Vestibulo-ocular physiology underlying vestibular hypofunction.

The vestibular system is responsible for sensing motion of the head and maintains stability of images on the fovea of the retina and postural control during that motion. When functioning normally, the vestibular receptors in the inner ear provide an exquisitely accurate representation of the motion of the head in 3 dimensions. This information is then used by the central vestibular pathways to control reflexes and perceptions that are mediated by the vestibular system. Disorders of vestibular function result in abnormalities in these reflexes and lead to sensations that reflect abnormal information about motion from the vestibular receptors. (1)

Best visual acuity is obtained when images are projected on the fovea of the retina. The fovea occupies a small area of the visual field, but movements of an image off the fovea by as little as 1 degree can cause substantial decreases in visual acuity. (2) Stabilization of a visual target on the fovea can be achieved by various systems, including the vestibular and smooth pursuit oculomotor systems. (3) Influences such as target velocity and distance as well as velocity and frequency of head motion are the stimulus variables the brain uses to determine which oculomotor system is recruited for gaze stability. Each of the oculomotor subsystems has a range in which it functions most efficiently.

Normal activities of daily life (such as running) can have head velocities of up to 550[degrees]/s, head accelerations of up to 6,000[degrees]/[s.sup.2], and frequency content of head motion from 0 to 20 Hz. (4,5) Only the vestibular system can detect head motion over this range of velocity, acceleration, and frequency. (3) Additionally, the latency of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) has been reported to be as short as 5 to 7 milliseconds. (6,7) In contrast, ocular following mechanisms, such as smooth pursuit, generate slower eye velocities (<60[degrees]/s) and have relatively long latencies (up to 100 milliseconds). (8,9)

The purposes of this article are to review the anatomy and physiology of the vestibular system and to describe the neurophysiological mechanisms responsible for the vestibulo-ocular abnormalities of people with vestibular dysfunction.

Anatomy and Physiology

Peripheral Vestibular Anatomy

Within the petrous portion of each temporal bone lies the membranous vestibular labyrinth. Each labyrinth contains 5 neural structures that detect head acceleration: 3 semicircular canals and 2 otolith organs (Fig. 1). The 3 semicircular canals (SCC) (lateral, posterior, and anterior) respond to angular acceleration and are orthogonal with respect to each other. Alignment of the SCCs in the temporal bone is such that each canal has a contralateral coplanar mate. The lateral canals form a coplanar pair, whereas the posterior and contralateral anterior SCC form coplanar pairs. The anterior aspect of the lateral SCC is inclined 30 degrees upward from a plane connecting the external auditory canal to the lateral canthus. The posterior and anterior SCCs are inclined about 92 and 90 degrees from the plane of the lateral SCC. (10) Because the SCCs are not precisely orthogonal with earth vertical or earth horizontal, angular rotation of the head stimulates each canal to varying degrees. (11)

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

The SCCs are filled with endolymph that has a density slightly greater than that of water. Endolymph contains a high concentration of potassium, with a lower concentration of sodium, and moves freely within each canal in response to the direction of the angular head rotation. (12) The SCCs enlarge at one end to form the ampulla. Within the ampulla lies the cupula, a gelatinous barrier that houses the sensory hair cells (Fig. 2A). The kinocilia and stereocilia of the hair cells are seated in the crista ampullaris (Fig. 2B). Deflection of the stereocilia caused by motion of the endolymph results in an opening (or closing) of the transduction channels of hair cells, which changes the membrane potential of the hair cells. Deflection of the stereocilia toward the single kinocilia in each hair cell leads to excitation (depolarization), and deflection of the stereocilia away from the kinocilia leads to inhibition (hyperpolarization).

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Hair cells are oriented in the lateral SCC so that endolymph motion toward the ampulla causes excitation. In contrast, hair cells of the vertical SCCs (posterior and anterior) are oriented so that depolarization occurs when endolymph mores away from the ampulla. Each of the SCCs responds best to motion in its own plane, with coplanar pairs exhibiting a push-pull dynamic. For example, as the head is turned to the right, the hair cells in the right lateral SCC are excited, whereas the hair cells in the left lateral SCC are inhibited. (13) The brain detects the direction of head movement by comparing input from the coplanar labyrinthine mates.

The saccule and utricle make up the otolith organs of the membranous labyrinth. Sensory hair cells project into a gelatinous material that has calcium carbonate crystals (otoconia) embedded in it, which provide the otolith organs with an inertial mass (Fig. 3). The utricle and the saccule have central regions known as the striola, dividing the otolith organs into 2 parts. The kinocilia of the utricular hair cells are oriented toward their striola, whereas the kinocilia of the saccular hair cells are oriented away from their striola. Motion toward the kinocilia causes excitation. Utricular excitation occurs during horizontal linear acceleration or static head tilt, and saccular excitation occurs during vertical linear acceleration.

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

Vestibular Afferent Physiology

In primates, primary vestibular afferents of the healthy vestibular system have a resting firing rate that is typically 70 to 100 spikes per second. (13,14) The discharge regularity (determined by the spacing of the interspike intervals between action potentials [Fig. 4]) of vestibular nerve afferents provides a useful marker for the information carried by these afferents. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean discharge) of the interspike interval provides a useful measurement for classifying afferents into irregularly and regularly discharging groups. The information carried by irregular and regular afferents varies over the spectral range of frequency and acceleration that encompasses natural head movements. Generally, irregular afferents are more sensitive to rotations during large head accelerations than regular afferents are. (14) The increased sensitivity of the irregular afferents may be more critical for the rapid detection of head movements as well as initiation of the VOR. (6,14) The regular afferents, in contrast, provide a signal that is proportional to head velocity over a wide spectral range. (14) In addition, the regular afferents may be the primary source of input to the VOR for steady-state responses to sinusoidal rotations because temporarily silencing the irregular afferents has no affect on the VOR during low-frequency and small head accelerations. (15)

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

The cells bodies of vestibular nerve afferents are located in the superior or inferior divisions of Scarpa's ganglia, which lie within the internal auditory canal near the emergence of the vestibular nerve into the cerebellopontine angle. (16) From the vestibular labyrinth, the afferent information travels ipsilateral in 1 of 2 branches of the vestibular nerve. The superior vestibular nerve innervates the lateral and anterior SCC as well as the utricle. The inferior vestibular nerve innervates the posterior SCC and the saccule. (17) It is estimated that between 15,000 to around 25,000 vestibular nerve fibers exist in humans. (18-20) Variation of nerve fiber counts among studies appears to be a function of age, although rate of decline of the number of afferent fibers also appears to be variable. The branches of the vestibular nerve travel together into the pontomedullary junction where they bifurcate. Primary vestibular afferents in the superior division of the vestibular nerve include axons that synapse in the superior and medial vestibular nuclei or the uvula, nodulus, flocculus, or fastigial nucleus of the cerebellum. (21-24) Primary vestibular afferents from the inferior branch synapse with neurons in either the medial, lateral, or inferior vestibular nuclei, which, along with the superior vestibular nuclei and other subnuclei, comprise the vestibular nuclear complex. (17)

Central Vestibular Anatomy

Secondary vestibular afferents have been identified as relaying signals from the vestibular nuclei to the extraocular motor nuclei, the spinal cord, or the flocculus of the cerebellum. (25) Central vestibular neurons differ in terms of the inputs they receive from regular and irregular afferents. Those central vestibular neurons that project to the extraocular motor nuclei receive a majority of their monosynaptic inputs from regular afferents, whereas those that project to the spinal cord receive a majority of their inputs from irregular "afferents. (25,26) Those central vestibular neurons projecting to the flocculus of the cerebellum receive relatively equal contributions from regular and irregular afferents. (25)

Many vestibular reflexes are controlled by processes that exist primarily within the brain stem. Tracing techniques, however, have identified extensive connections between the vestibular nuclei and the reticular formation, (27) thalamus, (28) and cerebellum. (21) Vestibular pathways appear to terminate in a unique cortical area. In studies of primates, fibers terminating in the junction of the parietal and insular lobes have been identified and considered the location for a vestibular cortex. (29-31) Recent evidence in studies of humans using functional magnetic resonance imaging appears to confirm the parietal and insular regions as the cortical location for processing vestibular information. (32) Connections with the vestibular cortex, thalamus, and reticular formation enable the vestibular system to contribute to the integration of arousal and conscious awareness of the body and to discriminate between movement of self and the environment. (33,34) The cerebellar connections help maintain calibration of the VOR, contribute to posture during static and dynamic activities, and influence the coordination of limb movements.

Vestibulo-ocular Physiology

The ability of the VOR to elicit rapid compensatory eye movements that maintain stability of images on the fovea depends on relatively simple patterns of connectivity in the central vestibular pathways. In its most basic form, the pathways controlling the VOR can be described as a 3-neuron are. In the case of the lateral SCC, primary vestibular afferents from the lateral SCC synapse in the ipsilateral medial and ventrolateral vestibular nuclei. Some of the secondary vestibular neurons receiving innervation from the ipsilateral labyrinth have axons that decussate and synapse in the contralateral abducens nucleus, whereas others ascend ipsilaterally to the oculomotor nucleus. Motoneurons from the abducens nucleus and the medial rectus subdivision of the oculomotor nucleus then synapse at the neuromuscular junction of the lateral rectus and medial rectus muscles, respectively. Similar patterns of connectivity exist for the anterior and posterior SCC and the eye muscles that receive innervations from them (Tab. 1). (35) Figure 5 illustrates the insertions of the ocular muscles.

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

The VOR has been tested across multiple frequencies and velocities and shows velocity-dependent nonlinearities, (6) which may correlate with unique afferent physiology. The gain of the VOR remains constant (linear) across multiple frequencies of sinusoidal rotations, with peak velocities of <20[degrees]/s. (6) For rotations at higher frequencies and velocities, the VOR gain rises with increases in stimulus velocity (nonlinear). Similar effects of stimulus frequency and velocity are seen in responses to steps of acceleration. Therefore, it may be that the output of the VOR is the combined result of linear and nonlinear components. (6) Adaptation experiments in which spectacles were used to modify the gain of the VOR support the notion that a linear component and a nonlinear component may be responsible for mediating the VOR. Using different frequency and velocity profiles for the adaptation stimulus, the nonlinear component has been shown to be adaptable only with high-frequency and high-velocity stimuli. (36)

Incidence and Prevalence of Dizziness in the United States

The incidence of dizziness in the United States is approximately 5.5%, which means that more than 15 million people develop the symptom each year. (37) The reported prevalence of dizziness as a medical complaint in community-dwelling adults varies based on their age, sex, and definition of the complaint (1%-35%). (38-41) Researchers using specific definitions such as vertigo (an illusion of motion) have reported a prevalence of up to 6.7%, which increases with age. (39,40,42) When researchers used a broader definition that included light-headedness and disequilibrium, they reported a greater prevalence of dizziness (25%-35%). (38,41) Many of these patients most likely bad nonvestibular causes of their dizziness. Dizziness is one of the most common complaints reported in physicians' offices, with the prevalence increasing with age. (43,44) For patients over 75 years of age, dizziness is the most common reason they see a physician. (45) Regardless of age, patients who experience dizziness report a significant disability that reduces their quality of life. (46-48) Furthermore, it has been reported that more than 70% of patients with initial reports of dizziness will not have a resolution of symptoms at a 2-week follow-up. Of those patients with persistent dizziness, 63% reported recurrent symptoms continuing beyond 3 months. (49)

Distinguishing Between Vestibular and Nonvestibular Causes of Dizziness

Clinicians who work with people who report dizziness and imbalance have the difficult task of sorting through potential causes. Capturing a thorough history is a critical component of the assessment. Many patients and clinicians use the imprecise term "dizziness" to describe a vague sensation of light-headedness or a feeling that they have a tendency to fall. The imprecision of the term can make clinical management decisions complicated. Generally, most complaints of being "dizzy" can be categorized as light-headedness, disequilibrium, vertigo, of oscillopsia.

Light-headedness is often defined as a feeling that fainting is about to occur and can be caused by nonvestibular factors such as hypotension, hypoglycemia, of anxiety. (50)

Disequilibrium is defined as the sensation of being off balance. Often, disequilibrium is associated with nonvestibular problems such as decreased somatosensation or weakness in the lower extremities. Vertigo is defined as an illusion of movement. Vertigo tends to be episodic and tends to indicate pathology at one of more places along the vestibular pathways. Vertigo is common during the acute stage of a unilateral vestibular lesion, but also may manifest itself through displaced otoconia (benign paroxysmal positional vertigo [BPPV]) of acute brain stem lesions affecting the root entry zone of the peripheral vestibular neurons or the vestibular nuclei. (50) Oscillopsia is the experience that objects in the visual surround that are known to be stationary are in motion. Oscillopsia can occur in association with head movements in patients with vestibular hypofunction because the vestibular system is not generating an adequate compensatory eye velocity during a head rotation. (51) A deficit such as this in the VOR results in motion of images on the fovea and in a decline in visual acuity. The severity of gaze instability, however, varies among people with vestibular hypofunction. (51-54)

Table 2 lists some of the more common causes associated with symptoms due to vestibular and nonvestibular dizziness and imbalance. Baloh (50) provided a thorough review that distinguishes vestibular causes of dizziness from nonvestibular causes.

Clinical Measures of Vestibular Function

To clinically assess vestibular dysfunction, first a careful history is taken. The clinical examination then encompasses assessment of eye movements, posture, and gait. Because of the direct relationship between vestibular receptors in the inner ear and eye movements produced by VORs, the bedside examination of eye movements can be of primary importance in defining and localizing vestibular pathology.

Clinical evaluation of the vestibulo-ocular system takes advantage of 2 physiological principles: the high resting firing rate and the inequality in firing rates within the central vestibular neurons for excitation and inhibition. The presence of a high resting firing rate means each vestibular system can detect head motion through excitation or inhibition. During angular head rotations, ipsilateral vestibular afferents can be excited up to 400 spikes per second. (55) Such head movements also result in inhibition of peripheral afferents and of many central vestibular neurons receiving innervation from the labyrinth opposite the rotation. Because the resting discharge rate of these afferents and central vestibular neurons averages 70 to 100 spikes per second, inhibitory cutoff is more likely to occur than is excitation saturation.

Head Thrust Test

The head thrust test is a widely accepted clinical tool that is used to assess semicircular canal function. (11,56-59) The head is flexed 30 degrees (to ensure cupular stimulation primarily in the tested lateral SCC). Patients ave asked to keep their eyes focused on a target while their head is manually rotated in an unpredictable direction using a small-amplitude (5[degrees]-15[degrees]), high-acceleration (3,000-4,000[degrees]/[s.sup.2]) angular thrust. When the VOR is functioning normally, the eyes more in the direction opposite to the head movement and through the exact angle required to keep images stable on the fovea. In the case of vestibular hypofunction, the eyes more less than the required amount. At the end of the head movement, the eyes are not looking at the intended target and images have shifted on the fovea. A rapid, corrective saccade is made to bring the target back on the fovea. The appearance of these corrective saccades indicates vestibular hypofunction as evaluated by the head thrust test. During a horizontal rotation toward the ear with vestibular hypofunction, corrective saccades occur because inhibition of vestibular afferents and central vestibular neurons on the intact side (inhibitory cutoff) is less effective in encoding the amplitude of a head movement than excitation is.

The head thrust test provides a sensitive indication of vestibular hypofunction in patients with complete loss of function in the affected labyrinth that occurs following ablative surgical procedures, such as labyrinthectomy. (11,58,60) The test is less sensitive in detecting hypofunction in patients with incomplete loss of function. (61-64)

Head-Shaking-Induced Nystagmus

Nystagmus is an involuntary back-and-forth motion of both eyes. Any nystagmus due to vestibular stimulation of pathology is composed of slow and fast eye movements. The slow component (slow eye velocity) is produce by the intact ear, which generates a normal VOR as a result of the asymmetry between the discharge rates of central vestibular neurons on each side. The fast component is a resetting eye movement that brings the eyes close to the center of the oculomotor range. (65)

The head-shaking-induced nystagmus (HSN) test is a useful aid in the diagnosis of people with asymmetry of peripheral vestibular input to central vestibular regions. Patients undergoing the HSN test must have their vision blocked because fixation on a visual target can suppress nystagmus. (66) Similar to the head thrust test, the head should initially be flexed 30 degrees. Next, the head is oscillated horizontally for 20 cycles at a frequency of 2 repetitions per second (2 Hz). Upon stopping the oscillation, people with symmetric peripheral vestibular input will not have HSN. Typically, a person with a unilateral loss of peripheral vestibular function will manifest a horizontal HSN, with the quick phases of the nystagmus directed toward the healthy ear and the slow phases directed toward the lesioned ear. (65) Not all patients with a unilateral vestibular loss will have HSN. Patients with a complete loss of vestibular function bilaterally will not have HSN because neither system is functioning and there is no asymmetry between the tonic firing rates.

Positional Testing

Positional testing is commonly used to identify whether otoconia have been displaced into the SCC, causing benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). The addition of the otoconia into the endolymph makes the semicircular canals sensitive to changes in head position. The abnormal signal results in nystagmus and vertigo, nausea with or without vomiting, and disequilibrium. Once the patients are in the provoking position, the resultant nystagmus indicates which semicircular canal is involved. Honrubia et al (67) and Herdman (68) have reviewed the oculomotor signs and intervention associated with BPPV pathology.

Dynamic Visual Acuity

Dynamic visual acuity (DVA) is the measurement of visual acuity during self-generated horizontal motion of the head. A "bedside" and computerized form of the test can be used to identify the functional significance of the vestibular hypofunction. (69,70) Head velocities need to be greater than 100[degrees]/s at the time DVA is measured in order to ensure that the vestibular afferents from the semicircular canals on the contralateral side are driven into inhibition and the letters are not identified with a smooth pursuit eye movement.

In people without vestibular problems, head movement results in little of no change of visual acuity compared with the head still. For patients with vestibular hypofunction, the VOR will not keep the eyes stable in space during the rapid head movements. This results in a decrease in visual acuity during head motion compared with the head still. Dynamic visual acuity has been found to correctly identify the side of lesion in patients with unilateral hypofunction for self-generated and unpredictable head motion. (70,71)

Laboratory Measures of Vestibular Function

The VOR is typically measured by monitoring eye motion during stimulation of the peripheral vestibular system. The VOR gain is expressed as the ratio of eye velocity to head velocity (eye velocity/head velocity). Under ideal conditions, when the eyes are not verged (adducting), the VOR gain is -1, implying a compensatory eye relucity equal to the head velocity and in the opposite direction. The VOR phase is a second useful measure of the vestibular system and represents the timing relationship for the eye and head position. Ideally, eye position should arrive at a point in time that is equal With the oppositely directed head position. By convention, this is described as zero phase shift (Fig. 6).

[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]

Semicircular Canal Function

The caloric test is the "gold standard" for identifying peripheral unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH). (72,73) By introducing a cold of warm stimulus in the external auditory canal, a temperature gradient is created with the temporal bone. The change in temperature is the greatest for the lateral aspect of the temporal bone and the least for the medial aspect. In the presence of gravity, this temperature gradient results in the convective flow of endolymph that deflects the cupula and generates nystagmus. Direct hair cell stimulation as well as changes in pressure across the middle ear also cause cupular deflection, contributing to the resulting nystagmus. (74-76) The caloric test is particularly useful for determining the side of a deficit because each labyrinth is stimulated separately. Slow components of the nystagmus resulting from irrigations of the right ear are compared with slow components of the nystagmus resulting from irrigations of the left ear. The caloric test provides limited information, however, because only the lateral SCCs are stimulated and that stimulation corresponds to a frequency (0.025 Hz) that is much lower than the natural frequencies of head movement (1-20 Hz). (4,5) The rotary chair test is the "gold standard" for identifying bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH) and the extent of central nervous system compensation due to vestibular hypofunction. (73) The rotary chair test provides a physiological stimulus because rotating the patient causes endolymphatic flow in both lateral SCCs. Nystagmus should be generated for rotations in subjects without known pathology of impairments. Depending on the extent of the lesion, people with vestibular hypofunction will demonstrate varied compensatory slow eye velocities. The extent of pathology can be determined by comparing VOR gain and phase from rotations toward one ear with rotations toward the opposite ear. In addition, VOR gain and phase of people without vestibular problems can be compared with that of people with suspected vestibular hypofunction. Rotary chair testing is limited because only the lateral SCCs are routinely assessed to determine extent of pathology.

Otolith Function

Recent advances in vestibular diagnostic testing have extended the region of identifiable pathology to include the otolith organs. (77-79) The vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) test has gained broad clinical use in recent years. (77) The VEMP test exposes patients to a series of loud (95 dB) clicks. During the sound application, the ipsilateral sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle is assessed for myogenic potentials. In people with healthy vestibular function, an initial inhibitory potential (occurring at a latency of 13 milliseconds after the click) is followed by an excitatory potential (occurring at a latency of 21 milliseconds after the click). For patients with vestibular hypofunction, the VEMPs are absent on the side of the lesion. The pathway of the VEMP is believed to be associated with the head-neck reflex that maintains verticality of the head in relation to gravity (the vestibulocollic reflex). The saccule has been implicated as the site of afferent stimulation during VEMP testing because saccular afferents provide ipsilateral inhibitory disynaptic input to the SCM muscle, (80) are responsive to click noise, (81-83) and are positioned close to the footplate of the stapes and, therefore, are subject to mechanical stimulation. (78,81)

The subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective visual horizontal (SVH) tests are used to assess otolith function, though they cannot be used to uniquely detect saccular or utricular pathology. With the SVV test, patients are asked to align a dimly lit luminous bar (in an otherwise darkened room) with what they perceive as being vertical. With the SVH test, patients are asked to align a bar with what they perceive as being horizontal. Subjects without vestibular problems can align the bar within 1.5 degrees of true vertical or horizontal, whereas patients with UVH generally align the bar more than 2 degrees of true vertical or horizontal with the bar tilted toward the lesioned side. (79,84,85) Whether the SW test or the SVH test can detect chronic UVH is the subject of debate. (85-87)

Causes of Vestibular Hypofunction

Unilateral

The most frequent cause (88) of UVH is vestibular neuronitis, which is commonly caused by the herpes simplex virus. The superior vestibular nerve is more likely to be affected than the inferior vestibular nerve. (89-91) Less common causes include Meniere disease and vestibular schwannoma on the eighth cranial nerve. The incidence rates for these disorders are: 1,710 cases of vestibular neuronitis per million per year, (88) 500 cases of Meniere disease per million per year, (92) and 11.5 cases of vestibular schwannoma per million per year. (93) Other pathological events such as vascular lesions affecting the vestibular nerve of traumatic brain injury also may damage the vestibular system unilaterally. Patients who sustain unilateral vestibular damage may experience vertigo, spontaneous nystagmus, oscillopsia, postural instability, and disequilibrium.

When the peripheral vestibular system is damaged unilaterally, neuronal activity reaching the ipsilesional vestibular nuclei is reduced compared with that reaching the contralateral vestibular nuclei. The brain interprets the asymmetry between resting firing rates as a head rotation toward the contralesional ear. This results in spontaneous nystagmus, with slow components directed toward the lesioned ear and fast components directed toward the intact ear. Resolution of spontaneous nystagmus in the light typically occurs within 3 to 7 days but may vary, and it can be a process as long as 2 months. (94,95) Spontaneous nystagmus may always be present in the dark after a unilateral loss of vestibular function. Regardless, resolution of spontaneous nystagmus in the light or dark occurs when symmetry between the resting firing rates of both vestibular systems is re-established. (96) A number of authors (97-100) have provided more detail on the complex processes involved in vestibular compensation.

Bilateral

The most common cause of vestibular hypofunction on both sides (BVH) is ototoxicity due to certain aminoglycoside antibiotics (gentamicin, streptomycin). The antibiotics selectively damage the vestibular hair cells, often preserving auditory function. It is estimated that 3% to 4% of the population who receive gentamicin will sustain damage to both vestibular systems. (101) For people who receive gentamicin and renal dialysis concurrently, it is estimated that the likelihood of sustaining BVH is from 12.5% to 30%. (102,103) Unfortunately, it appears that people who are susceptible to ototoxicity have little protection from monitoring serum levels of these antibodies. (104) Less common causes of BVH include meningitis, head trauma, tumors on each eighth cranial nerve (including bilateral vestibular schwannoma), transient ischemic episodes of vessels supplying the vestibular system, and sequential unilateral vestibular neuronitis. (105-107) Patients with BVH typically experience gait ataxia, postural instability, and oscillopsia. (104)

Vestibular Rehabilitation

Vestibular rehabilitation refers to interventions such as adaptation exercises, habituation exercises, repositioning techniques, and exercise to improve muscle force, gait, or balance. The beneficial effect of much of the rehabilitation for people with vestibulospinal impairments as a result of vestibular hypofunction is well documented. (108-110) Controlled studies have been used to demonstrate improvements in dynamic visual acuity and to reduce complaints of oscillopsia as well as to reduce VOR gain asymmetry in people receiving vestibular adaptation exercises. (110,111)

Basic research may identify additional roles for programs of vestibular rehabilitation. The angular VOR has components that can be selectively modified based on the frequency and velocity of head movements. (36) Future studies may reveal unique head movement strategies that optimize performance and promote recovery of the VOR. These strategies might then be used in the design of interventions. Existing principles of vestibular neurophysiology warrant vestibular rehabilitation that exposes the damaged vestibular system to multiple head frequencies and velocities, thereby ensuring a broad range of stimuli to which the system can adapt.

Conclusions

When receptors in the inner ear and central pathways are functioning normally, the vestibular system provides exquisitely accurate mechanisms for stabilizing gaze and posture. Disorders affecting the end organs in the labyrinth of the central pathways cause decreases in the performance of the system, including asymmetries in reflex responses. An understanding of vestibular anatomy and physiology can reveal the reasons that these deficits occur. Further advances in research may lead to design of more effective rehabilitation strategies.

Table 1.
Innervation Pattern of Excitatory Input From the Semicircular Canals

                  Secondary      Extraocular
Primary Afferent  Neuron (a)     Motoneuron      Muscle

Lateral (right)   Medial         Right           [right arrow]
                    vestibular     oculomotor      Right medial
                    nucleus        nucleus (b)     rectus
                                 Left abducens   [right arrow]
                                   nucleus         Left lateral
                                                   rectus
Anterior          Lateral        Left            [right arrow]
  (or superior)     vestibular     oculomotor      Left inferior
  (right)           nucleus        nucleus         oblique
                                                 [??] Right
                                                   superior
                                                   rectus
Posterior         Medial         Left            [right arrow]
  (or inferior)     vestibular     trochlear       Right superior
  (right)           nucleus        nucleus         oblique
                                 Left            [right arrow]
                                   oculomotor      Left inferior
                                   nucleus         rectus

(a) Ascending secondary neurons travel in the medial longitudinal
fasciculus (MLF).

(b) For the lateral semicircular canal, secondary neurons also
travel in the ascending tract of Dieters.

Table 2.
Possible Causes of Vestibular and Nonvestibular Symptoms

Etiology        Symptoms           Possible Causes

Vestibular      Oscillopsia with   Unilateral vestibular hypofunction,
                  head movement      bilateral vestibular hypo-
                Vertigo              function, benign paroxysmal
                Imbalance            positional vertigo, unilateral
                                     central lesion affecting the
                                     vestibular nuclei

Nonvestibular   Light-headedness   Orthostatic hypotension,
                Disequilibrium       hypoglycemia, anxiety, panic
                                     disorder, lower-extremity
                                     somatosensory deficit, upper
                                     brain stem and motor pathway
                                     lesions

References

(1) Minor LB. Physiological principles of vestibular function on earth and in space. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;118(3 pt 2):S5-S15.

(2) Green DG. Regional variations in the visual acuity for interference fringes on the retina. J Physiol. 1970;207:351-356.

(3) Waespe W, Henn V. Gaze stabilization in the primate: the interaction of the vestibulo-ocular reflex, optokinetic nystagmus, and smooth pursuit. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1987;106:37-125.

(4) Grossman GE, Leigh RJ, Abel LA, et al. Frequency and velocity of rotational head perturbations during locomotion. Exp Brain Res. 1988; 70:470-476.

(5) Das VE, Zivotofsky AZ, DiScenna AO, Leigh RJ. Head perturbations during walking while viewing a head-fixed target. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1995;66:728-732.

(6) Minor LB, Lasker DM, Backous DD, Hullar TE. Horizontal vestibuloocular reflex evoked by high-acceleration rotations in the squirrel monkey, I: normal responses. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82:1254-1270.

(7) Huterer M, Cullen KE. Vestibuloocular reflex dynamics during high-frequency and high-acceleration rotations of the head on body in rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88:13-28.

(8) Krauzlis RJ, Miles FA. Release of fixation for pursuit and saccades in humans: evidence for shared inputs acting on different neural substrates. J Neumphysiol. 1996;76:2822-2833.

(9) Krauzlis RJ, Lisberger SG. Temporal properties of visual motion signals for the initiation of smooth pursuit eye movements in monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1994;72:150-162.

(10) Della Santina CC, Potyagaylo V, Migliaccio AA, et al. Orientations of human vestibular labyrinth semicircular canals. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology; Daytona Beach, Fla; February 22-26, 2004. Mt Royal, NJ: Association for Research in Otolaryngology; 2004. In press.

(11) Cremer PD, Halmagyi GM, Aw ST, et al. Semicircular canal plane head impulses detect absent function of individual semicircular canals. Brain. 1998;121:699-716.

(12) Smith CA, Lowry OH, Wu ML. The electrolytes of the labyrinthine fluids. Laryngoscope. 1954;64:141-153.

(13) Goldberg JM, Fernandez C. Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating semicircular canals of the squirrel monkey, I: resting discharge and response to constant angular accelerations. J Neurophysiol. 1971;34:635-660.

(14) Lysakowski A, Minor LB, Fernandez C, Goldberg JM. Physiological identification of morphologically distinct afferent classes innervating the cristae ampullares of the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1995;73: 1270-1281.

(15) Minor LB, Goldberg JM. Vestibular-nerve inputs to the vestibuloocular reflex: a functional-ablation study in the squirrel monkey. J Neurosci. 1991;11:1636-1648.

(16) Brodal A. The cranial nerves. In: Brodal A, ed. Neurological Anatomy in Relation to Clinical Medicine. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1981:471-472.

(17) Naito Y, Newman A, Lee WS, et al. Projections of the individual vestibular end-organs in the brain stem of the squirrel monkey. Hear Res. 1995;87:141-155.

(18) Lopez I, Honrubia V, Baloh RW. Aging and the human vestibular nucleus. J Vestib Res. 1997;7:77-85.

(19) Park JJ, Tang Y, Lopez I, Ishiyama A. Unbiased estimation of human vestibular ganglion neurons. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;942:475-478.

(20) Richtcr E. Quantitative study of human Scarpa's ganglion and vestibular sensory epithelia. Acta Otolaryngol. 1980;90:199-208.

(21) Brodal A, Brodal P. Observations on the secondary vestibulocerebellar projections in the macaque monkey. Exp Brain Res. 1985;58:62-74.

(22) Fuvuya N, Kawano K, Shimazu H. Functional organization of vestibulofastigial projection in the horizontal semicircular canal system in the cat. Exp Brain Res. 1975;24:75-87.

(23) Korte GE, Mugnaini E. The cerebellar projection of the vestibular nerve in the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1979;184:265-278.

(24) Goldberg JM. Afferent diversity and the organization of central vestibular pathways. Exp Brain Res. 2000;130:277-297.

(25) Highstein SM, Goldberg JM, Moschovakis AK, Fernandez C. Inputs from regularly and irregularly discharging vestibular nerve afferents to secondary neurons in the vestibular nuclei of the squirrel monkey, II: correlation with output pathways of secondary neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1987;58:719-738.

(26) Goldberg JM, Highstcin SM, Moschovakis AK, Fernandez C. Inputs from regularly and irregularly discharging vestibular nerve afferents to secondary neurons in the vestibular nuclei of the squirrel monkey, I: an electrophysiological analysis. J Neurophysiol. 1987;58:700-718.

(27) Troiani D, Petrosini L, Zannoni B. Relations of single semicircular canals to the pontine reticular formation. Arch Ital Biol. 1976;114: 337-375.

(28) Butmer U, Henn V. Thalamic unit activity in the alert monkey during natural vestibular stimulation. Brain Res. 1976;103:127-132.

(29) Buttner U, Buettner UW. Parietal cortex (2v) neuronal activity in the alert monkey during natural vestibular and optokinetic stimulation. Brain Res. 1978;153:392-397.

(30) Grusser OJ, Pause M, Schreiter U. Localization and responses of neurones in the parieto-insular vestibular cortex of awake monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). J Physiol. 1990;430:537-557.

(31) Thier P, Erickson RG. Vestibular input to visual-tracking neurons in area MST of awake rhesus monkeys. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992;656: 960-963.

(32) Brandt T, Glasauer S, Stephan T, et al. Visual-vestibular and visuovisual cortical interaction: new insights from fMRI and PET. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;956:230-241.

(33) Dieterich M, Bense S, Stephan T, et al. fMRI signal increases and decreases in cortical areas during small-field optokinetic stimulation and central fixation. Exp Brain Res. 2003;148:117-127.

(34) Brandt T, Dieterich M. Vestibular syndromes in the roll plane: topographic diagnosis from brainstem to cortex. Ann Neurol. 1994;36: 337-347.

(35) Uchino Y, Hirai N, Suzuki S. Branching pattern and properties of vertical- and horizontal-related excitatory vestibuloocular neurons in the cat. J Neurophysiol. 1982;48:891-903.

(36) Clendaniel RA, Lasker DM, Minor LB. Differential adaptation of the linear and nonlinear components of the horizontal vestibuloocular reflex in squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88:3534-3540.

(37) Kroenke K, Mangelsdorff AD. Common symptoms in ambulatory care: incidence, evaluation, therapy, and outcome. Am J Med. 1989;86: 262-266.

(38) Yardley L, Owen N, Nazareth I, Luxon L. Prevalence and presentation of dizziness in a general practice community sample of working age people. Br J Gen Pract. 1998;48:1131-1135.

(39) Sloane PD. Dizziness in primary care: results from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. J Fam Pract. 1989;29:33-38.

(40) Tinetti ME, Williams CS, Gill TM. Dizziness among older adults: a possible geriatric syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:337-344.

(41) Colledge NR, Wilson JA, Macintyre CC, MacLennan WJ. The prevalence and characteristics of dizziness in an elderly community. Age Ageing. 1994;23:117-120.

(42) Sloane PD, Blazer D, George LK. Dizziness in a community elderly population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989;37:101-108.

(43) Sloane PD, Coeytaux RR, Beck RS, Dallara J. Dizziness: state of the science. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:823-832.

(44) Kroenke K, Hofman RM, Einstadter D. How common are various causes of dizziness? A critical review. South Med J. 2000;93:160-167.

(45) Koch H, Smith MC. Office-Based Ambulatory Care far Patients 75 Years Old and Over: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1980 and 1981. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics; 1985:6. NCHS Advance Data No. 110.

(46) Grimby A, Rosenhall U. Health-related quality of life and dizziness in old age. Gerontology. 1995;41:286-298.

(47) A Report of the Task Force on the National Strategic Research Plan, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; April 1989:74.

(48) Clark MR, Sullivan MD, Katon WJ, et al. Psychiatric and medical factors associated with disability in patients with dizziness. Psychosomatics. 1993;34:409-415.

(49) Kroenke K, Lucas CA, Rosenberg ML, et al. Causes of persistent dizziness: a prospective study of 100 patients in ambulatory care. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:898-904.

(50) Baloh RW. Dizziness: neurological emergencies. Neurol Clin. 1998; 16:305-321.

(51) Gillespie MB, Minor LB. Prognosis in bilateral vestibular hypofunction. Laryngoscope. 1999;109:35-41.

(52) Telian SA, Shepard NT, Smith-Wheclock M, Hoberg M. Bilateral vestibular paresis: diagnosis and treatment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;104:67-71.

(53) Belal A Jr. Dandy's syndrome. Am J Otol. 1980;1:151-156.

(54) Bhansali SA, Stockwell CW, Bojrab DI. Oscillopsia in patients with loss of vestibular function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;109: 120-125.

(55) Fernandez C, Goldberg JM. Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating semicircular canals of the squirrel monkey, II: response to sinusoidal stimulation and dynamics of peripheral vestibular system. J Neurophysiol. 1971;34:061-675.

(56) Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS. A clinical sign of canal paresis. Arch Neurol. 1988;45:737-739.

(57) Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS, Cremer PD, et al. The human horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex in response to high-acceleration stimulation before and after unilateral vestibular neurectomy. Exp Brain Res. 1990;81:479-490.

(58) Minor LB, Cremer PD, Carey JP, et al. Symptoms and signs in superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;942: 259-273.

(59) Aw ST, Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS, et al. Unilateral vestibular deafferentation causes permanent impairment of the human vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex in the pitch plane. Exp Brain Res. 1994;102: 121-130.

(60) Foster CA, Foster BD, Spindler J, Harris JP. Functional loss of the horizontal doll's eye reflex following unilateral vestibular lesions. Laryngoscope. 1994;104:473-478.

(61) Harvey SA, Wood DJ. The oculocephalic response in the evaluation of the dizzy patient. Laryngoscope. 1996;106:6-9.

(62) Harvey SA, Wood DJ, Feroah TR. Relationship of the head impulse test and head-shake nystagmus in reference to caloric testing. Am J Otol. 1997;18:207-213.

(63) Beynon GJ, Jani P, Baguley DM. A clinical evaluation of bead impulse testing. Clin Otolaryngol. 1998;23:117-122.

(64) Schubert MC, Tusa RJ, Herdman SJ, Grine LE. Optimizing the sensitivity of the head thrust test for identifying vestibular hypofunction. Phys Ther. 2004;84:151-158.

(65) Hain TC, Fetter M, Zee DS. Head-shaking nystagmus in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular lesions. Am J Otolaryngol. 1987;8: 36-47.

(66) Watabe H, Hashiba M, Baba S Voluntary suppression of caloric nystagmus under fixation of imaginary or after-image target. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1996;525:155-7.

(67) Honrubia V, Baloh RW, Harris MR, Jacobson KM. Paroxysmal positional vertigo syndrome. Am J Otol. 1999;20:465-470.

(68) Herdman SJ. Advances in the treatment of vestibular disorders. Phys Ther. 1997;77:602-618.

(69) Longridge NS, Mallinson AI. The dynamic illegible E (DIE) test: a simple technique for assessing the ability of the vestibulo-ocular reflex to overcome vestibular pathology. J Otolaryngol. 1987;16:97-103.

(70) Herdman SJ, Tusa RJ, Blatt P, et al. Computerized dynamic visual acuity test in the assessment of vestibular deficits. Am J Otol. 1998;19: 790-796.

(71) Tian JR, Shubayev I, Demer JL. Dynamic visual acuity during passive and self-generated transient head rotation in normal and unilaterally vestibulopathic humans. Exp Brain Res. 2002;142(4):486-495.

(72) Ferguson JH, Altrocchi PH, Brin M, et al. Assessment: electronystagmography: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee. Neurology. 1996;46:1763-1766.

(73) Fife TD, Tusa RJ, Furman JM, et al. Assessment: vestibular testing techniques in adults and children: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;55:1431-1441.

(74) Oosterveld WJ, Greven AJ, Gursel AO, de Jong HA. Caloric vestibular test in the weightless phase of parabolic flight. Acta Otolaryngol. 1985;99:571-576.

(75) Wit HP, Spoelstra AA, Segenhout JM. Barany's theory is right, but incomplete: an experimental study in pigcons. Acta Otolaryngol. 1990; 110:1-6.

(76) Hood JD. Evidence of direct thermal action upon vestibular receptors in the caloric test: a re-interpretation of the data of Coats and Smith. Acta Otolaryngol. 1989;107:161-165.

(77) Colebatch JG, Halmagyi GM. Vestibular evoked potentials in human neck muscles before and after unilateral vestibular deafferentation. Neurology. 1992;42:1635-1636.

(78) Halmagyi GM, Yavor RA, Colebatch JG. Tapping the head activates the vestibular system: a new use for the clinical reflex hammer. Neurology. 1995;45:1927-1929.

(79) Curthoys IS, Dai MJ, Halmagyi GM. Human ocular torsional position before and after unilateral vestibular neurectomy. Exp Brain Res. 1991;85:218-225.

(80) Kushiro K, Zakir M, Ogawa Y, et al. Saccular and utricular inputs to sternocleidomastoid motoneurons of decerebrate cats. Exp Brain Res. 1999;126:410-416.

(81) Young ED, Fernandez C, Goldberg JM. Responses of squirrel monkey vestibular neurons to audio-frequency sound and head vibration. Acta Otolaryngol. 1977;84:352-360.

(82) Murofushi T, Curthoys IS, Topple AN, et al. Responses of guinea pig primary vestibular neurons to clicks. Exp Brain Res. 1995;103: 174-178.

(83) Murofushi T, Curthoys IS, Gilchrist DP. Response of guinea pig vestibular nucleus neurons to clicks. Exp Brain Res. 1996;111:149-152.

(84) Bohmer A, Mast F, Jarchow T. Can a unilateral loss of otolithic function be clinically detected by assessment of the subjective visual vertical? Brain Res Bull. 1996;41:423-429.

(85) Tabak S, Collewijn H, Boumans LJ. Deviation of the subjective vertical in long-standing unilateral vestibular loss. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997;117:1-16.

(86) Vibert D, Hausler R, Safran AB. Subjective visual vertical in peripheral unilateral vestibular diseases. J Vestib Res. 1999;9:145-152.

(87) Vibert D, Hausler R. Long-term evolution of subjective visual vertical after vestibular neurectomy and labyrnthectomy. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120:620-622.

(88) Cooper CW. Vestibular neuronitis: a review of a common cause of vertigo in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1993;43:164-167.

(89) Arbusow V, Schulz P, Strupp M, et al. Distribution of herpes simplex virus type 1 in human geniculate and vestibular ganglia: implications for vestibular neuritis. Ann Neurol. 1999;46:416-419.

(90) Aw ST, Fetter M, Cremer PD, et al. Individual semicircular canal function in superior and inferior vestibular neuritis. Neurology. 2001; 57:768-774.

(91) Fetter M, Dichgans J. Vestibular neuritis spares the inferior division of the vestibular nerve. Brain. 1996;119:755-763.

(92) Morrison AW, Johnson KJ. Genetics (molecular biology) and Meniere's disease. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2002;35:497-516.

(93) Nestor JJ, Korol HW, Nutik SL, Smith R. The incidence of acoustic neuromas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;114:680-684.

(94) Fetter M, Dichgans J. Adaptive mechanisms of VOR compensation after unilateral peripheral vestibular lesions in humans. J Vestib Res. 1990;1:9-22.

(95) Cass SP, Kartush JM, Graham MD. Patterns of vestibular function following vestibular nerve section. Laryngoscope. 1992;102:388-394.

(96) Maioli C, Precht W, Ried S. Short- and long-term modifications of vestibulo-ocular response dynamics following unilateral vestibular nerve lesions in the cat. Exp Brain Res. 1983;50:259-274.

(97) Galiana HL, Flohr H, Jones GM. A reevaluation of intervestibular nuclear coupling: its role in vestibular compensation. J Neurophysiol. 1984;51:242-259.

(98) Beraneck M, Hachemaoui M, Idoux E, et al. Long-term plasticity of ipsilesional medial vestibular nucleus neurons after unilateral labyrinthectomy. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90:184-203.

(99) Johnston AR, Seckl JR, Dutia MB. Role of the flocculus in mediating vestibular nucleus neuron plasticity during vestibular compensation in the rat. J Physiol. 2002;545:903-911.

(100) Precht W, Shimazu H, Markham CH. A mechanism of central compensation of vestibular function following hemilabyrinthectomy. J Neurphysiol. 1966;29:996-1010.

(101) Kahlmeter G, Dahlager JI. Aminoglycoside toxicity: a review of clinical studies published between 1975 and 1982. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984;13(suppl A):9-22.

(102) Chong TK, Piraino B, Bernardini J. Vestibular toxicity due to gentamicin in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 1991;11: 152-155.

(103) Gailiunas P Jr, Dominguez-Moreno M, Lazarus M, et al. Vestibular toxicity of gentamicin: incidence in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1978;138:1621-1624.

(104) Halmagyi GM, Fattore CM, Curthoys IS, Wade S. Gentamicin vestibulotoxicity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;111:571-574.

(105) Baloh RW. Vertebrobasilar insufficiency and stroke. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;112:114-117.

(106) Schuknecht HF, Witt RL. Acute bilateral sequential vestibular neuritis. Am J Otolaryngol. 1985;6:255-257.

(107) Barber HO, Dionne J. Vestibular findings in vertebro-basilar ischemia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1971;80:805-812

(108) Krebs DE, Gill-Body KM, Riley PO, Parker SW. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of rehabilitation for bilateral vestibular hypofunction: preliminary report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;109: 735-741.

(109) Herdman SJ, Clendaniel RA, Mattox DE, et al. Vestibular adaptation exercises and recovery: acute stage after acoustic neuroma resection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;113:77-87.

(110) Szturm T, Ireland DJ, Lessing-Turner M. Comparison of different exercise programs in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic peripheral vestibular dysfunction. J Vestib Res. 1994;4:461-479.

(111) Herdman SJ, Schubert MC, Das VE, Tusa RJ. Recovery of dynamic visual acuity in unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:819-824.

MC Schubert, PT, PhD, is a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, 710 Ross Bldg, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD 21205 (USA) ([e-mail]). Address all correspondence to Dr Schubert.

LB Minor, MD, is Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University.

Both authors provided concept/idea/research design and writing.

This article was received June 3, 2003, and was accepted October 21, 2003.