Velazquez, Los Borrachos, and Painting at the Court of Philip IV.Steven N. Orso. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press (known colloquially as CUP) is a publisher given a Royal Charter by Henry VIII in 1534, and one of the two privileged presses (the other being Oxford University Press). , 1994. 208 pp. + 81 illus. $70. Velazquez's first major mythological painting, "Los Borrachos" [The Drunkards], is an enigmatic work that has both delighted and puzzled its viewers over the centuries. The wide variety of titles -- well over ten -- by which the painting has been known attests to its elusive resistance to a definitive reading. Steven Orso's meticulously researched and convincingly argued study advances a new and intriguing interpretation of the painting, and proposes a correspondingly new title: "Bacchus in Iberia." Orso uses reception theory both to build his argument and to locate his interpretation within the pantheon of earlier views. Historically, most explications of the painting viewed it either as a burlesque burlesque (bûrlĕsk`) [Ital.,=mockery], form of entertainment differing from comedy or farce in that it achieves its effects through caricature, ridicule, and distortion. It differs from satire in that it is devoid of any ethical element. of classical mythology in which Velazquez pokes fun at the antics of the ancient "god" and his followers, or as a sympathetic and humane interpretation of Bacchus and his "brotherhood" in which, following the general trend of Baroque naturalism naturalism, in art naturalism, in art, a tendency toward strict adherence to the physical appearance of nature and rejection of ideal forms. Artists as diverse as Velázquez, J. F. Millet, and Monet, have followed naturalistic principles. , the divine is humanized and made accessible to the common folk. The author reviews the various approaches, refuting some and adopting elements of others to support his argument. An examination of the historical context of artistic theory and practice at the royal court suggests reasons why Velazquez may have undertaken this painting. "Los Borrachos" was painted some six years after Velazquez's appointment as court artist and official portraitist to Philip IV Philip IV, king of France Philip IV (Philip the Fair), 1268–1314, king of France (1285–1314), son and successor of Philip III. The policies of his reign greatly strengthened the French monarchy and increased the royal revenues. . Competition and rivalry separated the court painters into the "old guard," represented by Carducho and Cajes, who produced history paintings in a conservative and outmoded Mannerist man·ner·ism n. 1. A distinctive behavioral trait; an idiosyncrasy. 2. Exaggerated or affected style or habit, as in dress or speech. See Synonyms at affectation. 3. style, and those such as Velazquez and Maino, who embraced the new style of Baroque naturalism The "old guard" held the traditional view that history painting was the most noble artistic expression, and in Orso's view, "Conservatives like Carducho and Cajes disparaged him [Velazquez] as a portraitist whose style consisted of an untutored imitation of nature." Could it be that "Los Borrachos," then, is an attempt by Velazquez to fuse the new naturalism with the genre of monumental history painting? Orso argues convincingly that "Los Borrachos" was painted partly as a response to criticism from certain well-established court artists. After explaining why the painting may have been created, Orso then examines its subject matter, and therein is his major contribution. The key to Orso's view is the until now obscure role of Bacchus in Spanish history. Orso documents Bacchus's legendary conquest of Iberia as presented in numerous contemporary histories and literature, most notably in several works by Antonio de Nebrija Antonio de Lebrija, also known as Antonio de Nebrija, Elio Antonio de Lebrija, Antonius Nebrissensis, and Antonio of Lebrixa, (1441-1522) was a Spanish scholar born at Lebrija in the province of Seville. , including his Cronica de los Reyes Los Reyes may mean:
The aspect of Orso's argument that is less convincing is his extension of the interpretation of the painting to include an analogy to the reign of Philip IV. According to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. this view, the painting glorifies the reign of Philip IV by likening lik·en tr.v. lik·ened, lik·en·ing, lik·ens To see, mention, or show as similar; compare. [Middle English liknen, from like, similar; see like2 it to the historical precedent of Bacchus, conqueror and compassionate ruler. Although Orso takes great pains to demonstrate that Bacchus was seen as benevolent rather than besotted be·sot tr.v. be·sot·ted, be·sot·ting, be·sots To muddle or stupefy, as with alcoholic liquor or infatuation. [be- + sot, to stupefy (from sot, fool , one wonders how such an analogy would have been perceived in Velazquez's day. It also raises questions as to how apparent this level of meaning would have been for even the most erudite er·u·dite adj. Characterized by erudition; learned. See Synonyms at learned. [Middle English erudit, from Latin at court. In general, Orso's prose is clear and unobstructed, fluidly moving the reader through what might, in less skilled hands, be a dry exhibition of historical proofs. Overall, his interpretation is carefully argued, leaving one with the conviction that the painting indeed merits its proposed new title, "Bacchus in Iberia." |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion