Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,665,456 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Welfare families no better off with National Child Benefit.


OTTAWA -- Most families on welfare are no better off since the federal government introduced the National Child Benefit in 1998 because of the deal that allowed the provinces and territories to claw back claw back
Verb

1. to get back (something) with difficulty

2. to recover (a part of a grant or allowance) in the form of a tax or financial penalty
 part of that money says the National Council of Welfare in its Welfare Incomes Report 2003.

The Council asserts that although the NCB (Network Control Block) A packet structure used by the NetBIOS communications protocol.  had "a great potential to help reduce child poverty," the benefit actually seems to "have helped those families with modest incomes in which the parents have been lucky enough to find and keep work on a relatively steady basis," while discriminating against families on welfare.

It also notes that despite regular increases in the NCB benefits, which includes the Canada Child Tax Benefit The Canada Child Tax Benefit (CCTB) is a tax-free monthly payment available to eligible Canadian families to help with the cost of raising children. The CCTB can incorporate the National Child Benefit (NCB), a monthly benefit for low-income families with children, and the Child  and the National Child Benefit Supplement, incomes for families in most cases actually decreased for people on welfare, including families, subsisting on as little as one-fifth of the poverty line.

"Some would argue that clawing back part of the National Child Benefit from parents on welfare creates an incentive to work. At the National Council on Welfare, we simply have no patience for that argument. Of course, it makes sense to provide incentives to work. But taking money away from people on welfare--with incomes already horrifyingly hor·ri·fy  
tr.v. hor·ri·fied, hor·ri·fy·ing, hor·ri·fies
1. To cause to feel horror. See Synonyms at dismay.

2. To cause unpleasant surprise to; shock.
 low--makes no sense at all," said John Murphy A number of people have been named John Murphy
  • Father John Murphy, leader during the Irish Rebellion of 1798
  • John Murphy (Alabama) (1786-1841), American Governor and Congressman from Alabama
, the Council's chairperson.

When the federal government introduced the NCB it allowed the provinces and territories to claw back the supplement from families on welfare. At the time, only Newfoundland and New Brunswick New Brunswick, province, Canada
New Brunswick, province (2001 pop. 729,498), 28,345 sq mi (73,433 sq km), including 519 sq mi (1,345 sq km) of water surface, E Canada.
 did not opt for the claw back. More recently Nova Scotia Nova Scotia (nō`və skō`shə) [Lat.,=new Scotland], province (2001 pop. 908,007), 21,425 sq mi (55,491 sq km), E Canada. Geography
, Quebec, Manitoba, Alberta and Ontario have limited their claw back of the supplement, but there are still three provinces and three territories that continue to claw back the NCB. and they have given no indication that this will change anytime soon.

The Council believes that families on welfare are further affected because the provinces and territories had no incentive to increase their welfare rates because of a deal that allowed them claw backs in their first place and due to the regular increases made by the federal government to the NCB.

It points to its 2001 report, Child Poverty Profile 1998, wherein only 66 per cent of poor families with children benefited from the child tax benefit between June 1998 and June 1999 with 79 per cent of poor two-parent families receiving the child supplement and only 57 per cent of poor single-parent families single-parent family Social medicine A family unit with a mother or father and unmarried children. See Father 'factor.', Latchkey children, Quality time, Supermom. Cf Extended family, Nuclear family, Two parent advantage.  being allowed to keep it.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Community Action Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Child & Family; National Council of Welfare's report
Publication:Community Action
Geographic Code:1CANA
Date:Aug 16, 2004
Words:406
Previous Article:Death sentences for China's baby trafficers.(Child & Family)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Squamish Nation withdraws objection to adoption of native girls in Ontario.(Child & Family)(Squamish Nation of British Columbia)(The Hamilton...
Topics:



Related Articles
Family planning. (lawsuit against welfare reform) (Trends)
Suffer the children: how government fails its most vulnerable citizens - abused and neglected kids.
A rare harmony: combining programs to help solve the problem of child poverty in Canada is one way Ottawa has tried to improve its relations with the...
CCTB makes 1-parent welfare family poorer.(Canada Child Tax Benefit)(Brief Article)
TIME RUNNING OUT FOR 43,000 MANY L.A. WELFARE RECIPIENTS TO LOSE BENEFITS.(News)(Statistical Data Included)
Dramatic downturn in well-being of Toronto families reported.(General)(Family Service Association of Toronto)(Community Social Planning Council of...
Child benefit clawback challenged in court.(Child & Family)(Brief Article)
Canada's "shabby" welfare gets worse, National Council on Welfare reports.(INCOME SECURITY)
A taxing solution.(child care )(Column)
Staggering losses in welfare incomes, NCW reports.(INCOME SECURITY)(National Welfare Council)(Statistical data)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles