Who's isolating whom?: Title III of the Helms-Burton Act and compliance with international law.I. INTRODUCTION
James Osborne's heirs want the White House back;(1) and because they are Canadians, they cannot run for president. But fortunately, Canadian Members of Parliament Peter Milliken Peter Andrew Stewart Milliken, MP, BA, MA, LL.B (born November 12, 1946) is a Canadian lawyer and politician. He has been a member of the Canadian House of Commons since 1988, and has served as Speaker of the House since 2001. and John Godfrey
2. of some 80,000 British loyalists Loyalists, in the American Revolution, colonials who adhered to the British cause. The patriots referred to them as Tories. Although Loyalists were found in all social classes and occupations, a disproportionately large number were engaged in commerce and the to claim compensation for property expropriated ex·pro·pri·ate
tr.v. ex·pro·pri·at·ed, ex·pro·pri·at·ing, ex·pro·pri·ates
1. To deprive of possession: expropriated the property owners who lived in the path of the new highway. during the American Revolutionary War.(2)
Has Parliament lost its bearings? Did the authors consider the legislation's implications under international law? Did they consider Canada's obligations under the U.N. Charter, the North American Free Trade Agreement North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), accord establishing a free-trade zone in North America; it was signed in 1992 by Canada, Mexico, and the United States and took effect on Jan. 1, 1994. (NAFTA NAFTA
in full North American Free Trade Agreement
Trade pact signed by Canada, the U.S., and Mexico in 1992, which took effect in 1994. Inspired by the success of the European Community in reducing trade barriers among its members, NAFTA created the world's ), or the World Trade Organization? In fact, the apparent lack of concern for these issues reflects Parliament's anger towards Congress(3) for failing to recognize U.S. international obligations in passing the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996.(4)
The Helms-Burton Act The Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (Libertad) Act of 1996 (Helms-Burton Act, Pub.L. 104-114, 110 Stat. 785, ) is a United States federal law which strengthens and continues the United States embargo against Cuba. , which seeks to deter foreign investment in Cuba,(5) has four Titles. Title I aims to strengthen the economic embargo over Cuba.(6) Title II promises generous aid to the free and independent Cuban government.(7) Title III Title III Program is a U.S. Federal Grant Program to improve education History
The Title III Program began as part of the Higher Education Act of 1965, which sought to provide support to strengthen various aspects of the schools through a formula grant program to accredited, , the most controversial and the inspiration for the Godfrey-Milliken bill The Godfrey-Milliken Bill, officially Bill C-339: The American Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (Loyalty) Act was a Private Member's Bill introduced in the Canadian parliament by Liberal MPs Peter Milliken and John Godfrey. ,(8) allows U.S. nationals to sue individuals who "traffic"(9) in expropriated property in Cuba.(10) Lastly, Title IV denies admission into U.S. territory for all "traffickers"(11) and their families.(12)
This Comment focuses on Title III's consistency with U.S. obligations to its neighbors in the Western Hemisphere Western Hemisphere
Part of Earth comprising North and South America and the surrounding waters. Longitudes 20° W and 160° E are often considered its boundaries. . The discussion begins with the history and development of the Helms-Burton Act. Next, this Comment examines international reactions to Helms-Burton, especially the reactions of Mexico and Canada. This Comment then evaluates Title III's compliance with international standards regarding the extraterritorial ex·tra·ter·ri·to·ri·al
1. Located outside territorial boundaries: fishing in extraterritorial waters.
2. application of domestic law. The final part of this Comment examines U.S. obligations under the NAFTA, the U.N. Charter, and the Charter of the Organization of American States The Charter of the Organization of the American States (otherwise known the Charter of the OAS) is a Pan-American treaty that sets out the creation of the Organization of American States. (OAS OAS
See: Option adjusted spread ) and questions Title III's compliance with those obligations.
II. THE ORIGINS OF HELMS-BURTON AND TITLE III
The Helms-Burton Act is the most recent development in the U.S. boycott of Cuba. President John F. Kennedy "John Kennedy" and "JFK" redirect here. For other uses, see John Kennedy (disambiguation) and JFK (disambiguation).
John Fitzgerald Kennedy (May 29, 1917–November 22, 1963), was the thirty-fifth President of the United States, serving from 1961 until his assassination in started the embargo under the authority of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961(13) and the Trading with the Enemy Act The Trading with the Enemy Act, sometimes abbreviated as TWEA, is a United States federal law, , was enacted in 1917 to restrict trade with countries hostile to the United States. The law gives the President the power to oversee or restrict any and all trade between the U.S. of 1917.(14) In 1992 anti-Castro groups pressured the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. to enact the Cuban Democracy Act The Cuban Democracy Act was a bill presented by U.S. Congressman Robert Torricelli and passed in 1992 which prohibited foreign-based subsidiaries of U.S. companies from trading with Cuba, travel to Cuba by U.S. citizens, and family remittances to Cuba. of 1992,(15) which restricted trade between Cuba and foreign subsidiaries of U.S. corporations.(16) The legislation sparked a quick, negative response from the international community, which felt the law was an impermissible im·per·mis·si·ble
Not permitted; not permissible: impermissible behavior.
im extraterritorial extension of U.S. jurisdiction.(17) The U.N. General Assembly voted to denounce de·nounce
tr.v. de·nounced, de·nounc·ing, de·nounc·es
1. To condemn openly as being evil or reprehensible. See Synonyms at criticize.
2. To accuse formally.
3. the Cuban Democracy Act of 1992 on three separate occasions: November 24, 1992, November 3, 1993, and October 26, 1994.(18)
While the United Nations was denouncing the Cuban Democracy Act of 1992, the Foreign Relations Foreign relations may refer to:
tr.v. con·fis·cat·ed, con·fis·cat·ing, con·fis·cates
1. To seize (private property) for the public treasury.
2. To seize by or as if by authority. See Synonyms at appropriate.
adj. property, and in so doing to deny the Cuban regime of Fidel Castro Noun 1. Fidel Castro - Cuban socialist leader who overthrew a dictator in 1959 and established a Marxist socialist state in Cuba (born in 1927)
Castro, Fidel Castro Ruz the capital generated by such ventures."(24)
Before March 1996, the Clinton Administration Noun 1. Clinton administration - the executive under President Clinton
executive - persons who administer the law had mixed feelings about Helms-Burton. The President worried that the bill constrained his authority to conduct foreign affairs foreign affairs
Affairs concerning international relations and national interests in foreign countries. .(25) Further, Under Secretary of State Peter Tarnoff Peter Tarnoff (born April 19 1937) served as the Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs during the first Clinton term.
Tarnoff is known to currently reside in San Francisco, CA.
Tarnoff graduated from Colgate University in 1958. told the congressional Western Hemisphere Subcommittee of the House International Relations international relations, study of the relations among states and other political and economic units in the international system. Particular areas of study within the field of international relations include diplomacy and diplomatic history, international law, Committee that the President was "concerned that a number of the bill's provisions could conflict with other important U.S. interests, including our compliance with major international trade and investment agreements, including GATT See General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
See General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). , NAFTA and Treaties of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation."(26) The Administration also worried that a ban on the importation of sugar products against countries that import Cuban sugar would be "viewed by others as a secondary boycott A group's refusal to work for, purchase from, or handle the products of a business with which the group has no dispute.
A secondary boycott is an attempt to influence the actions of one business by exerting pressure on another business. , similar to the Arab League Arab League, popular name for the League of Arab States, formed in 1945 in an attempt to give political expression to the Arab nations. boycott on Israel that the U.S. has vigorously opposed."(27) Ultimately, the State Department feared that "[i]f enacted, these provisions could prompt retaliatory re·tal·i·ate
v. re·tal·i·at·ed, re·tal·i·at·ing, re·tal·i·ates
To return like for like, especially evil for evil.
To pay back (an injury) in kind. measures [by trade allies] that would severely disrupt essential U.S. trade relationships."(28)
Given external opposition from the international community and opposition from the State Department,(29) the Helms-Burton Act's future seemed dim. But on February 24, 1996, Cuban Air Force MiGs shot down two Cessna light civilian aircraft over international waters.(30) Four Cuban Americans This is a list of famous Cuban Americans. This list contains both naturalized Cuban-born Americans and naturally-born Americans of Cuban-descent.
tr.v. co·spon·sored, co·spon·sor·ing, co·spon·sors
To function in the capacity of a joint sponsor of: corporations that cosponsored a marathon.
n. of the bill, bragged the "legislation will be on the [P]resident's desk before the blood dries on Castro's hands."(34) Seventeen days after the two planes were shot down, President Bill Clinton signed the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 into law.(35) The President made clear that he did not interpret the Act as "derogating from the President's authority to conduct foreign policy."(36) President Clinton did not mention his prior misgivings about the possible international backlash,(37) nor did the President state the reasons for his change of heart.(38)
III. INTERNATIONAL REACTIONS
The international community immediately denounced the passage of Helms-Burton.(39) While this controversial legislation sparked negative reaction from around the world, the sharpest criticism came from U.S. neighbors in the Western Hemisphere.
In addition to the satirical Godfrey-Milliken bill, the Canadian Parliament offered amendments to Canada's Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act (FEMA FEMA,
n.pr See Federal Emergency Management Agency. ) that could effectively counteract Helms-Burton.(40) The amendments, called Bill C-54, have three purposes. First, Bill C-54 gives the Canadian Attorney-General the power to identify foreign laws that infringe upon Canadian sovereignty and grants the power to deny nationals and governments of the targeted countries access to Canadian records that may be used in litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.
When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. or criminal prosecution.(41) Second, Bill C-54 blocks the enforcement of judgments rendered by courts of targeted countries and allows Canadians to recover court costs court costs n. fees for expenses that the courts pass on to attorneys, who then pass them on to their clients or, in some kinds of cases, to the losing party. .(42) Finally, the amendments provide stiff fines, some as high as US$1.5 million, for Canadian companies This is a list of companies from Canada.
Directory: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Current Companies that comply with the boycott laws of targeted countries.(43)
Canadian investment in Cuba continues to grow.(44) Canada is Cuba's largest trading partner with commerce totaling about US$500 million.(45) While Canadian private industry prospers by investing in Cuban pharmaceuticals, nickel mines, and tourism,(46) the Canadian Government refuses to be left out, agreeing to finance the construction of a new terminal at Havana International Airport.(47)
Helms-Burton has created the most ill will in Mexico, whose largest trading partner is the United States. Mexico's attitude towards the legislation is best exemplified by Mexico's reception of Under Secretary for International Trade Stuart B. Eizenstat, whom President Clinton sent on a worldwide mission to discuss Helms-Burton with trade allies.(48) When Under Secretary Eizenstat arrived in Mexico, he was pelted with eggs.(49)
Mexico chose to resolve the matter locally rather than on an international level. In a vote of 317 to 1, Mexico's Chamber of Deputies adopted an "Antidote Law" to counter Helms-Burton.(50) The "Law for the Protection of Business and Investment from Foreign Regulatory Provisions that Contradict International Law"(51) applies to all people or legal entities that (1) are located in Mexico, (2) take actions which have effect in Mexico, and (3) submit to Mexican Law.(52) The law prohibits two types of activities. First, it forbids "acts that affect trade or investment, when those acts are a consequence of the extraterritorial effects of foreign laws."(53) Second, the Antidote Law prohibits individuals and companies from providing information to foreign governments or foreign courts if the information relates to proceedings under the extraterritorial foreign law.(54) Violators of the Antidote Law incur fines of approximately US$290,000 for actions in compliance with the invalid foreign law and fines of approximately US$145,000 for providing information to foreign courts.(55) The Antidote Law empowers as well as penalizes, having both a "blocking effect Kamin's Blocking effect demonstrates that conditioning to a stimulus could be blocked if the stimulus were reinforced in compund with a previously conditioned stimulus. For example, an animal is exposed to conditioned stimulus A, which predicts the occurrence of a reinforcer. " and a "mirror effect."(56) Article 4 states that "National courts shall refuse the acknowledgment and enforcement of judgments, judicial requirements or arbitral ar·bi·tral
Of or relating to arbiters or arbitration.
Adj. 1. arbitral - relating to or resulting from arbitration; "the arbitral adjustment of the controversy"; "an arbitrational settlement"
arbitrational awards issued on the basis of the foreign laws."(57) Article 5 contains the mirror effect. The Article awards damages in Mexican courts to those who have been affected by the foreign laws.(58) The statute awards the aggrieved ag·grieved
1. Feeling distress or affliction.
2. Treated wrongly; offended.
3. Law Treated unjustly, as by denial of or infringement upon one's legal rights. individual a sum equal to the foreign judgment (hence the term "mirror effect") as well as other damages, economic losses, and court costs.(59) While the damages awarded under the Antidote Law are considerable, it is unclear whether this Mexican law will ever be implemented.(60)
C. The Latin American Economic System The Latin American Economic System, officially known as Sistema Económico Latinoamericano (SELA), is an organization founded in 1975 to promote economic cooperation and social development between Latin American countries.
The Latin American Economic System (SELA) issued a report disputing the legality of Helms-Burton under international law.(61) The 159 page report declares that the legislation "not only negatively affects Cuba's interests and its development, but also damages the interests of Latin America Latin America, the Spanish-speaking, Portuguese-speaking, and French-speaking countries (except Canada) of North America, South America, Central America, and the West Indies. and the Caribbean and the international community by interfering in its sovereign decisions and the management of its foreign relations."(62) The report denounces the United States for attempting to create a secondary boycott around Cuba, and questions the validity of the primary boycott A primary boycott occurs when a union or other political or community organization encourages both its members and the general public not to buy the products of a firm involved in a labor or political dispute. .(63)
IV. TITLE III AND GENERAL CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW In addition to treaties and other expressed or ratified agreements that create international law, the International Court of Justice, jurists, the United Nations and its member states consider customary international law
While international law is commonly established by treaty, international custom can sometimes rise to the level of international law.(64) American courts have adopted three customary doctrines that govern the extraterritorial application of U.S. laws: the Effects Doctrine, the principle of comity Courtesy; respect; a disposition to perform some official act out of goodwill and tradition rather than obligation or law. The acceptance or Adoption of decisions or laws by a court of another jurisdiction, either foreign or domestic, based on public policy rather than legal , and the Act of State Doctrine Act of state doctrine
This doctrine says that a nation is sovereign within its own borders, and its domestic actions may not be questioned in the courts of another nation. . Each may bar Title III's legality under international law.
A. The Effects Doctrine
Before the turn of the century, U.S. law abided by the principle that a nation could not exercise jurisdiction over a person outside its borders.(65) By 1909, in American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.,(66) the Supreme Court hesitantly agreed that in some circumstances, conduct outside the United States could be attacked under a U.S. statute.(67) By 1945 Judge Learned Hand declared it "settled law.., that any state may impose liabilities, even upon persons not within its allegiance, for conduct outside its borders that has consequences within its borders which the state reprehends."(68)
Judge Hand's rule is now called the Effects Doctrine and is embodied in section 402 of the Restatement Restatement
A revision in a company's earlier financial statements.
The need for restating financial figures can result from fraud, misrepresentation, or a simple clerical error. (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States The law of the United States was originally largely derived from the common law of the system of English law, which was in force at the time of the Revolutionary War. However, the supreme law of the land is the United States Constitution and, under the Constitution's Supremacy , which provides that "a state has jurisdiction to prescribe law with respect to... conduct outside its territory that has or is intended to have substantial effect within its territory."(69) The effects test is tempered by a reasonability requirement, equivalent to the concept of comity.(70) Section 403(2) sets out a laundry list laundry list A popular term for a long list of Sx, diseases, or etiologies that share something in common–eg, differential diagnosis of acute abdomen of factors to consider in determining the reasonableness of action taken under section 402.(71)
The effects test is accepted in some jurisdictions outside the United States, particularly in Europe. Germany expressly adopted the effects test in section 98 of the Law Against Restraints on Competition (GWB GWB George W Bush (US president)
GWB Gesetz Gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen (act against restraints of competition, Germany)
GWB Geochemist's Workbench (scientific software) ).(72) Additionally, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Japan, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland use the Effects Doctrine as the basis for extraterritorial applications of their competition laws.(73) The European Court of Justice European Court of Justice, judicial branch of the European Union (EU). Located in Luxembourg, it was founded in 1958 as the joint court for the three treaty organizations that were consolidated into the European Community (the predecessor of the EU) in 1967. also fashioned an effects test, first in Imperial Chemical Industries v. Commission(74) and more recently in the Wood Pulp wood pulp: see paper. case.(75)
B. Direct Effects and Comity
Does Helms-Burton pass the effects test? Section 301(9) copies verbatim the language of Restatement section 402.(76) Noticeably absent from the statute are the additional reasonability requirements set out in Restatement section 403. A mechanical application of section 403's requirements suggests why the drafters left the language out. For the Helms-Burton Act to be legal under international law standards, the legislation must be reasonable. The first criterion in determining reasonability is establishing a link between the United States and the proscribed PROSCRIBED, civil law. Among the Romans, a man was said to be proscribed when a reward was offered for his head; but the term was more usually applied to those who were sentenced to some punishment which carried with it the consequences of civil death. Code, 9; 49. conduct in Cuba.(77) When a foreign citizen purchases expropriated property in Cuba, the sale has an effect upon the former owner.(78) The intermediary sale of the property may cloud title and make claim settlement for the U.S. national difficult.(79) However, the passing of thirty years may attenuate To reduce the force or severity; to lessen a relationship or connection between two objects.
In Criminal Procedure, the relationship between an illegal search and a confession may be sufficiently attenuated as to remove the confession from the protection afforded by the the sale's effect on the claimant.
Second, there must be some connection--nationality, residence, or economic activity--between the United States and the purchasing entity.(80) An entity needs only minimum contacts with the United States to create liability under Title III of Helms-Burton.(81) Such a connection might be considered tenuous.
Third, Helms-Burton must be a type of law that is generally accepted, or is generally considered desirable.(82) Given the international community's negative response to the U.S. legislation, Helms-Burton is not generally accepted.(83)
Fourth, U.S. citizens must "have justified expectations that might be protected" by Helms-Burton.(84) Title III finds its firmest footing in the protection of property rights.(85) The United States could take the position that Cuba does not have proper title to the properties in issue because the former owners have not been compensated in accordance with international law.(86) Without compensation "'a good case can certainly be made for an international legal duty of non-recognition of Castro's titles."(87) And while the courts of some countries have declined to recognize title in foreign confiscations,(88) the United States is powerless to force another country's court not to ratify such transactions. Nor can former owners turn to the international tribunals because the jurisdiction of the tribunals is consensual.(89) Thus, Title III is the only way the United States can protect its citizens' interests in Cuban property.
It is also important to consider the extent to which Title III is consistent with the traditions of the international system.(90) International law contemplates the use of unilateral remedies such as Helms-Burton.(91) Section 905 of the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States provides that when a state is the victim of a violation of an international obligation by another state, the state may use unilateral countermeasures That form of military science that, by the employment of devices and/or techniques, has as its objective the impairment of the operational effectiveness of enemy activity. See also electronic warfare. if they "(a)are necessary to terminate the violation or prevent further violation, or to remedy the violation; and (b) are not out of proportion to the violation and the injury suffered."(92) Here, the violation is Castro's illegal expropriation The taking of private property for public use or in the public interest. The taking of U.S. industry situated in a foreign country, by a foreign government.
Expropriation is the act of a government taking private property; Eminent Domain is the legal term describing the of property owned by U.S. nationals and citizens.(93) Further, as previously discussed, Helms-Burton is necessary because there are no other means to protect the former owners' interests.(94)
Finally, Helms-Burton is not out of proportion to the violation.(95) The statute's proportionality is called into question, however, by the fact that the statute awards treble damages A recovery of three times the amount of actual financial losses suffered which is provided by statute for certain kinds of cases.
The statute authorizing treble damages directs the judge to multiply by three the amount of monetary damages awarded by the jury in those cases in some instances.(96) Treble damages are typically punitive(97) and may be outside the scope of section 905.(98)
Some detractors of Helms-Burton also claim that Title III acts as a secondary boycott on Cuba(99) and that such a boycott, even by the United States' admission, violates international norms.(100) Proponents are quick to respond that nothing in the Helms-Burton Act forbids foreign nationals or foreign governments from investing in Cuba.(101) But the possibility of treble damages makes the argument ring hollow.(102) Investing in certain Cuban properties is a "Hobson's choice Hob·son's choice
An apparently free choice that offers no real alternative.
[After Thomas Hobson "(103) at best and may deter some investors from buying on the island,(104)
One can make an argument for Title III's legitimacy under each one of the Restatement's reasonability factors in section 403. However, the current U.S. Supreme Court may no longer require a comity (reasonability) analysis when deciding whether to adjudicate adjudicate (jōō´dikāt´),
v cases arising under extraterritorial applications of U.S. law.(105) In the recent Hartford Fire Insurance Co. case, a five justice majority declined to use a reasonability analysis when determining the extraterritorial reach of the Sherman Act.(106) The case arose when nineteen states brought antitrust suits against a group of domestic and London-based insurers, in part, for collusive col·lu·sive
Acting in secret to achieve a fraudulent, illegal, or deceitful goal.
col·lusive·ly adv. agreements made in England.(107) The district court dismissed the action against all defendants, and declined to exercise jurisdiction over the foreign defendants explicitly on the basis of international comity.(108) The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the lower court and granted jurisdiction.(109) The court admitted that jurisdiction over the foreign defendants would clash with English law The system of law that has developed in England from approximately 1066 to the present.
The body of English law includes legislation, Common Law, and a host of other legal norms established by Parliament, the Crown, and the judiciary. and policy, but the substantial nature of the effect produced in the United States weighed in favor of exercising jurisdiction.(110) The defendants appealed and the Supreme Court granted certiorari certiorari
In law, a writ issued by a superior court for the reexamination of an action of a lower court. The writ of certiorari was originally a writ from England's Court of Queen's (King's) Bench to the judges of an inferior court; it was later expanded to include writs to "address the application of the Sherman Act to the foreign conduct at issue."(111)
The plaintiff-respondents, realizing the implications of a favorable ruling, expressly requested the Court to abandon the comity requirement.(112) The plaintiffs argued that the reasonability requirement was vague and anachronistic a·nach·ro·nism
1. The representation of someone as existing or something as happening in other than chronological, proper, or historical order.
The Court did not abandon the comity requirement, but rather stepped around the issue.(114) Justice Souter chose not to determine if the application of the Sherman Act was reasonable.(115) Justice Souter stated that "Congress expressed no view on the question whether a court with Sherman Act jurisdiction should ever decline to exercise such jurisdiction on grounds of international comity."(116) And in the absence of such a legislative mandate, the Court did not decide if jurisdiction over foreign defendants could ever violate international comity.(117)
Justice Scalia, writing for the dissent, argued in favor of using reasonableness standards to limit the extraterritorial application of U.S. law.(118) He provided a long list of lower court opinions that have limited the reach of the Sherman Act because of international comity.(119) The dissent analyzed the reasonability of jurisdiction over the defendants using the list of factors in section 403(2) of the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States.(120) Justice Scalia concluded that "[r]arely would these factors point more clearly against application of United States law."(121)
How does the Hartford Insurance case affect the analysis of Title III? Arguably ar·gu·a·ble
1. Open to argument: an arguable question, still unresolved.
2. That can be argued plausibly; defensible in argument: three arguable points of law. , the case prohibits district judges from dismissing cases brought under Helms-Burton on the basis of international comity--the rationale being that international comity is a political question that was answered by the legislature when it drafted the legislation.(122) If this is the proper interpretation of Hartford, then there are no governmental mechanisms that can prevent enforcement of Title III actions.(123) Given the veracity veracity (vras´itē),
n of the above proposition, one may conclude that the only barriers to the enforcement of Helms-Burton are other countries' antidote laws and U.S. obligations under international treaties.
C. The Act of State Doctrine
If the judiciary does not decline to adjudicate Title III claims because of international comity, they may decline to do so because of the Act of State Doctrine. The Doctrine stands for the proposition that "courts of one nation [cannot] sit in judgment of the acts of a foreign sovereign which occurred in the foreign state."(124) The Act of State Doctrine does not deprive a court of jurisdiction.(125) Rather, "it operates as an issue preclusion A concept that refers to the fact that a particular Question of Fact or law, one that has already been fully litigated by the parties in an action for which there has been a judgment on the merits, cannot be relitigated in any future action involving the same parties or their device."(126) U.S. courts first adopted the doctrine in Underhill v. Hernandez.(127) The Supreme Court stated, "Every sovereign State SOVEREIGN STATE. One which governs itself independently of any foreign power. is bound to respect the independence of every other sovereign State, and the courts of one country will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory."(128)
The modern rule was announced in Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino Banco National de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case that determined that the policy of United States federal courts would be to honor the Act of State Doctrine, which dictates that the propriety of decisions of .(129) The case arose out of disputes resulting from the Cuban government's expropriation of a U.S. resident's property in 1960.(130) The Court refused to hear defendant-respondents' contentions against the application of the Act of State Doctrine, stating: "[T]he Judicial Branch will not examine the validity of a taking of property within its own territory by a foreign sovereign ... even if the complaint alleges that the taking violates customary international law."(131) While nothing in the Constitution demands the court abide by the Act of State Doctrine, it does have "constitutional underpinnings."(132) The Act of State Doctrine arises out of the separation of powers separation of powers: see Constitution of the United States.
separation of powers
Division of the legislative, executive, and judicial functions of government among separate and independent bodies. , and maintains control over foreign affairs in the hands of the President and out of the hands of the judiciary.(133) In a later Supreme Court decision, Justice Brennan Justice Brennan could refer to:
But because the Act of State Doctrine is not constitutionally required, Congress has the power to force courts not to take the doctrine into consideration.(135) Therefore, Congress promptly enacted the "Sabbatino" or "Second Hickenlooper" Amendment to circumvent the Supreme Court's decision.(136) The amendment read:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court in
the United States shall decline on the ground of the
federal act of state doctrine to make a determination on
the merits giving effect to the principles of international
law in a case in which a claim of title or other rights to
property is asserted based upon a confiscation confiscation
In law, the act of seizing property without compensation and submitting it to the public treasury. Illegal items such as narcotics or firearms, or profits from the sale of illegal items, may be confiscated by the police. Additionally, government action (e.g. or
other taking ....(137)
Detractors of the Act of State Doctrine applaud the amendment, arguing the doctrine only resulted in "(a) frustrating frus·trate
tr.v. frus·trat·ed, frus·trat·ing, frus·trates
a. To prevent from accomplishing a purpose or fulfilling a desire; thwart: the application of international law...; (b) denying litigants their day in court...; and (c) frustrating the effective application of other U.S. laws."(138) Subsequent decisions have narrowly construed the Sabbatino Amendment, giving it effect only when confiscated property has been brought to the United States.(139) Because Title III claims deal with properties in Cuba, the Sabbatino Amendment, as presently construed, may not apply.(140)
The drafters of Helms-Burton wisely added their own version of the Sabbatino Amendment.(141) Section 6082(a)(6) states: "No court of the United States shall decline, based upon the act of state doctrine, to make a determination on the merits on the merits adj. referring to a judgment, decision or ruling of a court based upon the facts presented in evidence and the law applied to that evidence. A judge decides a case "on the merits" when he/she bases the decision on the fundamental issues and considers in an action brought under [this statute]."(142) This sentence may be the most important part of the statute(143) and, after the Supreme Court's holding in Hartford, eliminates the last barrier to judicial enforcement of Title III in the United States.
V. TITLE III AND INTERNATIONAL TREATY OBLIGATIONS
Title III may not violate the U.S. interpretation of general customary international law; however, it may violate U.S. treaty obligations. Helms-Burton implicates three different treaties between the United States and other nations. They are the NAFTA, the U.N. Charter, and the OAS Charter.
A. The North American Free Trade Agreement
There are certainly some portions of the Helms-Burton Act that seem to violate the NAFTA.(144) For example, Title IV's exclusion of traffickers from the United States may violate U.S. obligations under the NAFTA Chapter 16, which requires Parties to "grant temporary entry to business persons."(145) This discussion will keep its focus on Title III.
If a Canadian or Mexican individual or corporation is subject to an unfavorable judgment pursuant to Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, they could challenge the award through the NAFTA.(146) Two arguments are available. First, an investor could argue that Title III of Helms-Burton violates Article 1102 of the NAFTA.(147) Article 1102 provides that "[e]ach Party shall accord to investors of another Party treatment no less favorable than that it accords, in like circumstances, to its own investors ...."(148) By its terms, Helms-Burton cannot apply to U.S. citizens since they are prohibited from investing in Cuba by the primary boycott under the Cuban Democracy Act of 1992.(149) Therefore, Helms-Burton discriminates against investors of Mexico and Canada by threatening those investors with litigation in which a U.S. citizen could never be a defendant.
The United States may respond by pointing out the language of Helms-Burton which clearly states that "any person that ... traffics in property which was confiscated by the Cuban Government" is liable.(150) The statute does not limit its application to foreign nationals. Furthermore, U.S. investors and foreign investors are not "in like circumstances."(151) Foreign investors have the ability to invest in Cuba, whereas U.S. investors do not. Therefore, the two sets of investors are in differing sets of circumstances.
The United States used this line of reasoning Noun 1. line of reasoning - a course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating a truth or falsehood; the methodical process of logical reasoning; "I can't follow your line of reasoning"
logical argument, argumentation, argument, line in the Dolphin Tuna Cases argued before a General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), former specialized agency of the United Nations. It was established in 1948 as an interim measure pending the creation of the International Trade Organization. (GATT) dispute resolution panel.(152) The case arose after Mexico complained that the United States was using the Marine Mammal Protection Act The Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 prohibits, with certain exceptions, the taking of marine mammals in United States waters and by U.S. citizens on the high seas, and the importation of marine mammals and marine mammal products into the U.S. of 1972 (MMPA MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act
MMPA Michigan Milk Producers Association
MMPA Master of Management & Professional Accounting
MMPA Master Military Pay Account
MMPA Multicultural Motion Picture Association
MMPA Magnetic Material Producers Association )(153) as an unfair restriction on trade.(154) The United States defended on several grounds, particularly by arguing that the MMPA did not violate the National Treatment requirement,(155) and, therefore, was not inconsistent with Article III of the GATT.(156) The United States reasoned that tuna caught using nets that protect marine mammals marine mammals
mammals inhabiting the sea; generally taken to include the cetaceans (whales, porpoise, dolphin), the sirenians (sea-cows, including manatees and dugong) and the pinnipeds (the carnivores of the group, seals, sealions, walruses). was not a "like product" when compared to tuna harvested without such safeguards.(157) The Panel rejected the argument and decided that MMPA regulations "could not possibly affect tuna as a product."(158)
Similarly, a foreign investor would argue that the U.S. embargo on Cuba could not possibly affect nationals as investors inside the territory. The fact that U.S. residents may not trade with Cuba does not limit their right "to the establishment, acquisition, expansion, management, conduct, operation, and sale or other disposition of investments."(159) Therefore, investors of all parties are "in like circumstances."(160)
Second, a foreign investor could argue that actions brought under section 6082(a) of the Helms-Burton Act deny foreign investors the minimum standard of treatment required by the NAFTA. The NAFTA Article 1105 states: "Each Party shall accord to investments of investors of another Party treatment in accordance with international law, including fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security."(161) Investors may argue that when plaintiffs in Title III actions seek to enforce a court award, the foreign investor's interest becomes subject to attachment. At that point, the foreign national's investment is treated unfairly under international law.(162)
Title III arguably discriminates against investors from Mexico and Canada in violation of Chapter 11 of the NAFTA. Violation of this part of the NAFTA gives injured investors two avenues of recourse. First, investors have relief available to them via domestic blocking statutes.(163) Second, investors have the right to seek redress before dispute settlement panels under Chapter 11, section B of the NAFTA.(164)
B. The United Nations
The Helms-Burton Act violates U.S. obligations to the United Nations. The U.N. Charter states that the "Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members."(165) Sovereignty is the principle that a nation is the absolute authority within its jurisdiction.(166) From the concepts of sovereignty and state equality flows the principle that nations should refrain from interfering with the domestic affairs of fellow nations.(167)
The United Nations has previously condemned the United States for violating the sovereignty of other nations with extraterritorial legislation.(168) Here the United States is clearly interfering in the domestic affairs of both Cuba and its trading partners. The conduct that Title III intends to deter involves the sale of property in Cuba, by the Cuban Government, to individuals who are not U.S. citizens. While the property being sold once belonged to U.S. citizens, it is the U.S. government that bore the responsibility, under domestic and international laws, of settling the claims.(169) In fact, Cuba has settled expropriation claims with many other countries, including Canada, France, Spain, and Switzerland.(170)
Even the Cuban Democracy Act of 1972, which the United Nations so firmly denounced, limited its scope to targeting the conduct of U.S. corporations.(171) The Helms-Burton Act goes much further, not only by creating liability for non-citizens,(172) but also by trying to destroy an entire government through monetary asphyxiation asphyxiation /as·phyx·i·a·tion/ (as-fix?e-a´shun) suffocation; the stoppage of respiration.
Oxygen starvation of tissues. .(173) Because the United States is attempting to deter conduct taking place in another nation, the United States is violating the U.N. Charter.
C. The Organization of American States Organization of American States (OAS), international organization, created Apr. 30, 1948, at Bogotá, Colombia, by agreement of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti,
No speculation is necessary to determine if Helms-Burton and Title III are consistent with the OAS Charter. The General Assembly of the OAS has already announced that the two cannot be reconciled.(174) The OAS Charter(175) states that "[e]very American State has the duty to respect the rights enjoyed by every other State in accordance with international law."(176) Because the terms of the Helms-Burton Act implicate im·pli·cate
tr.v. im·pli·cat·ed, im·pli·cat·ing, im·pli·cates
1. To involve or connect intimately or incriminatingly: evidence that implicates others in the plot.
2. a violation of the Charter, the General Assembly passed a resolution in June 1996 directing the Inter-American Juridical Pertaining to the administration of justice or to the office of a judge.
A juridical act is one that conforms to the laws and the rules of court. A juridical day is one on which the courts are in session.
JURIDICAL. Committee "'to examine and decide upon the validity under international law'" of the Helms-Burton Act.(177) The Committee reported in August that Helms-Burton failed to comply with both the Charter and general international law.(178) The opinion complained that a "State may not exercise its power in any form in the territory of another State,"(179) and that "domestic courts of a claimant State are not the appropriate forum for the resolution of State-to-State claims."(180) The Committee did acknowledge the existence of the Effects Doctrine, but stipulated that the effects need be "direct, substantial and foreseeable."(181) However, the Committee found "no apparent connection between [sales of expropriated property] and the protection of [the United States] essential sovereign interests."(182) The Juridical Committee unanimously adopted the opinion the day it was published.(183)
Jesse Helms and Dan Burton Danny "Dan" Lee Burton (born June 21 1938), American politician, is a member of the United States House of Representatives for Indiana's At-large congressional district. A Republican, his first term in the United States Congress began in January 1983. carefully constructed their statute. The congressmen anticipated potential problems with the effects test and the Act of State Doctrine. Thus, they included clear language indicating that the former justified the law, and that the latter simply would not apply.
The drafters also saw considerations of comity looming in the background. So, they left out any wording attempting to justify the legislation as a reasonable extension of U.S. legislation. Perhaps Senator Helms and Representative Burton chose to rely on the increasing willingness of U.S. federal courts to apply the Sherman Act to conduct well outside U.S. borders.
The Act's authors either did not know, or did not care, that Title III violated U.S. obligations as a member of the United Nations or the OAS. While both organizations denounce the entire piece of legislation, the United Nations and the OAS can do little more than voice their collective dissatisfaction and frustration with the law.
Canada's and Mexico's blocking statutes were foreseeable as well. After all, the United States invented the mechanism, and other nations followed suit, including Australia,(184) Japan,(185) Korea,(186) the Philippines,(187) and the United Kingdom.(188) These laws not only rendered U.S. citizens unable to enforce their Title III judgments, but also created liability for the claimants abroad.
The President also told Congress that Title III would implicate the NAFTA. And, in fact, the NAFTA not only gives Mexican and Canadian investors another channel to collect damages, but may actually hold the United States liable under the Chapter 11 dispute settlement mechanism.
But no one could anticipate having to give the Rose Garden back to those the United States expropriated it from over two hundred years ago. Maybe if someone had told Congress and the President what Helms-Burton really implicated im·pli·cate
tr.v. im·pli·cat·ed, im·pli·cat·ing, im·pli·cates
1. To involve or connect intimately or incriminatingly: evidence that implicates others in the plot.
2. , they never would have passed the law.
While Helms-Burton is successful at angering allies, so far the law is not successful at stopping investment in Cuba. In fact, foreign investment in Cuba is estimated to total US$2.1 billion,(189) Since March 12, 1996, the date President Clinton signed Helms-Burton, Cuba inked 25 new joint ventures and another 143 are in negotiation.(190)
Bill Clinton need not lose any sleep over James Osborne's claim to the White House. But U.S. citizens' and nationals' claims under Title III stand about the same chance of being satisfied. Other nations' antidote laws and blocking statutes may stymie sty·mie also sty·my
tr.v. sty·mied , sty·mie·ing also sty·my·ing , sty·mies
To thwart; stump: a problem in thermodynamics that stymied half the class.
1. efforts at judgment collection, as well as deter potential litigants with the possibility of liability abroad. Moreover, the U.S. government's economic liability under the NAFTA may compel the United States to repeal the law. If for no other reason, the United States should repeal the law to maintain credibility as a leader in the United Nations and in the OAS. (1.) The land upon which the White House stands was owned by James Osborne James Osborne VC (April 13, 1857 - February 1, 1928) was an English recipient of the Victoria Cross, the highest and most prestigious award for gallantry in the face of the enemy that can be awarded to British and Commonwealth forces. , a captain in the British Army The British Army is the land armed forces branch of the British Armed Forces. It came into being with unification of the governments and armed forces of England and Scotland into the United Kingdom of Great Britain in 1707. during the American Revolutionary War. See Gord McIntosh, MPs Demand White House in Helms-Burton Spoof Bill, EDMONTON J., Oct. 23, 1996, at Al.
(2.) See No Joke: Canadian Lawmakers Pointedly Parody Helms-Burton Law, CHI. TRIB TRIB Tributary
TRIB Tire Retread Information Bureau
Trib Chicago Tribune Newspaper
TRIB Transfer Rate of Information Bits (ANSI formula for calculating throughput)
TRIB Transmission Rate of Information Bits ., Oct. 23, 1996, at 16. "More than 100 Canadians have contacted the lawmakers to inquire about claiming compensation." Id. Godfrey and Milliken plan to seek compensation for land in Virginia and New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of , respectively, that was taken from their British-loyalist ancestors after the American Revolutionary War. See id.
(3.) See id. "The bill `is one expression of growing resentment toward the U.S. and its view of itself as the "moral conscience" for all nations."' Id. (quoting cosponsors John Godfrey and Peter Milliken).
(4.) Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-114, 110 Stat. 785 (to be codified cod·i·fy
tr.v. cod·i·fied, cod·i·fy·ing, cod·i·fies
1. To reduce to a code: codify laws.
2. To arrange or systematize. at 22 U.S.C. [subsections] 6021-6091). The Act is also known as the Helms-Burton Act, named after its authors, Senator Jesse Helms and Representative Dan Burton. See Cecil Johnson Cecil Johnson (born August 19, 1955 in Miami, Florida) is a former professional American football player who played linebacker for nine seasons for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. , Not Too Much Could Be Sillier Than Helms-Burton, FORT WORTH STAR-TELEGRAM The Fort Worth Star-Telegram is a major U.S. daily newspaper serving Fort Worth and the western half of the North Texas area known as the Metroplex. Its area of domination is checked by its main rival, The Dallas Morning News , Oct. 24, 1996, at 9.
(5.) See No Joke: Canadian Lawmakers Pointedly Parody Helms-Burton Law, supra A relational DBMS from Cincom Systems, Inc., Cincinnati, OH (www.cincom.com) that runs on IBM mainframes and VAXs. It includes a query language and a program that automates the database design process. note 2. U.S. efforts to curb foreign investment in Cuba are at least one reason Canadians are so upset over the Helms-Burton Act. See id. Canada is Cuba's largest trading partner. See id.
(6.) See Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act [sections] 102, 110 Stat. at 792.
(7.) See id. [sections] 201, 110 Stat. at 805.
(8.) See Johnson, supra note 4.
(9.) The Helms-Burton Act defines "traffic" broadly. See Brice M. Clagett, Title III of the Helms-Burton Act Is Consistent with International Law, 90 AM. J. INT'L L. 434, 434 n.2 (1996). Section 4(13)(A) of the Helms-Burton Act states that a person traffics if he or she "knowingly and intentionally" sells, deals in, or possesses expropriated U.S. property. Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act [sections] 4(13)(A), 110 Stat. at 790-91. Trafficking also includes engaging in "commercial activity using or otherwise benefiting from confiscated property," as well as causing or directing another to traffic. Id. [sections] 4(13)(A), 110 Stat. at 822.
(10.) See Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act [sections] 302, 110 Stat. at 815.
(11.) See id. [sections] 401, 110 Stat. at 822. The Act also denies entry to a "corporate officer, principal, or shareholder with a controlling interest controlling interest
The ownership of a quantity of outstanding corporate stock sufficient to control the actions of the firm. Controlling interest often involves ownership of significantly less than 51% of a firm's outstanding stock because many owners fail " of a company that traffics in confiscated property. Id. [sections] 401(a)(3), 110 Stat. at 822.
(12.) See id. [sections] 401(a)(4), 110 Stat. at 822.
(13.) 22 U.S.C. [sections] 2370(a) (1994) (providing the President with the power to completely ban all trade with Cuba); see Proclamation No. 3447, 27 Fed. Reg. 1085 (1962).
(14.) 50 U.S.C. app. [sections] 5(b) (1994).
(15.) 22 U.S.C. [subsections] 6001-6010 (1994), see Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. [sections] 515.559 (1997); Peter J. Sampson, Cuban Exiles Applaud Torricelli and Guarini, RECORD (N.J.), Feb. 11, 1992, at A3. Prior to the passage of the Cuban Democracy Act of 1992, "most commercial and private dealings with Cuba were controlled by the licensing provisions of the Cuban Asset[s] Control Regulations." Harold G. Maier Harold G. Maier is a noted scholar in the field of international law, international civil litigation, and conflict of laws. After receiving his undergraduate education at the University of Cincinnati, he obtained his law degree from the University of Cincinnati College of Law. , Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Extraterritorial jurisdiction or ETJ is the legal ability of a government to exercise authority beyond its normal boundaries.
Any authority can of course claim ETJ over any external territory they wish. and the Cuban Democracy Act, 8 FLA FLA Florida (old style)
FLA Macromedia Flash (file extension)
FLA Flash Files (file extension)
FLA Fair Labor Association
FLA Front Line Assembly . J. INT'L L. 391, 391 (1993).
(16.) The Cuban Democracy Act of 1992 and the accompanying Cuban Assets Control Regulations effectively closed many loopholes exploited by U.S. companies abroad. See Clara David, Trading with Cuba: The Cuban Democracy Act and Export Rules, 8 FLA. J. INT'L L. 385, 386-87 (1993).
(17.) See Maier, supra note 15, at 396.
(18.) See G.A. Res. 50/10, 35 I.L.M. 483, 484 (1996).
(19.) See H.R. REP. NO. 104-253, at i (1995).
(20.) See United States Policy Toward Cuba: Testimony Before the Western Hemisphere Subcomm. of the House Comm. on Int'l Rel., 104th Cong. (1995) (testimony of Peter Tarnoff, Under Secretary of State), available in 1995 WL 306730 [hereinafter here·in·af·ter
In a following part of this document, statement, or book.
Formal or law from this point on in this document, matter, or case
Adv. 1. Tarnoff].
(21.) See id.
(22.) See id. Some unofficial sources estimate that the Cuban economy has shrunk by 50% since 1989, to a gross national product of approximately US$10 billion. See id.
(23.) See H.R. CONF CONF Conference
CONF Configuration File (Unix file extension)
CONF Configuration Failure
CONF Contracting Flight (US Air Force)
CONF Conference Call . REP. NO. 104-468, at 58 (1996), reprinted in 1996 U.S.C.C.A.N. 558, 573.
(25.) See Tarnoff, supra note 20.
(27.) Id. The United States actually criminalizes compliance with the Arab League boycott. See 50 U.S.C. [sections] 2407 (1994); 15 C.F.R. [subsections] 769.1-769.8 (1996). Any citizen who knowingly, "with intent to comply with, further, or support any boycott fostered or imposed by a foreign country against a country which is friendly to the United States" is subject to civil and criminal penalty. 50 U.S.C. [sections] 2407(a)(1).
(28.) Tarnoff, supra note 20.
(29.) See discussion infra [Latin, Below, under, beneath, underneath.] A term employed in legal writing to indicate that the matter designated will appear beneath or in the pages following the reference.
infra prep. Part III for international reactions. In September 1995 Secretary of State Warren Christopher Warren Minor Christopher (born October 27, 1925) is an American diplomat and lawyer. During Bill Clinton's first term as President, Christopher served as the 63rd Secretary of State. sent a letter to House Speaker Newt Gingrich stating that he believed Helms-Burton "`would jeopardize a number of key U.S. interests around the globe,'" and that he would advise the President to veto the bill if passed. Andreas F. Lowenfeld, Congress and Cuba: The Helms-Burton Act, 90 AM. J. INT'L L. 419, 419 n.3 (1996).
(30.) See Rene Sanchez & Catharine Skipp, Two Exile Planes Shot Down Near Cuba, WASH. POST, Feb. 25, 1996, at Al.
(31.) See William Branigin, From Miami's Cuban Exiles, Calls for a Tough Response; Rally Speakers Demand Blockade, Military Action, WASH. POST, Feb. 26, 1996, at A9.
(32.) The night of the shooting, President Clinton stated: "I condemn this action in the strongest possible terms." Sanchez & Skipp, supra note 30.
(33.) The Conference Committee promptly met and produced the Conference Report by March 1, 1996. See H.R. CONF. REP. NO. 104-468, at i (1996), reprinted in 1996 U.S.C.C.A.N. 527.
(34.) Ann Devroy. Clinton to Tighten Sanctions on Cuba; Charter Flights Halted; Legislation Backed, WASH. POST, Feb. 27, 1996, at A1.
(35.) See Statement on Signing the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act of 1996 (LIBERTAD), 32 WEEKLY COMP. PRES PRES President
PRES Present (abstention 'vote' or recorded show of presence, US Congress)
PRES Pressure (meteorology)
PRES Atmospheric Pressure
PRES Prestin . DOC. 479 (Mar. 12, 1996).
(37.) See id.
(38.) Some suggest that President Clinton signed Helms-Burton to curry favor to seek to gain favor by flattery or attentions. See Favor,
to seek to gain favor by flattery, caresses, kindness, or officious civilities.
See also: Curry favor with the Cuban community in Florida, a key electoral state. See Johnson, supra note 4. Others assert that the legislation was signed merely to assuage as·suage
tr.v. as·suaged, as·suag·ing, as·suag·es
1. To make (something burdensome or painful) less intense or severe: assuage her grief. See Synonyms at relieve.
2. the anger arising from the downing of the two planes. See Repeal Helms-Burton Act, AUSTIN AM.-STATESMAN, Oct. 25, 1996, at A14.
(39.) See Johnson, supra note 4.
(40.) See Randall J. Horley & Elliott Stikeman, Canada's Legislation to Block "Helms-Burton" Tabled, N. AM. FREE TRADE & INVESTMENT REP., Oct. 15, 1996, available in 1996 WL 10175715 (stating that "Bill C-54 is expected to meet little opposition in the Canadian Parliament and thus become law by early 1997"). Bill C54 allows the Attorney-General of Canada to block access to Canadian records for the prosecution of any case under the Helms-Burton Act, or even to refuse to recognize a judgment under that act. See id.
(41.) See id.
(42.) See id.
(43.) See id. The amendments define compliance much the same way as the U.S. antiboycott laws do in that a change in market position or terminating business in the boycotted country can create criminal liability. See id; see also 15 C.F.R. [sections] 769.2 (1996); supra note 27 and accompanying text.
(44.) See Howard Schneider, More Than Great Cigars--Canada Knows a Good Deal When It Sees One, and It Sees One in Cuba Forget the U.S. Trade Embargo and the Helms-Burton Act, Canada and Cuba Are Busy Forging a Mutually Beneficial Adj. 1. mutually beneficial - mutually dependent
dependent - relying on or requiring a person or thing for support, supply, or what is needed; "dependent children"; "dependent on moisture" Economic Partnership, STAR TRIB. (Minneapolis-St. Paul), Oct. 23, 1996, at 15A. Perhaps the sense of security provided by Bill C-54 has inspired Canadian investors to continue to do business in Cuba.
(45.) See id.
(46.) See id.
(47.) See Bernard Simon & Pascal Fletcher, Canada to Fund Cuban Airport Growth, FIN. TIMES (London), Sept. 21-22, 1996, at 3.
(48.) See Steven Lee This article is about the alpine skier. For other people named Steven or Stephen Lee, see Stephen Lee (disambiguation).
Steven Lee (born August 6, 1962 in Falls Creek) is an Australian alpine skier. Myers, Cuban Trade Regulations Still Raise Ire, ROCKY MTN MTN
A short-form for Medium Term Note.
Medium term notes issued by corporations, much like shorter-term commercial paper.
See medium-term note (MTN). . NEWS, Nov. 3, 1996, at 4A, available in 1996 WL 12354579; Repeal Helms-Burton Act, supra note 38.
(49.) See Myers, supra note 48; Repeal Helms-Burton Act, supra note 38.
(50.) See Mexico to Enforce Law Against Helms-Burton Act, XINHUA ENG ENG electronystagmography.
enzootic nasal granuloma. . NEWSWIRE, Oct. 23, 1996, available in 1996 WL 13766674. The law became effective on Thursday, October 24, 1996. See id.
(51.) "Ley LEY. This word is old French, a corruption of loi, and signifies law; for example, Termes de la Ley, Terms of the Law. In another, and an old technical sense, ley signifies an oath, or the oath with compurgators; as, il tend sa ley aiu pleyntiffe. Brit. c. 27. de Proteccion al Comercio y la Inversion de Normas Extranjeras que Contravengan el Derecho De`re´cho
n. 1. A straight wind without apparent cyclonic tendency, usually accompanied with rain and often destructive, common in the prairie regions of the United States. Internacional," D.O., 23 de octubre de 1996, translated in InterAm Database <http://www.natlaw.com/trans/tnstcu3.htm]> [hereinafter Ley de Proteccion].
(52.) See id. art. 1. (53.) Id. A law has extraterritorial effects if it has any of the following objectives:
I. To try to impose an economic blockade or even to limit investment toward a country to instigate To incite, stimulate, or induce into action; goad into an unlawful or bad action, such as a crime.
The term instigate is used synonymously with abet, which is the intentional encouragement or aid of another individual in committing a crime. a change in its form of government.
II. To permit payments to private parties to be claimed with the purpose of making expropriations in the country to which the blockade is applied.
III. To anticipate restricting entry to the country that issues the law as one of the means to reach the above-cited objectives.
Id. art. l(I)-(III). The subarticles relate, respectively, to Titles II, III, and IV of the Helms-Burton Act. See supra notes 7-12 and accompanying text.
(54.) See Ley de Proteccion, art. 2. Similarly, U.S. antiboycott laws prohibit citizens from disclosing information about business relationships with boycotted countries or blacklisted persons. See 15 C.F.R. [sections] 769.2(d) (1996).
(55.) See Enrique Ramirez Ramirez & Shaun F. Downey, Mexico: Mexico's Reaction to the Helms-Burton Act, N. AM. FREE TRADE & INVESTMENT REP., Nov. 30, 1996, available in 1996 WL 13938864. The dollar amounts are based on the current minimum wage in Mexico City Mexico City
Spanish Ciudad de México
City (pop., 2000: city, 8,605,239; 2003 metro. area est., 18,660,000), capital of Mexico. Located at an elevation of 7,350 ft (2,240 m), it is officially coterminous with the Federal District, which occupies 571 sq mi and the current exchange rate. See id. The statute defines penalties as 100,000 or 50,000 days of the minimum wage in the Federal District. See Ley de Proteccion, art. 9(I)-(II).
(56.) See Ramirez & Downey, supra note 55.
(57.) Ley de Proteccion, art. 4.
(58.) See id. art. 5.
(59.) See id. art. 5(I)-(II).
(60.) See Ramirez & Downey, supra note 55 (asserting that the ambiguity of the law might render its application problematic). Ramirez and Downey also exhort that the solutions to extraterritorial problems lie in the international arena, rather than in unilateral retaliation RETALIATION. The act by which a nation or individual treats another in the same manner that the latter has treated them. For example, if a nation should lay a very heavy tariff on American goods, the United States would be justified in return in laying heavy duties on the manufactures and . See id.
(61.) See Raul Ronzoni, SELA Probes Legality of Helms-Burton Law, INTER PRESS SERVICE Inter Press Service (abbreviated: IPS) is a global news agency. Its main focus is the production of independent news and analysis about events and processes affecting economic, social and political development. , Oct. 23, 1996, available in 1996 WL 13588666.
(63.) See id. The report found that the inefficiency of the embargo against Cuba led the United States to implement even broader measures to boost its effects. See id.
(64.) See MALCOLM N. SHAW, INTERNATIONAL LAW 57 (4th ed. 1997).
(65.) See Pennoyer v. Neff Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714 (1877), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that there is no personal jurisdiction over a defendant unless the defendant is served while physically within the state. , 95 U.S. 714, 720 (1877). Of course, this statement related to the jurisdiction of courts and the enforcement of judgments rather than the jurisdiction of legislatures and the enforcement of statutory laws; however, the opinion's reasoning was based upon 19th century principles of sovereignty. See id.
(66.) 213 U.S. 347 (1909) (Holmes, J.).
(67.) See Philip R. Wolf, International Securities Fraud.' Extraterritorial Subject Matter Jurisdiction, 8 N.Y. INT'L L. REV. 1, 5 (1995) (citing American Banana, 213 U.S. at 356). The Court wrote, "In cases immediately affecting national interests they may go further still and may make, and... execute similar threats as to acts done within another recognized jurisdiction." 213 U.S. at 356. However, the Court still relied on the presumption that Congress only intended its statutes to apply to acts committed within its territorial jurisdiction Territorial jurisdiction in United States law refers to a court's power over events and persons within the bounds of a particular geographic territory. If a court does not have territorial jurisdiction over the events or persons within it, then the court cannot bind the defendant . See id. at 357.
(68.) United States v. Aluminum Co. of Am., 148 F.2d 416, 443 (2d Cir. 1945).
(69.) RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF THE FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES [sections] 402(1)(c) (1987) [hereinafter RESTATEMENT].
(70.) See id. [sections] 403 cmt. a (stating comity is "understood not merely as an act of discretion and courtesy but as reflecting a sense of obligation among states").
(71.) See id. [sections] 403(2). These factors include:
(a) the link of the activity to the territory of the regulating state...;
(b) the connections, such as nationality, residence, or economic activity, between the regulating state and the person principally responsible for the activity to be regulated...;
(c) the character of the activity to be regulated .... the extent to which other states regulate such activities, and the degree to which the desirability of such regulation is generally accepted;
(d) the existence of justified expectations that might be protected or hurt by the regulation;
(e) the importance of the regulation to the international political, legal, or economic system;
(f) the extent to which the regulation is consistent with the traditions of the international system.
Id. [sections] 403(2)(a)-(f).
(72.) See id. [sections] 402 reporters' note 2.
(73.) See id. [sections] 403 reporters' note 3.
(74.) See Case 48/69, 18 E.C.R. 619, [1971-1973 Transfer Binder] Common Mkt. Rep. (CCH CCH Colegio de Ciencias y Humanidades (Spanish)
CCH Certified Clinical Hypnotherapist
CCH Cook County Hospital
CCH Certified in Classical Homeopathy
CCH Country Club Hills (Fairfax City, VA, USA) ) [paragraph] 8161 (1972).
(75.) See Thomas C. Fischer, Extraterritorial Application of United States Law Against United States and Alien Defendants (Sherman Act), 29 NEW ENG NEW ENG New England . L. REV. 577, 578 (1995) (citing Cases 89/85, 104/85, 114/85, 116-117/85, 125-129/85, Ahlstrom v. Commission, (Wood Pulp) 1988 E.C.R. 5193, 4 C.M.L.R. 901 (1988)).
(76.) Compare Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-114, [sections] 301(9), 110 Stat. 785, 815 ("International law recognizes that a nation has the ability to provide for rules of law with respect to conduct outside its territory that has or is intended to have substantial effect within its territory."), with RESTATEMENT, supra note 69, [sections] 402 (1)(C).
(77.) See RESTATEMENT, supra note 69, [sections] 403(2)(a); supra note 71 and accompanying text.
(78.) See Clagett, supra note 9, at 435.
(79.) See id.
(80.) See RESTATEMENT, supra note 69, [sections] 403(2)(b).
(81.) The statute creates federal subject matter jurisdiction over suits between U.S. nationals and "any person that ... traffics in property which was confiscated by the Cuban Government." Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-114, [sections] 302(a)(1)(A), 110 Stat. at 815. Therefore the limit of the statute's reach is the court's personal jurisdiction, which requires minimum contacts. See Asahi Metal Indus. Co. v. Superior Court, 480 U.S. 102, 113 (1987).
(82.) See RESTATEMENT, supra note 69, [sections] 403(2)(c).
(83.) See supra text accompanying notes 37-63.
(84.) RESTATEMENT, supra note 69, [sections] 403(2)(d).
(85.) See Clagett, supra note 9, at 439 (arguing "that the duty of a state not to confiscate To expropriate private property for public use without compensating the owner under the authority of the Police Power of the government. To seize property.
When property is confiscated it is transferred from private to public use, usually for reasons such as its citizens' property without compensation is a `general principle of law common to the major legal systems of the world'").
(86.) See id. at 437 & n. 15, 438.
(87.) Id. at 438 (quoting Ignaz Seidl-Hohenveldern, Title to Confiscated Foreign Property and Public International Law, 56 AM. J. INT'L L. 507, 509 (1962)).
(88.) See id. (naming Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Switzerland as such countries).
(89.) See id. at 436-37.
(90.) See RESTATEMENT, supra note 69, [sections] 403(2)(f).
(91.) See id. [sections] 905.
(92.) Id. [sections] 905(1).
(93.) See supra text accompanying note 87.
(94.) See supra text accompanying note 89.
(95.) The statute awards the greater of (1) the amount certified by the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission under the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, plus interest; (2) an amount declared by a court-appointed "special master" that apprises the value of the claim, plus interest; or (3) "the fair market value of that property, calculated as being either the current value of the property, or the value of the property when confiscated plus interest, whichever is greater." Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-114, [sections] 302(a)(1)(A)(i), 110 Stat. 785, 815. The statute also awards court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. See id. [sections] 302(a)(1)(A)(ii), 110 Stat. at 815.
(96.) See id. [sections] 302(a)(3)(C), 110 Stat. at 816. The statute requires that potential claimants under Title III give defendants written notice of impending im·pend
intr.v. im·pend·ed, im·pend·ing, im·pends
1. To be about to occur: Her retirement is impending.
2. litigation 30 days before initiating the action. See id. [sections] 302(a)(3)(B), 110 Stat. at 816. If, 30 days after receiving notice, the person continues to traffic in the property that is the subject of the action, the person is liable for 3 times the value of the property, plus attorneys' fees and court costs. See id. [sections] 302(a)(3)(B)-(C), 110 Stat. at 816.
(97.) See, e.g., Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 427 (1955).
(98.) The Restatement contemplates countermeasures such as the suspension of treaty relations, the freezing of assets, or the "imposition of other economic sanctions Economic sanctions are economic penalties applied by one country (or group of countries) on another for a variety of reasons. Economic sanctions include, but are not limited to, tariffs, trade barriers, import duties, and import or export quotas. ." RESTATEMENT, supra note 69, [sections] 905 cmt. b.
(99.) See Lowenfeld, supra note 29, at 429.
(100.) See supra text accompanying note 27.
(101.) See Lowenfeld, supra note 29, at 430.
(102.) See id.
(103.) The investor is caught between the Scylla of U.S. civil liability and the Charybdris of forgoing potentially lucrative investment opportunities in Cuba.
(104.) See Lowenfeld, supra note 29, at 430.
(105.) See Aubry D. Smith, Note, Bringing Down Private Trade Barriers--An Assessment of the United States' Unilateral Options: Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act and Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Antitrust Law antitrust law
Any law restricting business practices that are considered unfair or monopolistic. Among U.S. laws, the best known is the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, which declared illegal “every contract, combination…or conspiracy in restraint of trade or , 16 MICH v. i. 1. To lie hid; to skulk; to act, or carry one's self, sneakingly. . J. INT'L L. 241, 253-56 (1994) (discussing the majority opinion in Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. California, 509 U.S. 764 (1993)). Smith states that the majority did not address issues of comity and reasonableness because it did not see a "true conflict" in the case. See id.
(106.) See Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 509 U.S. at 769-70, 798-99.
(107.) See id. at 769-70, 794-95.
(108.) See In re Insurance Antitrust Litig., 723 F. Supp. 464, 490-91 (N.D. Cal. (1989).
(109) See In re Insurance Antitrust Litig., 938 F.2d 919, 934 (9th Cir. 1991).
(110.) See id. at 933-34.
(111.) Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 509 U.S. at 779.
(112.) See Smith, supra note 105, at 254.
(113.) See id.
(114.) See id.
(115.) See Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 509 U.S. at 798.
(117.) See id. (118.) See id. at 800, 814-15.
(119.) See id. at 817 (citing Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum Corp., 595 F.2d 1287, 1294-98 (3d Cir. 1979); Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of Am., 549 F.2d 597, 608-15 (9th Cir. 1976)). However, authority exists for the proposition that courts rarely decline to exercise jurisdiction under the Sherman Act due to unreasonable jurisdiction. See Russell J. Weintraub, The Extraterritorial Application of Antitrust and Securities Laws: An Inquiry into the Utility of a "Choice-of-Law" Approach, 70 TEX (tai epsion chi) A typesetting language developed by Stanford professor Donald Knuth that is noted for its ability to describe elaborate scientific formulas. Pronounced "tek" or the guttural "tekhhh" (the X is the Greek chi, not the English X), TeX is widely used for mathematical book . L. REV. 1799, 1810-12 (1992).
(120.) See Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 509 U.S. at 818-19; see also supra note 71.
(121.) Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 509 U.S. at 819.
(122.) See Fischer, supra note 75, at 584.
(123.) Assuming, of course, President Clinton does not suspend enforcement of Title III for another six months. See Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-114, [sections] 306(b)(1), 110 Stat. 785, 821 ("The President may suspend the effective date [of Title III] for additional periods of not more than 6 months each if the President determines that the suspension is necessary to the national interests of the United States and will expedite a transition to democracy in Cuba."). This also assumes that the new members of the Supreme Court will side with the majority opinion of Hartford, rather than Scalia's dissenting opinion dissenting opinion n. (See: dissent) . See Smith, supra note 105, at 256. Smith comments:
The broader message of [Hartford Insurance] is suggested by the fact that
five of nine Supreme Court justices were inclined not to engage in
interest-balancing .... However, with new justices on the Court, it is
probably premature to draw any conclusions about the fate of
interest-balancing as a means of controlling the extraterritorial reach of
the antitrust laws antitrust laws n. acts adopted by Congress to outlaw or restrict business practices considered to be monopolistic or which restrain interstate commerce. The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 declared illegal "every contract, combination.... .
(124.) RALPH H. FOLSOM ET AL., INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS [sections] 24.31 (3d ed. 1995).
(125.) See id.
(126.) National Am. Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 448 F. Supp 622, 640 (S.D.N.Y. 1978), aff'd 597 F.2d 314 (2d Cir. 1979).
(127.) 168 U.S. 250 (1897).
(128.) Id. at 252.
(129.) 376 U.S. 398 (1964).
(130.) See id. at 400-01, 403.
(131.) Id. at 420, 428.
(132.) Id. at 423 (quotations omitted).
(133.) See id.
(134.) First Nat'l City Bank v. Banco Nacional Banco Nacional was a bank from Brazil. It was taken over by Unibanco in 1995.
The Nacional brand is better known as main sponsor of Ayrton Senna during most of his racing career in Formula 1 (1985-1994). de Cuba, 406 U.S. 759, 787-88 (1972) (Brennan, J., dissenting).
(135.) See Clagett, supra note 9, at 439-40.
(136.) See id. at 439.
(137) 22 U.S.C. [sections] 2370(e)(2) (1994).
(138.) Monroe Leigh Monroe Leigh was a prominent political philosopher and diplomat. He served in varying capacities throughout his life, including occupations as a legal adviser for the Defense Department and State Department, NATO mission envoy,and president of the American Society of International Law.. , Sabbatino's Silver Anniversary and the Restatement: No Cause for Celebration, 24 INT'L LAW. 1, 3 (1990).
(139.) See Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First Nat'l City Bank of New York The Bank of New York, abbrieviated to BNY, was a global financial services company that existed until its merger with the Mellon Financial Corporation on July 2, 2007. The bank now continues under the new name of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. , 431 F.2d 394, 399-402 (2d Cir. 1970).
(140.) See Lowenfeld, supra note 29, at 427.
(141.) See Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-114, [sections] 302(a)(6), 110 Stat. 785, 817.
(143.) See Lowenfeld, supra note 29, at 427 (noting Brice M. Clagett's position during a debate between the two commentators before the American Society of International Law).
(144.) North American Free Trade Agreement, Dec. 17, 1992, Can.-Mex.-U.S., 32 I.L.M. 289, 605 [hereinafter NAFTA].
(145.) Id. art. 1603(1), 32 I.L.M. at 664; see Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act [sections] 401, 110 Stat. at 822; see also Jonathan R. Ratchik, Comment, Cuban Liberty and the Democratic Solidarity Act of 1995, 11 AM. U. J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 343, 367 (1996) ("Although Chapter Sixteen establishes criteria by which a NAFTA member can refuse entry to an otherwise qualified business person, trafficking or benefiting from confiscated American property is not one of them.").
(146.) The dispute settlement mechanism under Chapter 11 of the NAFTA is unique in that it allows individual investors to submit a claim to arbitration against a member nation when they feel the nation has breached an obligation under Chapter 11, which covers investment. See NAFTA, supra note 144, art. 1116, 32 I.L.M. at 642-43.
(147.) The NAFTA Chapter 11 creates freedom of investment among member nations, specifically granting investors and their investments National Treatment and Most-Favored-Nation Treatment. See id. arts. 1102, 1103, 32 I.L.M. at 639.
(148.) Id. art. 1102(1).
(149.) See 22 U.S.C. [sections] 6005(a) (1994).
Until early 1992, most commercial and private dealings with Cuba were
controlled by the licensing provisions of the Cuban Asset[s] Control
Regulations .... Some provisions in those Regulations defined the
parameters within which the foreign subsidiaries of U.S. corporations could
carry on trade with Cuba.
[The Cuban Democracy Act of 1992] generally prohibits foreign firms
that are owned or controlled by U.S. nationals from entering into any trade
or financial transactions with Cuba, without regard to the strategic
importance of the goods traded. That legislation wiped out the existing
licensing criteria under the old Assets Control Regulations.
Maier, supra note 15, at 391-92.
(150.) Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act [sections] 302(a)(1)(A), 110 Stat. at 815.
(151.) NAFTA, supra note 144, art. 1102(1), 32 I.L.M. at 639.
(152.) See GATT Dispute Settlement Panel Report on United States Restrictions on Imports of Tuna, 30 I.L.M. 1594, 1610 (1991) [hereinafter Panel Report]. The case is relevant to NAFTA disputes inasmuch as in·as·much as
1. Because of the fact that; since.
2. To the extent that; insofar as.
1. since; because
2. "GATT and its interpretative in·ter·pre·ta·tive
Variant of interpretive.
in·terpre·ta notes ... are incorporated into and made part of this Agreement." NAFTA, supra note 144, art. 301, 32 I.L.M. at 299.
(153.) 16 U.S.C. [subsections] 1371-1421 (1994).
(154.) See Panel Report, supra note 152, at 1603.
(155.) See id.
(156.) Article III(4) of the GATT states: "[P]roducts of the territory of any contracting party imported into the territory of any other contracting party shall be accorded treatment no less favourable than that accorded to like products of national origin." General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Oct. 30, 1947, 61 Stat. A-11, T.I.A.S. 1700, 55 U.N.T.S. 194, art. III(4).
(157.) See Panel Report, supra note 152, at 1603.
(158.) Id. at 1618. (159.) NAFTA, supra note 144, art. 1102(1), 32 I.L.M. at 639.
(161.) Id. art. 1105(1), 32 I.L.M. at 639.
(162.) See id.
(163.) See supra text accompanying notes 40-60.
(164.) See NAFTA, supra note 144, arts. 1115-1138, 32 I.L.M. at 642-47. Section B of Chapter 11 is unique in that the provision gives an individual investor the opportunity to raise a dispute with a member nation. See id. Typically, dispute settlement panels resolve controversies between nations, precluding individuals from challenging another nation's actions directly.
(165.) U.N. CHARTER art. 2, para. 1.
(166.) See EDWIN DEWITT DICKINSON, THE EQUALITY OF STATES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 55-57 (1920).
(167.) See F. V. Garcia-Amador, Latin American Law, in SOVEREIGNTY WITHIN THE LAW 123, 125 (Arthur Larson Lewis Arthur Larson (July 4, 1910 — March 27, 1993) was an American lawyer, law professor, United States Under Secretary of Labor from 1954 to 1956, director of the United States Information Agency from 1956 to 1957, and Executive Assistant to the President for Speeches from & C. Wilfred Jenks eds., 1965).
(168.) See supra text accompanying note 18.
(169.) See generally Matias F. Travieso-Diaz, Some Legal and Practical Issues in the Resolution of Cuban Nationals' Expropriation Claims Against Cuba, 16 U. PA. J. INT'L BUS. L. 217 (1995). However, the United States has attempted to resolve strained relations with Cuba. For example, the settlement of U.S. property claims against Cuba is a prerequisite to the normalization In relational database management, a process that breaks down data into record groups for efficient processing. There are six stages. By the third stage (third normal form), data are identified only by the key field in their record. of trade relations. See id. at 222 & n.20. The President has broad power to settle those claims. See id. at 225. Cuba violated international law by expropriating the property of U.S. citizens without making timely compensation. See id. at 222 & n.19. Generally, unless some other law or agreement provides otherwise, those aggregate settlements are a claimant's sole remedy. See id. at 225-26. But under Helms-Burton, U.S. nationals may pursue their claims in U.S. courts if the expropriated property is trafficked. See supra text accompanying note 10.
(170.) See Travieso-Diaz, supra note 169, at 220-21.
(171.) See supra text accompanying notes 15-18.
(172.) See supra text accompanying note 149.
(173.) See supra text accompanying notes 5-6.
(174.) See Seymour J. Rubin, Organization of American States: Inter-American Juridical Committee Opinion Examining the U.S. Helms-Burton Act, Introductory Note, 35 I.L.M. 1322, 1334 (1996). The United States was the only dissenter of the General Assembly Resolution, which directed the Inter-American Juridical Committee to determine the validity of the Helms-Burton Act under international law. See id. at 1322.
(175.) Charter of the Organization of American States, Apr. 30, 1948, 2 U.S.T. 2394, 119 U.N.T.S. 3.
(176.) Id. art. 7, 2 U.S.T. at 2419, 119 U.N.T.S. at 54.
(177.) Rubin, supra note 174, at 1322 & n. 1.
(178.) Opinion of the Inter-American Juridical Committee in Response to Resolution AG/DOC.3375/96 of the General Assembly of the Organization, Entitled "Freedom of Trade and Investment in the Hemisphere," Aug. 23, 1996, 35 I.L.M. 1329, 1334 (1996).
(179.) Id. at 1333.
(180.) Id. at 1332.
(181.) Id. at 1333.
(183.) See id. at 1334. It is interesting to note that the Committee was careful to avoid a violation of international law themselves. The Committee carefully stated that the opinion was merely advisory and that it did not grant the OAS power to censure A formal, public reprimand for an infraction or violation.
From time to time deliberative bodies are forced to take action against members whose actions or behavior runs counter to the group's acceptable standards for individual behavior. In the U.S. the United States, nor was the opinion binding. See id. at 1329-30.
(184.) Foreign Antitrust Judgments (Restriction of Enforcement) Act 1979 (Austl.).
(185.) MINPO, art. 203, NO. 547 (1960) (Japan).
(186.) Korean Civil Procedure Act, art. 203, no. 61 (Korea).
(187.) Blocking Decree, Presidential Decree No. 1718 (Aug. 21, 1980) (Phil.).
(188.) Protection of Trading Interests Act, C.11, reprinted in 959 Antitrust Trade Reg. Rep. (BNA BNA Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
BNA Birds of North America
BNA block numbering area (US Census)
BNA British North America
BNA Banco Nacional de Angola (National Bank of Angola) ) F02 (Apr. 10, 1980).
(189.) See Cuba: Saying Boo to Helms-Burton, ECONOMIST, Oct. 19-25, 1996, at 49, 49.
(190.) See id.
Antroy A. Arreola, B.A. 1995, Rice University; J.D. Candidate, 1998, University of Houston Law Center The University of Houston Law Center—founded in 1947 as Bates College of Law—is an American Bar Association accredited law school and one of the 13 academic colleges at the University of Houston. It awards the Juris Doctor (J.D. . This Comment received the Alan R. Crain, Jr. Writing Award for the best student paper on the extraterritorial application of law. The author would like to thank his wife, Marissa, his family, Mr. Crain, and all of the students who worked to prepare this Comment.