Virgin and the dynamo: use and abuse of religion in environmental debate.The Virgin and the Dynamo Use and Abuse of Religion in Environmental Debate by Robert Royal
abbr. International Standard Book Number ISBN International Standard Book Number ISBN n abbr (= International Standard Book Number) → ISBN m 0 8028 4468 5 AT FIRST GLANCE this book seemed yet another in the spate of anti-environmentalist backlash books I've reviewed. This is a readable account, more positive than many. Royal states his thesis that the West has a better religious basis for a sound ecological ethic than radical environmentalists think. This part is lively and gives hope. Then Royal argues that most environmentalists' claims have been exaggerated, but his own documentation is often out of context, outdated, misused, or missing. His mention of the 1998 El Nino shows he can be up to date when it suits, but gaps in his knowledge yawn when it is inconvenient for his case. One example: he says "a now famous poll of the members of the American Geophysical Union The American Geophysical Union (or AGU) is a nonprofit organization of geophysicists, consisting of over 50,000 members from over 140 countries. AGU's activities are focused on the organization and dissemination of scientific information in the interdisciplinary and and the American Meteorological Society The American Meteorological Society (AMS) promotes the development and dissemination of information and education on the atmospheric and related oceanic and hydrologic sciences and the advancement of their professional applications. found that 49 per cent of these professionals believe that no anthropogenic an·thro·po·gen·ic adj. 1. Of or relating to anthropogenesis. 2. Caused by humans: anthropogenic degradation of the environment. warming has taken place ..." That survey is out of date. In 1993, climate science had many global warming skeptics, including even Environment Canada's head meteorologist who remained skeptical until 1997. Since then, almost all meteorologists Atmospheric scientists
Furthermore, meteorologists say the question of whether human activity has warmed the planet is less important than whether our polluting activity will cause global warming. To that question, they say "Yes." The last chapters are an expose of the radical environmentalist environmentalist a person with an interest and knowledge about the interaction of humans and animals with the environment. ideologies of Matthew Fox, Starhawk, Charlene Spretnak, et al. Here, Royal is on firmer ground: his critique follows many leading anthropologists and historians. Yet, why does he concentrate on lightweights like Starhawk, while omitting moderate Christian environmentalists like Loren Wilkinson and Calvin de Witt? This omission undermines the book's claim to build "an expectation that an answer to some environmental questions may still be found in the classic religious view of the West (the Virgin.)" |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion