Wrong role for schools.Byline: The Register-Guard If people could always be counted on to use common sense, Senate Bill 6 would not be needed. School employees should not encourage students to gain a competitive edge in sports by using performance-enhancing supplements. But if some people won't come to that understanding on their own, the state should lead them to it - and SB 6, approved by the Senate on Tuesday, should become law. The bill was born in the Oregon School Activities Association's sports medicine sports medicine, branch of medicine concerned with physical fitness and with the treatment and prevention of injuries and other disorders related to sports. Knee, leg, back, and shoulder injuries; stiffness and pain in joints; tendinitis; "tennis elbow"; and committee, which was looking for Looking for In the context of general equities, this describing a buy interest in which a dealer is asked to offer stock, often involving a capital commitment. Antithesis of in touch with. effective ways to respond to the widespread use of performance-enhancers. The committee's concern was aroused by the case of Chris Miller Chris Miller is the name of:
SB 6 would make it illegal for any school employee or volunteer to sell performance-enhancers to students, or even to recommend their use. The bill would bring schools throughout Oregon into line with the Eugene School District Eugene School District (4J) is a public school district in the U.S. state of Oregon. It serves the city of Eugene Elementary schools
Creatine and other widely used supplements are legal - anyone can buy them, and they're no more than a few steps removed from multivitamins. But they can have health effects for which no school district should wish to be responsible. They are also part of a continuum of substances that extends to steroids and other banned or illegal drugs. Young athletes who, with their coaches' encouragement, gain speed, strength or endurance with creatine or other dietary supplements are on their way toward trying other performance-enhancers. Beyond that, performance-enhan- cers corrupt what's left of the purity of athletic competition by communicating the message that victory comes in a container, rather than being achieved through talent and hard work. Banning the substances would create enforcement difficulties. But clearly, public schools should have no role in promoting performance-enhancers' use. If it takes legislative action to drive home such an obvious point, SB 6 will do the job. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion