Printer Friendly

"Alternative" structures and government accountants.

As CPAs choose different forms in which to practice public accounting--such as selling their firms to publicly held companies--the AICPA is taking steps to make sure the Code of Professional Conduct keeps up with these new developments. The professional ethics executive committee issued an exposure draft that would ensure application of the code to CPAs regardless of whether they practice in alternative structures or in more traditional practice forms.

The ED uses a hypothetical traditional firm ("Oldfirm") purchased by a publicly held corporation as an example. Some of Oldfirm's owners and employees continue to offer nonattest services on behalf of their new employer, the publicly held corporation. Some Oldfirm partners form "New-firm," owned by a CPA majority, to provide attest services. Newfirm leases employees and office space from the public company parent, which also may provide billing, advertising and other services for NewFirm. In return, Newfirm pays to the public company an amount determined as a percentage of revenues or profits.

The proposed statement addresses the applicability of the Code of Conduct to these alternative forms of practice in three areas: independence (Rule 101), non-CPA ownership (Rule 505) and equality of enforcement of the Code among members in all practice forms (Rule 505).

Code's applicability to government auditors

The ED does not limit itself to alternative structures. Another key component of the draft, according to Lisa Snyder, senior technical manager in the AICPA professional ethics division, is the applicability of the Ethics Code's independence rules to federal, state and local government auditors. The proposed change would modify the Code's definition of a client so that government accountants would be considered in public practice. "Basically," said Synder, "if certain criteria are met, CPAs employed by federal, state and local government agencies would be considered to be in the practice of public accounting. If they are independent under Code rules, they could issue GAAS reports." Of course, those CPAs would be subject to all other rules applicable to members in public practice.

Two other portions of the ED are relatively minor and address

* The applicability of independence rules to former owners of accounting firm.

* Staff members who remove client files or proprietary information upon termination of employment.

The comment period for Omnibus Proposal of Professional Ethics Division Interpretations and Rulings runs until July 15. To order a copy, call the Institute at 888-777-7077 or go to
COPYRIGHT 1998 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Jun 1, 1998
Previous Article:Checking vendors for Y2K compliance.
Next Article:Model company goes online.

Related Articles
An invitation from the AICPA president: World Congress of Accountants.
International reciprocity in accounting: where in the world are we headed?
The FDIC Improvement Act: a precedent for expanded CPA reporting?
Licensure and regulation of the profession: a time for change.
IFAC revises ethics code.
Are you ready for the new accounting?
Build on your firm's strengths.
Ethics keeps up with new world order.
APS generates debate at NASBA annual meeting.
Uniform CPA Examination Developments.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters