Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,506,906 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Word v. Croce.


U.S. District Court

CONTAGIOUS DISEASES

Word v. Croce, 230 F.Supp.2d 504 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). An inmate sued state corrections officials alleging violation of her constitutional rights when she was left in segregated housing after she refused to submit to a tuberculosis test tuberculosis test Any of a number of tests used to detect past exposure to, or current infection by M tuberculosis. See Mantoux test, Tuberculin skin test.

Tuberculosis test

1.
 for religious reasons. The district court granted summary judgment to the officials. The court held that the prison regulation that requires segregated housing of inmates who refuse to submit to a test for latent tuberculosis latent tuberculosis Infectious disease Infection with M tuberculosis that has been contained by the host's immune system and thus does not infect others Diagnosis Tuberculin skin test; release of IFN-γ in blood after PPD stimulation. See Tuberculosis.  did not violate the First Amendment rights of the inmate, because the regulation was rationally related to a legitimate penological pe·nol·o·gy also poe·nol·o·gy  
n.
The study, theory, and practice of prison management and criminal rehabilitation.



[Latin poena, penalty (from Greek
 interest in retarding the spread of a deadly disease. (Bedford Hills Correctional Facility, New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:solitary confinement and civil rights claim
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2NY
Date:Feb 1, 2003
Words:117
Previous Article:U.S. v. Flores.(ADMINISTRATIVE SEGREGATION)(Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Allen v. Leis.(county jail's pay-for-stay program unauthorized)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Koch v. Lewis.(administrative segregation and solitary confinement)
Gayle v. Gonyea.(prisoner files administrative segregation complaint)(Brief Article)
Ortiz v. Voinovich.(inmate sues correction officers alleging sexual assaul and administrative segregation)(Brief Article)
Koch v. Lewis.(CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT)(violation of right to due process)
Gayle v. Gonyea.(DISCIPLINE)(Brief Article)
Ortiz v. Voinovich.(sexual abuse by corrections officer)(Brief Article)
Koch v. Lewis.(FACILITIES)(violation of civil rights by Arizona. Department of Corrections)
Magluta v. Samples.(CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT)(Brief Article)
Magluta v. Samples.(DISCIPLINE)(violation of constitutional rights)(Brief Article)
Magluta v. Samples.(FACILITIES)(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles