Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,800,487 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Webster v. City of New York.


U.S. District Court

EXCESSIVE FORCE

RESTRAINTS

Webster v. City of New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
, 333 F.Supp.2d 184 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). Arrestees brought an action against a city, police commissioner and police officers alleging unreasonable use of force and punishment without due process. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, in part. The court held that failure to provide food and water to the pretrial pre·tri·al  
n.
A proceeding held before an official trial, especially to clarify points of law and facts.

adj.
1. Of or relating to a pretrial.

2.
 detainees for a few hours when they were held at a police station did not rise to the level of a due process violation, because of the relatively brief duration and the absence of allegations of injury or punitive intent. The court also held that the use of handcuffs hand·cuff  
n.
A restraining device consisting of a pair of strong, connected hoops that can be tightened and locked about the wrists and used on one or both arms of a prisoner in custody; a manacle. Often used in the plural.

tr.v.
 on the pretrial detainees, and subjecting them to abusive language, did not rise to the level of a due process violation. (City of New York Police New York Police may refer to:
  • New York City Police (NYPD)
  • New York State Police
  • Port Authority Police(PAPD)
 Department)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:violation of due process of law
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2NY
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:147
Previous Article:Mladek v. Day.(violation of United States Constitution. 4th Amendment and United States Constitution. 14th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Next Article:King v. Frank.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment and United States Constitution. 1st Amendment)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
The SPARC task force: Solving Problems and Restarting Communities.
Intentional violations of Miranda: a strategy for liability. (Miranda rights and police interrogation)
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE- DUE PROCESS EX POST FACTO.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. courts grapple with constitutional claims for loss of adult children.
Substantive due process claims in the land-use context: the need for a simple and intelligent standard of review.
Daniels v. Woodside.(due process claim )(Brief Article)
Daniels v. Woodside.(juvenile claims violation of his due process and state law )(Brief Article)
Jones v. Ray.(RELEASE)(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Webster v. City of New York.(pretrial detention, arrestees alleges police officers of unreasonable use of force)(Brief Article)
Discipline.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles