Valdivia v. Davis.U.S. District Court PAROLE DUE PROCESS Valdivia v. Davis, 206 F.Supp.2d 1068 (E.D.Cal. 2002). Parolees filed a class action challenging a state's parole revocation The recall of some power or authority that has been granted. Revocation by the act of a party is intentional and voluntary, such as when a person cancels a Power of Attorney that he has given or a will that he has written. procedures, and alleging violation of their due process rights. The district court held that the state's unitary unitary pertaining to a single object or individual. parole revocation hearing system violated the parolees' procedural due process rights. According to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. the court, the hearing system, which permitted detention of parolees upon a parole officer's issuance of a parole hold without a preliminary hearing to determine probable cause Apparent facts discovered through logical inquiry that would lead a reasonably intelligent and prudent person to believe that an accused person has committed a crime, thereby warranting his or her prosecution, or that a Cause of Action has accrued, justifying a civil lawsuit. , violated the parolees' rights even though the state permitted a comprehensive hearing prior to making a final revocation decision. The court noted that the average delay in holding the final revocation hearing was between thirty-one and forty-five days. (California Board of Prison Terms) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion