Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,489,688 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

You actually want us to enforce our rules?


One hole in the FANs system appeared in May, when a 69-year old pilot caused near-chaos in Washington by penetrating the restricted air space around the nation's Capitol. The pilot took off from the small airport in Smoketown, Pa., without checking weather reports and without reading the FAA's "Notice to Airmen" which pilots are supposed to read before taking off and which would have told him about the restrictions. He then proceeded to get completely lost, penetrating three layers of restricted airspace--"we have a system of systems"--becoming confused and falling to respond to several warnings by pursuit planes before finally answering.

Why was this pilot flying? He was supposed to have his piloting skills reappraised every two years and have frequent physicals. But what the system fails to provide is a check to see that he actually does what he is supposed to do. No one knows unless he happens to be seen doing something wrong. Then, he may be reported to the FAA. It is also possible that he could have been spotted by one of the very occasional "ramp checks" that FAA conducts to check pilot credentials. There does not, however, appear to have been a ramp check in Smoketown.

Did you see the story in June about the drunk who stole a plane from the Westchester County Airport and flew it away? He could have been a terrorist--as could the pilot from Smoketown.

COPYRIGHT 2005 Washington Monthly Company
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:American airspace rules
Author:Peters, Charles
Publication:Washington Monthly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 1, 2005
Words:238
Previous Article:The case against the case against pill-splitting.(Tilting at Windmills)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Lessons in corporate suicide.(Exxon Mobil Corp.)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Chamber wants Supreme Court to air EPA case. (Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce)
Federal Court Bars Mass. Ballot Question On Parochial School Aid.
Was it something we said? The government's defensive reply to TEI's amicus brief in Mead strikes a nerve.(Tax Executives Institute, United States v....
Do not call: the gathering storm?(Outsourcing)
OXLEY: OCC PREEMPTION RULE THOUGHTFUL AND APPROPRIATE.
When a win may not mean much.(Church & State)(ruling denying state scholarship aid to divinity student)
AmeriCorps program shouldn't promote religion, AU argues.(Around The States)(Brief Article)
Supreme court weighs enforcement of arbitration clause in 'payday' loans.
WTO to enforce Kyoto restrictions?(World Trade Organization)(Protocol to the Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1997)
Travel Safety Update.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles