Venter's synthetic cell divides the world.
A specialist in genetics.
a specialist in genetics.
geneticist Dr J. Craig Venter The introduction of this article is too short.
To comply with Wikipedia's lead section guidelines, it should be expanded. evoked extreme reactions on Friday.
While scientists described it as " one of the most important scientific achievements in the history of science", religious groups and critics called for a moratorium on such research.
Their main fears are related to certain ethical and safety issues.
Critics fear that the technology of creating synthetic building blocks of life developed by Venter and his research teams could be used by terrorists to develop weapons of bioterrorism.
Venter agreed that it is a powerful technology that falls in the category of " dual use technology", but said: " It's hard to find a technology today that's not dual use where it could be used to do harm to somebody, or used for public benefit." He says while the new technology could provide " a linear increase in the ability for somebody to do harm, but it's an exponential increase in a toolset that can be used to help humanity". Bob Friedman of J. Craig Venter Institute The J. Craig Venter Institute is a non-profit genomics research institute founded by J. Craig Venter, Ph.D. in October 2006. (Venter first announced the existence of the Institute on 29 September 2004. ( JCVI JCVI Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (UK) ) said it would be possible for someone to use this technology to synthesise a pathogen. " We have a government infrastructure that controls access to really nasty stuff that we would not like a potential bioterrorist to acquire," he pointed out. The US government is considering screening procedures for genomic companies so as to detect whether somebody was trying to synthesise a pathogen. One of the scientific ways to control new pathogens could be the so- called " suicide genes" that kick in to prevent the organism from living outside the lab or environment.
Responding to fears of risks involved in the new development, US President Barack Obama asked the Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues to " consider the potential medical, environmental, security and other benefits of this field of research, as well as any potential health, security or other risks". The panel has also been asked to identify ethical boundaries and risks involved in synthetic biology research.
" It is a major scientific breakthrough, but it needs to be treated with great deal of caution," said Dr Suman Sahai of Gene Campaign.
" Synthetic biology has great potential for misuse as well as harm to the environment. Here we are dealing with organisms that are not a product of evolution, they have no pedigree, our bodies have no immune response immune response
An integrated bodily response to an antigen, especially one mediated by lymphocytes and involving recognition of antigens by specific antibodies or previously sensitized lymphocytes. to them and we don't know how they are going to impact on the environment." Besides fears of biosafety and biosecurity, religious groups are opposing Venter's work on the grounds of ethics involved in tampering naturally occurring life forms. " Only God can create life", they warn scientists. " The organised religion has always been opposed to new ideas and new knowledge.
They had even opposed surgery and painkillers," pointed out Sanal Edamaruku of Indian Rationalist Society.
" Venter's achievement would seem to extinguish the argument that life requires a special force or power to exist," said Arthur Caplan, professor of bioethics bioethics, in philosophy, a branch of ethics concerned with issues surrounding health care and the biological sciences. These issues include the morality of abortion, euthanasia, in vitro fertilization, and organ transplants (see transplantation, medical). at University of Pennsylvania (body, education) University of Pennsylvania - The home of ENIAC and Machiavelli.
Address: Philadelphia, PA, USA. .
Some scientists have sounded a note of grave caution.
" These new powers create new responsibilities. Nobody can be sure about the consequences of making new forms of life, and we must expect the unexpected and the unintended," noted Mark Bedau, bioethics expert at Reed College, Oregon, in a special commentary in scientific journal Nature . Kenneth Oye, a scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said: " Right now, we are shooting in the dark as to what the long- term benefits will be." Pat Mooney, of the ETC group, a technology watchdog with a special interest in synthetic biology, said: " This is a Pandora's box moment -- like the splitting of the atom or the cloning of Dolly the sheep, we will all have to deal with the fallout from this alarming experiment." Dr David King, of the Human Genetics Human genetics
A discipline concerned with genetically determined resemblances and differences among human beings. Technological advances in the visualization of human chromosomes have shown that abnormalities of chromosome number or structure are surprisingly Alert watchdog, said: " What is dangerous is these scientists' ambitions for total and unrestrained control over nature." Reports said that three Indianorigin scientists are part of Venter's team. The 24- member team included Sanjay Vashee, Radha Krishnakumar and Prashanth P. Parmar.
email@example.com ' '
Copyright 2009 India Today Group. All Rights Reserved.
Provided by Syndigate.info an Albawaba.com company