Printer Friendly

What is the difference between cycle time and throughput? Or t = ct + o.

We have heard the terms "cycle time" and "throughput" throughout the industry. Is there a difference? Are they interchangeable? And, most important, which one really matters to a production engineer?

Let's start with cycle time. For the printing process, cycle time is the total time required to perform a specific set of activities to achieve the primary function of the process. In this case, it includes board load, raise to vision height, fiducial alignment, raise to print height, squeegee lowering (if required), lower to transport height and board unload. The total time to move the board into the machine, perform the required tasks and move the board out of the printer is cycle time--and it varies greatly depending upon the type of printer selected.

Cycle time is a common specification for benchmarking printing systems because it can be used as a quantitative comparison between platforms. But it is really just a term that marketing folks use to say their product is faster than the competition's; it really does not reveal anything about how the production process will run or the final quality of the printing process. If you believe the marketing hype, faster is always better. But will a machine with a faster specified cycle time really produce more good boards?

Before we answer that question, let's review the term throughput. Throughput is a measurement of the total processing time to print the printed circuit board and optimize the quality of the print. This is a sum of the cycle time (all the activities noted above), the print stroke and overhead functions such as wiping, paste dispensing and inspection functions. In other words, throughput is the sum of all the required steps to turn a bare PCB into a quality board that is ready for the next step of the manufacturing process.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

So, which is more important? Since the goal of every production line is to produce high quality boards, throughput is actually the metric that should be used to compare printing systems. Cycle time is only a component of what is important; throughput is the measurement that will really tell how quickly a line will actually produce quality boards. The overhead variables of wiping, paste dispensing and inspection functions have a huge impact on the quality and the pulse rate of the process: maximizing throughput rate should be the ultimate goal for every production line.

To accomplish this task, the focus of all electronics manufacturing operations should be to identify, evaluate and implement methods, procedures and tools that will optimize the amount of "good products" that are built each day. There is a definite balance between product cycle time and the quality of that product. Producing defective products to achieve a specified cycle time is certainly not acceptable, nor is slowing the process to an unacceptable rate to minimize every possible defect. We must understand and optimize this balance to optimize the throughput of quality products.

What equipment features are available to help us achieve this goal? On sophisticated solder paste printing equipment, there is two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) post print inspection, stencil wiping and stencil vacuum cleaning, automatic board support placement systems, board-to-stencil alignment systems, and other options that reduce process defects and cycle time. These features can help improve the final product quality but, with current printing solutions, impact the final throughput.

When considering the purchase of new process equipment, take into consideration the balance between those two important goals: throughput and quality. Remember: cycle time is important but it is just a subset of throughput. What really matters is how many good boards can be produced over a period of time. Maximize throughput, and you maximize profitability.

Joe Belmonte is project manager, advanced process development, at Speedline Technologies (speedlinetech.com); jbelmonte@speedlinetech.com.
COPYRIGHT 2005 UP Media Group, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Screen Printing
Author:Belmonte, Joe
Publication:Circuits Assembly
Date:Apr 1, 2005
Words:630
Previous Article:Swimming with sharks: don't let buying PCBs direct from Asia turn you into pond scum.
Next Article:Remember when surface-mount was the 'next big thing?' Reminisces on the scary "new" technology.


Related Articles
PCB Support System.
Mass imaging processes for via-filling: as via-filling processes mature, enclosed-head screen-printing offers an alternative to the squeegee.
Throughput vs. cycle time in evaluating paste printing: is the best indicator of performance machine cycle time, or first-pass yield?
How mass-imaging is chaning dispensing: printing thousands of dots in a single stroke.
Evaluating screen printer options: how the three most common features impact board quality and throughput.
Speedline's MPM Accela: the new stencil printer platform maximizes parallel processing.
No more friction: new board transport systems can aid printer throughput.
Closed loop TIM processing: printers offer better process control and cost savings over dispensers.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters