Violinists can depreciate antique instruments.In two recent Tax Court cases, three professional musicians were allowed to depreciate Depreciate To allocate the purchase cost of an asset over its life. antique bows and a 17th century viol viol, family of bowed stringed instruments, the most important ensemble instruments from the 15th to the 17th cent. The viol's early history is indefinite, but it is recognizable in depictions from as early as the 11th cent. During the second half of the 17th cent. it lost its dominant position to the violin family and became practically extinct until the general revival of interest in early music and instruments in the 20th cent.">bass viol bass viol (bās vī`əl), properly, the largest instrument of the viol family. The term now refers most often to the double bass., respectively. In the first case, Simon (103 TC no. 15), Mr. and Mrs. Simon, both professional violinists, bought original Tourte bows, made in the 1800s, for use in performances. They paid $30,000 for the bows, which needed some restoration, and claimed depreciation for them. The Internal Revenue Service disallowed the depreciation deductions, but the Tax Court allowed them since the bows were shown to wear down from use and were used in a trade or business. The IRS has always argued in such cases that musical instruments are priceless works of art that do not depreciate over time. The distinguishing factor in this case was that the Simons proved the bows wore out. In the second case, Liddle (103 TC no. 16), the taxpayer bought a 17th century bass viol made by Ruggeri (a contemporary of Stradivari) for use in the business of playing the viol professionally. Depreciation was allowed. Even though a Ruggeri is regarded as a work of art, for which depreciation is traditionally not allowed, the taxpayer showed the viol met the definition of depreciable property as property used in a trade or business. Note: The IRS says it does not intend to acquiesce on this issue. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion