Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,763,825 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

What's your damage? (Corn Losers).


IN FEBRUARY THE creators and distributors of genetically modified genetically modified
Adjective

(of an organism) having DNA which has been altered for the purpose of improvement or correction of defects

genetically modified genetic adj [food etc] →
 (G.M.) StarLink corn settled a $110 million class action suit from corn farmers, marking a victory for environmentalist environmentalist

a person with an interest and knowledge about the interaction of humans and animals with the environment.
 panic that could retard biotech development.

Back in 2001, StarLink corn, invented to resist an insect pest and intended only for animal feed, was found to have entered the human food supply via Taco Bell taco shells. The Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), independent agency of the U.S. government, with headquarters in Washington, D.C. It was established in 1970 to reduce and control air and water pollution, noise pollution, and radiation and to ensure the safe handling and  had not approved StarLink for human consumption because of speculative fears that a specific protein could cause an allergic reaction allergic reaction
n.
A local or generalized reaction of an organism to internal or external contact with a specific allergen to which the organism has been previously sensitized.
. Even though the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), agency of the U.S. Public Health Service since 1973, with headquarters in Atlanta; it was established in 1946 as the Communicable Disease Center.  found no evidence that such allergic reactions had actually occurred, anti-biotech activists created enough of a public panic that a class action suit against StarLink's sellers and food manufacturers led to a $9 million settlement last year, mostly through dollar-off coupons on food packages.

The class action suit settled for $110 million in February was brought by corn farmers, who argued that their sales were damaged by a backlash against corn caused by the StarLink panic. That is, the fact that anti-G.M. activists frightened everyone about StarLink was enough of an excuse for its makers to be sued-whether or not the corn itself ever harmed anyone. That's a powerful weapon for G.M. opponents: The very panic they create can be the basis of a damage claim.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Doherty, Brian
Publication:Reason
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:May 1, 2003
Words:228
Previous Article:Comic bureaucracy. (E.U. Superheroes).(Troubled Waters comic book)
Next Article:Bureaucratic enrichment zone. (A Radical Proposal Wasted).(Cincinnati Empowerment Corporation )
Topics:



Related Articles
Taco Bell Recall Illustrates Need For Image Insurance.(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles