Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,474,287 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Valdivia v. Davis.


U.S. District Court

PAROLE

DUE PROCESS

Valdivia Valdivia, city (1990 est. pop. 113,500), capital of Valdivia prov., S central Chile, on the Valdivia River. It is a leading commercial and industrial center. Founded in 1552, it was a fortress in the defense against the Araucanians and was a royalist center during the war of liberation. The city did not grow until the arrival in the mid-19th cent. of German immigrants who founded the first industries (beer and shoes). v. Davis, 206 F.Supp.2d 1068 (E.D.Cal. 2002). Parolees filed a class action challenging a state's parole revocation revocation n. 1) mutual cancellation of a contract by the parties to it. 2) withdrawing an offer before it is accepted. ("I revoke my offer"). 3) cancelling a document before it has come into legal effect or been acted upon, as revoking a will. 4) to recall a power or authority previously given as cancelling a power of attorney or cancelling a driver's license due to traffic offenses. (See: contract, will) procedures, and alleging violation of their due process rights. The district court held that the state's unitary parole revocation hearing system violated the parolees' procedural due process rights. According to the court, the hearing system, which permitted detention of parolees upon a parole officer's issuance of a parole hold without a preliminary hearing preliminary hearing n. in criminal law, a hearing to determine if a person charged with a felony (a serious crime punishable be a term in the state prison) should be tried for the crime charged, based on whether there is some substantial evidence that he/she committed the crime charged. to determine probable cause probable cause n. sufficient reason based upon known facts to believe a crime has been committed or that certain property is connected with a crime. Probable cause must exist for a law enforcement officer to make an arrest without a warrant, search without a warrant, or seize property in the belief the items were evidence of a crime., violated the parolees' rights even though the state permitted a comprehensive hearing prior to making a final revocation decision. The court noted that the average delay in holding the final revocation hearing was between thirty-one and forty-five days. (California Board of Prison Terms)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:parole revocation and right to due process
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U9CA
Date:Feb 1, 2003
Words:129
Previous Article:U.S. v. Scales.(CIVIL RIGHTS)
Next Article:Koch v. Lewis.(solitary confinement and right to due process)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE-REVOCATION PAROLE-DUE PROCESS.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
Good time.(prisoner litigation)(Brief Article)
Valdivia v. Davis.(parole, revocation)(Brief Article)
Taylor v. Sebelius.(prisoner claims violation of civil rights under ex post facto clause)(Brief Article)
Ash v. Reilly.(prisoner petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus)(Brief Article)
Coleman v. Dretke.(due process of law)(Brief Article)
Taylor v. Sebelius.(inmate alleges state of unlawful fees on parolees)(Brief Article)
French v. Adams County Detention Center.(parole violation case)(Brief Article)
Pate v. U.S.(absolute immunity)(Brief Article)
Pate v. U.S.(revocation petition)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles