Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,529,145 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Wine issue before Supreme Court.


Consumer Alert joined with 11 other organizations in filing an amicus curiae brief Noun 1. amicus curiae brief - a brief presented by someone interested in influencing the outcome of a lawsuit but who is not a party to it
brief, legal brief - a document stating the facts and points of law of a client's case
 with the United States Supreme Court United States Supreme Court: see Supreme Court, United States.  in a case being heard in oral arguments December 7, 2004. The case, Granholm v. Heald Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), is a court case finally decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, unusual because the arguments centered around the rarely-invoked 21st Amendment to the Constitution ratified in 1933. , concerns the freedom of consumers to order wines directly from vintners in other states. It has been combined with Swedenburg v. Kelly.

At issue are laws such as those in the states of Michigan and New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
 which bar direct-to-consumer wine deliveries from other states, while allowing them from wineries in the same state. These laws, on the books in several states, unfairly restrict consumer choice in favor of local wineries and the wholesalers which broker sales between out-of-state wineries and stores carrying wine.

The arguments offered by states such as Michigan and New York for imposing these laws--claims of endangering minors and the like--fall apart in that the same purported concerns apply to shipments from in-state wineries as well. Thus, the only real reason behind the laws can be simple, old-fashioned protectionism. "These kind of shenanigans shenanigans
Noun, pl

Informal

1. mischief or nonsense

2. trickery or deception [origin unknown]
 are exactly why the Founders gave Congress, not the states, the right to regulate interstate commerce," said CA Executive Director Fran Smith.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Consumer Alert
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Consumer Comments
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 22, 2004
Words:194
Previous Article:CA reminds consumers: compare prices for pharmaceutical drugs.(Consumer Alert)(Brief Article)
Next Article:'Intelligent Transportation' threatens privacy.(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Don't tread on me: states resist federal preemption. (includes related articles)
The Supreme Court's new rule on amicus briefs.
Was it something we said? The government's defensive reply to TEI's amicus brief in Mead strikes a nerve.(Tax Executives Institute, United States v....
Wine consumers winning in courts.(Brief Article)
Online research strategies for the bookish lawyer: lawyers with more legal than technical know-how can still use the many computer tools available to...
CASES COULD PUT MORE WINE ONLINE.(News)
Justices wade into wine sales.(Courts)(Local wineries are watching for a decision that could ease a patchwork of state laws that often keep them from...
Wine ruling a setback for consumers.(Brief Article)
Catch the High Court's eye with a compelling petition.
Grape expectations.(direct shipping petition)(Brief article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles