When the International Atomic Energy Agency referred Iran to the U.N.
When the International Atomic Energy Agency referred Iran to the
U.N. Security Council over its nuclear program, the mullahs responded by
barring snap IAEA inspections and announcing their intention to resume
large-scale uranium enrichment. The Iranian defense minister, meanwhile,
warned that "any attack against Iran's peaceful nuclear
facilities will meet a swift and crushing response." Such bluster
is no doubt motivated in part by a perception that the West is
irresolute. How else could the West be perceived after three years of
fruitless negotiations designed more to avoid confrontation than to win
concessions, ongoing signals from European diplomats that sanctions
won't be imposed anytime soon, and agreement among the Security
Council's permanent members to postpone debate on Iran until at
least March? Perhaps the Security Council will surprise us by living up
to its name and confronting Iran seriously. But America and its allies
need to keep other options on the table.
COPYRIGHT 2006 National Review, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
|
Reader Opinion