Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,558,366 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Why warming? Climate change confidential.


THE UNITED Nations Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change claims to have found "new and stronger evidence that most of the observed warming over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities." This conclusion is based on improvements in computer models that can now "produce satisfactory simulations of the current climate." But two recent studies show that the models may not have adequately accounted for two important factors: soot and land use changes.

The first study, by University of Maryland University of Maryland can refer to:
  • University of Maryland, College Park, a research-extensive and flagship university; when the term "University of Maryland" is used without any qualification, it generally refers to this school
 climate researchers Eugenia Kalnay and Ming Cal, was published last May in Nature. It showed that, in addition to the well-known "urban heat island An urban heat island (UHI) is a metropolitan area which is significantly warmer than its surroundings. The temperature difference usually is larger at night than during the day and larger in winter than in summer, and is most apparent when winds are weak.  effect," in which temperatures increase in metropolitan areas, other land use changes, especially agricultural conversion and irrigation irrigation, in agriculture, artificial watering of the land. Although used chiefly in regions with annual rainfall of less than 20 in. (51 cm), it is also used in wetter areas to grow certain crops, e.g., rice. , cause surface warming as well. The authors wrote that "the trend in daily mean temperature due to land use changes is 0.35 degrees centigrade centigrade /cen·ti·grade/ (sen´ti-grad) having 100 gradations (steps or degrees); see under scale.

cen·ti·grade
adj.
Celsius.
 per century. "This value is more than twice as high as previous estimates based on urbanization alone.

The second study, by James Hansen and Larissa Nazarenko of NASA'S Goddard Institute for Space Studies The NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), at Columbia University in New York City, is a component laboratory of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center Earth-Sun Exploration Division and a unit of The Earth Institute at Columbia University. , appeared in the December Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, usually referred to as PNAS, is the official journal of the United States National Academy of Sciences. . Hansen and Nazarenko looked at the effect that the soot produced by burning fossil fuels and biomass has once it settles on ice and snow in the Northern Hemisphere. Dirty snow melts faster than clean snow because the black particles absorb more heat from the sun. Hansen and Nazarenko estimate that the soot effect may be responsible for about 0.2 degree Celsius of warming over 120 years. It also helps explain thinning Arctic sea ice, earlier spring snowmelt snow·melt  
n.
1. The runoff from melting snow.

2. A period or season when such runoff occurs: streams that flood during snowmelt. 
, and many melting glaciers often cited by environmental activists.

Both sets of researchers still firmly maintain that greenhouse gases are the most important man-made influence on climate. Hansen and Nazarenko insist, despite their findings, that "anthropogenic an·thro·po·gen·ic  
adj.
1. Of or relating to anthropogenesis.

2. Caused by humans: anthropogenic degradation of the environment.
 greenhouse gases have been the main cause of recent global warming."

Yet these studies suggest that land use changes account for 0.35 degrees Celsius of warming over 200 years and that soot is responsible for another 0.2 degrees of warming over a slightly longer period. Total warming during the century was 0.6 degrees Celsius, leaving something like 0.05 degrees attributable to increases in greenhouse gases. Cut both results in half, and accumulating greenhouse gases would still account for only about half of the warming seen in the last century.

While both studies could be wrong, they suggest the computer models may not adequately account for some important processes and may therefore overestimate future warming due to greenhouse gas increases. Despite these uncertainties, environmental activists insist the science is settled and demand that the world's governments reorganize the global economy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Citings
Author:Bailey, Ronald
Publication:Reason
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Apr 1, 2004
Words:453
Previous Article:About 12,000 residents of Allentown, Pennsylvania, were notified that they had failed to pay city taxes.(Brickbats)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Balance sheet.
Topics:



Related Articles
Warming shouldn't wither U.S. farming. (global warming)
Global warming underfoot: holes in the ground hold untapped climate riches.
Tasmanian trees track recent warming. (global warming)
Global warming: checking out the sun. (Earth Science)
Climate change: a diversity of views. (Brief Article)
Cloudy clues. (Climate Change)
Consensus reached on climate change causes. (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report concludes greenhouse gas pollutants are the most...
Mysteries of nature. (natural causes of climate change)
CLIMATE FEVER.(efforts to halt global warming)(Brief Article)
Ocean Warming Studies Bolster Evidence of Human Hand in Climate Change. (Update).(research)(Brief Article)(Illustration)(Statistical Data Included)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles