Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,794,322 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Ziemba v. Rell.


U.S. Appeals Court

SUICIDE

Ziemba v. Rell, 409 F.3d 553 (2nd Cir. 2005). A prisoner brought a purported pur·port·ed  
adj.
Assumed to be such; supposed: the purported author of the story.



pur·ported·ly adv.
 class action against correctional officials, alleging that the execution of another prisoner would violate his constitutional rights by increasing the risk that he and other suicide-prone prisoners would attempt to harm themselves, and that the state corrections department lacked the resources necessary to prevent harm. The district court dismissed the action and denied the prisoner's request for a temporary restraining order temporary restraining order: see injunction. , and the prisoner appealed. The appeals court affirmed af·firm  
v. af·firmed, af·firm·ing, af·firms

v.tr.
1. To declare positively or firmly; maintain to be true.

2. To support or uphold the validity of; confirm.

v.intr.
, finding that the prisoner failed to establish a causal causal /cau·sal/ (kaw´z'l) pertaining to, involving, or indicating a cause.

causal

relating to or emanating from cause.
 connection between the execution and the risk that he would attempt to harm himself, as required to have standing to bring a claim. The court noted that the alleged injury of which the prisoner complained would be caused by a chain of events including actions taken by class members themselves, and was highly indirect. The prisoner asserted that the media paid substantial attention to the pending execution case and that news reports of the execution would be read class members. (Connecticut Connecticut, state, United States
Connecticut (kənĕt`ĭkət), southernmost of the New England states of the NE United States. It is bordered by Massachusetts (N), Rhode Island (E), Long Island Sound (S), and New York (W).
)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:class action lawsuits
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U1CT
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:179
Previous Article:Orwat v. Maloney.(cases of prisoner abuse)(Brief Article)
Next Article:King v. Frank.(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
New bill would govern class-action lawsuits.(Brief Article)
Connecticut HMOs Hit With Class Action Lawsuit.(Brief Article)
Connecticut: we will sue over NCLB.(update: Education news from schools, businesses, research and government agencies)(No Child Left Behind Act of...
Connecticut governor backs NCLB lawsuit.(Inside the Law)(No Child Left Behind Act of 2001)(Brief Article)
Ziemba v. Armstrong.(CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT)(Brief Article)
Ziemba v. Armstrong.(MENTAL PROBLEMS (PRISONER))(Brief Article)
Ziemba v. Armstrong.(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
High court gives clarity to litigation venues: in a key decision issued earlier this year, the Supreme Court has restricted the ability of...
Jailed for being on a list.(McCarthyism Watch)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles