Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,529,347 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences.


Contrary to futurist Alvin Toffler's prediction in The Third Wave that "making paper copies of anything is a primitive use of (electronic word processing word processing, use of a computer program or a dedicated hardware and software package to write, edit, format, and print a document. Text is most commonly entered using a keyboard similar to a typewriter's, although handwritten input (see pen-based computer) and ) machines and violates their spirit," Edward Tenner Edward Tenner (born 1944) is a researcher at Princeton University and former editor at Princeton University Press. Tenner is also a technology writer who currently writes a column named Megascope for Technology Review.  noticed that, in his workplace, the use of personal computers, networking, and electronic mail had not reduced the amount of paper being used. In fact, Tenner's colleagues were making lots of back-up hard copies, circulating files across departments, and networking had actually multiplied paper use. Tenner wrote an essay, "The Paradoxical Proliferation of Paper" to describe this phenomenon and started to look around at "the strange consequences of nearly everything." He became a connoisseur of what he calls "revenge effects" - the unintended ironic consequences of the mechanical, chemical, biological and medical forms of ingenuity that have been the hallmarks of the "progressive," improvement-obsessed twentieth century.

In Why Things Bite Back you will learn about such revenge effects as: low-tar cigarettes, which may encourage smokers to defer quitting altogether; the meltdown at Chernobyl, which occurred during a test of enhanced safety designs; and personal office computers, which may cause executives to waste time on what are essentially clerical tasks. The author is not just interested in providing a list of technological ironies. He believes that Murphy's Law (humour) Murphy's Law - (Or "Sod's Law") The correct, *original* Murphy's Law reads: "If there are two or more ways to do something, and one of those ways can result in a catastrophe, then someone will do it.  (what can go wrong will go wrong) should be seen not as a fatalistic fa·tal·ism  
n.
1. The doctrine that all events are predetermined by fate and are therefore unalterable.

2. Acceptance of the belief that all events are predetermined and inevitable.
, defeatist de·feat·ism  
n.
Acceptance of or resignation to the prospect of defeat.



de·featist adj. & n.

Noun 1.
 principle but as a call for alertness and adaptation. To reduce revenge effects he believes we need to deintensify our quest for Verb 1. quest for - go in search of or hunt for; "pursue a hobby"
quest after, go after, pursue

look for, search, seek - try to locate or discover, or try to establish the existence of; "The police are searching for clues"; "They are searching for the
 "more, better, faster" in favor of finesse (read "delayed reaction delayed reaction
n.
An allergic or immune response that begins 24 to 48 hours after exposure to an antigen to which the individual has been sensitized.
" if you want to use a general semantics term) and analysis of consequences.

In agriculture, this means looking at forgoing applications of heavy fertilizer in favor of planting complementary crops in the same fields, increasing both productivity and resilience. In business computing, deintensification requires that we reassess the functional value of "more powerful" new releases of both hardware and software. It also suggest doubts about whether higher workloads and longer days produce greater profits. In medicine, the move away from intensity calls for a shift from heavy reliance on a few antibiotics.

Whether you're a Luddite, a technophile A person who enjoys learning about and using electronics and computers. See computerphile, hacker and dweeb. Contrast with technophobe. , or a curious observer, this wide-ranging book, written in a literate and lucid style, will have you rethinking the conventional optimism that surrounds technological change. It reminds us that since change is inevitable, knowledge and vigilance are needed to reduce the "revenge of unintended consequences."
COPYRIGHT 1997 Institute of General Semantics
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1997, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Levinson, Martin H.
Publication:ETC.: A Review of General Semantics
Article Type:Book Review
Date:Mar 22, 1997
Words:397
Previous Article:Media Virus! Hidden Agendas in Popular Culture.
Next Article:Clicking: 16 Trends to Future Fit Your Life, Your Work, and your Business.
Topics:



Related Articles
The great American banking snafu.
Reckless disregard.
The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite.
On Looking into the Abyss: Untimely Thoughts on Culture and Society.
Orwell's Revenge: The 1984 Palimpsest.
The Pinball Effect: How Renaissance Water Gardens Made the Carburetor Possible - and Other Journeys Through Knowledge.
Murder in Greenwich: Who Killed Martha Moxley?
Hot Stuff.(Review)
Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire.(Review)
The Unintended Consequences of High-Stakes Testing.(book)(Book Review)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles