When programs "don't work" with everyone: planning for differences among correctional clients."It's not that we haven't found effective correctional interventions, it's that we haven't found interventions that work with all of our clients all of the time." It's a frustrating and real observation made by researchers, practitioners and policy-makers that is well-grounded in correctional research. Indeed, 30 years of research on correctional clients provides us with three fairly consistent observations: a) there are no panaceas that work with all offenders or even the majority of offenders within a single program,(1) b) offenders respond differentially to correctional treatment strategies(2) and c) offenders evidence differential adjustments to correctional environments.(3)
The need to accommodate important differences among clients is not a new idea. In the 1960s and 1970s, programs within the California Youth Authority and elsewhere used personality-based classification models to "match" clients to interventions. Evaluators of such applications of "differential treatment" found they enhanced program effectiveness. More recently, "differential treatment" has become subsumed under the Responsivity Principle,(4) which is receiving growing attention in corrections. The responsivity principle suggests that clients should be assigned to those interventions that are most able to meet their needs and styles of learning.(5) The California programs classified delinquents according to according to
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.
2. In keeping with: according to instructions.
3. personality types, but personality is not the only individual characteristic that should be considered in program assignments; intellectual functioning, maturity, stages of change, sex and ethnicity also are considered to be relevant to client responsivity.
Effective application of the responsivity principle requires sound methods of assessment of responsivity traits such as those listed above. However, such assessments are viewed as secondary to risk assessment systems. They are used as "internal classifications" - the classification system applied by correctional facilities once offenders are in their care - recognizing that even when groups are separated according to risk, they are still highly heterogeneous.
The personality-based or psychological classification systems have the longest history of systematic practice in corrections. Examples of such systems include: a) Client Management Classification (CMC (Common Messaging Calls) A programming interface specified by the XAPIA as the standard messaging API for X.400 and other messaging systems. CMC is intended to provide a common API for applications that want to become mail enabled.
1. )(6), b) I-level,(7) c) Megargee MMPI-based Prison Typology typology /ty·pol·o·gy/ (ti-pol´ah-je) the study of types; the science of classifying, as bacteria according to type.
the study of types; the science of classifying, as bacteria according to type. (8) and d) Quay Behavioral Categories.
The following proposes a personality-based model for adult male offenders. This model represents a simplified version of personality-based classification models. It suggests five offender types and puts forward treatment implications for each. The types are common to each of the personality systems listed above. Although all but the CMC and the Quay behavioral typology enumerate To count or list one by one. For example, an enumerated data type defines a list of all possible values for a variable, and no other value can then be placed into it. See device enumeration and ENUM. more than five types, recent research on adult, male, prison inmates suggests that it is possible to simplify them and still make meaningful distinctions among offenders. This requires collapsing types when using the systems that typically recommend nine or more types. While this has some support in the corrections literature, these suggestions are still being tested in a number of studies currently under way at the University of Cincinnati The University of Cincinnati is a coeducational public research university in Cincinnati, Ohio. Ranked as one of America’s top 25 public research universities and in the top 50 of all American research universities, .
The purpose of proposing these five types and their treatment recommendations is to: a) aid correctional practitioners in making meaningful distinctions among clients in their daily interactions, b) assist in the process of matching offenders to meaningful treatment programs and c) offer a responsivity-based classification methodology that is not overly complex. In today's correctional environment, a classification system overburdened o·ver·bur·den
tr.v. o·ver·bur·dened, o·ver·bur·den·ing, o·ver·bur·dens
1. To burden with too much weight; overload.
2. To subject to an excessive burden or strain; overtax.
1. with complex assessment methods and numerous types with complicated distinctions is not likely to be a realistic option for most agencies.
This article also makes treatment recommendations for each type. Readers are cautioned, however, that differential treatment/responsivity is not widely practiced or researched in correctional practice. We draw our treatment recommendations from: a) the few studies known to have used differential treatment to its full potential, b) recommendations offered by the designers of the classification systems and c) inferences drawn from the type descriptions. This article draws heavily from results of programs such as the Community Treatment Project(9) and other differential models as well as studies that have noted differential adjustments to correctional settings. Thus, we are discussing a classification and treatment system that is grounded in the research literature, but one that clearly will need further testing.
Differential Treatment and Personality-based Classification
There are six key assumptions underlying differential treatment: a) correctional populations can be classified into relatively homogeneous subgroups, b) each subgroup poses different treatment or supervision needs, c) classification helps correctional personnel identify treatment and supervision strategies most appropriate to each group, d) failure to differentiate can result in some offenders being assigned to inappropriate supervision and treatment strategies, e) prospects for successful intervention are increased by the assignation ASSIGNATION, Scotch law. The ceding or yielding a thing to another of which intimation must be made. of offenders to appropriate treatment and f) failure to examine evaluation results according to differences among offenders can mask the treatment effect (i.e., successes are cancelled by failures).(10)
The type descriptions that follow should not be viewed as a substitute screen for mental illness, sex offending, substance abuse or violence. Moreover, while the classification systems are described as psychological, they are not intended to be diagnostic of mental health disorders. A "type" simply describes personality, interaction styles and crime dynamics. If we refer to a type as "neurotic," for example, we are describing an anxiety-prone individual, but the description is not intended to be a clinical diagnosis of neurosis neurosis, in psychiatry, a broad category of psychological disturbance, encompassing various mild forms of mental disorder. Until fairly recently, the term neurosis was broadly employed in contrast with psychosis, which denoted much more severe, debilitating mental .
Personality Types and Treatment Implications
The first personality type is the committed criminal. Individuals classified into this type fit social stereotypes of criminals. They are ones for whom most correctional policies are designed. Closer observation, however, reveals that this type of offender comprises no more than 45 percent of a federal prison population, depending upon type of institution and type of classification instrument.
As the label denotes, this offender is not uncomfortable with the label of "criminal." He espouses anti-social values and exhibits a greater tendency to lie than other offenders. This offender does not suffer from self-esteem problems, is self-centered and an exploiter of others, and has an extensive prior record. He tends to have more criminal peers than other offenders, and much of his antisocial antisocial /an·ti·so·cial/ (-so´sh'l)
1. denoting behavior that violates the rights of others, societal mores, or the law.
2. denoting the specific personality traits seen in antisocial personality disorder. behavior is learned and rewarded by peers. This offender can be aggressive and tends to demonstrate many of Stanton Samenow's "thinking errors" - blaming victims, exploiting others' trust and expecting to be successful with minimal effort.
Although the asocial a·so·cial
1. Avoiding or averse to the society of others; not sociable.
2. Unable or unwilling to conform to normal standards of social behavior; antisocial. tendencies of this group have caused some to label them "untreatable Un`treat´a`ble
a. 1. Incapable of being treated; not practicable. ," a number of appropriate treatment strategies have emerged in recent years. Common to these newer interventions is an attempt to shift offender values and thinking patterns that support or even cause criminal behavior. Other recommended goals of treatment include altering situations that reward anti-social behavior, teaching respect for personal boundaries and keeping responsibility for behavior on the offender. Furthermore, offenders classified into this type may be more amenable to confrontational modes of therapy than others.
The second personality type is the neurotic acting-out offender. If we focus on the neurotic acting-out dimensions of this offender, we note an offender whose behavior is a defense against anxiety. While these offenders verbalize a need for change, they actually have little tolerance for unraveling or talking about problems. Anxiety in these offenders may result in substance abuse for medication of feelings and may instill in·still
To pour in drop by drop.
instil·lation n. a strong need for others to see them as calm and in control. This offender also uses grandiosity and super-adequacy as a cover-up. In prison settings, staff may be tested for whether they can be trusted. Furthermore, since this offender's anxiety is linked to his criminality, careless confrontation can escalate acting-out behaviors, rather than curb them. This offender also demonstrates numerous disciplinary infractions and there is potential for violent and explosive behavior.
In earlier studies, we found many of the offenders classified as Able or Delta, two types on the Megargee-based prison typology to be in this group. Thus, while these inmates had 4,9 or spike 4 MMPI MMPI
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
MMPI Child psychiatry A personality assessment tool widely used in making psychologic evaluations, which is normally given at age 16 and older. Personality testing profiles, often associated with Antisocial Personality Disorder antisocial personality disorder
A personality disorder characterized by chronic antisocial behavior and violation of the law and the rights of others. (psychopathy psy·chop·a·thy
Mental disorder, especially when manifested by antisocial behavior.
psychopathy Antisocial personality disorder, see there ), their MMPI classifications were found to correlate with anxiety scores on other assessments (e.g., the Jesness Inventory and I-level interview method). This is not entirely inconsistent with the research on psychopathy, which sometimes refers to secondary neurotic qualities, or secondary psychopathy, as individuals who behave in a psychopathic psy·cho·path·ic
1. Of, relating to, or characterized by psychopathy.
2. Relating to or affected with an antisocial personality disorder that is usually characterized by aggressive, perverted, criminal, or amoral behavior. manner, but demonstrate defended, highly anxious qualities as well (primary psychopaths are characterized as demonstrating no anxiety, even in situations that typically would evoke great anxiety).
The primary focus of treatment for this offender has been the reduction of use of destructive defense mechanisms. In addition, we recognize that emotionality and anxiety must be addressed in ways that acknowledge this individual's disdain for discussion of personal problems. At the same time, communication should be open and direct to avoid the offender's fearful misinterpretations. Programs such as Anger Control,(11) Aggression Replacement Training Aggression Replacement Training or ART is manual-based program focused on young adolescents, helping them to cope with their aggressive emotions. It treats three different topics: prosocial skills, anger control and moral reasoning. (12) and Cognitive Skills(13) seem especially applicable.
Practitioners also may benefit from the notion of "counseling on the run," where insights are given in passing, as carefully planted seeds for further thought, rather than in long, drawn-out discussions. While confrontation, or paying too much attention to "what's wrong," is not likely to prove helpful, it may be helpful for counselors to model healthy expressions of feelings, in ways that "normalize normalize
to convert a set of data by, for example, converting them to logarithms or reciprocals so that their previous non-normal distribution is converted to a normal one. " anger, fear, frustration and vulnerability.
Unlike neurotic acting-out types, the neurotic anxious offender is more likely to manage anxiety through self-control and introspection introspection /in·tro·spec·tion/ (in?trah-spek´shun) contemplation or observation of one's own thoughts and feelings; self-analysis.introspec´tive
n. . Defenses tend toward intellectualization intellectualization /in·tel·lec·tu·al·iza·tion/ (in?te-lek?choo-al-i-za´shun) an unconscious defense mechanism in which reasoning is used to avoid confronting an objectionable impulse, emotional conflict, or other stressor and thus to and superficial insights into problems and fears. Counselors view neurotic anxious offenders as more likely to become "stuck" in dysfunctional patterns of behavior, due primarily to fear and anxiety. Within this group, instances of substance abuse usually are derived from the use of medication for these insecurities. Offenders classified as neurotic anxious also may have problems trusting others, and these issues may cause problems with others in incarceration Confinement in a jail or prison; imprisonment.
Police officers and other law enforcement officers are authorized by federal, state, and local lawmakers to arrest and confine persons suspected of crimes. The judicial system is authorized to confine persons convicted of crimes. settings. As inmates, they require programmatic pro·gram·mat·ic
1. Of, relating to, or having a program.
2. Following an overall plan or schedule: a step-by-step, programmatic approach to problem solving.
3. support. They often experience high stress in prison settings and their frustration can lead to aggression.
While many of the treatment recommendations for the neurotic acting-out offenders apply to this type as well, there are some specific directions to consider. For example, this may be a group of offenders which can benefit from insight-oriented therapy, because they are more willing to explore feelings and discuss problems. Thus, court-ordered therapies (if possible) and family therapy seem more amenable to this group of offenders than for others. For similar reasons, support groups make some sense. In addition, cognitive therapies designed to address self-defeating cognitive patterns and irrational fears also are appropriate.
Situational offenders can comprise a substantial proportion of the inmate population, especially in minimum security settings. On the surface of these type descriptions, we observe rather benign behaviors and personality patterns. For example, situational inmates tend to have a positive self-concept although they are not comfortable with the criminal label or with their crimes. They endorse pro-social values, evidence stable relationships with others, and have minimal or no prior records. Their criminal behavior occurs during periods of adversity and is situation-specific rather than indicative of a life style.
Further examination of this offender, however, reveals adjustment difficulties in prison and clear treatment implications. For example, stress and fear have been noted in maximum security settings and these inmates often receive many official citations for insubordination in·sub·or·di·nate
Not submissive to authority: has a history of insubordinate behavior.
in , which may be attributable to limited prison experience. Since this offender's criminal behavior typically results from some adversity, treatment should focus on problem-solving and coping skills. Failure to recognize this inmate is one of the tragedies of our current correctional policies. In including situational offenders in interventions that address criminal thinking patterns and values, for example, we may be inadvertently teaching such values, worsening the prognosis of an individual who, in fact, has a very good chance of succeeding.
The fifth personality type is the dependent offender. We do not have a clear picture of this type, because immature types failed to converge in a clear manner in the construct validity construct validity,
n the degree to which an experimentally-determined definition matches the theoretical definition. tests conducted in the prison classification study noted earlier. Our suggestions, therefore, emerge from a limited array of tests. Given this caveat, we offer a picture of this offender as one who displays poor emotional control in prison settings and has a tendency to use drugs and alcohol while incarcerated incarcerated /in·car·cer·at·ed/ (in-kahr´ser-at?ed) imprisoned; constricted; subjected to incarceration.
Confined or trapped, as a hernia. . This inmate may become institutionalized in·sti·tu·tion·al·ize
tr.v. in·sti·tu·tion·al·ized, in·sti·tu·tion·al·iz·ing, in·sti·tu·tion·al·iz·es
a. To make into, treat as, or give the character of an institution to.
b. and incur numerous adjustment difficulties. He or she also may exhibit high fear and stress in incarceration settings and become vulnerable to more aggressive inmates. Most research pertaining per·tain
intr.v. per·tained, per·tain·ing, per·tains
1. To have reference; relate: evidence that pertains to the accident.
2. to this type of offender suggests that they benefit from a highly structured environment where rules and expectations are clear.
Assessment and Classification Strategy
How do correctional clients receive one of the classifications listed above? The systems vary in terms of their assessment procedures: the Jesness Inventory is a 155-item paper and pencil test Pencil test has multiple meanings.
The literature often faults the complicated nature of psychological classification processes which in turn generates a host of reliability, validity and resource problems. Having used all of the above systems except CMC, however, we have learned that difficult is not necessarily better. The more efficient systems were just as adequate in terms of their reliability and validity as systems that required more expenditure of staff resources.
Readers familiar with psychological classification in corrections will recognize the type descriptions offered above. Scholars also note theoretical(14) and empirical similarities across different personality-based typologies. Treatment recommendations, however, are largely hypothetical and will require further research. This is primarily due to the fact that correctional practice has not begun to adequately use the responsivity principle.
Research currently is being conducted at the University of Cincinnati to further our understanding of these types and to expand upon their treatment recommendations. These studies use the psychological typologies to examine the relationship between these types and recidivism recidivism: see criminology. ; differentiate among child molesters; and understand offenders' amenability to correctional programming.
In addition, we are conducting a large, statewide evaluation of cognitive skills and cognitive restructuring Cognitive restructuring
The process of replacing maladaptive thought patterns with constructive thoughts and beliefs.
Mentioned in: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
n programs which, among other objectives, seeks to determine whether the programs are more successful with some offenders than with others. Greater attention to differential effectiveness also promises better program evaluation Program evaluation is a formalized approach to studying and assessing projects, policies and program and determining if they 'work'. Program evaluation is used in government and the private sector and it's taught in numerous universities. results, because such evaluations no longer "mask" the treatment effect. When we ask for whom did this program work, we are likely to find that it helped some more than others or that it "worked" with some and not others. When we ask, instead, whether it worked with everyone, as we do in most evaluations, we are likely to find disappointing outcomes, because we have no way of knowing whether the results of our successes are being cancelled out by our failures.
As noted earlier, only CMC and the Quay AIMS list five types; the other systems vary from nine to 13 types. In these cases, types are collapsed as follows:
Jesness Inventory: Cultural Conformist con·form·ist
A person who uncritically or habitually conforms to the customs, rules, or styles of a group.
Marked by conformity or convention: (CFC CFC
See: Controlled foreign corporation ) and Manipulator (MP)
Megargee MMPI-based Typology: Charlie and Foxtrot foxtrot
one of the two artificial gaits of the five-gaited horse. A four-beat gait midway in speed between a walk and a trot. There is a great deal of similarity with several other gaits such as amble, fadge, slow pace, stepping pace, running walk, jog, hound jog.
Quay AIMS: Asocial Aggressive and Manipulator
I-level Interview: Cultural Identifiers
CMC: Limit Setting
Jesness Inventory: Neurotic Anxious (NX)
Megargee MMPI-based Typology: Baker, George Baker, George (known as Father Divine) (?1877–1965) evangelist; born near Savannah, Ga. He began preaching to poor blacks in the rural South, migrated northward, and eventually established himself in New York City, where he launched the Peace Mission movement , Jupiter
Quay AIMS: Neurotic Anxious
I-level Interview: Neurotic Anxious (NX)
CMC: Casework case·work
Social work devoted to the needs of individual clients or cases.
Jesness Inventory: Situation (SE) and Adaptive (CI)
Megargee MMPI-based Typology: Easy and Item
Quay AIMS: Situational
I-level Interview: Situation (SE)
Dependent (requires further testing):
Jesness Inventory: Asocial Passive (AP) and Immature Conformist (CFM)
Megargee MMPI-based Typology: How, Baker (perhaps) (requires further testing)
Quay AIMS: Immature Dependent
I-level Interview: Immature Conformist
CMC: Environmental Structure
Neurotic Acting Out:
Jesness Inventory: Neurotic Acting-Out (NA)
Megargee MMPI-based Typology: Able and Delta
Quay AIMS: none
I-level Interview: Neurotic Acting-Out (NA)
1 Palmer, 1992
2 Gendreau and Ross, 1987; Palmer, 1992; Van Voorhis, 1987
3 Carbonnel, Megargee, and Moorehead, 1984; Megargee and Bohn, 1979; Van Voorhis, 1994
4 Andrews, Bonta and Hoge, 1990
5 Andrews and Bonta, 1994
6 Learner, Arling and Baird, 1986
7 Jesness, 1996: Warren, 1966
8 Megargee and Bohn, 1979
9 Palmer, 1974; Palmer, forthcoming, Warren, 1966; Warren, 1983
10 Andrews, Bonta, and Hoge, 1990; Gendreau and Ross, 1987; Palmer, 1992; Van Voorhis, 1987, 1994
11 Novoco, 1975
12 Goldstein and Keller, 1987
13 Ross & Fabiano, 1985
14 Warren, 1971
Andrews, D. and J. Bonta. 1994. The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati: Anderson Press.
Andrews, D., J. Bonta and R. Hoge. 1990. Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1): 19-52.
Carbonnel, J., E. Megargee and K. Moorhead. 1984. Predicting prison adjustment with structured personality inventories. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (JCCP) is a bimonthly psychology journal of the American Psychological Association. Its focus is on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical-health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad . 52: 280-294.
Gendreau, P. and R. Ross. 1987. Revivification re·viv·i·fi·ca·tion
Refreshening the edges of a wound by paring or scraping to promote healing. Also called vivification. of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4(3): 349409.
Goldstein, A. and B. Glick. 1987. Aggression replacement training. Champaign, III.: Research Press.
Hare, R. 1970. Psychopathy: Theory and research. New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of : Wiley.
Jesness, C. 1971. The preson typology study: An experiment with differential treatment in an institution. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 8:38-52.
Jesness, C., W. DeRisi, P. McCormick and R. Wedge. 1972. The youth center research project: Final report. Sacramento, Calif.: California Youth Authority and American Justice American Justice is an hour-long criminal justice program on the cable channel A&E Network, hosted by Bill Kurtis. The show features interesting or notable cases, such as the Scarsdale Diet doctor murder, the Hillside Stranglers, Selena Murder of a Star, Matthew Shepard, or the Institute.
Jesness, C. 1996. The Jesness inventory manual. North Tonowanda, N.Y.: Multi-Health Systems.
Learner, K, G. Arling and S. Baird. 1986, Client management classification strategies lot case supervision. Crime and Delinquency. 32(3):254-271.
Levinson, R. 1988. Development in the classification process. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15(1):24-38.
Martinson, R. 1974. What works: Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest. 35:22-54.
Megargee, E. and M. Bohn. 1979. Classifying criminal offenders: A new system based on the MMPI. Beverly Hills Beverly Hills, city (1990 pop. 31,971), Los Angeles co., S Calif., completely surrounded by the city of Los Angeles; inc. 1914. The largely residential city is home to many motion-picture and television personalities. , Calif.: Sage Publications This article or section needs sources or references that appear in reliable, third-party publications. Alone, primary sources and sources affiliated with the subject of this article are not sufficient for an accurate encyclopedia article. .
Novaco, R. 1975. Anger control: The development and evaluation of an experimental treatment. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
Palmer, T. 1974. The youth authority's community treatment project. Federal Probation The Federal Probation Service or United States Probation Service is an agency that services the United States District Court in all 94 judicial federal districts nationwide and constitutes the community corrections arm of the Federal Court System. , 38(1): 3-14.
Palmer, T. 1992. The re-emergence of correctional intervention. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
Palmer, T. (forthcoming). Individualized in·di·vid·u·al·ize
tr.v. in·di·vid·u·al·ized, in·di·vid·u·al·iz·ing, in·di·vid·u·al·iz·es
1. To give individuality to.
2. To consider or treat individually; particularize.
3. intervention with young multiple offenders: The California community treatment project. Hampton, Conn.: Garland Press.
Quay, H. 1984. Managing adult inmates: Classification for housing and program assignments. College Park, Md.: American Correctional Association The American Correctional Association is an association of providers of services to prisons in the United States. It holds an annual trade show where products used in prisons are shown to prospective purchasers.
It was formerly known as the American Prison Association. .
Quay, H. and L. Parsons Parsons, city (1990 pop. 11,924), Labette co., SE Kans.; inc. 1871. It is a shipping point for dairy products, grain, and livestock. Manufactures include ammunition, wire and paper products, plastics, and appliances. . 1972. The differential behavioral classification of the juvenile offender. Washington, D.C.: Department of Justice.
Ross, R. and E. Fabiano. 1985. Time to think: A cognitive model The term cognitive model can have basically two meanings. In cognitive psychology, a model is a simplified representation of reality. The essential quality of such a model is to help deciding the appropriate actions, i.e. of delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Johnson City Johnson City.
1 Village (1990 pop. 16,890), Broome co., S N.Y., in a tricity area including Endicott and Binghamton; inc. 1892. It has been noted for its Endicott-Johnson shoes. , Tenn.: Institute of Social Science and Arts.
Samenow, S. 1984. Inside the criminal mind. New York: Times Books.
Van Voorhis, P. 1987. Correctional effectiveness: The high cost of ignoring success. Federal Probation, 51 (1): 56-62.
Van Voorhis, P. 1994. Psychological classification of the adult male, Prison Inmate, Albany, N.Y.: SUNY SUNY - State University of New York Press.
Warren, M. 1971. Classification of offenders as an aid to efficient management and effective treatment. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology criminology, the study of crime, society's response to it, and its prevention, including examination of the environmental, hereditary, or psychological causes of crime, modes of criminal investigation and conviction, and the efficacy of punishment or correction (see and Police Science, 62: 239-268.
Warren, M. 1983. Application of interpersonal maturity theory to offender populations. In W. Laufer and J. Day, eds., Personality theory, moral development and criminal behavior. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
Warren, M. and the staff of the Community Treatment Project. 1966. Interpersonal maturity level classification: Diagnosis and treatment of low, middle, and high maturity delinquents. Sacramento, Calif.: California Youth Authority.
Patricia Voorhis is a professor in the Division of Criminal Justice at the University of Cincinnati. Kimberly Spencer is a research assistant in the Division of Criminal Justice at the University of Cincinnati.