Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,758,148 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Was Disclosure Unfair?


The decision not long ago by Emulex Corp. to broadcast bad news via a Webcast is not one other companies may want to emulate.

Nothing wrong with a Webcast, of course -- but the California-based networking equipment maker appeared to contravene con·tra·vene  
tr.v. con·tra·vened, con·tra·ven·ing, con·tra·venes
1. To act or be counter to; violate: contravene a direct order.

2.
 the Securities and Exchange Commission's recent Regulation FD ("fair disclosure") rules by not issuing a press release first, covering an announcement about disappointing sales. Instead, it sent a brief release, not detailing the news, that directed investors to its Web site, where CEO (1) (Chief Executive Officer) The highest individual in command of an organization. Typically the president of the company, the CEO reports to the Chairman of the Board.  Paul Folino was to address a technology conference a few days later.

In doing so, Emulex appeared to be violating Reg FD rules stipulating that "material" disclosures be issued broadly before being given to a select audience. But a former SEC attorney told The Wall Street Journal that there may be some latitude latitude, angular distance of any point on the surface of the earth north or south of the equator. The equator is latitude 0°, and the North Pole and South Pole are latitudes 90°N and 90°S, respectively.  in the code, and that a news release directing investors to a Webcast may be acceptable.

Emulex argued that the news wasn't a matter of lowering earnings guidance, but "a change in tone." Still, analysts and investors made it clear they disapproved, and Emulex officials said afterward af·ter·ward   also af·ter·wards
adv.
At a later time; subsequently.

Adv. 1. afterward - happening at a time subsequent to a reference time; "he apologized subsequently"; "he's going to the store but he'll be back here
 that, in hindsight hind·sight  
n.
1. Perception of the significance and nature of events after they have occurred.

2. The rear sight of a firearm.
, they would have handled the release differently.
COPYRIGHT 2001 Financial Executives International
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:webcast
Publication:Financial Executive
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2001
Words:193
Previous Article:Global Fraud: A Growth Industry.(computer crime)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Security Heads AICPA's Top 10 Technologies.(American Institute of Certified Public Accountants)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
The Supreme Court's new rule on amicus briefs.
NEW RULE LEVELS THE PLAYING FIELD.(Brief Article)
Business vs. Business.(Business 2.0 article on Business.com's Jake Winebaum)(Brief Article)
New law gives lawyers pause to draw up prenuptials. (Up Front).(Brief Article)
The accelerating evolution in fairness opinions. (Advertising Supplement: Banking & Finance).
Ruling on veracity of news releases opposed by press. (Law).
Regulation FD: coping in the trenches: CFOs tell how the SEC's stricter disclosure rules have changed the way they release financial information...
Note from the editors: full disclosure policy.(Editorial)
'Rounders' lawsuit results in broader protection for writers.(Up Front)
Our side of the story.(Letter to the editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles