WARRANT ISSUED FOR ARGENTINE ACCUSED OF HACKING INTO NASA.Byline: Carol Rosenberg Knight-Ridder Tribune News Wire He called himself ``griton,'' Spanish for screamer screamer, common name for gregarious, aquatic birds comprising three species in the family Anhimidae. Although they are related to the ducks and geese, they do not resemble them in outward appearance. , and allegedly used stolen Harvard University Harvard University, mainly at Cambridge, Mass., including Harvard College, the oldest American college. Harvard College Harvard College, originally for men, was founded in 1636 with a grant from the General Court of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. passwords to sneak into U.S. government computers from his home in Buenos Aires Buenos Aires (bwā`nəs ī`rēz, âr`ēz, Span. bwā`nōs ī`rās), city and federal district (1991 pop. , Argentina. He hacked his way into NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory “JPL” redirects here. For other uses, see JPL (disambiguation). Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) is a NASA research center located in the cities of Pasadena and La Cañada Flintridge, near Los Angeles, California, USA. , poked around the Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) (previously known at various times as Site Y, Los Alamos Laboratory, and Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory) is a United States Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratory, managed and operated by Los Alamos National and even tried, but failed, to invade the Army Research lab's computer system. On Friday, federal officials announced an arrest warrant for Argentine Julio Cesar Ardita, 22, who was described as part snoop, part spook, and was unmasked in an international crime hunt carried out with the first computer wiretap wiretap n. using an electronic device to listen in on telephone lines, which is illegal unless allowed by court order based upon a showing by law enforcement of "probable cause" to believe the communications are part of criminal activities. order. ``This is a case of cyber-sleuthing, a glimpse of what computer crime fighting will look like in the coming years,'' said U.S. Attorney Donald Stern. ``We have made enormous strides in developing the investigative tools to track down individuals who misuse vital computer networks.'' The felony charges: Fraudulent possession of unauthorized computer passwords, destructive activity in connection with computers and illegal interception of electronic communications. While Ardita hacked his way into ``important and sensitive information in government research files on satellites, radiations and energy-related engineering,'' a Justice Department announcement said, Ardita is ``not accused of obtaining classified information related to national security.'' Ardita may not ever face trial. While the United States has an extradition treaty with Argentina, the crimes for which Ardita is being sought are not extraditable ex·tra·dit·a·ble adj. 1. Subject to extradition: extraditable fugitives. 2. Making liable to extradition: an extraditable crime. , according to Justice Department spokesman John Russell. Still, the case reflects the new world of computer crime confronting federal and international law enforcement agencies. Attorney General Janet Reno said the unusual use of a wiretap - in which law enforcement officers electronically sifted through billions of bytes to hunt down and identify a hacker - ``is an example of how the Fourth Amendment and a court order can be used to protect rights while adapting to modern technology.'' The history-making tap was attached to the Harvard University Faculty of Arts Historically the Faculty of Arts was one of the four traditional divisions of the teaching bodies of universities, the others being theology, law and medicine.[1] Nowadays it is a common name for the faculties teaching humanities. References 1. and Science computers in the last two months of 1995, according to Justice Department officials. It was issued by a federal judge in Boston and involved a balancing act between federal interests in tracking down the hacker and the need to ensure other people's privacy on the Internet, said Stern. ``We intercepted only those communications which fit a pattern,'' he said. ``Even when communications contained the identifying pattern of the intruder, we limited our initial examination.'' |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion