Why does antitrust matter to me? Your role in helping prevent anticompetitive behavior--and the unwanted scrutiny it invites.Without question, your trade association or professional society plays a vital role in the modern economy. Notwithstanding your organization's importance, your conduct is subject to legal scrutiny, particularly in the area of antitrust Antitrust The antitrust laws apply to virtually all industries and to every level of business, including manufacturing, transportation, distribution, and marketing. They prohibit a variety of practices that restrain trade. and anticompetitive an·ti·com·pet·i·tive adj. That discourages competition among businesses: anticompetitive foreign trade restrictions. activities. As a board member, you need to understand what triggers this scrutiny and what it means for the organization, the well-being of which you are charged with protecting and advancing. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] This subject is especially pertinent right now. Recently the United States Department of Justice “Justice Department” redirects here. For other uses, see Department of Justice. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) is a Cabinet department in the United States government designed to enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States expanded the attention given to this important issue by releasing An Antitrust Primer for Federal Law Enforcement Personnel, which helps officials to better understand, detect, and report antitrust violations. No board members want to find that their board has come under a law enforcement microscope because policies that should have been put in place were tabled. To help ensure that this won't happen to you, here are three questions and answers about why antitrust matters and what to do about it. 1. Why is antitrust an issue? It's due to certain characteristics inherent in trade associations and professional societies: * They have members who are competitors, who meet, and who may take concerted action on matters of common interest. Usually members act jointly to accomplish some legitimate business activity. But competitors might also act openly or (more commonly) in secret to fix prices or take some other prohibited action under the cover of a legitimate association meetings or functions. * They have been misused in the past to carry out or facilitate anticompetitive purposes. As a result, both federal and state agencies, as well as consumers and other competitors, examine the conduct of these organizations to ensure that the principles of fair and free competition are preserved in the marketplace. Antitrust laws antitrust laws n. acts adopted by Congress to outlaw or restrict business practices considered to be monopolistic or which restrain interstate commerce. The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 declared illegal "every contract, combination.... provide a means for government and private parties to enforce these principles. These four federal laws provide the basics: the Sherman Act, Clayton Act A federal law enacted in 1914 as an amendment to the Sherman Anti-Trust Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. [1890]), prohibiting undue restriction of trade and commerce by designated methods. The Clayton Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 12 et seq. , Robinson-Patman Act Robinson-Patman Act, passed by the U.S. Congress in 1936 to supplement the Clayton Antitrust Act. The act, advanced by Congressman Wright Patman, forbade any person or firm engaged in interstate commerce to discriminate in price to different purchasers of the same , and Federal Trade Commission Act. Although all of these are generally aimed at preserving open competition, each is used to prevent and rectify rec·ti·fy v. 1. To set right; correct. 2. To refine or purify, especially by distillation. a different abuse of the economic system. In addition, all states have some form of antitrust law antitrust law Any law restricting business practices that are considered unfair or monopolistic. Among U.S. laws, the best known is the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, which declared illegal “every contract, combination…or conspiracy in restraint of trade or , generally patterned after the federal laws, to regulate unfair methods of competition. 2. What do antitrust laws mean for your association? These laws allow your members to engage in a wide variety of group activities as long as the purpose or intended effect is to promote your industry or profession--not to gain a competitive advantage over non-members. Thus, your association may, among other things: * engage in public relations public relations, activities and policies used to create public interest in a person, idea, product, institution, or business establishment. By its nature, public relations is devoted to serving particular interests by presenting them to the public in the most and promote the industry or profession and its products and services; * engage in lobbying and otherwise attempt to improve government relations and affect decisions that have an impact on your industry's interests; * exchange information on best practices; * conduct educational programs; * adopt voluntary standards and best-practices programs; * engage in joint research programs; and lastly * develop codes of conduct designed to protect consumers and enhance competition. Nonetheless, under the Sherman Act--which prohibits unreasonable restraint of trade--certain conduct is so patently unreasonable In Canadian law, patently unreasonable or the patent unreasonableness test is a standard of review used by a court when performing judicial review of administrative decisions. that it is deemed illegal on its face. The prime example, and the one posing the greatest threat to fair competition, is the Sherman Act's per se prohibition against price-fixing. The term price-fixing covers a multitude of activities beyond the mere increase of a product's price by competitors. Simply stated, any conduct by competitors that has the purpose or effect of raising, depressing, fixing, pegging, or stabilizing the price of a product or service is unlawful. For your association, that means you must not collect or discuss information with an intent to restrict competition. For example, doctors', lawyers', and engineers' groups have been sanctioned for setting maximum or minimum fees for their members' services or for prohibiting competitive bids. Remember, the antitrust laws are designed to protect competition, not competitors. Certain other conduct that limits competition is deemed unlawful under the Sherman Act. Concerted action that may have an effect on prices is also prohibited, including matters relating to relating to relate prep → concernant relating to relate prep → bezüglich +gen, mit Bezug auf +acc production; terms, and conditions of sale CONDITIONS OF SALE, contracts. The terms upon which the vendor of property by auction pro poses to sell it; the instrument containing these terms, when reduced to writing or printing, is also called the conditions of sale. 2. ; distribution of products; and division of markets. In practice, that means your association should not encourage any activities that could inhibit free and fair trade. To name a few, these activities might include using standards activities to exclude competitors' products, boycotting certain buyers through misuse of a credit reporting system, or joint refusals to deal with nonmembers. Here is a partial list of matters that competitors should not discuss or make the subject of any type of agreement, whether formal or informal, express or implied: * prices to be charged to customers or by suppliers; * coordination of bids or requests for bids; * the basis upon which prices are determined; * terms and conditions of sales, including credit or discount terms; * profit levels; * division or allocation of markets or customers; * boycott of or a refusal to deal Refusal to deal is one of several anti-competitive practices forbidden in countries which have free market economies. For example, in Australia:
* compilation of "approved lists Approved list A list of equities and other investments that a financial institution or mutual fund is allowed to invest in. See: Legal list. approved list See legal list. " of customers or suppliers; * dissemination dissemination Medtalk The spread of a pernicious process–eg, CA, acute infection Oncology Metastasis, see there of information relating to sales policies of specific customers or manufacturers; and * production of products or the level of production. 3. What should a board do to prevent antitrust violations? Obviously, your board's first step is to understand these issues and how they apply to your particular organization. Then you must establish an antitrust policy and provide in-service programs for board and committee members to educate them about the dangers. Many associations develop a standard antitrust statement of do's and don'ts to remind members of the antitrust requirements, to protect the members as well as the association, and to establish a paper trail indicating the association is serious about antitrust. It is not burdensome to include such a statement as a standard document with board and member meeting agendas. Most important, whether antitrust authorities allege To state, recite, assert, or charge the existence of particular facts in a Pleading or an indictment; to make an allegation. allege v. any violation at your association or not, your board must realize that the process of being investigated can be costly. In addition to legal fees and the major disruption of personnel and ongoing activities that any government investigation or litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute. When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. can cause, criminal antitrust violations are punishable by fines and/or up to three years' imprisonment Imprisonment See also Isolation. Alcatraz Island former federal maximum security penitentiary, near San Francisco; “escapeproof.” [Am. Hist.: Flexner, 218] Altmark, the German prison ship in World War II. [Br. Hist. for individuals. Violations can be subject to fines of twice the gross financial loss or gain; private parties may recover as much as three times the damages they suffer. The key is for your board to know the limits of what your association may and may not do. The presence of knowledgeable legal counsel at board meetings can help to avoid such problems and--in the worst cases--jail sentences. Jonathan T. Howe is president and founding partner of the law firm of Howe & Hutton, Ltd., with offices in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and St. Louis. E-mail: jth@howehutton.com. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion