Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,637,667 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Ziemba v. Armstrong.


U.S. District Court

CONFINEMENT conĀ·fineĀ·ment
n.
1. The act of restricting or the state of being restricted in movement.

2. Lying-in.



confinement
 

RESTRAINTS

DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE

Ziemba v. Armstrong, 343 F.Supp.2d 173 (D.Conn. 2004). A state inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  filed a civil rights action alleging that prison officials failed to provide constitutionally adequate health care, failed to protect him from the use of excessive force, and used excessive force. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants in part, and denied it in part. The district court held that fact issues remained as to whether a prison supervisor adequately trained correctional officers with respect to the use of four-point restraints, and failed to respond to reports and complaints of use of force against the inmate. The court denied qualified immunity Qualified immunity is a doctrine in United States law providing immunity from suit to government officials performing discretionary functions when their action did not violate clearly established law. Qualified immunity was created by the U.S. , finding that a reasonable prison official ought to have understood in 1998 that it was a constitutional violation to restrain a mentally ill prisoner for twenty-two hours, with no penal Punishable; inflicting a punishment.


penal adj. referring to criminality, as in defining "penal code" (the laws specifying crimes and punishment), or "penal institution" (a state prison or penitentiary confining convicted felons).
 justification, no food or water, and no access to a bathroom. (Northern Correctional Institution Northern Correctional Institution is a high-security state prison in Somers, Connecticut, USA.

It the designated restrictive housing facility for the Connecticut Department of Correction, managing those inmates who have demonstrated a serious inability to adjust to
, Connecticut)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:MENTAL PROBLEMS (PRISONER)
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U1CT
Date:Feb 1, 2005
Words:159
Previous Article:Veloz v. New York.(MEDICAL CARE)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Cygan v. Wisconsin Dept. of Corrections.(PERSONNEL)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Thompson v. Carter.(civil rights action )(Brief Article)
Page v. Norvell.(MEDICAL CARE)(Brief Article)
Thompson v. Davis.(RELEASE)(violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)(Brief Article)
Armstrong v. Davis.(ATTORNEY FEES)(Brief Article)
Singleton v. Norris.(MENTAL PROBLEMS (PRISONER))(Brief Article)
Miller v. King.(CIVIL RIGHTS)(Brief Article)
Ziemba v. Armstrong.(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
Gates v. Cook.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)
Medical care.(Hallett v. Morgan)(Gibson v. County of Washoe)(Fenner v. Suthers)(Evans v. Bonner)
Mental problems (Prisoner).(Pelletier v. Magnusson)(Hallett v. Morgan)(Bozeman v. Orum)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles