Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,680,088 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Virginia Supreme Court To Hear Regent U. Bond Case.


The Virginia Supreme Court has announced that it will decide whether TV preacher Pat Robertson's Regent University Notable faculty

Name Position Known For
John Ashcroft Distinguished Professor of Law and Government Former Attorney General of the United States and Politician
Admiral Vern Clark Distinguished Professor of Leadership Studies Former Chief of Naval Operations, U.S.
 is eligible for $55 million in state bonds.

The state court granted the appeal of Virginia College This article or section is written like an .
Please help [ rewrite this article] from a neutral point of view.
Mark blatant advertising for , using .
 Building Authority v. Barry Lynn March 6. The case was brought by Americans United for Separation of Church and State Americans United for Separation of Church and State (Americans United or AU for short) is a religious freedom advocacy group in the United States which promotes the separation of church and state, a legal doctrine seen by the AU as being enshrined in the Establishment , which argued that the bonds would be a form of taxpayer aid to Regent.

AU Executive Director Barry W. Lynn Reverend Barry W. Lynn (born 1948 in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania) has been the Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State since 1992.[1]  said he hopes the Virginia high court affirms the lower court ruling. "Religious schools should be supported by voluntary contributions, not money coerced from taxpayers," he remarked. "We're confident that the Virginia Supreme Court will uphold this important principle."

Robertson is seeking the bonds to underwrite new construction at Regent's Virginia Beach campus and the building of a satellite campus in Alexandria, Va. On July 30, 1999, Richmond Circuit Judge Randall G. Johnson ruled against the bond issue, noting that the Virginia Constitution forbids government support of sectarian institutions.

At the lower court, AU attorney Ayesha Khan was able to prove that Regent includes its fundamentalist Christian perspective in all classes and other educational activities, based on Regent documents AU had obtained. Khan's argument was so persuasive that Johnson ruled against Regent from the bench, remarking, "I don't know Don't know (DK, DKed)

"Don't know the trade." A Street expression used whenever one party lacks knowledge of a trade or receives conflicting instructions from the other party.
 how in the world you can say its [Regent's] primary purpose isn't religious training or that it is not pervasively sectarian."

Americans United brought this action with the cooperation of the Virginia affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), nonpartisan organization devoted to the preservation and extension of the basic rights set forth in the U.S. Constitution. .
COPYRIGHT 2000 Americans United for Separation of Church and State
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Church & State
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Apr 1, 2000
Words:252
Previous Article:Battling Big Silence In Big Sky Country.(Brief Article)
Next Article:Religious Right Leader Randall Terry Censured By New York Church.(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Pat Robertson Seeks $54.5 Million In State Bonds For Regent U.
BONDS UNDONE.(government financing for Christian-oriented Regent University)
Supremes will skirt most gay issues this term.(Supreme Court and gay rights)(Brief Article)
MICROSOFT - SURPRISE GOOD NEWS!(antitrust case)(Company Business and Marketing)
Va. Supreme Court Hears Arguments In Regent Bonds Case.(Brief Article)
U.S. Supreme Court: PAROLE-POLICIES EX POST FACTO.(Brief Article)
Virginia Supreme Court Approves Bonds For Regent University.(Brief Article)
Appeals Court Rejects Lawsuit Challenging Christmas.(Brief Article)
Washington Supreme Court Refuses to Review NSPI Decision.(National Spa and Pool Institute)(Brief Article)
Telephone solicitation: will High Court play the percentages?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles