

(9)    a. akpukpa         [right arrow] akpkpa   'scabies'
       b. nt[??]It[??]I   [right arrow]          'velvet tamarind'
                            nt[??]It[??]I
       c. otiti           [right arrow] otti     'a shout'
       d. cvuvu           [right arrow] cvvu     'caterpillar'
       e. ozuzo           [right arrow] ozzo     'raining'
       f. ozuzu           [right arrow] ozzu     'completion'


Note that the above instances are considered to be geminate because there are some words with similar phonotactics which cannot be pronounced like the above. We refer to such words as constituting non geminate environments. The words include the examples in (10) below.
(10)

a. mkpomko         'rubbish heap'    [right arrow] * mkpmkpo
b. mkpcmkpc        'useless'         [right arrow] * mkpmkpc
c. mkpumkpu        'hunch back'      [right arrow] * mkpmkpu
d. mmanu           'oil'
e. mmanu           'a person'
f. mmanwu          'masquerade'
g. ndundu          'short and fat'   [right arrow] * ndndu
h. ij[k.sub.h]an   'mosquito'        [right arrow] * n[k.sup.h]ij
[k.sub.b]a                           [k.sup.h]a


It seems that gemination operates where the Owere speakers regard the syllables as forming one and same word without which gemination does not operate. A reduplicated form as in (10) is not morphologically regarded as one word but two, in spite of the fact that semantically it is inevitably one word and not two. An alternative explanation is that consonant gemination in Owere requires that only one vowel be elided. Since reduplicative examples in (10) carry two successive vowels, they do not satisfy the conditions for gemination to take place.

5. Summary and Conclusion

This paper has studied cases of vowel elision in Igbo, with our focus on the Owere dialect. The researchers discovered that the consonant 'geminates' that result from this elision, even though phonetic can be used to make distinctive contrasts in the dialect. Many instances where they contrast with their single segment variants were shown. All the instances of 'gemination' discovered for the dialect obey the gemination rule as stated above and repeated here as (11).

(11) [CV.sup.t1] + [CV.sup.t1/2] [right arrow] [CCV.sup.t1/2] ([CCV.sup.t1]/[CCV.sup.t2])

This shows that all the instances of gemination listed result from vowel elision. Some environments constrain the realization of geminates. For example, when the words/morphemes consist of reduplicated form; or the vowel of the morpheme comes between two nasals produced at different points of articulation.

The Igbo language does not permit consonant cluster; and what we find in Owere dialect with respect to gemination does not contradict this stand, as two identical consonants cannot be termed a consonant cluster. The fact that gemination does occur in the slow normal speech of many OD speakers suggests that gemination is gradually becoming phonemic in the dialect and could be formalized in the future phonology of OD, as separate phonemes. The researchers suggest that more investigations are required using many more dialects of Igbo in order for one to be able to make further and reliable statements on gemination phenomenon in the Igbo language. This study is perceptual in nature, but an experimental analysis may be needed in the future studies to show the actual duration of the geminate consonants as compared to the lenght of the source consonants.

References

Bakovic, Eric. 1995. Geminate Shortening in Fula. In Akinlabi, Akin (ed.) Theoretical Approaches to African Linguistics, 239-254. New Jersey: African World Press.

Bussmann, Hadumod. 1996. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London: Routledge.

Clark, John, Colin Yallop & Janet Fletcher 2007. An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology 3rd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Crystal, David. 1987. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, David. 2003. A Dictionary of Linguistics & Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Eme, Cecilia. 2008. Parameters of Intersegmental Co-ordination in Speech: Insight from Igbo. Awka: Amaka Dreams.

Eme, Cecilia & Angela U. N. Nwankwere. 2012. Phonetic Lengthening of Sounds in Igbo Speech.

Kpakpando Journal 1: 1-8.

Mutaka, Ngessimo & Puis Tamanji. 2000. An Introduction to African Linguistics. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.

Nwankwere, Angela U. N. 2012. The Voiceless Alveolar Implosive in Owere dialect of Igbo. (A Ph. D. seminar paper presented at the Department of Linguistics, Igbo & Other Nigerian Languages, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.)

Nwaozuzu, Gabriella. I. 2008. Dialects of Igbo language. Nsukka: University Press.

Paradis, Carole. 1992. Lexical Phonology and Morphology: The Nominal Classes in Fula. New York: Garland.

Pycha, Anne. 2007. Phonetic vs Phonological Lengthening in Affricates. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report. 269-272.

Angela U.N. Nwankwere, Cecilia A. Eme & Greg O. Obiamalu

Department of Linguistics

Nnamdi Azikiwe University

Awka, Nigeria

go.obiamalu@unizik.edu.ng
COPYRIGHT 2016 The Slovak Association for the Study of English
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Nwankwere, Angela U.N.; Eme, Cecilia A.; Obiamalu, Greg O.
Publication:SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jun 1, 2016
Words:3186
Previous Article:Pavel Stekauer, Professor at Karoli Gaspar University of the Reformed Church in Hungary.
Next Article:Intrinsic fundamental frequency in Igbo.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |